SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 — Benchmark Database Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a desktop-class combination that pairs a high-core-count 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor with a professional-grade Turing-architecture GPU. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The combined percentile position of this pairing is 77, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop configurations tracked in the database.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data is available for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 indicate moderate 1080p capability, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,355 suggests strong frame pacing potential. The Quadro RTX 4000 sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% higher average score) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% higher). This places the GPU in a performance band where 1080p gaming at high settings is plausible for esports titles, but 1440p ultra settings would likely stress the 8 GB GDDR6 memory buffer.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,604 suggest the i9-13900 will not bottleneck most game engines, which typically rely on one or two heavily loaded threads. The GPU's pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s provide enough throughput for high-refresh 1080p gaming in lighter titles, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest by modern standards. For 1440p gaming, the estimated frame rates would likely drop substantially due to the GPU's 61st percentile standing — the data indicates this is not a high-refresh 1440p configuration. At 4K, the GPU would be the limiting factor, with the 8 GB frame buffer and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth potentially causing texture streaming issues in modern AAA titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), which is the current generation standard for graphics cards and NVMe storage. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-class builds. The CPU's 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core, 32-thread processor, suggesting that most ATX and many smaller form factor power supplies can handle the processor without issue.

The GPU requires a 450 W suggested PSU and uses a single 8-pin power connector, drawing a 160 W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components when paired with the CPU's modest 65 W TDP. The GPU also uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, so no motherboard upgrade is strictly necessary for this pairing. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU from the GeForce 40-series, since the Quadro RTX 4000 is marked as end-of-life and its successor is Workstation Ampere. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing among all CPUs means it remains a strong foundation for future GPU upgrades — the i9-13900 would not bottleneck a significantly faster graphics card in most workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance is excellent — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,355 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 indicate the i9-13900 can push high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's 61st percentile ranking limits overall gaming performance. Estimated frame rates at 1080p would be competitive with the RTX 4060 (a 0.9% higher average score), meaning high-refresh 1080p is achievable in esports titles, but 1440p high-refresh gaming is not realistic.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 45,680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,931 mean software encoding (x264/x265) would have minimal impact on game performance. The GPU's 288 tensor cores could also assist with AI-based encoding features, though the Quadro RTX 4000 lacks the dedicated NVENC performance of newer consumer cards.

Video editing: The strong multicore performance (Geekbench multicore 21,164, PassMark integer math 176,107) handles timeline rendering and export efficiently. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and some 1440p editing timelines, but the 61st percentile GPU score suggests 4K multi-stream editing would be sluggish. The CPU's 36 MB shared L3 cache helps with large file operations common in video workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here — Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15,931 and R15 multicore score of 3,823 place it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. CPU-based rendering (Blender Cycles, V-Ray) would be fast. GPU rendering, however, is limited by the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is about 40% lower than what a modern mid-range consumer card would offer.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 577,285 and data encryption score of 35,242 indicate strong performance in compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 92nd CPU percentile means large codebases compile quickly. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for typical student workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU can handle office tasks even if the discrete GPU is not utilized. For students, the 24-core CPU and 32 threads are far beyond what spreadsheet, document, or web-based workloads require, but the system would last many years without feeling slow.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at only the 61st percentile. This 31-percentage-point gap means the i9-13900 can feed frames much faster than the Quadro RTX 4000 can render them. In gaming, this would manifest as the GPU being pegged at 100% usage while the CPU remains underutilized — a classic GPU-bound scenario. The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield substantial frame rate improvements without touching the CPU.

In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the balance flips. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 14.24 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) are sufficient for compute tasks, but the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45,680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,931 dominate the overall system performance. For mixed workloads like gaming while streaming, the CPU has enough headroom (32 threads vs. typical game usage of 8-16 threads) to handle both tasks simultaneously, making the GPU the only real bottleneck.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that is remarkably efficient for its core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support included.

Benchmark results show this is a top-tier CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,931 and single-core score of 5,355 place it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The Geekbench multicore score of 21,164 and single-core score of 2,604 reinforce this position. The PassMark suite shows balanced performance: integer math at 176,107, floating-point math at 120,492, and extended instructions at 32,760. The data compression score of 577,285 is particularly strong. The nearest CPU rival is the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T with a 0.2% higher average score, followed by the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX (both 1.0% higher). The Intel Core i9-14900F is 1.1% higher in average score. The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,676, and it was released on January 3, 2023 with a launch MSRP of $549.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance for professional workloads but have moderate GPU requirements. Gamers at 1080p who prioritize high frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles would find the i9-13900 more than sufficient, with the Quadro RTX 4000 providing playable performance. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering would benefit from the CPU's 92nd percentile multicore performance, though GPU-accelerated rendering would be slower than the CPU rendering path. Software developers working on large codebases with parallel compilation would appreciate the 32 threads and the PassMark data compression score of 577,285, which indicates fast build times. Students in engineering or computer science programs would have a system that handles any academic workload for years, though the GPU is overkill for most coursework. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive simulations, data analysis, or virtualization would find the 24-core processor ideal, and the Quadro RTX 4000's 8 GB VRAM and ECC-capable platform (via the CPU's ECC memory support) suits professional reliability requirements.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,676, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 37,931, Geekbench multicore at 21,164, and PassMark multithread at 45,680. The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Key GPU scores include PassMark G3D at 15,117, Geekbench Vulkan at 78,844, and Geekbench OpenCL at 74,540. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77.

The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (92 vs. 61) is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by narrow margins (0.2% to 1.1%), indicating it is already at the top of its performance class. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% higher average score), which is a much older, lower-end card — this highlights that the Quadro RTX 4000, while professional-grade, is not a high-performance gaming GPU. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but leaves significant GPU performance on the table.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900 support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the CPU runs at its factory-set clocks. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is the maximum achievable without external clock generator manipulation.

Q: What memory types does this configuration support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is also supported, which is a professional workstation feature.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 4000 compare to the GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The RTX 4060 has a 0.9% higher average benchmark score (17,639 vs. 17,789 for the Quadro RTX 4000). This places them in essentially the same performance tier.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile ranking make 4K gaming impractical. The estimated performance at 4K would be well below acceptable frame rates for modern titles.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 4000 is 450 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector. The GPU has a 160 W TDP, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 was released on January 3, 2023. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 was released on November 12, 2018, and is now end-of-life.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i9-13900 includes UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for display output or light graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture (TU104 chip) manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. It has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 288 tensor cores. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 1,625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1,005 MHz with a boost clock of 1,545 MHz. The GPU has a 160 W TDP and measures 241 mm in length (9.5 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches), occupying a single slot.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 17,789. The PassMark G3D score is 15,117, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,873. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 74,540, and Vulkan score is 78,844. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably low: DirectX 9 at 205, DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, and DirectX 12 at 52. These low DirectX scores suggest the GPU's gaming performance is significantly weaker than its compute performance — a characteristic of professional workstation cards. The GPU's FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The GPU has 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm².

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900 (24 cores, 32 threads, Raptor Lake architecture) with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Turing architecture, 8 GB GDDR6). The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-tier professional card at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 77, placing this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all tracked desktop builds. This pairing is fundamentally unbalanced for gaming — the CPU is overqualified for any game, while the GPU is adequate for 1080p but not more demanding resolutions. For professional workloads like CPU-based rendering, software compilation, and data processing, the system is exceptional. For GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering in real-time viewports, the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be a limiting factor. The 450 W suggested PSU, 65 W CPU TDP, and 160 W GPU TDP mean this system is power-efficient by modern standards, and the Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path to newer GPUs without replacing the motherboard. Overall, this build represents a workstation-class CPU paired with a professional GPU that prioritizes stability and compute versatility over raw gaming frame rates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds