SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a desktop configuration that pairs a high-core-count 13th Gen Intel flagship with an entry-level Blackwell GPU. The data indicates a significant imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier productivity and multi-threaded compute monster, while the GPU is positioned for 1080p gaming and light rendering. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided fact pack, which contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination; all gaming performance discussions are therefore estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores and clearly labeled as such.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus and includes ECC memory support, making it viable for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770, though the discrete RTX 5050 will handle all graphics workloads.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and heavily parallel workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 37,931 points in multi-core and 5,355 points in single-core. The single-core score indicates strong responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications, while the multi-core score positions it as a formidable rendering and compilation engine. Geekbench results echo this, with a multi-core score of 21,164 and a single-core score of 2,604. The PassMark suite further breaks down performance: integer math scores 176,107, floating-point math scores 120,492, and extended instructions score 32,760. Data compression is particularly strong at 577,285, while encryption scores 35,242.

The percentile ranking of 92 against all CPUs places this chip firmly in the enthusiast tier. Its average benchmark score of 60,676 positions it just ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60,572, a 0.2% delta), and 1% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900F, scores 60,008, which is 1.1% lower. These deltas are small, suggesting that the 13900 is competitive with newer and server-class parts, though the architectural differences are not reflected in these aggregate scores. For real workloads, the data shows a CPU that can handle simultaneous heavy tasks—such as video encoding while compiling code—without significant slowdown, thanks to its 32 threads and high cache capacity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Intel Core i9-13900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results.

The RTX 5050’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502 and PassMark G3D score of 17,326 suggest a GPU aimed at 1080p gaming with high settings. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,355 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. Estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings would likely produce playable frame rates in esports titles, but demanding AAA games may require lowering settings to high or medium to maintain smooth gameplay. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors, and players should expect significant frame rate drops compared to 1080p. The GPU’s pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s provide raw throughput that aligns with a budget-tier 1080p card, but the 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms it is not designed for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2,484 indicates adequate game physics handling, but the GPU remains the primary constraint in gaming workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the RTX 5050 is the limiting factor in gaming workloads, while the CPU is the dominant component in compute-heavy tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60,676 places it in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 21,035 places it in the 66th percentile. This 26-point percentile gap highlights a severe imbalance. In gaming, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will saturate before the CPU’s 32 threads are fully utilized. For example, a modern AAA title at 1080p ultra will likely see the GPU running at near 100% utilization, while the CPU remains under 50% load, as evidenced by the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2,604 in Geekbench.

Conversely, in workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 indicates that rendering tasks will scale across all 32 threads, leaving the GPU idle. The PassMark data compression score of 577,285 further shows that the CPU is capable of crushing data-heavy tasks, but the GPU’s compute score of 9,184 in PassMark GPU Compute suggests it will lag behind in GPU-accelerated rendering. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this mismatch: the system is well above average overall, but it is not a balanced gaming machine. Users should expect to either upgrade the GPU for better gaming or utilize the CPU’s massive compute power for productivity, accepting that the GPU will not accelerate those tasks significantly.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets specific user profiles based on the measured performance. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates will find the RTX 5050 adequate, but they must accept that the CPU’s power is largely unused in this scenario. The CPU’s single-core performance and the GPU’s frame rates at 1080p make this a viable entry-level gaming build, but not one that will push 1440p or 4K. Content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit enormously from the 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 means projects will render faster than with most rival CPUs, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long compute sessions.

Software developers writing multi-threaded code will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 176,107, which indicates fast compilation times. Students and small business workstations that run virtual machines or data analysis tools will also benefit from the CPU’s data compression and encryption scores. However, the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking means this is not a workstation for GPU-accelerated AI training or high-end 3D modeling. The launch MSRP of $549 for the CPU and $249 for the GPU dictates a build where the processor is the primary investment. The combined percentile of 79 suggests a system that is above average for general use but specialized in CPU-bound tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 5050’s 3DMark score of 2,502 and PassMark G3D score of 17,326 suggest it can handle competitive shooters at high frame rates, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer titles. The CPU’s single-thread performance will not be a hindrance, but the GPU will cap performance.

Streaming: The CPU’s 32 threads are ideal for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark x264 or similar workloads are not listed, but the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 indicates ample headroom to encode video simultaneously with gameplay. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities are not specified, but its compute score of 9,184 suggests hardware encoding is possible, though software encoding via the CPU is more robust.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core score of 37,931 in Cinebench R23 will accelerate timeline rendering and export times. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p edits but may struggle with 4K timelines. The PassMark floating-point score of 120,492 supports complex effects processing.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will see exceptional performance from the 13900, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,931 confirming scalability. GPU-accelerated renderers will be limited by the RTX 5050’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is modest for production work.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 176,107 and data compression score of 577,285 indicate rapid code compilation and asset packaging. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-core score of 2,604 ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance makes everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing snappy. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, but the RTX 5050 is overkill for this scenario.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB207 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² area, yielding a density of 113.4 million transistors per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 13.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The RTX 5050 includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features, though the modest core counts suggest entry-level performance in these areas. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 21,035 places it in the 66th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153, -0.6%), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237, -1%), and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713, 1.6%). The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21,379, which is 1.6% higher. These close deltas indicate that the RTX 5050 performs similarly to older mobile and desktop parts, which is expected for a budget-tier GPU.

For rendering, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the PassMark DirectX 11 score of 150 and DirectX 9 score of 186 show backward compatibility. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 90,334 and Vulkan score of 89,381 suggest solid compute performance for general-purpose tasks, but the PassMark GPU Compute score of 9,184 is lower, indicating that raw compute is not the GPU’s strength. The 130 W TDP and dual-slot design require a 300 W power supply and a single 8-pin connector, making it easy to integrate into most systems. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides ample bandwidth, though the GPU’s performance does not require the full speed of the interface.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and availability. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The motherboard must support these standards to fully utilize the components. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, which is surprisingly low for a 24-core part, but the boost clock of 5.60 GHz suggests it can draw more power under load. The GPU’s TDP is 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, which means a quality 400-500 W power supply would provide headroom for overclocking or additional drives.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited to adjusting base clock or using Intel’s automatic boost features. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the current RTX 5050 is the bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking means it has years of life left, so upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier Blackwell or future GeForce 60-series card would balance the system. Alternatively, users who do not need the CPU’s full compute power could downgrade to a lower-core CPU, but the data shows the 13900 is already a top performer. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a niche feature for workstation builds, but the consumer market segment suggests this is not a primary use case.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed in the fact pack as a feature of the processor.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050?

A: The launch MSRP is $249 USD, as stated in the fact pack.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21,035, which is 1.6% higher than the RX 5600 XT’s score of 20,713.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 20 RT cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 79, indicating the system is above average compared to all other desktop configurations.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5050?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s, based on its 128-bit bus and 20 Gbps effective memory speed.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900 delivers an average benchmark score of 60,676, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 37,931, and single-core is 5,355. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 15,931 multi-core and 2,249 single-core, while in R15 they are 3,823 multi-core and 539 single-core. Geekbench multi-core scores 21,164, and single-core scores 2,604. PassMark results include multi-thread at 45,680, single-thread at 4,309, physics at 2,484, integer math at 176,107, floating-point math at 120,492, and extended instructions at 32,760. Data compression scores 577,285, and encryption scores 35,242.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 achieves an average benchmark score of 21,035, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,502. Geekbench OpenCL scores 90,334, and Vulkan scores 89,381. PassMark results include G3D at 17,326, G2D at 1,113, GPU Compute at 9,184, DirectX 12 at 66, DirectX 11 at 150, DirectX 10 at 103, and DirectX 9 at 186.

The combined picture is a system with a CPU that is 26 percentile points higher than the GPU, indicating a severe imbalance. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, is only 0.2% slower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX are both 1% slower. The Intel Core i9-14900F is 1.1% slower. The GPU’s closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, is 0.6% faster, while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile are both 1% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 1.6% slower. This data shows that the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a mid-range part that will limit the system in graphics-intensive tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds