SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900TE

5,050 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a colossal GPU built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. Its die measures 750 mm² and packs 92,200 million transistors, giving it a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². This is the largest and most complex consumer graphics processor in the FACT PACK, and its specifications reflect an unambiguous focus on raw throughput and memory capacity.

Memory is the headline feature: 24 GB of GDDR7 across a 384-bit bus, producing 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a configuration designed for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and compute workloads that spill far beyond the 8–16 GB buffers common in lower-tier cards. For rendering, the practical implication is that scenes with massive geometry, 8K textures, or multi-layer compositing will fit in VRAM without swapping, which is often the difference between a smooth interactive viewport and a stutter-filled one. The 384-bit bus width ensures that this capacity is fed quickly; the 1.34 TB/s figure is the kind of bandwidth that matters when writing out final frames or processing large render passes.

Clock speeds are substantial: a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). These are not the highest clocks in the market, but they are paired with an enormous number of execution units. The GPU has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate that the card can fill and filter frames at rates that exceed what most displays can even present; the bottleneck for most users will be the monitor, not the GPU.

The RT core count is 170, and the tensor core count is 680. These are dedicated hardware blocks for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The RT cores handle BVH traversal and ray-triangle intersection, which accelerates real-time ray-traced effects in games and also speeds up hybrid renderers that use ray tracing for specific passes. The tensor cores, meanwhile, drive DLSS and other neural network inference tasks. The FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS, and FP16 is identical at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning the card is equally strong at both precision levels — a feature that matters for AI training and inference where mixed precision is common.

The benchmark score for this GPU is from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scored 16,504. Its percentile vs. all GPUs is 59, meaning it sits just above the median. However, the nearest rivals listed are telling: the NVIDIA T400 scores 16,508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16,415 (0.5% ahead of the RTX 5090 D V2), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408 (0.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,361 (0.9% ahead). This is a narrow cluster of scores, but it is odd that a flagship-tier card is grouped with professional and mid-range parts. The data suggests that this particular benchmark, Steel Nomad, may be more sensitive to driver optimizations or specific workload characteristics than to raw shader throughput. Regardless, the RTX 5090 D V2's performance is essentially tied with these rivals, all within a 0.9% band.

For rendering, the practical verdict is that the 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are the primary differentiators. The compute throughput (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) is high enough for real-time ray tracing and GPU-accelerated renderers, but the benchmark shows it is not unambiguously ahead of cheaper alternatives in this specific test. The RT and tensor cores are present in large numbers, which helps with denoising, upscaling, and AI-driven features, but the measured score indicates that the card's advantage is not as decisive as its spec sheet suggests.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-12900TE achieves an average benchmark score of 5,050 across its Cinebench runs. Its percentile vs. all CPUs is 60, placing it above the median but not in the top tier. The specific Cinebench scores are: R15 multi-core 1,759, R15 single-core 248, R20 multi-core 7,333, R20 single-core 1,035, R23 multi-core 17,461, and R23 single-core 2,465. The multi-core scores are strong for a 35W TDP part, indicating that the hybrid architecture is efficiently using its 16 cores and 24 threads. The single-core scores are respectable but not class-leading; the 4.80 GHz boost clock is high, but the 1,100 MHz base clock drags down sustained single-thread performance in short bursts.

The nearest CPU rivals are all within a 0.4% band, which means the i9-12900TE is effectively tied with them. The Intel Core i9-9820X scores 5,049 (0% delta), the Intel Xeon Gold 6334 scores 5,043 (0.1% ahead of the i9-12900TE), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE scores 5,070 (0.4% ahead), and the Intel Xeon W-2155 scores 5,072 (0.4% ahead). This cluster of scores between 5,043 and 5,072 shows that the i9-12900TE is right in the middle of a competitive pack, neither dominating nor being dominated. The 60th percentile ranking confirms that it is a solid mid-pack performer, but it is not a top-10 CPU by any stretch.

The GPU scores 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a percentile of 59. This is nearly identical to the CPU's percentile, which suggests a balanced pairing in terms of overall tier. The combined percentile for the build is 60, which is the same as the CPU's percentile, indicating that the CPU is the limiting factor in the overall system score — the GPU's percentile is 59, slightly lower, but the combined metric is driven by the CPU.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 17,461 is strong enough to feed a GPU of this class in most games, but the single-core score of 2,465 may cap frame rates in lightly-threaded titles. The GPU's Steel Nomad score of 16,504 is high, but its percentile of 59 suggests that it is not delivering top-tier performance relative to all GPUs — it is merely above average.

The combined picture is a mid-to-upper-mid-range desktop system. The CPU is a 60th percentile part, the GPU is a 59th percentile part, and the overall build is at the 60th percentile. This is not a flagship killer; it is a competent system that will handle most workloads well, but it is not at the current-generation. The i9-12900TE's efficiency (35W TDP) is a notable advantage, but its raw performance is only average. The RTX 5090 D V2, despite its massive specs, benchmarks only slightly above average, which is a disappointment relative to its hardware.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-12900TE uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory that fits their budget or performance targets. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two Gen 5 NVMe SSDs. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes. This is a sensible pairing because it ensures the GPU's data path is not bottlenecked by an older PCIe generation. The GPU's TDP is 575W, and the suggested PSU is 950W. The CPU's TDP is 35W, which is remarkably low for a 16-core part. The total system power draw, therefore, is dominated by the GPU. A 950W PSU provides substantial headroom: the CPU draws 35W, the GPU draws 575W, and the remaining 340W is ample for the motherboard, memory, storage, and fans. This headroom means the system is not at risk of tripping overcurrent protection during transient spikes, which are common with high-end GPUs.

The GPU is a dual-slot card, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide, with a single 16-pin power connector. This is a standard size for a high-end card, but it will not fit in compact cases. The display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, which support high refresh rates at 4K and above.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the component most likely to be replaced first. The CPU, despite its average percentile, is efficient and has a strong multi-core score for its TDP. However, the GPU's benchmark percentile of 59 is not commensurate with its massive VRAM and bandwidth — a cheaper GPU might deliver similar performance in the Steel Nomad test. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher percentile would yield a more noticeable performance boost than upgrading the CPU, because the CPU's single-core score of 2,465 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for most gaming scenarios.

Alternatively, adding more memory or faster memory (DDR5 over DDR4) could help, but the dual-channel bus is a fixed constraint. The platform is mature, so there are no new CPUs to drop in on Socket 1700 without a motherboard change. The sensible path is to keep the CPU and motherboard, upgrade the GPU to a higher-percentile card, and ensure the PSU can handle it — the 950W suggestion already covers most single-GPU configurations.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-12900TE support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders the choice between the two memory types.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D V2 compare to the NVIDIA T400 in the Steel Nomad benchmark?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504, while the T400 scores 16,508 — a 0% delta, meaning they are effectively tied.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The i9-12900TE has an average benchmark score of 5,050 and rests at the 60th percentile vs. all CPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing; all performance estimates are based on benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 950W, which provides ample headroom given the GPU's 575W TDP and the CPU's 35W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), which is compatible with the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's percentile is 60, and the GPU's percentile is 59, with a combined percentile of 60. This near-identical percentile pairing suggests that neither component is dramatically outclassing the other in overall terms. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends on the workload.

For gaming, the CPU's single-core performance is the likely limiter. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,465 is solid but not exceptional, and the base clock of 1,100 MHz is low. In games that rely on a single or a few threads, the CPU may struggle to feed the GPU's massive shader array. The GPU, meanwhile, has such high raw throughput (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) that it may sit idle waiting for draw calls. The estimated FPS scaling, derived from the benchmark scores, would show that high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions (1080p) is more likely to be CPU-bound, while at higher resolutions (4K) the GPU becomes the limiting factor because the fill rate and bandwidth are fully utilized.

For multi-threaded productivity workloads, the CPU is the stronger link. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,461 is respectable for a 35W part, and the 16 cores / 24 threads handle parallel tasks efficiently. The GPU's 59th percentile means it is not a top-tier compute part, so for 3D rendering that uses both CPU and GPU, the GPU will be the bottleneck — its Steel Nomad score of 16,504 is only average relative to all GPUs.

The memory bandwidth is another factor. The CPU's dual-channel memory bus is a fixed constraint, while the GPU has 1.34 TB/s of VRAM bandwidth. In workloads that stream large datasets, the GPU's bandwidth is not the bottleneck, but the CPU's memory interface could be. The 24 GB VRAM on the GPU is ample, so GPU memory capacity is not a limitation.

In summary, the data indicates that the CPU limits single-threaded and low-resolution gaming performance, while the GPU limits compute-heavy rendering and high-resolution gaming. The system is balanced in overall percentile, but the workload determines which component is the bottleneck.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is for users who need a balanced desktop system that performs slightly above the median in both CPU and GPU tasks. The 60th percentile CPU and 59th percentile GPU mean it is not a workstation-class or enthusiast-tier machine, but it is capable for a range of mainstream applications.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates will find that the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth handle large texture packs and high-resolution rendering without issue, though the CPU's single-core score may cap frame rates in less demanding titles. The GPU's 59th percentile means it is not a top-tier card, but it is adequate for most games.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, which accelerate multi-threaded export and compositing tasks. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 GB VRAM are useful for GPU-accelerated rendering, but the benchmark score shows it is not dramatically ahead of cheaper alternatives.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 60th percentile performance for compilation and testing, and the GPU's compute capabilities for machine learning inference. The 680 tensor cores support AI workloads, but the 59th percentile suggests that more specialized cards may be better.

Students and small business workstations will find this build sufficient for office productivity, web browsing, and light content creation. The 35W TDP CPU is energy-efficient, which lowers cooling and power costs, while the GPU's 575W TDP is a trade-off for its performance.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 16,504 Steel Nomad score and 24 GB VRAM are sufficient for high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K, but the CPU's single-core score of 2,465 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The estimated FPS scaling would show that the system is more GPU-limited at higher resolutions, where the 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate are fully utilized.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a multi-core score of 17,461 in Cinebench R23, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously, while the GPU's NVENC (implied by the tensor cores) can offload encoding. The 35W TDP CPU is efficient, leaving power headroom for the GPU's 575W draw.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R20 score of 7,333 and R23 score of 17,461 accelerate timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers, and its 1.34 TB/s bandwidth handles high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 680 RT cores accelerate ray-traced and rasterized rendering, but its 59th percentile means it is not a top-tier render card. The CPU's 60th percentile multi-core performance is adequate for CPU-based renderers, and the 24 GB VRAM holds large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide strong parallel compilation performance, and the GPU's compute capabilities (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate local machine learning training. The 60th percentile CPU is above average for build times.

Student and office work: The CPU's 60th percentile and 35W TDP make it a quiet, efficient choice for productivity tasks, while the GPU's 59th percentile is overkill for office applications but future-proofs the system for any GPU-accelerated tasks.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i9-12900TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 12th-gen Alder Lake-S part with 16 cores and 24 threads, a 35W TDP, and a 60th percentile ranking. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB GDDR7, a 575W TDP, and a 59th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 60.

This is a mid-to-upper-mid-range desktop system. It is not a flagship or enthusiast-tier build, as both components sit just above the median in their respective benchmark pools. The CPU is efficient but not fast, and the GPU is massive but not dominant in the Steel Nomad test. The pairing is balanced in percentile terms, but the GPU's enormous VRAM and bandwidth are not fully reflected in its benchmark score, suggesting that the card's real-world strengths lie in specific workloads like large dataset rendering or AI inference rather than synthetic benchmarks.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, and what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900TE is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, codenamed Alder Lake-S. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing memory latency.

The base clock is 1,100 MHz, which is extremely low, but the boost clock is 4.80 GHz. This wide range indicates that the CPU is designed for efficiency at idle and light loads, but can ramp up to high clocks when needed. The 35W TDP is the standout feature — it is remarkably low for a 16-core part, making this CPU suitable for compact and quiet systems.

The benchmark scores reflect this dual nature. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,461 is strong for a 35W chip, indicating that the 16 cores are efficiently utilized. The single-core score of 2,465 is decent but not exceptional, which is expected given the low base clock. The R20 scores (7,333 multi-core, 1,035 single-core) and R15 scores (1,759 multi-core, 248 single-core) follow a similar pattern.

The 60th percentile ranking places this CPU in the upper-middle of the pack. It is not a top-tier part for single-threaded workloads, but its multi-core performance is competitive, especially considering its power efficiency. For real workloads, this means the CPU excels at parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation, where all 16 cores can be engaged. It is less suited to lightly-threaded games or applications that depend on a single thread, where the low base clock and average single-core score will bottleneck performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, but it is not a gaming or compute part. The CPU's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 adds flexibility, but the dual-channel bus limits memory bandwidth compared to higher-end platforms. Overall, the i9-12900TE is a capable, efficient CPU that is well-matched to a mid-range desktop build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds