SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its configuration splits into performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock reaching 5.60 GHz. This high boost frequency, combined with the large core count, positions the chip as a serious multitasking and content-creation workhorse. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, along with ECC memory support, which signals intended use in stable, long-running workstation environments. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output fallback, though the pairing with a discrete GPU makes it largely irrelevant for demanding work.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the i9-13900 scores 37,931 points in multi-core and 5,355 points in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly telling: it indicates that the 24-core design scales well under sustained load, a critical factor for video rendering, compilation, and scientific simulations. The single-core score of 5,355 is equally strong, showing that the 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers tangible benefits in lightly threaded tasks like spreadsheet recalculations, script execution, and legacy software. The Cinebench R20 scores of 15,931 (multi-core) and 2,249 (single-core) reinforce this pattern, with the multi-core result being roughly 7 times the single-core number — a ratio that highlights the chip's parallel processing strength.

Looking at Geekbench results, the i9-13900 achieves 21,164 in multi-core and 2,604 in single-core. These numbers are consistent with the Cinebench data, confirming that the processor maintains its performance advantage across different benchmark suites. The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The multi-thread score of 45,680 and single-thread score of 4,309 are strong, but the specialized tests are more revealing. The floating-point math score of 120,492 and integer math score of 176,107 indicate robust arithmetic throughput, which matters for financial modeling, engineering analysis, and cryptography. The data compression score of 577,285 and data encryption score of 35,242 show that the chip handles archival and security workloads efficiently, while the extended instructions score of 32,760 confirms solid support for modern SIMD instruction sets.

The i9-13900 sits in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,676. Its nearest rivals highlight the competitive landscape. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572, a mere 0.2% behind, meaning the i9-13900 effectively trades blows with a server-class Xeon in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX both score around 60,100, sitting 1% behind. The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008, 1.1% behind. These deltas are small, but they show that the i9-13900 holds its own against both newer and more expensive parts, making it a compelling choice for users who need maximum compute density without moving to a different platform.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and uses the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU features 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. Clock speeds are set at 2,321 MHz base, 2,424 MHz game, and 2,581 MHz boost, which are high for the generation and contribute directly to its compute throughput. The memory subsystem comprises 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth combination is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K textures, though not for extreme resolution work.

The GPU's compute capabilities are defined by its 40 ray-tracing cores and a peak FP32 throughput of 13.21 TFLOPS. The FP16 rate of 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) indicates that the card can accelerate certain AI and compute workloads, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores, meaning machine learning tasks will rely on standard shader execution. The pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s are strong figures for the class, ensuring that the card can sustain high fill rates in modern game engines. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics features, including hardware-accelerated ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Benchmark results place the RX 6700 XT in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 27,425. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,435, which is a modern, demanding test that stresses overall GPU throughput. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 93,500 and OpenCL score of 44,152 show strong cross-API performance, while the Metal score of 130,896 is notably high but less relevant for Windows-based gaming. The PassMark G3D score of 19,786 is a solid mid-range result, and the GPU compute score of 9,336 confirms that the card can handle general-purpose compute tasks like video encoding acceleration and physics simulation.

The nearest rivals show just how tight the competition is at this tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 27,435, a 0% delta, meaning the RX 6700 XT matches a high-end laptop GPU in synthetic tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27,565, which is 0.5% higher — the desktop flagship from the previous generation is only marginally faster in these benchmarks. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 27,135, 1.1% lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27,839, 1.5% higher. This grouping suggests that the RX 6700 XT delivers performance that sits squarely in the upper-mid-range desktop segment, competitive with much more expensive cards in specific workloads.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU-GPU pairing is one of exceptional CPU dominance and solid, but not class-leading, GPU performance. The i9-13900's average benchmark score of 60,676 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 6700 XT's average score of 27,425 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 82, reflecting the strong overall performance but also the imbalance — the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU.

In CPU-specific tests, the i9-13900's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 is a standout figure. To put it in context, this is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 5,355, demonstrating excellent parallel scaling. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164 corroborate this. For GPU-specific tests, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,435 indicates modern DirectX 12 performance, while the PassMark G3D score of 19,786 shows consistent DirectX 11 and 12 behavior across the suite (DX11 score of 173, DX12 score of 77, DX9 score of 242).

The percentile gap between CPU (92nd) and GPU (72nd) is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU is clearly the more powerful component, capable of driving far more demanding workloads. The GPU, while competent, will be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios where frame rates depend primarily on rasterization throughput. In productivity tasks, the CPU will handle rendering and compilation with ease, but GPU-accelerated workloads like video encoding or 3D viewport rendering will not scale as well. The combined percentile of 82 reflects this middle ground — the system is more capable than the average desktop, but it is not a top-tier gaming or compute rig.

# Gaming Performance

Important note: There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the RX 6700 XT's benchmark scores, the GPU is positioned for 1440p gaming. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,435 suggests that modern titles will run at high settings with smooth frame rates at this resolution, but not at maximum settings with ray tracing enabled. The 12 GB VRAM capacity and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p textures and moderate 4K, but the 72nd percentile GPU ranking means it will struggle with 4K ultra settings in demanding titles.

For esports and competitive games, the RX 6700 XT's high boost clock of 2,581 MHz and 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will deliver very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, likely exceeding 144 Hz in lighter titles. For AAA games, the GPU will handle 1440p high settings well, but ray tracing workloads — given the 40 RT cores and the absence of dedicated tensor hardware — will see significant performance drops. The i9-13900's CPU performance, particularly its single-core score of 5,355 in Cinebench R23, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, even at high frame rates.

The estimated frame rates for this build are strong for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, the CPU's fast single-threaded performance will push frame rates high, but the GPU will still be the limiting factor in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will allow high settings with good performance. At 4K, the system will struggle with ultra settings, and users should expect to lower settings or use upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates. The lack of measured FPS data means these are educated estimates, but the benchmark scores support the conclusion that this is a 1440p gaming system.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the RX 6700 XT as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means the CPU is roughly 20 percentile points more capable than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads like video rendering, code compilation, and data processing, the system will perform exceptionally well, with the i9-13900's 24 cores and high multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 37,931) driving performance. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the RX 6700 XT will limit overall throughput, with its PassMark G3D score of 19,786 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,435 being the ceiling.

The FPS scaling evidence supports this analysis. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance becomes more relevant, but the GPU still limits maximum frame rates in most games. At higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the overwhelming bottleneck, and the CPU's advantages are largely irrelevant. In productivity tasks, the balance shifts the other way — the CPU handles multi-threaded workloads with ease, but GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or machine learning inference will be limited by the GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like software development, scientific computing, or video editing, the i9-13900 is the right choice, and the RX 6700 XT is a competent companion for occasional gaming or GPU acceleration. For users who prioritize gaming, this pairing will underutilize the CPU, and a more balanced GPU would be a better fit. The combined percentile of 82 suggests that the system is well above average, but the specific workload determines whether the bottleneck is meaningful or irrelevant.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This flexibility means users can choose between cheaper DDR4 memory or faster DDR5, depending on budget and performance needs. The CPU's memory bus is dual-channel, and the support for ECC memory makes it suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The i9-13900 has a TDP of 65 watts, which is low for a 24-core processor, suggesting good power efficiency under load.

The RX 6700 XT has a TDP of 230 watts, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 watts. This means a system with the i9-13900 and RX 6700 XT will likely need a power supply in the 550-650 watt range, depending on other components. The GPU uses a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration and is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU is already near the top of its class, and its 92nd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a faster graphics card. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher benchmark score would balance the system better, particularly for 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated compute workloads. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage would improve system responsiveness, but the CPU and GPU are the primary performance drivers. The Socket 1700 platform is mature, and the i9-13900 represents a high-end option within its generation, so a CPU upgrade would require a platform change to a newer socket.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need maximum CPU performance for productivity tasks but are willing to accept a mid-range GPU for gaming or light GPU work. The i9-13900's 92nd percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile large codebases. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680 indicate that the system will excel in these workloads, reducing render times and compilation delays. The RX 6700 XT's 72nd percentile ranking means the system can handle 1440p gaming at high settings, but users should expect to lower settings for 4K or ray tracing.

Software developers will find the i9-13900's 24 cores and 32 threads particularly valuable for parallel builds and test runs. The PassMark data encryption score of 35,242 and floating-point math score of 120,492 suggest strong performance in security and numerical applications. Students in engineering or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's compute power for simulations and analysis, while the GPU provides adequate graphics performance for visualization and gaming. Small business workstations that need to handle heavy multitasking, large spreadsheets, and occasional rendering will also benefit from this pairing.

The system is less well-suited for gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 4K or ray tracing, as the RX 6700 XT will be the limiting factor. For those users, a more balanced build with a stronger GPU and a mid-range CPU would be more appropriate. Similarly, users who need GPU compute for machine learning will find the lack of tensor cores and the relatively modest 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput a constraint, though the 12 GB VRAM is useful for moderate model sizes.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-13900 with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the GPU is a 12 GB RDNA 2.0 card with 2,560 shading units and a boost clock of 2,581 MHz. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, placing it in the upper tier of desktop systems. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, indicating a CPU-dominant configuration.

The system is best described as a high-performance workstation with gaming capabilities. The i9-13900's benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 37,931, Geekbench multi-core of 21,164) are among the best in the database, rivaling server-class Xeon processors. The RX 6700 XT's benchmark scores (3DMark Steel Nomad of 2,435, PassMark G3D of 19,786) are solidly mid-range, matching or exceeding high-end laptop GPUs and previous-generation flagships like the RTX 3090. The overall tier is high-end for productivity and mid-range for gaming, making this a versatile but unbalanced system.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T?

A: The i9-13900 has an average benchmark score of 60,676, which is 0.2% higher than the Xeon Gold 6338T's score of 60,572.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RX 6700 XT is in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,425.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900 supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT had a launch MSRP of 479 USD.

Q: What is the GPU's suggested power supply wattage?

A: The RX 6700 XT has a suggested PSU of 550 watts, with a TDP of 230 watts.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6700 XT's boost clock of 2,581 MHz and 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with the i9-13900's single-core score of 5,355 in Cinebench R23 ensuring the CPU keeps up. However, the 72nd percentile GPU ranking means 4K ultra settings will be challenging, and ray tracing performance will be limited by the 40 RT cores.

Streaming: The i9-13900's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 45,680. The RX 6700 XT's GPU compute score of 9,336 can assist with encoding tasks, but the CPU will handle the load efficiently.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 makes short work of video rendering and export, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth handle effects and timeline scrubbing. This is a very strong configuration for 1080p and 1440p editing workflows.

3D rendering: The i9-13900 will dominate CPU-based rendering, with its 92nd percentile ranking and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,931. The RX 6700 XT's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will accelerate GPU-based renderers, but its 72nd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier choice for this workload.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads will dramatically reduce compile times, with a PassMark integer math score of 176,107 indicating strong arithmetic throughput. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and light testing, but not for GPU-accelerated development workloads.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the i9-13900's data compression score of 577,285 and encryption score of 35,242 make it excellent for large datasets and secure file handling. Students in engineering or data science will benefit from the CPU's compute power, while the GPU handles visualization and gaming.