SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count workstation CPU with a professional laptop-derived GPU. The data shows a significant imbalance between the two components, with the CPU ranking in the 92nd percentile among all processors while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This section examines how that imbalance manifests across different workload types.

The CPU's benchmark scores are uniformly strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and a single-core score of 5,355. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164 and single-core score of 2,604 reinforce this picture of a processor that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks. The GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the data, making its relative performance harder to pin down, but its 50th percentile placement suggests it is an average performer compared to all other GPUs.

For gaming, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU. The CPU has the headroom to feed frames at high rates, evidenced by its strong single-thread performance, but the GPU's mid-pack percentile means it will likely cap frame rates in graphically intense scenarios. In CPU-light games at lower resolutions, the GPU will still be the limiting factor because of its modest relative standing. In contrast, for productivity workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU's role is secondary. The data indicates that this is a system where the processor does the heavy lifting for compute tasks, while the graphics card handles display output and GPU-accelerated effects without being a leader in its class.

The PassMark sub-scores illustrate the CPU's versatility. The integer math score of 176,107 and floating-point math score of 120,492 show strong arithmetic throughput, while the data encryption score of 35,242 and data compression score of 577,285 indicate robust performance for those specific operations. The random string sorting score of 64,396 and extended instructions score of 32,760 round out a picture of a well-rounded compute engine. The physics score of 2,484 and single-thread score of 4,309 are less impressive relative to the multi-core numbers, but still adequate for general use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,676, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a high-ranking result that puts it just ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, which scores 60,572, a delta of 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX both score around 60,100, putting them roughly 1 percent behind the i9-13900. The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008, a 1.1 percent deficit. These narrow margins show that the i9-13900 is competitive with the very best processors available, though not the absolute top performer.

Looking at individual benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 is a strong indicator of multi-threaded rendering performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,931 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,823 follow the same trend. Single-core performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,355, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2,249, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 539. The Geekbench scores of 21,164 multi-core and 2,604 single-core are consistent with these results.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680 is a composite of the various sub-scores and reinforces the CPU's strong showing. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data and its average benchmark score is listed as zero, which means its performance can only be inferred from its 50th percentile placement and hardware specifications. The combined percentile for the system is 71, which is lower than the CPU's percentile alone, reflecting the drag from the GPU's mid-pack performance.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is average at GPU-bound tasks. For users who primarily need processing power for compilation, simulation, or batch processing, this pairing is effective. For users who need top-tier graphics performance, the GPU will be a limiting factor. The CPU is roughly 1 percent faster than its nearest rivals, which is a small but measurable advantage in multi-core workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture and a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The base clock is 930 MHz, and the boost clock is 1680 MHz.

The GPU has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. It includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 32.69 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The thermal design power is 150 W, and the card uses no power connectors, suggesting it draws power from the motherboard slot. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are described as portable device dependent.

The 50th percentile placement means this GPU performs at the median of all GPUs in the database. With no benchmark scores to reference, the FP32 figure of 32.69 TFLOPS provides a theoretical ceiling for compute performance. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, but the lack of a strong percentile suggests it will not compete with high-end desktop cards. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for modern titles at high settings, and the GDDR6 type is standard for this class.

The ray tracing cores and tensor cores are present, but their real-world impact depends on software optimization. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, but the mid-pack percentile indicates these features will not deliver class-leading results. The 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the key metric for compute tasks like rendering or scientific simulation, but it is paired with a modest pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s, which may limit fill-rate-bound scenarios. The memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is enough for 1440p high-refresh gaming but may struggle at 4K with heavy texture loads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 scores 60,676 on average, placing it 0.2 percent ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T and 1 percent ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX. It is 1.1 percent faster than the Intel Core i9-14900F.

Q: Does the GPU have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the GPU has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of zero. Its performance is inferred from its 50th percentile placement and hardware specifications.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, which is lower than the CPU's 92nd percentile because the GPU sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bus width?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this configuration?

A: No, the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. All FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the FP32 performance of the GPU?

A: The GPU delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 performance also at 32.69 TFLOPS.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's single-core score of 5,355 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can keep up with fast-paced titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile placement will limit frame rates in demanding games. This system is more suited to 1080p or 1440p gaming at medium to high settings rather than 4K ultra.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU's multi-thread score of 37,931 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for software encoding, and the 32 threads can handle simultaneous game and stream workloads. The GPU's average performance may struggle with hardware encoding at high bitrates, but the CPU can compensate.

Video editing benefits from the CPU's strong multi-core performance, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 4K timelines, but the 50th percentile means effects rendering will not be as fast as with a higher-tier GPU.

3D rendering relies heavily on CPU compute, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 is a strong indicator of performance in applications like Blender or Maya. The GPU's FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but it will not be the primary driver.

Software development is a CPU-intensive task, and the PassMark integer math score of 176,107 shows strong compilation throughput. The 24 cores and 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable for long compile sessions.

Student and office work is well served by this CPU, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 handling everyday tasks easily. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the dedicated GPU will handle any graphics needs. The system is overkill for this use case but will not struggle with any office application.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,355 suggests it can feed frames quickly in CPU-bound scenarios. For esports titles at 1080p, the GPU's 50th percentile placement and 16 GB VRAM should allow for high frame rates in less demanding games. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, and the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides compute headroom.

For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU will likely deliver playable frame rates at medium to high settings. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being a bottleneck, but the mid-pack percentile suggests performance will be average compared to other GPUs. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, and the 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate may limit fill-rate-heavy scenes.

Ray tracing performance is supported by 76 RT cores, but the GPU's overall 50th percentile indicates it will not excel in ray-traced workloads. DLSS, enabled by 304 tensor cores, can help recover some performance, but the baseline rasterization performance will still be the limiting factor. For a 60 FPS target at 1440p, this GPU should handle most current titles, but for 1440p high-refresh or 4K gaming, a more powerful GPU would be needed to fully utilize the CPU's capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and has a TDP of 65 W.

The processor includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, providing a basic display output without the dedicated GPU. It has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for storage and expansion. The process node is 10 nm, and the die size is 257 mm². The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, meaning its overclocking potential is limited.

The benchmark scores demonstrate strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 places it among the top processors for rendering workloads. The single-core score of 5,355 is also competitive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164 and single-core score of 2,604 confirm this balance.

The PassMark scores provide insight into specific workloads. The data compression score of 577,285 is high, making this CPU suitable for archiving and storage tasks. The data encryption score of 35,242 is moderate, indicating acceptable performance for encrypted data handling. The extended instructions score of 32,760 shows capability with modern instruction sets. The find prime numbers score of 186 is low, suggesting this CPU is not optimized for that specific type of integer math.

The multithread score of 45,680 and single-thread score of 4,309 show that the CPU is well-balanced between multi-core and single-core performance. The floating-point math score of 120,492 and integer math score of 176,107 both indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The physics score of 2,484 is less impressive, but this is a niche workload. The random string sorting score of 64,396 is adequate for data processing tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor, while the GPU is an embedded-class mobile part repurposed for a desktop system. The combined percentile is 71, reflecting the strong CPU and average GPU.

The CPU's 92nd percentile among all CPUs makes it a top-tier processor for compute-intensive tasks. The GPU's 50th percentile places it at the median of all GPUs, making it adequate for general use but not a performance leader. This pairing creates a system that is CPU-heavy, with the processor doing the majority of the heavy lifting in most workloads.

The build is suitable for users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance. The 24 cores and 32 threads of the CPU provide excellent multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle display output and GPU-accelerated tasks without excelling. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 150 W TDP of the GPU combine for a total power draw that is manageable for a desktop system.

The system's tier is defined by the CPU's high percentile, which places it in the upper echelon of processors. The GPU's mid-pack performance brings the overall system down to a combined 71st percentile. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, making it a balanced system for productivity tasks that are CPU-bound.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who prioritize high frame rates in CPU-bound titles will find this system adequate, but those seeking 4K gaming performance should look elsewhere due to the GPU's 50th percentile placement. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931, which accelerates export times and rendering workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 176,107, which indicates fast compilation throughput. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing wait times. Students and professionals in office environments will find the CPU's single-thread score of 4,309 more than sufficient for daily tasks, though the system is overkill for this use case.

Small business workstations that run simulations, data analysis, or batch processing will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The PassMark data compression score of 577,285 makes it suitable for database and archival tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM can handle moderate GPU-accelerated workloads, but professionals needing top-tier graphics performance should consider a higher-end GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high bandwidth for modern SSDs and expansion cards. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, leaving substantial headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future.

The suggested PSU is null in the data, but the combined TDP of the CPU and GPU is 215 W, indicating a modest power supply would suffice. The GPU uses no power connectors and draws power from the PCIe slot, simplifying installation. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with older motherboards.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU to match the CPU's performance. The CPU's 92nd percentile means it can drive higher-end graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The 16 GB VRAM of the current GPU is adequate, but a GPU with a higher percentile would improve gaming and GPU-accelerated compute performance.

The platform's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility in choosing memory modules. The ECC memory support is a feature for workstation users who require error correction. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the dedicated GPU fails or is removed. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future storage devices and expansion cards will be compatible.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds