SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT represents a desktop configuration that sits at the 65th percentile across all CPU and GPU combinations, according to the aggregate benchmark data. This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Intel processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a mid-range RDNA 2.0 graphics card, creating a system that is heavily weighted toward multi-threaded computational tasks rather than pure gaming throughput. The data shows a significant imbalance between the two components’ relative standings, with the CPU and GPU both landing at the 65th percentile individually, yet the nature of their workloads diverges sharply. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark scores, which include Cinebench R15/R20/R23, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, and compute-oriented tests, and it must be noted upfront that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation for this build is the Intel Socket 1700, which accommodates the Core i9-13900E, a processor from the Core 13th Gen series with the Raptor Lake-S codename. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, though the benchmark data does not specify which memory type was used for the scores. The processor also supports ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation users who require error correction in long-running compute tasks. On the PCIe front, the CPU provides Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes available from the processor itself, which is sufficient for a primary graphics card and high-speed NVMe storage, while the GPU in this pairing uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, meaning the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes are not fully utilized by the Radeon RX 6650 XT.

The integrated graphics on the CPU is UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output capability but is not intended for gaming or heavy graphical workloads — the discrete GPU handles those tasks. The processor’s TDP is rated at 65 watts, which is notably low for a 24-core part, and this figure reflects the “E” suffix in the model name, indicating an embedded-focused or efficiency-oriented variant with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 176 watts, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card alone is 450 watts. When combining the 65-watt CPU with the 176-watt GPU, a sensible power supply would need to account for the sum of these values plus system overhead, though the FACT PACK does not provide a combined PSU recommendation. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, which are standard specifications for a card in this class.

Looking at a sensible next upgrade path, the data suggests that the CPU has substantial headroom for a more powerful GPU, as the i9-13900E’s multi-core scores are far above what the RX 6650 XT can feed in gaming scenarios. A user could move to a higher-tier Radeon RX 6000 series card or a newer generation GPU without hitting a CPU bottleneck in most workloads, given the processor’s 24 cores and 32 threads. However, the motherboard’s Socket 1700 platform is tied to the 13th Gen Core series, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard unless Intel releases compatible parts within the same socket generation, which the FACT PACK does not confirm. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a platform upgrade could carry over either type of RAM, but the dual-channel bus width limits memory bandwidth compared to quad-channel workstation platforms. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU provide future-proofing for storage devices, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface will not benefit from the newer standard. Overall, the most logical upgrade for this system, based strictly on the numbers, is a stronger GPU to match the CPU’s compute capability, rather than replacing the processor itself.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13900E and the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is heavily skewed toward the CPU in compute-heavy workloads, while the GPU becomes the limiting factor in graphics-bound tasks. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 places it in a performance tier that rivals high-end workstation processors, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 17166 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 indicate a mid-range graphics solution. In gaming, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck at standard resolutions, as the CPU’s single-core performance — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1646 — is strong enough to keep up with or exceed what the RX 6650 XT can render. The data shows that the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are far in excess of gaming demands, which means that in most game titles, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU’s pixel and texture throughput rather than the processor’s ability to feed it.

The percentile data reinforces this imbalance. Both components sit at the 65th percentile versus all CPUs and all GPUs respectively, but the CPU’s average benchmark score of 8676 is influenced heavily by its multi-core results, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 19765 is pulled up by compute tests like Geekbench OpenCL (10111) and Vulkan (81306), which do not directly translate to gaming frame rates. In productivity applications that leverage multiple cores — such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation — the CPU will dominate the workload, and the GPU will have minimal impact. Conversely, in gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit memory bus will constrain performance, particularly in titles that demand high texture fidelity or ray tracing, where the RX 6650 XT’s 32 ray accelerators are modest by modern standards.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated rather than measured, suggests that lowering graphical settings or resolution will yield diminishing returns once the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the secondary constraint. At lower resolutions, the GPU may still be the bottleneck, but the gap narrows because the CPU’s frame generation capability is so high. Conversely, at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU’s advantage becomes irrelevant — the RX 6650 XT will be fully saturated, and the frame rate will drop accordingly. For non-gaming tasks like GPU compute, the PassMark GPU Compute score of 7532 indicates that the GPU can handle some parallel processing, but the CPU’s 32 threads will outperform it in most general-purpose compute workloads. The overall picture is a system where the CPU is over-provisioned for the GPU, meaning that users who prioritize gaming would see a better balance with a more powerful graphics card, while users who prioritize productivity will find the CPU to be the star of the show.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data provides a comprehensive view of this pairing’s performance, starting with the CPU’s Cinebench scores. In Cinebench R15, the i9-13900E scores 3451 in multi-core and 487 in single-core, while in Cinebench R20, the scores are 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results show a multi-core score of 34244 and a single-core score of 4834, which represents a strong multi-threaded showing that places the processor in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs. The Geekbench scores are lower, with a multi-core score of 8337 and a single-core score of 1646, which may reflect differences in how the benchmark scales with thread counts or memory configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 8676, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8565U with an average score of 8665 (deltaPct of 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i5-8365U with a score of 8708 (deltaPct of -0.4 percent), the AMD EPYC 7601 with a score of 8619 (deltaPct of 0.7 percent), and the Intel Core i7-10510U with a score of 8580 (deltaPct of 1.1 percent). These rivals are all mobile or server parts with far fewer cores, which highlights how the i9-13900E’s average score is pulled down by its relatively low single-core performance compared to its multi-core might.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1859, which is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses the GPU’s ability to handle complex geometry and effects. The Geekbench Metal score is 97969, the OpenCL score is 10111, and the Vulkan score is 81306, with the latter two being more relevant for cross-platform compute and gaming APIs. The PassMark suite provides a broader view: DirectX 10 scores 109, DirectX 11 scores 169, DirectX 12 scores 62, DirectX 9 scores 215, G2D scores 918, G3D scores 17166, and GPU Compute scores 7532. The low DirectX 12 PassMark score of 62 is striking, but PassMark’s older test suite may not fully utilize the RDNA 2.0 architecture, which is better represented by the 3DMark result. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19765, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Tesla K40m at 19885 (deltaPct of -0.6 percent), the AMD FirePro D300 at 19637 (deltaPct of 0.7 percent), the AMD FirePro W7000 at 19905 (deltaPct of -0.7 percent), and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 at 19602 (deltaPct of 0.8 percent). These rivals are professional workstation cards, which underscores that the RX 6650 XT’s compute capabilities are comparable to older pro-grade GPUs, though its gaming architecture is more modern.

The combined picture is a system that excels at multi-threaded CPU workloads but is modest in GPU performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is roughly 4.1 times its single-core score of 4834, which is typical for a high-core-count processor, but the Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 is only about 5.1 times the single-core score of 1646, suggesting that the Geekbench test may not scale as well with 32 threads. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 10.79 TFLOPS, which is competitive for a mid-range card, but the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory limit its ability to handle large textures or high resolutions. The build’s combined percentile of 65 places it in the middle of all desktop configurations, meaning that roughly one-third of systems are faster overall, but this aggregate metric masks the wide gap between CPU and GPU capabilities.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance but are willing to accept mid-range graphics capabilities. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium to high settings will find the RX 6650 XT sufficient for many titles, given the GPU’s 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 168.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, but the 8 GB memory buffer may require texture quality reductions in newer games. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even CPU-bound game engines will run smoothly, but the GPU will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenes. For content creators, the i9-13900E’s 24 cores and 32 threads make it an excellent choice for video editing, 3D rendering, and batch processing, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, which rivals dedicated workstation CPUs. The GPU can accelerate some effects through OpenCL (score 10111) or Vulkan (score 81306), but it is not a primary rendering device.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s thread count for compilation and testing, with the 65-watt TDP keeping power draw manageable in office environments. Students working on engineering or scientific projects that use multi-threaded solvers will find the CPU’s performance compelling, though the GPU’s compute capabilities are adequate for entry-level CUDA-like workloads via OpenCL. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or financial simulations will appreciate the CPU’s 32 threads and ECC memory support, which the FACT PACK confirms is available on this processor. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 450-watt suggested PSU mean that the system fits into standard desktop cases without requiring specialized cooling or power infrastructure, though the CPU’s 65-watt TDP suggests that a capable air cooler is sufficient — the FACT PACK does not specify cooler requirements, so this is a qualitative observation. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails, which is a practical benefit for office deployments.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 1800 MHz, which is low for a desktop CPU, but the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, indicating that the processor can ramp up significantly under load. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing a total of 36 MB of L3 that is shared across all cores. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the memory bus width is dual-channel, though the FACT PACK does not list a specific memory bandwidth figure. The TDP is 65 watts, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part, and this is likely due to the “E” designation, which typically indicates an embedded processor with reduced power targets.

The benchmark scores for the CPU reveal a mixed profile. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 34244 is excellent, placing it above many desktop and server processors in the database, while the single-core score of 4834 is good but not top-tier. The Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 is lower than expected relative to Cinebench, which may be due to differences in how the two benchmarks handle thread scheduling or memory latency. The average benchmark score of 8676 puts the CPU at the 65th percentile versus all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all low-power mobile or server parts with far fewer cores, which skews the comparison — the i9-13900E’s multi-core performance is clearly superior to the Intel Core i7-8565U or i5-8365U, but its single-core performance is not proportionally higher. The CPU’s production status is Active, and it was released on 2023-01-03, making it a relatively recent part at the time of this analysis. The multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is not supported, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a basic GPU that can handle 2D workloads and video playback, but it is not suitable for gaming, and the discrete RX 6650 XT is required for any serious graphics work.

For real workloads, the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads excel at parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing, as demonstrated by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data-intensive applications, and the support for ECC memory makes it viable for error-sensitive workloads. The low base clock of 1800 MHz means that lightly threaded tasks may see lower performance than a higher-clocked part, but the boost clock compensates when needed. The process node of 10 nm is older than the 7 nm process used by the GPU, which may affect power efficiency, but the 65-watt TDP is still low for the core count. Overall, this CPU is a compute powerhouse that is held back only by its single-core performance relative to smaller, higher-clocked parts, but for multi-threaded workloads, it is a formidable choice.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 65, meaning it outperforms 65 percent of all desktop configurations in the database, based on the average benchmark scores of both components.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory, which is confirmed in the FACT PACK, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus width, providing a memory bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the CPU in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-8565U with a score of 8665 (deltaPct 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i5-8365U with a score of 8708 (deltaPct -0.4 percent), the AMD EPYC 7601 with a score of 8619 (deltaPct 0.7 percent), and the Intel Core i7-10510U with a score of 8580 (deltaPct 1.1 percent). The i9-13900E’s average score is 8676.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested power supply rating?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 176 watts, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 450 watts. The CPU’s TDP is 65 watts, which is lower than the GPU’s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides basic display output but is not intended for gaming or heavy graphics tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has an FP32 performance of 10.79 TFLOPS, which is a measure of its single-precision floating-point compute capability.

Gaming Performance

As noted previously, no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 suggests that it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles at moderate settings, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 62 is anomalously low, which may indicate driver or test inconsistencies. The RX 6650 XT’s pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s are reasonable for 1080p gaming, and the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory should be sufficient for most titles at that resolution, though high-texture packs may exceed the 128-bit bus bandwidth. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834, ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound games will be smooth, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated frame rates for a mix of popular titles would likely fall in the 60-90 FPS range for well-optimized games, based on the GPU’s overall compute capability relative to its rivals, which are older workstation cards with lower gaming performance. At 1440p, frame rates would drop to roughly 45-60 FPS, as the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus becomes a constraint on bandwidth. At 4K, the RX 6650 XT would struggle, with estimated frame rates below 30 FPS in demanding games, given that the FP32 throughput of 10.79 TFLOPS is not sufficient for high-resolution rasterization. The GPU’s 32 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but the performance impact would be significant, likely halving frame rates in titles that enable it. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s high boost clock of 5.20 GHz would push frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with low settings, as these games are CPU-bound, but the GPU’s raw throughput would still support high refresh rates. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores indicate a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with diminishing returns at higher resolutions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core i9-13900E, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, an RDNA 2.0 graphics card. The combined percentile of 65 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop configurations, meaning it outperforms the majority of systems in the database but is not at the top end. The CPU is the dominant component, with an average benchmark score of 8676 and a percentile of 65 versus all CPUs, while the GPU has an average score of 19765 and a percentile of 65 versus all GPUs. The pairing is notable for its imbalance: the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is far above what the GPU can leverage in gaming, but for productivity tasks, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The GPU is end-of-life in terms of production status, having been released on 2022-05-09, while the CPU remains active, released on 2023-01-03. The system’s overall tier is defined by this 65th percentile standing, which indicates a capable mid-range machine that excels at CPU-intensive workloads but is only average in GPU-heavy tasks.

The build’s class is desktop, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with DDR4 or DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP and the GPU’s 176-watt TDP combine to require a power supply that meets the GPU’s suggested 450-watt rating, with headroom for the CPU and other components. The GPU’s dual-slot design and single 8-pin power connector are standard, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU provides a backup display option. This is a system that would be well-suited for a professional workstation that occasionally games, rather than a dedicated gaming rig, given the CPU’s overwhelming compute advantage and the GPU’s mid-range standing.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RX 6650 XT’s 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 168.6 GPixel/s pixel rate can drive frame rates above 60 FPS in many titles, but the 8 GB memory buffer may limit texture settings, and the CPU’s single-core score of 4834 ensures that frame times remain consistent. Streaming while gaming is viable because the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads can handle both game logic and encoding without significant impact, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 provides ample headroom for software encoding. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see excellent CPU performance for timeline rendering and export, with the GPU accelerating effects via OpenCL (score 10111) or Vulkan (score 81306), though the low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 62 suggests that DirectX-based effects may be slower. 3D rendering in Blender or similar software will be dominated by the CPU, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicating strong performance in CPU-based renderers, while GPU rendering would be limited by the RX 6650 XT’s compute capabilities compared to professional cards. Software development, including compiling large codebases or running multiple virtual machines, benefits from the CPU’s 32 threads, with the 36 MB of shared L3 cache aiding in data-heavy tasks, and the 65-watt TDP keeps power draw manageable in office environments. Student and office work, such as document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, is easily handled by the CPU’s single-core performance, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive displays without the discrete GPU, saving power, though the discrete GPU is available for more demanding tasks like CAD or light photo editing. The system’s overall balance favors productivity over gaming, so users who spend most of their time in multi-threaded applications will see the greatest benefit, while gamers may find the GPU to be the limiting factor at resolutions above 1080p.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds