SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT pairing is a high-tier desktop combination, landing in the 90th percentile overall. The CPU, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, with 16 GB of VRAM and a 256-bit memory bus, provides substantial rasterization power. However, the data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions here are estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the components, not from direct testing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits in the 90th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900 has an average benchmark score of 60676, placing it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T and 1% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RX 6950 XT holds an 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58392, placing it marginally ahead of the Intel Arc A570M by 0.3% and slightly behind the NVIDIA P102-100 by -0.2%.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900 supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after for workstation builds that require high data integrity.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has a suggested PSU requirement of 700 W to ensure stable operation, particularly under peak loads.

Q: What is the process node for the GPU?

A: The RX 6950 XT is built on TSMC's 7 nm process node, which is a significant factor in its power efficiency and transistor density of 51.5M / mm².

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the Core i9-13900's clock speeds are fixed to its specified base and boost frequencies.

Gaming Performance

Since there are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT combination, the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The data is not measured, so these figures should be treated as projections rather than empirical results.

The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2604 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355, suggests it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. This is critical for high-refresh-rate gaming where frame pacing depends on the CPU's ability to feed the GPU.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28070 and its 88th percentile ranking indicate strong rasterization performance. At 1440p and 4K resolutions, this combination should deliver high frame rates in most titles, as the workload shifts from the CPU to the GPU. The RX 6950 XT's 16 GB of VRAM provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures, reducing the likelihood of memory-related stuttering in modern games.

However, the lack of measured data means the exact scaling between 1080p and 4K cannot be quantified here. Given the CPU's high multi-thread score of 37931 in Cinebench R23, the system should maintain consistent performance even in CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or simulators. For esports titles at 1080p, the combination of a strong single-core CPU and a high-bandwidth GPU suggests the potential for very high frame rates, though the exact numbers remain estimates.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability, posting a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 21164. Its single-thread performance is equally robust, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4309. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60676 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with the nearest rival being the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at a 0.2% delta.

On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 6950 XT achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 and a PassMark G3D score of 28070. Its average benchmark score of 58392 secures an 88th percentile position, with the NVIDIA P102-100 being the closest competitor at a -0.2% delta. The GPU also shows strong compute performance with a PassMark GPU compute score of 14199.

Combined, these scores paint a picture of a balanced high-end system. The CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile combine to a 90th percentile overall build, indicating that neither component is drastically underpowered relative to the other. The CPU's data encryption score of 35242 and floating point math score of 120492 suggest it can handle complex calculations, while the GPU's texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s ensures it can process detailed scenes without becoming a bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a well-balanced pairing, though the CPU holds a slight edge in relative performance. The i9-13900's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 88th percentile suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI-driven NPC logic, the processor will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 2484 reinforces this, showing strong computational throughput.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution rendering or heavy post-processing effects, the RX 6950 XT will likely be the constraint. The GPU's pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS are substantial, but the CPU's superior percentile ranking implies it has more headroom to spare. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU might be underutilized, potentially leading to a GPU bottleneck, whereas at 4K, the balance shifts toward the GPU as the primary limiter.

The memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s on the GPU is generous, which helps mitigate bottlenecks in texture-heavy workloads. The CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel bus, allows for flexible system memory configurations, though the bandwidth itself is not specified in the data. Overall, the bottleneck analysis suggests that users will see the GPU max out first in most graphically intensive tasks, while the CPU remains the stronger component for multi-threaded productivity.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 21 chip on a 7 nm TSMC process. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1860 MHz, a game clock of 2100 MHz, and a boost clock of 2310 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

The GPU includes 80 RT cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure broad API coverage. The shading units number 5120, with 320 TMUs and 128 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is rated at 23.65 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1).

In benchmark terms, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4235 and PassMark G3D score of 28070 indicate strong directX 12 and general 3D rendering performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998 shows robust compute capability, while the Vulkan score of 165212 suggests good cross-platform performance. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking, with a -0.2% delta to the NVIDIA P102-100, places it in a competitive position, though it trails the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by -0.5%.

The GPU's TDP is 335 W, requiring a 700 W power supply and two 8-pin power connectors. Its triple-slot width and dimensions of 267 mm in length make it a substantial card that needs adequate case clearance. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and two DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern high-refresh-rate monitors.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions, where the RX 6950 XT's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth can handle demanding textures and effects. The CPU's strong single-core performance, as shown by its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 539, ensures smooth frame pacing in fast-paced titles.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded prowess, evident in its PassMark multithread score of 45680 and data compression score of 577285. Video editors and 3D modelers can leverage the 24 cores for faster rendering times, while the GPU's compute scores, such as the Geekbench Metal score of 222653, assist in GPU-accelerated workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 176107 and extended instructions score of 32760. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. For students and small business workstations, this combination provides a versatile platform capable of handling everything from office productivity to moderate scientific computing, though the power requirements and physical size may be overkill for basic tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is specific to Intel's 12th and 13th generation processors. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel bus means users must choose one type. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe SSDs or future GPUs, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, and the CPU's TDP is 65 W, leaving significant headroom for additional components. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer generation GPU, as the RX 6950 XT is marked as end-of-life, but this would require checking PSU capacity if the new card draws more power. Alternatively, users could add more system memory or high-speed NVMe storage to leverage the PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The CPU's production status is active, meaning it remains available for purchase, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting future availability may become limited. The platform's longevity is tied to the LGA 1700 socket, which may not support future Intel generations, so users planning long-term upgrades should consider this a final-stop platform for the CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is a high-end RDNA 2.0 card with 16 GB of VRAM.

The build ranks in the 90th percentile overall, with the CPU at 92nd and the GPU at 88th percentile. This places it in the upper echelon of desktop systems, suitable for demanding applications. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60676 and the GPU's 58392 combine to a formidable pair, though the lack of measured FPS data means real-world gaming performance is inferred, not confirmed.

The CPU's TDP of 65 W is notably low for its core count, thanks to the 10 nm Intel process, while the GPU's 335 W TDP is substantial. The GPU's launch MSRP is 1,099 USD, and the CPU's is 549 USD, though current market prices are not reflected in the data. This build is a high-end desktop configuration aimed at users who need both strong single-thread responsiveness and massive multi-thread throughput.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for error correction. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for CPU-attached devices and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is efficient for the core count.

In benchmarks, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and a PassMark multithread score of 45680. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21164 confirms its strength in parallel workloads. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4309.

The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking, with a 1.1% lead over the Intel Core i9-14900F, shows it is a top-tier processor. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, is only 0.2% behind, indicating a tight competition at the high end. The CPU's data encryption score of 35242 and find prime numbers score of 186 suggest it is capable in security and mathematical workloads, though the latter is relatively low, indicating a potential area where the CPU may not lead.