SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake desktop flagship with a mid-range Ampere GPU that, while end-of-life, still targets 1080p and 1440p gaming. The data shows a stark contrast in performance tiers: the CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and component specifications.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is a capable but not exceptional choice. The CPU's single-core strength is substantial, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2604, which provides the headroom needed to drive high frame rates in less demanding titles. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM capacity suggest that at 1080p with high refresh rates, the graphics card will often be the limiting factor in modern, graphically intensive games, preventing the system from consistently reaching the highest refresh rates.

Streaming while gaming is a workload where this CPU excels. The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931, provide ample parallel processing power to handle both game rendering and video encoding without significant competition for resources. The Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 further reinforces this, indicating that the CPU can handle the simultaneous load of a game and streaming software, making it a strong foundation for a single-PC streaming setup, though the GPU's performance ceiling will still constrain in-game frame rates.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits significantly from the CPU's multi-core might. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15931 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 21164 show that timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks will be processed quickly. The GPU's 14.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 120 tensor cores can also accelerate effects and encoding, but the 6 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor for complex 4K projects with many layers and effects, potentially causing performance drops or forcing the use of proxy workflows.

For 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, the CPU is the primary workhorse, and its performance is impressive. A Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3823 and a Cinebench R23 score of 37931 place it in the top tier for CPU-based rendering, making it suitable for final-frame renders and simulations. The GPU can contribute to rendering via its CUDA cores, but its mid-range class means it will not drastically accelerate GPU-based renderers like OptiX or Cycles; the CPU is the clear star for this workload.

Software development involves compilation, which is heavily multi-threaded, and this CPU is well-suited for it. The Passmark integer math score of 176107 and the data compression score of 577285 indicate strong performance in tasks like code compilation and running test suites. The high thread count allows for parallel builds and faster iteration times, making this a productive environment for developers, though the GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for most development tasks outside of graphics programming.

For student and office work, this system is massively overqualified. The CPU's single-thread performance, as shown by the Passmark single-thread score of 4309, ensures snappy application loading and responsive spreadsheets, while the multi-core performance handles any occasional heavy multitasking, like running multiple virtual machines or large data analysis in Python. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for display output, and the system's power efficiency, with a 65W CPU TDP, means it will be quiet and cool for everyday tasks, making it a premium, future-proof choice for productivity.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is defined by a massive CPU advantage and a modest GPU presence. The Intel Core i9-13900 achieves an average benchmark score of 60676, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572, 0.2% faster), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104, 1% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099, 1% slower), showing it is competitive with high-end server and mobile HX parts. The GPU, however, has an average benchmark score of 0, a placeholder in the data, and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a perfectly average performance level.

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across different test suites. In Cinebench, it scores 3823 in R15 multi-core, 539 in R15 single-core, 15931 in R20 multi-core, 2249 in R20 single-core, 37931 in R23 multi-core, and 5355 in R23 single-core. These figures demonstrate a balanced architecture that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores of 21164 (multi-core) and 2604 (single-core) corroborate this, showing strong scaling across cores and high per-core efficiency.

The combined percentile for this build is 71, which is a weighted average reflecting the CPU's high standing and the GPU's mid-range position. This means the system as a whole is better than roughly 71% of all desktop configurations in the database, but it is held back from a higher ranking by the GPU. The absence of measured FPS data means we cannot provide specific in-game performance numbers, but the component scores allow for a clear estimation: the CPU will rarely be a bottleneck, while the GPU will set the performance ceiling for gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a combination of performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed to deliver high single-thread performance for everyday tasks and immense multi-threaded throughput for content creation and heavy computational work.

The benchmark results confirm this design intent. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 is particularly telling, placing the CPU among the fastest consumer desktop processors. This score translates to significantly reduced render times in video editing and 3D modeling software compared to lower-core-count parts. The single-core score of 5355 is equally important, ensuring that tasks like web browsing, office applications, and gaming logic remain highly responsive, as these workloads often rely on one or two fast cores.

The Passmark results offer further granularity. The floating-point math score of 120492 and the integer math score of 176107 indicate robust performance in scientific computing, financial modeling, and data analysis. The data encryption score of 35242 and extended instructions score of 32760 show strong capability in security-related tasks and vectorized workloads, respectively. The find prime numbers score of 186 is a lower score, reflective of a workload that is less optimized for the architecture, but it does not detract from the overall picture of a top-tier CPU. The 65W TDP, while lower than many high-end chips, does not appear to hamper its benchmark performance, suggesting efficient power delivery and thermal management.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60676.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The data shows it is 0.2% slower than the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T and 1% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, and 1.1% faster than the Intel Core i9-14900F.

Q: What are the key specifications of the CPU?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, a base clock of 2000 MHz, a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, a 36 MB shared L3 cache, and a 65W TDP. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The GPU is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it performs at the median level. It has an average benchmark score of 0 in the data pack.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All FPS-related discussion is estimated from the component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 71, meaning it is estimated to outperform 71% of other configurations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes the UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for display output or as a fallback if the discrete GPU is not present or is malfunctioning.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. With a 92nd percentile CPU and a 50th percentile GPU, the graphics card is the clear bottleneck for any workload that relies on GPU processing, particularly gaming. The CPU's immense multi-core and single-core power means it can easily feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them, especially at lower resolutions like 1080p. In this scenario, the GPU will be running at 100% utilization while the CPU sits at a lower usage, limiting the maximum achievable frame rate.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the GPU is largely idle, and the CPU becomes the limiting factor. Here, the system's performance is dictated entirely by the i9-13900's ability to process data, which is exceptional. The high Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 ensure that these tasks are completed as quickly as the CPU allows.

For a balanced gaming experience, the data suggests that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary constraint, potentially limiting frame rates in demanding titles. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU's workload increases, but its 6 GB VRAM and 50th percentile performance will likely still be the limiting factor, as it may struggle to maintain playable frame rates with high detail settings. The CPU's performance is so far ahead that it is unlikely to be a bottleneck in any gaming scenario, making a future GPU upgrade the most logical step to improve gaming performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, offering flexibility in choosing cost-effective or higher-performance RAM, with a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for the latest storage devices and graphics cards. The included UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback for troubleshooting or basic tasks.

The power supply requirement is a key consideration. The GPU has a TDP of 185 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This leaves significant headroom for a future GPU upgrade. The power connectors on the GPU are a 1x 12-pin, which may require an adapter for older power supplies, but the 450 W suggestion indicates a standard, mid-range PSU will suffice for the current configuration.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing means it will remain relevant for years, capable of driving much more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would improve gaming performance and enable higher resolutions and refresh rates. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which could be a consideration for workstation use, though it requires a motherboard and memory that support this feature. The platform itself, being on Socket 1700, has a defined upgrade path within its generation, but a future platform change would also be a viable option given the CPU's current high performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP is an Ampere architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process. It features 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1627 MHz with a boost clock of 1852 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU's performance is defined by its 50th percentile ranking. Its FP32 performance of 14.22 TFLOPS is respectable for its class, and the 120 tensor cores enable features like DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games. The 30 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though its performance in this area will be limited compared to higher-tier cards. The 6 GB VRAM, while sufficient for 1080p gaming at high settings, is a potential limitation for 1440p or for games with high-resolution textures, where it may run out of memory and cause stuttering.

The pixel rate of 88.90 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.2 GTexel/s are consistent with its mid-range positioning. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles. As an end-of-life product, it is a mature and stable platform, but it lacks the raw power or VRAM capacity of newer or higher-tier GPUs. For rendering workloads, its CUDA cores can accelerate certain tasks, but its 50th percentile performance means it is a secondary accelerator rather than a primary renderer when paired with such a powerful CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier, high-core-count CPU with a mid-range, end-of-life GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, is a flagship processor designed for maximum multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its 92nd percentile ranking and high Cinebench scores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP is an average-performing GPU, sitting at the 50th percentile, with 6 GB of VRAM and 14.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The overall tier of this build, as indicated by the combined percentile of 71, is above average, but it is a system with a distinct imbalance. It is a high-end workstation CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, but it is not a high-end gaming rig. The GPU is capable of delivering playable frame rates at 1080p and some 1440p titles, but it will not deliver the high refresh rates or ultra-high settings that the CPU is capable of supporting.

This pairing is logical for a content creator who needs massive CPU power for rendering and occasional gaming, but less so for a gamer who spends most of their time in graphically demanding titles. The system's class is clearly a desktop workstation with gaming capabilities, where the CPU is the primary investment and the GPU is a secondary component that can be upgraded later without needing to change the core platform.

Who Should Build It

The primary target for this build is a content creator, specifically video editors and 3D artists who work with large projects. The CPU's 37931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 21164 Geekbench multi-core score will drastically reduce render and export times, while the GPU's CUDA cores can provide some acceleration for effects and encoding. The 6 GB VRAM may require using proxy workflows for 4K projects, but the CPU's power makes it a compelling workstation.

Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases, will also benefit significantly. The high thread count and strong Passmark integer math score of 176107 make compilation and testing much faster, improving productivity. The system's 65W CPU TDP also means it can run in quieter, cooler workstations without compromising on performance, making it suitable for long development sessions.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those who play at 1080p and prioritize high frame rates in esports or less demanding titles. The CPU's single-core performance of 5355 in Cinebench R23 ensures a responsive experience, but the GPU's 50th percentile performance will limit maximum settings in AAA games. It is a solid foundation for a gaming PC where the user plans to upgrade the GPU in the future, as the CPU will not be a bottleneck for years to come.

Students and professionals in office environments will find this system to be exceptionally fast and future-proof. The CPU's single-thread score of 4309 in Passmark ensures every application feels instantaneous, and the multi-core performance handles any occasional heavy multitasking with ease. The integrated graphics provide a reliable backup, and the overall system is powerful enough to handle any productivity software without issue, making it an overkill but enjoyable investment for general use and small business workstations.