SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, backed by a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking headroom is limited to what the platform allows, but the high boost clock already delivers strong single-thread performance.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 37,931, while the single-core score is 5,355. These numbers suggest that the i9-13900 excels in heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, compilation, and scientific computing, while also maintaining excellent responsiveness in single-threaded tasks like everyday application use and legacy software. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: 15,931 multi-core and 2,249 single-core. The Geekbench scores of 21,164 multi-core and 2,604 single-core reinforce the balanced nature of this chip. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score is 45,680, with integer math at 176,107 and floating-point math at 120,492, demonstrating strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression scores 577,285, and encryption hits 35,242, indicating capable performance in data-intensive tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, 1% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F. These deltas are narrow, showing that the i9-13900 sits at the frontier of CPU performance, though not by a commanding margin. The average benchmark score is 60,676, which is consistent with the high percentile ranking. For real workloads, the 24 cores (mixing performance and efficiency cores) provide exceptional multi-threading capability, while the 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded operation. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with data reuse in large working sets, and the dual-channel memory controller with DDR5 support allows high bandwidth for memory-sensitive applications. The PassMark data encryption score of 35,242 suggests robust security-related performance, useful for encrypted storage and communications.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900 delivers standout CPU benchmark results across the board, as detailed above. However, the GPU side of this build — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM — has no benchmark scores listed in the data pack, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which is a mid-pack position, but the lack of specific scores means we cannot quantify its exact performance relative to rivals. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, reflecting a system that is strong overall, with the CPU carrying much of the performance weight. The GPU's nearestRivals array is empty, so no direct comparisons are available from the data.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry: the CPU is in the top 8% of all processors, while the GPU is exactly at the median. This suggests that the i9-13900 has substantial headroom in many workloads, and the RTX 3070 TiM will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. For CPU-bound applications like software compilation, data analysis, or server-style workloads, the system will perform at elite levels. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the system will perform at mid-range levels, consistent with the GPU's 50th percentile standing. The average CPU benchmark score of 60,676 dwarfs the GPU's 0, further emphasizing the CPU's dominance in this pairing. In mixed workloads where both CPU and GPU are utilized — such as video editing with effects or live streaming with encoding — the CPU will handle the processing side comfortably, while the GPU manages rendering, and the overall experience will be limited by the GPU's throughput.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and strong single-core scores (5,355 in Cinebench R23, 2,604 in Geekbench) indicate that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, as modern titles rely heavily on single-thread performance for game logic and draw calls. The GPU's 50th percentile position, with its 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 256-bit bus, and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but may struggle at 4K with ultra details due to VRAM capacity and raw compute limits.

At 1080p ultra settings, the system likely delivers smooth frame rates in most titles, with the CPU ensuring high minimum FPS and the GPU providing consistent output. The CPU's high single-thread performance avoids the classic stutter associated with weaker processors. At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and frame rates will drop accordingly, but the 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 184 texture mapping units should still produce playable results in many games. At 4K ultra, the 8 GB VRAM is a likely bottleneck, as modern textures can exceed this capacity, leading to potential texture streaming issues. The pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s set a theoretical ceiling that aligns with mid-range 4K performance. The RTX 3070 TiM's ray tracing capabilities, with 46 RT cores, will enable ray-traced effects at lower resolutions or reduced settings, but the 50th percentile standing suggests it is not a top-tier ray tracing performer.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over GPU-accelerated graphics. The 92nd percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, where the 24 cores and 32 threads shine. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680 indicate that tasks like compiling large codebases, rendering frames in Blender, or encoding videos will complete quickly. The single-core performance (5,355 in Cinebench R23) also makes it suitable for developers who need fast response times in interactive development environments or for running virtual machines with near-native performance.

For gamers, this build is best suited for those playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures high minimum FPS, and the GPU can deliver adequate frame rates. The 50th percentile GPU means it is not a 4K ultra powerhouse, so gamers targeting that resolution should look elsewhere. Students in computer science, engineering, or data science fields will benefit from the CPU's multi-threading for simulations and data processing, and the GPU can handle moderate graphics work. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or virtualization will find the CPU's 92nd percentile performance more than adequate, though the GPU is overkill for office tasks and could be downgraded for cost savings — but this pairing is what the data describes.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The Core i9-13900 sits at the 92nd percentile, while the RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads — such as compiling, data compression (PassMark score 577,285), or encryption (35,242) — the CPU will be the limiting factor only in the sense that it is the component doing the work, but it will perform at elite levels. In GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at 1440p or 4K, or 3D rendering with ray tracing — the GPU will be the bottleneck, capping performance at mid-range levels. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this compromise: the system is better than average overall, but not top-tier in graphics.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. At 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread scores will keep frame rates high, and the GPU's 50th percentile will deliver playable but not exceptional FPS. At 4K, the GPU's throughput limits become more pronounced, and the CPU's performance becomes less relevant, as the GPU's pixel rate (135.4 GPixel/s) and VRAM capacity (8 GB) are the binding constraints. For productivity tasks, the CPU is the clear workhorse, and the GPU's role is secondary — for video editing, the CPU handles encoding and processing, while the GPU assists with effects and previews, but the CPU's dominance means the system will excel in these scenarios. The locked multiplier on the CPU limits overclocking, but the boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high, so the bottleneck is not the CPU's speed but the GPU's compute capacity.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a solid figure for mid-range cards, though the VRAM capacity is modest by modern standards. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, with base and boost clocks of 915 MHz and 1410 MHz respectively. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration — a point that may affect certain compute workloads. The pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s.

The RTX 3070 TiM includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing ray tracing and AI acceleration capabilities. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The GPU has a TDP of 220 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU, and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The triple-slot cooler design suggests adequate thermal management, though the card's length of 270 mm and width of 55 mm may require a roomy case. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, which may affect availability. With no benchmark scores available, the 50th percentile ranking is the only performance indicator, placing it at the median of all GPUs — suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but not for high-end 4K or heavy ray tracing. The 8 GB VRAM is a potential limitation for future games with high texture requirements.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core strength (5,355 in Cinebench R23) ensures high FPS, and the GPU's 50th percentile performance can drive 144Hz monitors in esports titles. At 1440p, frame rates will be lower, but the combination is still viable for 60Hz gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores handle encoding and streaming overhead with ease, as seen in the PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680, freeing the GPU to focus on rendering. The GPU's 46 RT cores and tensor cores assist with NVENC encoding, though the lack of measured FPS makes exact performance uncertain.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 accelerates timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth aid in effects processing, but the CPU is the primary driver, and the system will handle 4K editing comfortably.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be fast, thanks to the multi-thread scores, but GPU-based rendering (e.g., in Blender Cycles) will be limited by the GPU's 50th percentile standing and 8 GB VRAM, which may struggle with large scenes.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with PassMark integer math at 176,107 indicating strong logic performance. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and light graphics work.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but its single-thread performance ensures snappy response. The GPU is unnecessary for such tasks, but the system will handle any student workload, including coding or data analysis, without breaking a sweat.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the interface is backward compatible. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a rarity for consumer CPUs and valuable for workstation builds. The 65 W TDP of the CPU, combined with the GPU's 220 W TDP, suggests a total system draw that is manageable with the suggested 550 W PSU, but there is headroom for upgrades. The multiplier is locked, so CPU overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom — the 92nd percentile CPU can easily drive a higher-end GPU without bottlenecking. Given the PCIe Gen 5 support, a newer GPU would be fully compatible, though the current PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not a limitation. The DDR5 memory support allows for high-bandwidth upgrades, and the dual-channel bus can be populated with faster kits. The platform's ECC support makes it suitable for error-sensitive workloads, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy applications. The socket 1700 is mature, and the TDP of 65 W means the CPU is power-efficient, leaving thermal headroom for a more powerful GPU. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests that a replacement may be wise, and the system's PSU headroom (550 W suggested) can accommodate a range of options, though specific wattage figures for alternatives are not in the data pack.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 37,931 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 45,680 in PassMark multi-thread, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported, but the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is based on the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 71, indicating above-average overall performance.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 46 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling ray-traced effects in compatible games.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a top-tier 24-core processor in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range Ampere card in the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 71 places this system above average, but the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The i9-13900 excels in productivity, content creation, and development workloads, while the RTX 3070 TiM provides competent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The system is best suited for users who need elite CPU power but only require moderate graphics capability, such as software developers, video editors, or researchers. Gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p will find it adequate, but those seeking 4K ultra gaming or heavy ray tracing will need a more powerful GPU. The build is balanced in the sense that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU will limit the system's overall graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds