SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 7400: A Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake desktop flagship with AMD's entry-level Radeon RX 7400, creating a system where the CPU's 92nd percentile performance dwarfs the GPU's 17th percentile standing. Benchmark data shows a dramatic imbalance: the Core i9-13900 scores 37,931 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the RX 7400 manages only 1,103 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The combined percentile sits at 55, placing this desktop build squarely in the middle of all tracked configurations, though for entirely different reasons than most mid-range systems.

FAQ

Q: Is the Core i9-13900 a good match for the RX 7400?

A: Benchmark percentiles indicate a severe mismatch. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 17th percentile of all graphics cards. The data shows the CPU is capable of far more graphics work than this GPU can feed or render, making the RX 7400 the definitive bottleneck in nearly all graphics-intensive tasks.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i9-13900's average benchmark score of 60,676 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60,572), 1% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60,104) and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60,099), and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F (60,008). These are marginal differences, placing the i9-13900 at the top of a tightly clustered group.

Q: What are the RX 7400's closest competitors according to the data?

A: The RX 7400's average benchmark score of 2,467 is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8040S (2,440), 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2,433), 1.8% ahead of the Intel HD Graphics 610 (2,425), and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2,422). These rivals are all integrated or very low-end discrete parts.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics that could be used instead?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13900 includes UHD Graphics 770. However, the RX 7400's PassMark G3D score of 11,897 is dramatically higher than what any integrated solution in this comparison achieves, so the discrete GPU remains the better choice for any graphics workload despite its low percentile ranking.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Core i9-13900 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation use cases. The memory bandwidth is not specified in the benchmark data.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The Core i9-13900 ships with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the locked multiplier means users cannot adjust the ratio beyond factory settings. The 65 W TDP reflects a power-constrained design compared to unlocked variants.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing of this configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is profoundly lopsided, and the bottleneck direction is unambiguous. The Core i9-13900 achieves a 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,676. The RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 2,467. The gap between these percentile positions — 75 points — is among the largest possible in any pairing.

In CPU-bound workloads, the system performs at an elite level. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164 place this processor in contention with server-class Xeon parts. PassMark multi-thread performance of 45,680 and integer math of 176,107 indicate tremendous compute throughput. For tasks that stress the processor — compilation, rendering, scientific computing — the RX 7400 is essentially irrelevant, as it only handles display output.

In GPU-bound workloads, the situation reverses entirely. The RX 7400's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897 are entry-level numbers. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for basic gaming at modest settings but will saturate quickly at higher resolutions or with demanding effects. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish each frame, making the RX 7400 the sole performance limiter in gaming and real-time graphics.

The FPS scaling picture, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured data, reinforces this imbalance. At 1080p, the CPU can deliver far more frames than the GPU can render, so the RX 7400 caps performance. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's workload increases further, and the already-limited RX 7400 becomes even more restrictive. The Core i9-13900's single-thread score of 5,355 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 ensure that no game logic or physics calculation will ever be the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7400 cannot support high-refresh gaming at any modern resolution. Its 17th percentile GPU ranking and 1,103 Steel Nomad score indicate that even 1080p at high refresh rates is out of reach for demanding titles. The CPU is more than capable — its 92nd percentile ranking and 5,355 Cinebench R23 single-core score would support 144 Hz or higher in many games — but the GPU will hold frame rates far below that threshold.

Streaming: The Core i9-13900's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 577,285 and encryption score of 35,242 suggest strong throughput for stream encoding workloads. However, the RX 7400's limited GPU performance means the game being streamed will run at low quality settings, making this a poor streaming setup despite the CPU's capabilities.

Video editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks like rendering and exporting, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and PassMark floating point math of 120,492. The GPU, however, handles effects, transitions, and real-time previews, and its 17th percentile performance will cause sluggish timeline scrubbing and slow effect rendering. For proxy-based workflows that lean heavily on CPU, this system works; for GPU-accelerated editing, it falters.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will perform exceptionally well. The 37,931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 21,164 Geekbench multi-core score place this processor among the top tier for ray tracing on the CPU. GPU-based renderers, however, will be severely constrained by the RX 7400's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 5,152 PassMark GPU compute score, which are low for rendering tasks.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for the Core i9-13900. Compilation and linking are highly multi-threaded, and the CPU's 45,680 PassMark multi-thread score and 176,107 integer math score indicate rapid build times. The GPU's performance is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this pairing surprisingly practical for programmers who do not game.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for these workloads, but it will handle them effortlessly. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures snappy response in productivity applications, and the RX 7400 provides sufficient acceleration for office graphics, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP and 43 W GPU TDP keep power consumption modest, though the system is far more expensive than needed for these tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Based on the RX 7400's 17th percentile GPU ranking, 1,103 3DMark Steel Nomad score, and 11,897 PassMark G3D score, this GPU is positioned at the entry level of discrete graphics. At 1080p with ultra settings, estimated frame rates in modern AAA titles would likely fall below 30 FPS, and in esports titles, the GPU would struggle to maintain 60 FPS at high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures but will limit performance in newer titles that demand more memory.

The Core i9-13900's performance is not a limiting factor in any gaming scenario. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,355 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 place it among the fastest gaming CPUs available. The bottleneck is entirely the GPU. At 1440p, estimated frame rates would drop further, and at 4K, the RX 7400 would deliver results that are playable only in undemanding or older titles.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 is particularly telling, as this benchmark targets modern DX12 workloads. Compared to the GPU's nearest rivals — the Radeon 8040S, GeForce 710M, HD Graphics 610, and GT 710M — the RX 7400 is only 1-2% faster, placing it in the same performance class as integrated graphics from nearly a decade ago. Gaming performance will be correspondingly modest.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a narrow set of users. The Core i9-13900 is a 92nd percentile desktop processor suited for heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the RX 7400 is a 17th percentile GPU suited for basic display output and light gaming. The combination makes sense for developers, researchers, or small businesses that need maximum CPU compute but have no graphics requirements beyond standard desktop use.

Gamers should avoid this build. The RX 7400's performance class — within 2% of the GeForce 710M and HD Graphics 610 — cannot deliver playable frame rates in modern titles at any resolution above low settings. Gamers targeting 1080p at 60 FPS would need a substantially stronger GPU to match the CPU's capabilities.

Content creators face a split decision. Video editors and 3D artists who rely on CPU rendering will benefit from the i9-13900's 37,931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 120,492 PassMark floating point math. Those who use GPU-accelerated renderers or effects will be severely limited by the RX 7400's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 5,152 GPU compute score.

Students and office workers will find the system functional but wasteful. The CPU provides far more performance than these workloads require, and the GPU is adequate for basic tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP and 43 W GPU TDP keep the system efficient, but the launch MSRP of $549 for the CPU alone makes this an expensive choice for such workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The GPU features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in memory-intensive workloads, particularly at higher resolutions.

Clock speeds are set at a 1452 MHz base, 2200 MHz game clock, and 2300 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 16.49 TFLOPS for FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with 28 RT cores providing hardware ray tracing support.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 places the GPU in the 17th percentile of all graphics cards. PassMark scores show 11,897 for G3D, 5,152 for GPU compute, and very low DirectX scores — 59 for DX10, 97 for DX11, 44 for DX12, and 176 for DX9. The G2D score of 1,209 is comparatively stronger, indicating the GPU handles 2D desktop acceleration reasonably well.

The power draw is minimal at 43 W TDP, requiring only a single 6-pin power connector and a 200 W suggested PSU. The dual-slot cooler and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are sufficient for this power level. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900 delivers elite-level CPU benchmark scores across every test. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 3,823 in R15 multi-core, 539 in R15 single-core, 15,931 in R20 multi-core, 2,249 in R20 single-core, 37,931 in R23 multi-core, and 5,355 in R23 single-core. Geekbench results show 21,164 multi-core and 2,604 single-core. PassMark tests are consistently strong: data compression at 577,285, data encryption at 35,242, extended instructions at 32,760, find prime numbers at 186, floating point math at 120,492, integer math at 176,107, multi-thread at 45,680, physics at 2,484, random string sorting at 64,396, and single-thread at 4,309.

These scores place the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all processors. The average benchmark score of 60,676 edges out the nearest rivals by narrow margins: 0.2% over the Xeon Gold 6338T, 1% over both the Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX, and 1.1% over the Core i9-14900F.

The RX 7400's benchmark results are dramatically lower. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897 place the GPU in the 17th percentile. The average benchmark score of 2,467 is just 1.1% above the Radeon 8040S, 1.4% above the GeForce 710M, 1.8% above the HD Graphics 610, and 1.9% above the GT 710M.

The combined system percentile of 55 reflects the midpoint between these extremes. The CPU's elite performance is dragged down by the GPU's entry-level results, producing a system that is neither a high-end gaming rig nor a balanced workstation.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The combination produces a system percentile of 55, placing it in the middle of all tracked configurations, though the individual components sit at opposite ends of the performance spectrum.

The Core i9-13900 is a desktop-class processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $549. The RX 7400 is a desktop-class GPU released on August 7, 2025. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 17th percentile ranking create an unusual system profile: exceptional compute performance paired with minimal graphics capability.

This is not a balanced build. The data shows the CPU outperforms the GPU by a margin of roughly 75 percentile points. Systems in the 55th combined percentile typically feature components with more similar relative performance. For users who need the CPU's multi-threaded power and have no graphics demands, this pairing is functional. For anyone expecting gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the RX 7400 will be a severe limitation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 features 24 cores and 32 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700. The base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark scores demonstrate why this CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and Geekbench multi-core of 21,164 show exceptional parallel performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680 and integer math of 176,107 further confirm this. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core of 5,355 and PassMark single-thread of 4,309.

The nearest rival comparisons show how tightly clustered the top-tier CPUs are. The i9-13900 leads the Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.2%, the Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX by 1%, and the Core i9-14900F by 1.1%. These differences are within noise for most workloads, but the i9-13900's combination of high multi-thread scores and strong single-thread performance makes it a versatile choice for CPU-bound tasks.

For real workloads, the data indicates the i9-13900 excels at compilation, rendering, scientific computing, and any multi-threaded application. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power management. The locked multiplier means users cannot push beyond the 5.60 GHz boost, but the stock performance is already at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy.