SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT: A High-End CPU Paired with a Mid-Range GPU

This desktop build pairs Intel's 24-core Core i9-13900 with AMD's Radeon RX 6600 XT, creating a configuration where CPU performance dramatically outpaces GPU capabilities. The i9-13900 sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6600 XT ranks at the 70th percentile among GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 81. This pairing is fundamentally CPU-centric: the processor is built for extreme multi-threaded workloads, while the graphics card delivers competent but not flagship 1080p and 1440p gaming. The data shows a system that excels in productivity, content creation, and CPU-bound tasks, but which will be GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU-GPU pairing, so gaming performance must be estimated from the component benchmark scores. The RX 6600 XT's PassMark G3D score of 16461 and its 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p capability. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 1804, which positions it as a mid-range performer. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most current titles at 1080p with high settings, though texture-heavy games at 1440p may approach memory limits.

The i9-13900's exceptional single-core performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 — ensures that CPU bottlenecks will rarely limit frame rates. However, the RX 6600 XT's 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 165.7 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest that the GPU, not the CPU, will determine gaming performance. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely range from 60-100 FPS in demanding AAA titles, given the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 (relative to its DirectX 11 score of 163) indicates weaker DX12 optimization. At 1440p, frame rates would drop further, with the 8 GB VRAM becoming a more significant constraint.

The GPU's 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs are typical of a mid-range card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the modest compute resources mean ray-traced effects will require reduced resolutions or settings. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 912 indicates competent 2D performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 80503 shows reasonable compute capability for non-gaming tasks. Overall, gaming performance will be solid for 1080p high-refresh monitors, but this build is not optimized for 4K or maximum ray tracing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results are exceptional across the board. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 places the i9-13900 in the top tier of desktop processors, while the single-core score of 5355 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench results reinforce this: 21164 multi-core and 2604 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45680 and single-thread score of 4309 further confirm the CPU's strength in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The average benchmark score of 60676 places the CPU at the 92nd percentile, with its nearest rival being the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (0.2% difference), followed by the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (1% difference), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at 60099 (1% difference), and the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008 (1.1% difference).

The GPU's benchmark results are more modest. The PassMark G3D score of 16461 places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A350M at 24647 (-0.8% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 (0.7% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti at 24236 (0.8% difference), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER at 24170 (1.1% difference). The GPU's average benchmark score of 24442 reflects its mid-range positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804 is modest, and the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 163, suggesting the GPU performs better in legacy APIs.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-tier performer while the GPU is mid-range. The i9-13900 outperforms its nearest rivals by 1% or less in average benchmark score, indicating it sits at the very top of its class. The RX 6600 XT, meanwhile, trades blows with older high-end cards like the GTX 780 Ti and RTX 2080 SUPER, differing by less than 1.1% in average score.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the Navi 23 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but can become a constraint at higher resolutions or with maximum texture settings.

The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s and texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 10.60 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 21.21 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These specifications indicate a GPU designed for efficient 1080p and entry-level 1440p rendering. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the overall compute throughput limits ray-traced performance compared to higher-tier cards.

Benchmark results provide context: the PassMark GPU Compute score of 7520 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 80503 indicate competent compute performance for general-purpose tasks. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 72417 and Metal score of 88720 (the latter more relevant for macOS, though this is a desktop Windows/Linux build) show reasonable API versatility. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern game engines. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth, though the x8 lane width means the card benefits from a PCIe 4.0 motherboard to avoid bandwidth limitations.

The GPU's 160 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU requirement indicate modest power needs. Its dual-slot design and 190 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple monitors. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status, having been released on 2021-07-29 with a launch MSRP of 379 USD.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this build can drive high-refresh monitors in most titles. The CPU's 5355 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures no CPU bottleneck, while the GPU's 16461 PassMark G3D score suggests frame rates around 100+ FPS in less demanding games. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute will limit performance in the most demanding titles at ultra settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding and streaming overhead with ease. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 indicates the i9-13900 can run games and encode simultaneously without performance degradation. The GPU's modest compute resources mean x264 encoding on the CPU is preferable to GPU encoding.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is exceptional for video rendering. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45680 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21164 indicate fast export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p video timelines with effects.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D will be very fast given the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the RX 6600 XT's 10.60 TFLOPS, which is mid-range. The 32 RT cores provide some ray tracing acceleration, but not at the level of higher-end GPUs.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 32 threads and high multi-core scores. The PassMark data compression score of 577285 and integer math score of 176107 indicate strong performance in build tools and code processing. Single-core performance (5355 in Cinebench R23) ensures responsive IDE interaction.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's 65 W TDP (though boost clocks will draw more) and the GPU's 160 W TDP mean higher power consumption than necessary for word processing or spreadsheets. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU could handle these tasks alone, though the discrete GPU is present for gaming or creative work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and boosts up to 5.60 GHz. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output without a discrete GPU.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This generous cache allocation supports the high multi-core throughput. The CPU has a 65 W TDP (though actual power draw under load will be higher), and it is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments. The launch MSRP was $549, and the production status is active, having been released on 2023-01-03.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's high-end positioning. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3823 and single-core score of 539 show strong performance across generations of the Cinebench test. The Cinebench R20 scores of 15931 multi-core and 2249 single-core continue this trend. The PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: data encryption at 35242, extended instructions at 32760, floating-point math at 120492, and integer math at 176107. The find prime numbers score of 186 is notably low, suggesting weaker performance in certain integer-heavy algorithms. Random string sorting at 64396 and physics at 2484 round out the PassMark suite.

The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it among the top desktop processors available. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, is only 0.2% ahead in average score, indicating the i9-13900 is effectively at parity with a server-class chip. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX are 1% behind, as is the Intel Core i9-14900F. This positions the i9-13900 as a top-tier choice for any CPU-bound workload.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will benefit from the CPU's excellent single-core performance (5355 Cinebench R23 single-core), ensuring frame rates are never CPU-limited. Those playing at 1440p will find the RX 6600 XT adequate for medium-high settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may restrict texture quality in newer titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's 37931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which dramatically reduces export times.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the 32 threads, with PassMark integer math at 176107 and data compression at 577285 indicating strong build performance. Students and small business users will find this configuration far more powerful than needed for typical productivity tasks, though the integrated graphics in the CPU could serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is not required. The build is particularly suited for workstation-class tasks like scientific computing, data analysis, or virtual machine hosting, where the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking provides substantial compute headroom.

The GPU's 70th percentile ranking means it is not the focus of this build. Users who intend to play the latest AAA titles at maximum settings or at 1440p/4K should consider a more powerful GPU. However, for esports titles, older games, or 1080p gaming with adjusted settings, the RX 6600 XT provides a reasonable experience. The GPU's end-of-life production status and 379 USD launch MSRP suggest it may be available at lower prices, making this a potentially cost-effective pairing for CPU-centric workloads with moderate gaming needs.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900 a good match for the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT?

A: The CPU significantly outperforms the GPU, with the i9-13900 at the 92nd CPU percentile and the RX 6600 XT at the 70th GPU percentile. This creates a CPU-heavy build where the GPU will limit gaming performance, but the CPU provides exceptional productivity performance.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect at 1080p?

A: Estimated from benchmark scores, the RX 6600 XT's 16461 PassMark G3D score and 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest capable 1080p performance, likely 60-100 FPS in demanding titles at high settings. No measured FPS data exists for this specific combination.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM sufficient for modern games?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures, but 1440p or games with large texture packs may approach the memory limit, potentially causing stuttering or reduced texture quality.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900 has an average benchmark score of 60676, placing it 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572) and 1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099), and Intel Core i9-14900F (60008).

Q: Can this build handle ray tracing?

A: The RX 6600 XT has 32 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute limits ray-traced performance. Ray tracing will be playable at 1080p with reduced settings, but not at high frame rates with maximum effects.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption?

A: The i9-13900 has a 65 W TDP, while the RX 6600 XT has a 160 W TDP. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, so a power supply in that range or higher is recommended for the full system.

Q: Is this build suitable for video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45680 indicate excellent video rendering performance. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing workflows at 1080p and 1440p.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines Intel's top-tier Core i9-13900 processor with AMD's mid-range Radeon RX 6600 XT graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 5.60 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 60676. The GPU is a Navi 23-based RDNA 2.0 card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 2048 shading units, and a 2589 MHz boost clock, ranking at the 70th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 24442.

The combined percentile of 81 reflects the overall system capability, which is heavily weighted toward CPU performance. This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") intended for users who need substantial multi-core processing power for productivity, content creation, or development tasks, with gaming as a secondary consideration. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking places it among the best processors available, while the GPU's 70th percentile ranking is respectable but not outstanding. The i9-13900's launch MSRP was $549, and the RX 6600 XT's launch MSRP was 379 USD.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between these components is substantial. The CPU operates at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile, creating a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or compilation, the i9-13900's 37931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures no bottleneck from the processor. In gaming, however, the RX 6600 XT's 16461 PassMark G3D score and 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute will limit frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions or with demanding settings.

The bottleneck manifests differently across workloads. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's excellent single-core performance (5355 Cinebench R23 single-core) means the GPU will be the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become additional constraints. In productivity tasks, the GPU's 7520 PassMark GPU Compute score is sufficient for general acceleration, but the CPU handles most heavy lifting. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 versus DirectX 11 score of 163 suggests better performance in older APIs, meaning DirectX 12 titles may underperform relative to expectations.

For users seeking a balanced system, the GPU should be upgraded to match the CPU's capabilities. However, for workloads where CPU performance is paramount — such as software development, scientific computing, or video rendering — this pairing is sensible. The combined percentile of 81 indicates the overall system is above average, but the delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (92 vs 70) is significant. In practical terms, this means users will experience CPU-bound performance in productivity tasks and GPU-bound performance in gaming, with the CPU never being the limiting factor in any workload.