SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that is unusually low for a Core i9-class part, suggesting a power-limited engineering sample or a low-power SKU variant. The CPU includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled, and the processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results reveal a somewhat paradoxical profile. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the chip scores 34244 points, which is a strong result for a 65 W part, while the single-core score of 4834 indicates solid per-thread performance. Cinebench R20 multicore and single-core scores are 14382 and 2030, respectively. The Geekbench multicore score is 8337, with a single-core score of 1646. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8676, placing the CPU in the 65th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals in the database are Intel Core i7-8565U (avg score 8665, delta 0.1%), Intel Core i5-8365U (avg score 8708, delta -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (avg score 8619, delta 0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (avg score 8580, delta 1.1%). These are all mobile or older server parts, which is telling: the i9-13900E performs at a similar aggregate level to these chips despite having far more cores and threads. The delta percentages are all under 1.2%, meaning the i9-13900E is essentially tied with those rivals in aggregate benchmark terms. However, the multicore Cinebench numbers suggest the chip can leverage its core count heavily in threaded workloads, while the single-core scores are more modest, likely constrained by the low base clock and power envelope.

For real workloads, this means the i9-13900E behaves like a high-core-count processor that is throttled by power limits. In lightly threaded tasks, the boost clock of 5.20 GHz helps, but the 1800 MHz base clock means sustained single-core performance may not match higher-clocked desktop parts. In heavily threaded tasks like rendering or video encoding, the 24 cores provide ample parallelism, but the 65 W TDP will limit sustained all-core boost behavior.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i9-13900E’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 suggests adequate per-thread performance for most game engines, but the GPU pairing (RX 6750 XT) will be the primary driver of frame rates at high refresh rates. The CPU should not bottleneck at 1440p or 4K in most titles, but at 1080p with a powerful GPU, the modest single-core scores could become a limiting factor in CPU-intensive scenes.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CPU’s multicore score of 34244 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle x264 encoding at high presets while gaming, though the 65 W power limit may reduce sustained throughput. Alternatively, the GPU’s hardware encoders (if present) could offload this work.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and effect rendering benefit from both high single-core and multicore performance. The i9-13900E’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14382 and single-core score of 2030 suggest it can handle 4K video editing in software like Premiere Pro, though export times will be longer than with higher-power desktop i9 parts due to the power cap.

3D rendering: This is where the i9-13900E shines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 places it well above typical desktop processors in aggregate, and the 24 cores will scale well in Blender, V-Ray, or Corona render tasks. The 65 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost, but for bursty render jobs, the chip delivers strong throughput.

Software development: Compilation tasks are heavily multithreaded, and the 32 threads will reduce build times significantly. The Geekbench multicore score of 8337 supports this, though the low base clock may make incremental builds (single-threaded) slower than expected for a high-end CPU.

Student and office work: The i9-13900E is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. The single-core scores are adequate, but the power efficiency and integrated UHD Graphics 770 are sufficient for basic tasks. The chip’s high core count is wasted in this scenario, but it does not hinder productivity.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the exact combination of the Intel Core i9-13900E and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component individually. Frame rates should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548, the RX 6750 XT is positioned in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. This suggests it can handle 1440p gaming at high-to-ultra settings in most titles, with 1080p gaming at ultra settings being comfortably playable. The GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern game textures at 1440p.

The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 indicates it can feed the GPU in most scenarios without becoming a major bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load is heavier. At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU should still deliver well above 60 FPS in most games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor.

For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i9-13900E’s 5.20 GHz boost clock should provide high frame rates, but the power-limited base clock may cause frame time inconsistency in prolonged sessions. In AAA single-player games, the RX 6750 XT will be the bottleneck at 1440p, with estimated frame rates between 60-100 FPS depending on the title and settings. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding games, and the CPU’s role diminishes further.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, indicating a balanced mid-to-high-end desktop configuration. The CPU sits at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. This close alignment suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other in aggregate benchmark terms.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering or video encoding, the i9-13900E is the primary performer. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 is substantial, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (FP32 of 13.31 TFLOPS) are secondary in these tasks. The GPU’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 9550 indicates it can assist in some GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU will carry most of the load.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at 1440p or 4K, the RX 6750 XT is the limiting factor. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548 and PassMark G3D score of 20700 are moderate, and the CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to keep up. The FPS scaling between resolutions will show a clear pattern: at 1080p, the CPU may bottleneck in some titles; at 1440p, the GPU becomes the constraint; at 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting component.

The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 250 W GPU TDP highlights the imbalance in power consumption. The GPU draws nearly four times the power of the CPU, reinforcing that the graphics card is the dominant component in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The suggested PSU of 600 W provides ample headroom for both components without excessive margin.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 8676, placing it in the 65th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8565U, scores 8665, a delta of 0.1% — essentially a tie. The i5-8365U scores 8708, a delta of -0.4% (the i9-13900E is slightly behind), while the AMD EPYC 7601 scores 8619, a delta of 0.7%, and the i7-10510U scores 8580, a delta of 1.1%. These tiny deltas indicate that, in aggregate benchmarks, the i9-13900E performs almost identically to these much lower-core-count parts, which is surprising given its 24-core configuration.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26011, placing it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (avg score 25891, delta 0.5%), AMD FirePro W7100 (avg score 25856, delta 0.6%), AMD FirePro D700 (avg score 25842, delta 0.7%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (avg score 25740, delta 1.1%). The RX 6750 XT leads these rivals by small margins, with the largest delta being 1.1% over the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU. The CPU’s 65th percentile is respectable but not outstanding, while the GPU’s 71st percentile is solidly above average. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this balance, indicating a system that is well-matched for 1440p gaming and productivity tasks, with the GPU being the stronger component in gaming and the CPU being competitive in threaded workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. The socket is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Intel Core processors, so users could upgrade to a higher-TDP 13th-gen part (if available) for better sustained performance, but the 65 W TDP of the i9-13900E is a deliberate power envelope choice.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The RX 6750 XT has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W power supply, which is the suggested PSU rating. The card is dual-slot with 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors, measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-end GPU, such as a current-generation flagship, to push the system into 4K gaming territory. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures no bandwidth bottleneck for future GPUs. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the CPU’s dual-channel memory bus limits the benefit. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means a modest air cooler suffices, leaving room in the power budget for a more power-hungry GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the Navi 22 chip, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. It features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 40 ray-tracing cores. The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Base clock is 2150 MHz, boost clock is 2600 MHz, and game clock is 2495 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating solid compute throughput for its class. Pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The PassMark G3D score of 20700 is strong, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 80 is notably low, suggesting poor optimization in that specific API test. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 16360 and Vulkan score of 98089 are moderate. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 places the GPU in the 71st percentile overall, meaning it outperforms about 71% of all GPUs in the database.

For rendering, the GPU’s 40 ray-tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DXR workloads, but the low FP32 count relative to higher-end cards means ray-traced performance will be modest. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1440p textures, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handles high-resolution assets without significant stuttering. The nearest rival, the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, scores 25740, a delta of 1.1%, meaning the RX 6750 XT is slightly faster in aggregate benchmarks than a high-end mobile GPU.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, indicating a balanced mid-to-high-end desktop configuration.

Q: Does the i9-13900E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor and beneficial for workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 6750 XT has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: How does the i9-13900E compare to the Intel Core i7-8565U in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-13900E scores 8676, while the i7-8565U scores 8665, a delta of 0.1%, making them essentially tied.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which provides headroom for the 250 W GPU and 65 W CPU.

Q: Does the RX 6750 XT support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The i9-13900E scores 34244 in Cinebench R23 multicore, reflecting strong multithreaded performance.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT build is suited for gamers targeting 1440p at high-to-ultra settings. The GPU’s 71st percentile standing and 12 GB VRAM handle modern titles at this resolution, while the CPU’s 24 cores ensure no bottleneck in most scenarios. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244, though the 65 W power limit may cap sustained render speeds.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to 32 threads, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. Students and office workers will find the system overkill, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads can leverage the CPU’s core count and ECC support, though the GPU is more oriented toward gaming than compute.

The pair is less ideal for 4K gaming, where the GPU’s 13.31 TFLOPS will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. For those seeking maximum ray-tracing performance, the 40 RT cores are present but not abundant, so framerates in DXR titles will be lower than with higher-end GPUs.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system combining the Intel Core i9-13900E with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP and 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an RDNA 2.0-based card with 12 GB VRAM and a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile of 68 places this system in the upper-mid tier of all configurations in the database, with the GPU being slightly stronger relative to peers (71st percentile) than the CPU (65th percentile).

The system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming and multithreaded productivity, with the CPU providing strong compute throughput and the GPU delivering solid rasterization performance. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming estimates are derived from benchmark scores, but the component-level performance suggests a capable mid-range desktop that can handle most modern workloads without major bottlenecks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds