SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and the 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, pairing a high-core-count design with excellent single-thread headroom. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration positions the chip as a top-tier productivity and gaming hybrid, with the 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirming its place in the upper echelon of available processors.

Benchmark data underscores the chip's balanced strength. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 37931 in multi-core and 5355 in single-core, showing that it can sustain heavy parallel workloads without sacrificing responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench results follow the same pattern: 21164 multi-core and 2604 single-core. A PassMark single-thread score of 4309 and a multithread score of 45680 further validate this dual nature. For specialized tasks, the data shows a PassMark data compression score of 577285 and an encryption score of 35242, indicating robust throughput for archiving and secure data operations. The floating-point math score of 120492 and integer math score of 176107 highlight strong computational muscle for scientific and financial workloads, while the extended instructions score of 32760 confirms solid SIMD performance. The average benchmark score of 60676 places it in a tight competitive cluster, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (deltaPct 0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (deltaPct 1), and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (deltaPct 1). The i9-13900 leads these alternatives by a narrow margin, with the Xeon Gold 6338T trailing by just 0.2% and the AMD parts by 1%, suggesting that in raw CPU throughput, this Intel chip is effectively at parity with those workstation and mobile flagship parts.

The architecture also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output, and supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop part and adds a layer of reliability for workstation use. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring modern GPU and NVMe storage bandwidth is available. With a TDP of 65 watts, the chip is remarkably power-efficient for its core count, which has implications for cooling and PSU requirements that will be explored later.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-13900 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i9-13900 has an average benchmark score of 60676, placing it ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.2%, and ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX by 1%. It also edges out the Intel Core i9-14900F by 1.1%.

Q: What is the memory and ECC support situation?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. It also supports ECC memory, a feature typically reserved for server and workstation platforms, which can be critical for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: Is this CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. This means users are limited to adjusting BCLK or using motherboard-based tuning features, but the chip does not offer the same unlocked multiplier overclocking as some other models.

Q: What is the integrated graphics capability?

A: The CPU includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This integrated GPU provides basic display output and can be useful for troubleshooting or for systems that do not require a discrete GPU for compute tasks.

Q: What is the PCIe connectivity?

A: The CPU provides Gen 5, 16 lanes from the CPU itself. This is sufficient for a single high-end graphics card and a Gen 5 NVMe SSD, offering modern bandwidth standards.

Q: What is the launch MSRP and release date?

A: The launch MSRP is $549. The processor was released on January 3, 2023, and remains in active production.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, putting it 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. It is 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, 1.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, and 2.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Core i9-13900 with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 presents a distinct imbalance in raw compute potential. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60676, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 21629. This 25-percentile gap suggests that in CPU-bound workloads—such as physics calculations, data compression, or heavy multitasking—the processor is the dominant component, and the GPU may not be able to keep pace with the data the CPU can feed it. The PassMark physics score of 2484 for the CPU and the GPU's passmark_directx_12 score of 59 illustrate this disparity in gaming contexts, where the CPU's high single-thread score of 4309 could outpace the GPU's rendering capabilities in lighter scenes.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering with ray tracing or high-resolution texture processing, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The Quadro RTX 5000's fp32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are respectable, but they are not in the same league as the CPU's throughput. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means we cannot state exact frame pacing, but the benchmark scores indicate that for gaming at high frame rates, the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU to finish drawing frames. In productivity tasks like video encoding, the CPU's 24 cores will handle the encode process, while the GPU's compute score of 6525 in PassMark may accelerate certain effects; the balance will depend on the software's optimization.

The TDP figures also inform the balance. The CPU TDP of 65 watts is low for a 24-core part, meaning it will not generate excessive heat and will leave thermal headroom in a system. The GPU TDP of 230 watts is the primary power consumer, and the suggested PSU of 550 watts indicates that the system is not power-hungry by high-end standards. This suggests that in a typical desktop build, the CPU will not be thermally throttled, allowing it to sustain its boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which further widens the gap between CPU and GPU capability in CPU-bound scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This flexibility means builders can choose to reuse existing DDR4 modules to save costs or invest in DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the dual-channel bus limits the memory bandwidth compared to HEDT platforms. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU ensures that any modern graphics card or storage device will not be bottlenecked by the interface. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a safety net for display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

The TDP of 65 watts is a critical advantage for the upgrade path. It allows for a wide range of air coolers and small-form-factor cooling solutions, as the chip does not require the massive radiators or high-end liquid coolers often needed for higher-TDP parts. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 watts, which is modest for a system with this CPU and GPU combination. This means an existing PSU in the 550-650 watt range will likely suffice, leaving headroom for minor upgrades like additional storage or fans. However, if a user plans to upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model in the future, the PSU headroom may become a constraint, as higher-end GPUs typically require more power.

The production status of the CPU is "Active," ensuring availability and ongoing driver support. The GPU, however, is "End-of-life" with a successor in "Workstation Ampere." This means the Quadro RTX 5000 is a legacy part, and while it will continue to function, driver optimizations for new games or software may be limited. For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU has a clear path: it can be paired with a more modern, higher-performance GPU to unlock its full potential, given that the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking suggests it has significant headroom to drive faster graphics cards. Conversely, the GPU is the weaker link, and replacing it with a newer workstation or gaming GPU would provide the most substantial performance uplift for gaming and GPGPU tasks. The platform itself, with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support, is not the limiting factor; the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900 delivers a commanding benchmark performance profile. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and single-core score of 5355 demonstrate a strong dual-purpose design. The Geekbench scores of 21164 (multi) and 2604 (single) corroborate this, showing that the chip excels in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 45680 and single-thread score of 4309 place it in the top tier of desktop processors. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60676 puts it at the 92nd percentile, meaning it outperforms 92% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, scores 60572, a delta of just 0.2%, indicating that the i9-13900 is essentially tied with a server-class chip in overall throughput. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX sit 1% behind, and the Intel Core i9-14900F is 1.1% behind, solidifying the i9-13900's position as a top-tier performer.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 presents a different picture. Its average benchmark score of 21629 places it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. In specific tests, it scores 78999 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92309 in Geekbench Vulkan, showing strong compute potential for professional applications. However, its PassMark DirectX scores are low: 59 for DirectX 12, 140 for DirectX 11, and 113 for DirectX 10. These numbers are indicative of a workstation-oriented GPU that prioritizes compute and driver stability over raw gaming rasterization. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 is modest for a 16 GB card, and the GPU compute score of 6525 is solid for FP32 workloads. The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856, a delta of -1% (meaning the GTX 1060 is 1% faster in this metric). This is a surprising comparison, as the Quadro RTX 5000 is a much more expensive card, but it highlights that in pure benchmark metrics, the older gaming card can match it in certain rasterization tests. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80, reflecting a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4309, is excellent for gaming, ensuring that the processor will not be a bottleneck in most titles. The GPU, however, with its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140, is not designed for high-refresh gaming. These low DirectX scores, compared to its OpenCL score of 78999, indicate that the Quadro RTX 5000 is optimized for compute workloads like rendering and simulations, not for rasterizing game scenes quickly.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i9-13900 could potentially push very high frame rates, but the GPU's weak DirectX performance would likely cap the output at moderate levels. For AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU's 16 GB of memory and 256-bit bus are sufficient for texture storage, but the 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is roughly equivalent to a mid-range gaming GPU. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, as the 67th percentile ranking suggests it is below the top tier of gaming GPUs. At 4K, the GPU is likely to be the primary limiter, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in most modern games. The estimated FPS for this pairing would be playable at 1080p with medium-to-high settings in many games, but not competitive for high-refresh monitors (144Hz+). For a system with a 92nd percentile CPU, the gaming experience is held back by the GPU, and users seeking high-refresh gaming would need to consider a different graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not ideal. The CPU's single-thread score of 4309 can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 will limit output. Expect playable frame rates at 1080p, but not the high refresh rates (144Hz+) that the CPU is capable of supporting. The GPU is the bottleneck here.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are well-suited for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 577285 indicates fast encoding throughput, and the TDP of 65 watts leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions. The GPU's Turing architecture includes NVENC, but its DirectX gaming performance will still limit the game's frame rate, making this a viable but not optimal streaming setup.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and the PassMark floating-point score of 120492 will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export efficiently. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and color grading, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting in most editors. This is a strong combination for professional video work.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core power is exceptional for CPU-based rendering engines, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores support hardware ray tracing and GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray, but its 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 is not top-tier. This pairing is competent for hybrid rendering workloads, though a more powerful GPU would accelerate the GPU-rendering pipeline.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread speed (5355 in Cinebench R23) and 32 threads make it ideal for compilation tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 176107 ensures quick code compilation, and the support for ECC memory adds stability for long-running build servers. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capabilities can be used for testing GPGPU code.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle display output without the discrete GPU, which could be removed for a more efficient system. The TDP of 65 watts makes it a quiet and cool option, but the cost of the platform is high for basic tasks. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is wasted in this scenario.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900, a 24-core, 32-thread processor ranked in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a workstation GPU ranked in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with an average benchmark score of 60676, while the GPU's average score of 21629 is solidly mid-range. The combined percentile for the pairing is 80, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 80% of all benchmarked configurations. This is a desktop workstation class build, not a gaming-optimized system. The CPU is the star of the show, offering performance that rivals server-class chips like the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (deltaPct 0.2), while the GPU is a professional-grade card designed for compute and stability, not high-refresh gaming. The system is best described as a high-performance content creation workstation with a capable, but not top-tier, GPU for acceleration. The TDP of 65 watts for the CPU and 230 watts for the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 550 watts, makes this a power-efficient build for its performance class. It is a balanced platform in terms of connectivity, with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support, but the GPU is the component that would need an upgrade to unlock the CPU's full gaming potential.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for professionals and prosumers who prioritize CPU compute power over gaming frame rates. The primary target is content creators working in video editing and 3D rendering, where the i9-13900's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and PassMark floating-point score of 120492 will dramatically reduce export times and simulation runs. Software developers will benefit from the short compile times enabled by the 32 threads and the PassMark integer math score of 176107, especially those working on large codebases or building cross-platform applications. The ECC memory support makes this a viable option for small business workstations that handle financial modeling or scientific data analysis, where data integrity is paramount.

For gamers, this build is not recommended at high resolutions. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking and low DirectX scores mean that a gamer would be better served by a more gaming-oriented GPU. However, a gamer who also streams or does light video editing could leverage the CPU's strength, but the GPU will cap the gaming experience at 1080p with moderate settings. Students and office workers should avoid this build, as the cost is unjustified for basic tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could be used for a display, but the discrete GPU is unnecessary for that workload. The system is best suited for a workstation that occasionally plays games at 1080p, but its true calling is productivity and compute-heavy tasks. The Quadro RTX 5000, with its 16 GB of VRAM and 384 tensor cores, is also a candidate for AI inferencing and machine learning workloads at a modest scale, though the fp32 performance is not class-leading. In summary, this build is for the power user who needs a high-core-count CPU for demanding professional applications and wants a reliable, professional-grade GPU for acceleration and compute, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds