SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 pairs a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake architecture with a 65 W TDP, a configuration that delivers exceptional multi-threaded throughput via its hybrid core layout. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth to the table, making this combination a high-end desktop solution. Benchmark data places the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 55th percentile, a disparity that heavily influences workload distribution and overall system balance.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900 is a Raptor Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It houses 24 cores (8 performance and 16 efficiency) and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache, which provides ample fast storage for active data. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus and includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, though discrete GPU pairing is the intended use case here.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU shows dominant multi-core strength. It scores 37,931 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 15,931 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, while single-core performance is equally robust at 5,355 and 2,249 in the respective tests. Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 21,164 and a single-core score of 2,604. The PassMark suite reveals workload-specific strengths: integer math scores 176,107, floating-point math hits 120,492, and data compression reaches 577,285. The multi-thread score of 45,680 and single-thread score of 4,309 confirm that the CPU handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks with ease. The average benchmark score of 60,676 places it at the 92nd percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900 leads by slim margins. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, 1% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F. These small deltas suggest that in heavily threaded workloads, the i9-13900 is effectively on par with these alternatives, but its higher single-core boost clock may give it an edge in tasks that depend on raw per-core speed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this build is 74, but the CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 55th creates a pronounced performance gap. The data indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding data far faster than the GPU can process it in most scenarios. Consequently, the Radeon RX 9070 XT is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, where its lower relative standing limits frame rates and compute throughput.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, compilation, or spreadsheet calculations, the i9-13900's high percentile means it will rarely be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 2,484 and data encryption score of 35,242 highlight the CPU's ability to handle complex calculations, but these workloads are less likely to stress the GPU. The balance issue is most evident in gaming: the CPU's single-thread score of 4,309 ensures high minimum frame rates, but the GPU's 55th percentile position caps maximum FPS, particularly at 1440p and 4K resolutions where the GPU workload increases. This is not a catastrophic imbalance, but it means the system is optimized for CPU-heavy productivity tasks rather than pure gaming throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-core performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,355, which ensures that even the most demanding game engines can run at high frame rates. However, the GPU's 55th percentile ranking means that at 1080p with low settings, the system may still be CPU-bound, but at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU will dominate the load. Expect smooth gameplay at high refresh rates in esports titles, but AAA games at maximum settings may not consistently hit 240 FPS.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CPU's multi-thread score of 45,680 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 indicate that software encoding (x264) will not significantly impact gaming performance. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its RDNA 4.0 architecture, though its compute capabilities are comparatively lower at a 55th percentile, so CPU-based streaming is the safer choice for quality.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both components. The CPU's high multi-core score accelerates timeline scrubbing and export rendering, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth handle effects and color grading. However, the GPU's 55th percentile suggests that GPU-accelerated effects may not be as fast as those on higher-tier cards, so complex projects with heavy effects could see longer render times.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a PassMark floating-point math score of 120,492 and extended instructions score of 32,760, which translate to fast ray tracing calculations and physics simulations. The GPU's 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides decent rasterization, but its 64 RT cores are less robust than competitors, so GPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) will be slower than CPU-based rendering for final frames.

Software Development: The CPU's high thread count and single-core speed make it ideal for compilation, with the PassMark integer math score of 176,107 indicating rapid code execution. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so the system's overall performance is dictated by the CPU's 92nd percentile, ensuring quick build times for large codebases.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4,309 ensures snappy application launches and browser responsiveness. The GPU's 55th percentile does not hinder office software, which relies on the CPU's 2,484 physics score and 43.9 GB/s memory bandwidth (implied by DDR4/DDR5 support). The system will handle spreadsheets, documents, and video conferencing without breaking a sweat.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over GPU-bound tasks. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU's 92nd percentile standing, as export times and physics simulations will be fast. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads, which reduce build times significantly. For gamers, this system is best suited for those playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, where the CPU can maintain high minimum FPS, but it is not ideal for 4K ultra gaming due to the GPU's 55th percentile. Small business workstations running virtualization or database applications will find the CPU's multi-thread score of 45,680 and data compression score of 577,285 highly beneficial. Students in engineering or data science fields will have ample compute power for simulations and data analysis, though the GPU may be underutilized in these tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,676, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572 (0.2% slower), the Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60,104 (1% slower), the Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60,099 (1% slower), and the Core i9-14900F scores 60,008 (1.1% slower). These results show the i9-13900 is at the top of its class, though the margins are small enough that real-world differences will be minimal.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 13,543, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are significantly older or lower-tier parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7770M scores 13,536 (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 scores 13,515 (0.2% slower), the NVIDIA P106-090 scores 13,470 (0.5% slower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 scores 13,407 (1% slower). This is a surprising result, as the RX 9070 XT is a modern part, but the benchmark data shows its average score is comparable to much older GPUs, indicating that its performance is not as strong as its architecture might suggest. The combined percentile of 74 reflects the CPU's dominance, but the GPU's lower standing drags down the overall system score.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the GPU's relative percentile. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,309 ensures high CPU-bound frame rates, but the GPU's 55th percentile position means that at 1080p ultra, the system may achieve around 100-140 FPS in modern AAA titles, based on typical GPU scaling from similar benchmark scores. At 1440p ultra, expect 70-100 FPS, and at 4K ultra, 40-60 FPS. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, could see 200+ FPS, but the GPU will cap performance in graphically intensive scenes. These figures are estimates and should be treated as such, as the lack of measured data prevents precise confirmation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between older, cheaper DDR4 or newer, faster DDR5. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low for a 24-core part, but the GPU's 304 W TDP requires a robust power supply; the suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides adequate headroom for the entire system. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design, fitting most standard cases. For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, so replacing the RX 9070 XT with a higher-percentile card would improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU has little headroom for overclocking since the multiplier is locked, but its stock performance is already near the top of the database. The platform itself is mature, so the next logical step would be a full platform upgrade rather than a CPU swap.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i9-13900 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 XT has a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, using 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Core i9-14900F?

A: The i9-13900 has an average benchmark score of 60,676, which is 1.1% higher than the i9-14900F's score of 60,008.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The GPU is built on a 4 nm process with 53,900 million transistors, yielding a die size of 357 mm².

Q: Is the CPU's boost clock sufficient for gaming?

A: The 5.60 GHz boost clock, combined with a single-thread score of 4,309, ensures high performance in gaming workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU delivers 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is suitable for rasterization but not top-tier for compute-heavy tasks.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is based on the Navi 48 chip, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 53,900 million transistors and a die size of 357 mm². It features 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, with 64 RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU's base clock is 1660 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2970 MHz, while memory runs at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K texture loads.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 7,260 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 17,428 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 65,879 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 26,795 and a GPU compute score of 15,864. However, the average benchmark score of 13,543 places it at the 55th percentile, which is surprisingly low for a modern card. The nearest rivals include the HD 7770M (0.1% slower), GTX 570 (0.2% slower), P106-090 (0.5% slower), and Radeon Pro 555 (1% slower), all of which are much older parts. This suggests the RX 9070 XT's real-world performance may not match its architectural promise, possibly due to driver issues or benchmark weighting. For rendering, the 64 RT cores and 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 provide decent performance, but the 55th percentile indicates that it will lag behind higher-tier GPUs in compute-heavy tasks. The GPU's 380.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 760.3 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable, but the overall package is held back by its lower-than-expected benchmark standing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds