SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop configuration that presents a striking asymmetry in raw compute capability versus graphics throughput. The data shows a CPU that ranks in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile among all graphics cards. This divergence is the defining characteristic of the pairing, establishing a clear bottleneck hierarchy where the graphics card is the limiting factor for most gaming and graphically intensive workloads. The CPU’s massive 24-core, 32-thread configuration provides an enormous reservoir of processing power that the GPU simply cannot fully utilize in frame rendering, meaning that system performance in gaming scenarios will be dictated by the RX 6600’s capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the processor. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60,676 positions it within 1.1% of the Intel Core i9-14900F, indicating a negligible performance gap at the top of the processor hierarchy. Conversely, the GPU’s average score of 19,036 places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, a professional workstation card from a previous era. This contrast highlights that while the CPU is a modern high-end part, the GPU is a mid-range component.

In practical terms, the bottleneck is the GPU. For any workload that relies on rendering frames—such as gaming or 3D viewport interaction—the RX 6600 will be operating at its maximum capacity while the i9-13900 remains underutilized. The data suggests that the CPU has headroom to process far more data than the GPU can deliver, meaning frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card’s pixel and texture throughput. The GPU’s 159.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 279.0 GTexel/s texture rate are the physical limits for this pairing. The system’s combined percentile of 78 reflects this imbalance, showing that while the whole is capable, it is not as strong as the CPU alone would suggest.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Consequently, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the components. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning that the following analysis is a projection based on the GPU’s compute, pixel, and texture rates, as well as its DirectX and Vulkan scores.

The GPU’s benchmark results indicate a capable 1080p performer. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 152 and DirectX 12 score of 51 suggest solid, but not class-leading, performance in modern APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67,623 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 28,850, which implies the architecture is well-optimized for gaming workloads that leverage Vulkan. At 1080p, the RX 6600 is estimated to deliver high frame rates in most titles, but the lack of a large VRAM pool (8 GB) will limit texture quality settings in newer games. Moving to 1440p, the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will become a more significant constraint, and users should expect frame rates to drop as resolution increases. At 4K, the GPU is likely to be insufficient for maintaining smooth gameplay at high settings, and the lack of measured data suggests that this resolution is not the target for this pairing. The CPU’s high single-core score of 5,355 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not be the source of frame pacing issues, even in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a feature typically reserved for workstation platforms. It has 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, which contribute to its strong single-threaded performance.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end positioning. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 is exceptional, placing it in the top tier of processors for rendering and multi-threaded tasks. The single-core score of 5,355 demonstrates that it also excels in lightly-threaded workloads, such as legacy applications or certain game engines. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164 and single-core score of 2,604 align with these results. The PassMark data further illustrates its capabilities: the integer math score of 176,107 and floating-point math score of 120,492 are strong indicators of computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The data compression score of 577,285 and encryption score of 35,242 show that it can handle data-heavy tasks with ease. The processor’s 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs on the market, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the Intel Core i9-14900F, with the i9-13900 trailing the latter by only 1.1%.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for users who require extreme processor performance but have a more modest graphics requirement. The primary target audience is content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the CPU is the primary engine. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 indicates that this system will handle 4K video exports and complex 3D scene renders much faster than systems with lower-core-count processors. For a developer, the high multi-threaded throughput and ECC memory support make this a viable workstation for compiling large codebases or running virtual machines, where the CPU’s 32 threads provide ample parallelism.

For gamers, this pairing is best suited for those playing at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at this resolution, allowing the RX 6600 to operate at its full potential. However, gamers targeting 1440p or 4K would benefit more from a more balanced allocation of budget toward a stronger GPU. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the processor’s power useful for simulations and data analysis, but they should be aware that the GPU is not designed for heavy compute tasks like machine learning training, where the 8,928 TFLOPS FP32 performance is limited compared to dedicated compute cards. Small business workstations that run data-intensive analytics or database workloads will see a significant benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 577,285.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s core count and architecture?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the graphics card?

A: The RX 6600 has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the system’s overall performance percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 78, which places it in the upper quarter of all desktop configurations.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning that overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not supported.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Radeon RX 6600 is 300 W, with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Which processor is the closest rival to the i9-13900 in benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F is a close rival, with the i9-13900 scoring 1.1% lower on average.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The chip, Navi 23, contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. Its performance is defined by its clock speeds: a base of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The benchmark scores place the RX 6600 in a mid-range tier. The PassMark G3D score of 15,096 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,492 indicate that it is a solid choice for 1080p gaming. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (with the RX 6600 scoring 0.4% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (with the RX 6600 scoring 0.1% lower). This suggests that the desktop RX 6600 performs on par with a mobile RTX 4050, which confirms its efficiency but also highlights its position as a mid-range part. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.928 TFLOPS is adequate for standard rendering tasks, and its FP16 performance of 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) provides headroom for workloads that can utilize reduced precision. The 28 ray tracing cores are present, but the raw compute power is modest, meaning ray tracing effects will require significant performance compromises in games. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the Navi III generation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present a stark contrast in their benchmark standings. The i9-13900’s average benchmark score of 60,676 puts it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with a nearest rival delta of only 0.2% against the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T. This indicates that the processor is performing at the very edge of what is available in the consumer market. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,931 and PassMark multithread score of 45,680 are strong evidence of its multi-threaded prowess.

The RX 6600’s average benchmark score of 19,036 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a substantial drop from the CPU’s ranking, confirming the imbalance in this pairing. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15,096 is respectable, but it is far from the top-tier graphics cards. The combined picture is a system that is heavily front-loaded in processor power. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this, indicating that the system as a whole is strong but is held back by the GPU. In a balanced system, one would expect the CPU and GPU percentiles to be closer together; here, the 29-point gap between the two components defines the performance envelope.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is compatible with Intel 600-series and 700-series chipsets. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory kits. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes, which is essential for future high-bandwidth storage devices and graphics cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and can be used for quick sync video encoding, although the discrete GPU will handle most graphics tasks.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The CPU has significant headroom, as evidenced by its 92nd percentile ranking, and could support a much more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The suggested PSU of 300 W for the RX 6600 implies that the current power delivery is modest, and a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU will not be constrained by the interface. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is low for a 24-core part, but this is the base power; a more powerful GPU will draw more power, and the system’s PSU should be sized accordingly.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) that combines a top-tier 13th Gen Intel Core i9 processor with a mid-range Radeon RX 6000 series graphics card. The overall tier of the system, based on the combined percentile of 78, is high, but it is a lopsided configuration. The CPU is a flagship part, designed for maximum compute throughput, while the GPU is an entry-level to mid-range part intended for 1080p gaming. This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-bound tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the processor’s 32 threads will be fully utilized. For gaming, it is a system that will excel at high-refresh-rate 1080p play but will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p and above. The build is essentially a professional-grade workstation CPU paired with a consumer-grade gaming GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 5,355 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame times will be consistent, while the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 11 score of 152 suggests it can drive high refresh rates in competitive titles. Users should expect a smooth experience in esports and older games, but visual effects in newer AAA titles will need to be tuned to achieve high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 32 threads are more than sufficient for encoding a video stream while gaming, and the PassMark data encryption score of 35,242 indicates solid performance for encryption tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could offload encoding work, but the dedicated GPU’s compute is adequate for this task.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,931 is a strong indicator that 4K video exports and effects rendering will be significantly faster than on systems with fewer cores. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines, but 4K editing may require more memory for complex effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 cores will excel in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 120,492 showing high throughput. The GPU can assist with real-time viewport rendering, but its FP32 performance of 8,928 TFLOPS is modest for final-frame GPU rendering.

Software development: The high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the Geekbench multi-core score of 21,164, will drastically reduce compile times for large projects. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes, and the 32 threads allow for efficient parallel compilation.

Student and office work: For general productivity, this system is vastly overpowered. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,309 ensures snappy application responsiveness, but the hardware is wasted on basic office tasks. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 889 is more than adequate for 2D desktop acceleration, but the system’s power is better suited to specialized academic workloads like data analysis or simulations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds