SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900 a high-end desktop processor?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13900 sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,676. It is within 0.2% of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T and 1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX, placing it firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Core i9-13900?

A: The Core i9-13900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S) built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core.

Q: What is the memory and expansion support on the Core i9-13900?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Q: How does the Radeon RX 6800 XT compare to its nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks?

A: The RX 6800 XT holds the 85th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48,477. It is 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, but trails the Intel Arc A550M by 2.5%, the RTX 5070 Ti by 3%, and the Radeon RX Vega 64 by 3%.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The GPU comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs, with 72 ray tracing cores.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct game testing.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pairing is 89, reflecting a very strong overall performance tier for a desktop system.

# Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rates discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Radeon RX 6800 XT's PassMark G3D score of 24,980 and its 85th percentile GPU ranking indicate it is a high-end graphics card, while the Core i9-13900's 92nd percentile CPU ranking ensures the processor will not be a limiting factor in most gaming workloads.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the RX 6800 XT's raw compute throughput of 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest frame rates well above 100 FPS in most modern titles, assuming the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough. The i9-13900's strong single-thread performance — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,355 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 — indicates it can handle high-refresh gaming at this resolution, where CPU-bound scenarios like physics and draw calls can become bottlenecks. The combination of these scores points to an estimated 120–170 FPS in competitive shooters and 90–130 FPS in demanding AAA titles at 1080p ultra.

Moving to 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes more heavily stressed relative to the CPU. The RX 6800 XT's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 648.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample headroom for higher resolutions, but the performance scaling from 1080p to 1440p typically results in a 20–30% drop in frame rates across comparable GPUs. Based on its benchmark position, estimated frame rates at 1440p ultra would range from 80–110 FPS in AAA games and 100–140 FPS in lighter esports titles. The i9-13900's 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame pacing in open-world games that rely on large data sets.

At 4K ultra, the RX 6800 XT's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a significant asset, as it avoids capacity-related stutters in heavy textures. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking suggests it is positioned to deliver 50–80 FPS in most AAA titles at 4K ultra, with less demanding games reaching 90+ FPS. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, but the i9-13900's 24 cores and 32 threads ensure background tasks and streaming overhead do not interfere with frame delivery. The estimated figures place this pairing as a strong 1440p high-refresh and capable 4K gaming system, though not a top-tier 4K high-refresh contender — that would require a GPU closer to the 97th percentile.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5600 MHz, with a 65 W TDP that undersells its actual power draw under full load. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the high thread counts and data-intensive workloads.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 places it in the top 8% of all CPUs (92nd percentile), with the average benchmark score of 60,676 confirming its position within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,931 and R15 multi-core score of 3,823 reinforce this strength. For single-thread performance, the Cinebench R23 score of 5,355 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,604 are competitive with the best desktop CPUs, though not class-leading.

Real-world workload analysis from the PassMark suite shows specific strengths: the data compression score of 577,285 is exceptional, indicating strong integer throughput for archiving and compression tasks. The data encryption score of 35,242 and extended instructions score of 32,760 suggest solid cryptographic and SIMD performance. The floating point math score of 120,492 and integer math score of 176,107 are both high, supporting scientific computing and financial modeling. The multi-thread score of 45,680 and physics score of 2,484 highlight the CPU's ability to handle simulation and physics workloads, while the single-thread score of 4,309 ensures responsiveness in lightly threaded applications.

The i9-13900's 24 cores are split between performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact distribution. The 32 threads indicate Hyper-Threading is enabled, which benefits heavily parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering. The CPU also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, which provides a fallback display output and can handle basic GPU tasks without a discrete card. The ECC memory support is notable for workstation reliability, though it requires compatible motherboard and memory modules.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i9-13900's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,355, PassMark single-thread 4,309) combined with the RX 6800 XT's 85th percentile GPU ranking delivers estimated 130–170 FPS at 1080p ultra in competitive titles. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency in game logic, and the GPU's 16 GB memory prevents texture-related frame drops.

Streaming: The 24-core/32-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680 indicates the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining game performance, though the RX 6800 XT's lack of a dedicated encoder would rely on CPU or GPU compute-based encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and PassMark floating point score of 120,492 make this pairing strong for 4K video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 41.47 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate effects and color grading, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large timelines without spills.

3D rendering: The CPU's 32 threads and the GPU's 72 ray tracing cores create a balanced rendering workstation. The Cinebench scores (R23 multi 37,931) indicate strong CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,689 supports GPU-accelerated renderers. This pairing is suitable for Blender and Octane workloads.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 176,107 and data compression score of 577,285 speed up compilation and code analysis. The multi-thread performance allows parallel build systems to utilize all 32 threads, while the single-thread score ensures IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity. The i9-13900's 92nd percentile ranking and RX 6800 XT's 85th percentile are far beyond the requirements for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The system would excel in engineering and data science coursework but is excessive for general academic use.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900 achieves an average benchmark score of 60,676, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60,104 (1% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60,099 (1% behind). The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008 (1.1% behind), showing that this 13th Gen processor is within 1% of its 14th Gen successor. Key individual scores include Geekbench multi-core 21,164, Cinebench R23 multi-core 37,931, and PassMark multi-thread 45,680.

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 48,477, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show mixed results: the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47,743 (1.5% behind), while the Intel Arc A550M scores 49,737 (2.5% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti scores 49,957 (3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50,001 (3% ahead). The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24,980, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,689, and Geekbench OpenCL score of 171,304 demonstrate strong compute capabilities.

The combined picture shows a desktop system at the 89th percentile overall. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group (92nd vs. 85th percentile), meaning the GPU is slightly closer to the middle of its own distribution. This creates a system where the CPU has more headroom for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck, while the GPU is already a high-end part. The balanced nature is evident from the score deltas: the CPU leads its rivals by 0.2–1.1%, while the GPU trails its top rivals by 2.5–3%, suggesting the GPU is the limiting factor in peak gaming performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the RX 6800 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU is fully compatible with the available lanes. ECC memory support adds a workstation-grade reliability option, though most consumer boards will use non-ECC DDR4 or DDR5.

The RX 6800 XT has a TDP of 300 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W. The i9-13900 has a 65 W TDP, though real-world power draw for the CPU can be higher under multi-threaded loads. The combined system power demand is well within the 700 W suggested PSU, leaving headroom for overclocking or additional drives and peripherals. The GPU uses 2x 8-pin power connectors and is dual-slot wide, measuring 267 mm in length, so it fits in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the user's priorities. For pure gaming, replacing the RX 6800 XT with a GPU in the 95th+ percentile (based on the benchmark distribution) would eliminate the 3% gap to the top rivals listed and push the system closer to the combined 95th percentile. For CPU upgrades, the i9-13900 is already within 1% of the i9-14900F, so upgrading to a 14th Gen CPU would yield minimal gains — the better move would be a motherboard and chipset change to a platform with more PCIe lanes or newer memory support, though the fact pack does not specify such options.

The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, meaning the GPU is more likely to be replaced first. The successor to the RX 6800 XT is Navi III (RX 7000 series), which would offer higher performance per watt, but the fact pack does not provide specific benchmark comparisons. The i9-13900's socket and memory support will eventually be superseded, but for now, the platform has headroom for one more GPU generation before a full rebuild becomes necessary.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows an asymmetric balance: the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 85th percentile. This 7-percentage-point gap indicates the GPU is the limiting component in most gaming workloads, especially at higher resolutions where the graphics card's compute and memory bandwidth determine frame rates. The RX 6800 XT's 3% deficit to the RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64 in average benchmark score supports this conclusion — the GPU is slightly behind the top of its class.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings or simulation-heavy games with many AI agents, the i9-13900's 92nd percentile ranking ensures it can feed the GPU without being the bottleneck. The single-thread benchmarks (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,355, PassMark single-thread 4,309) are strong enough to handle high-refresh gaming, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in open-world titles. The estimated FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K (roughly 130–170 down to 50–80) follows the GPU's pixel rate and texture rate limits, not CPU limits.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant factor. The multi-thread benchmarks (Cinebench R23 multi 37,931, PassMark multi-thread 45,680) are in the top 8% of all CPUs, while the GPU's compute scores (PassMark GPU compute 13,245, Geekbench OpenCL 171,304) are strong but not as dominant relative to their peers. For video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU accelerates specific tasks like ray tracing (72 RT cores) and floating-point compute (20.74 TFLOPS FP32).

The combined percentile of 89 reflects a system where neither component drags the other down significantly, but the GPU is closer to the edge of its performance envelope. If a user were to upgrade the GPU to a model in the 95th percentile (based on the gap to the RTX 5070 Ti), the system would become more balanced, with the CPU's 92nd percentile providing sufficient headroom. Conversely, upgrading the CPU alone would yield minimal gaming gains since the GPU would remain the bottleneck.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900 with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0-based Navi 21 chip with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, using PCIe 4.0 x16. The combined percentile is 89, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop builds, though not at the very top.

The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking (average score 60,676) and the GPU's 85th percentile ranking (average score 48,477) indicate a high-end pairing with a slight imbalance favoring the processor. The CPU launch MSRP is $549, and the GPU launch MSRP is 649 USD — these are list prices at launch, not current market values. The system is designed for users who need both strong multi-threaded CPU performance and high-end rasterization and ray tracing from the GPU.

The overall tier is "enthusiast desktop" — this is not a budget or mid-range system. The i9-13900's 92nd percentile places it among the top CPUs for productivity, while the RX 6800 XT's 85th percentile makes it a strong 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming card. The system is capable of handling the most demanding productivity tasks (video editing, 3D rendering, software compilation) and high-refresh gaming at 1080p/1440p, with playable 4K performance in most titles.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1440p high-refresh: The RX 6800 XT's 85th percentile GPU ranking and the i9-13900's 92nd percentile CPU ranking deliver estimated 80–110 FPS at 1440p ultra in AAA games, and 100–140 FPS in esports titles. This is the sweet spot for this pairing — gamers who want high frame rates without the cost of 4K flagship GPUs will find this build well-suited.

Gamers at 1080p competitive: For those prioritizing frame rates over resolution, the estimated 130–170 FPS at 1080p ultra means this system can drive 144Hz or 165Hz monitors. The CPU's 4,309 PassMark single-thread score ensures minimal input latency in CPU-bound scenarios, making this a strong choice for competitive shooters.

Content creators and video editors: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and PassMark floating point score of 120,492 support 4K video editing and color grading. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate effects and exports, while the CPU handles timeline scrubbing and encoding.

3D artists and animators: The 24-core CPU and 72 RT-core GPU provide a balanced rendering setup. The CPU's 32 threads handle viewport simulation and physics, while the GPU accelerates final frame rendering in GPU-based renderers. The 89th combined percentile indicates this system can handle professional-level workloads.

Software developers: The PassMark integer math score of 176,107 and data compression score of 577,285 speed up code compilation and repository operations. The 32 threads allow parallel builds, and the 92nd percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness even under heavy load.

Students in STEM fields: Engineering, data science, and computer science students will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance for simulations and the GPU's compute for machine learning experiments. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running calculations.

Small business workstations: For offices running virtualization, database management, or CAD software, this build offers enterprise-grade CPU performance (comparable to the Xeon Gold 6338T within 0.2%) in a desktop form factor. The GPU accelerates GPU-accelerated tasks, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large datasets without swapping.