SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
76%
VS
GPU
97%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900TE

5,050 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored on the Intel Socket 1700 with the Alder Lake-S architecture, which places this CPU on a socket family that spans multiple generations, but the FACT PACK only confirms this specific Core i9-12900TE uses that socket. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, so the platform offers flexibility depending on motherboard choice and existing DRAM inventory. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only, meaning the primary x16 slot for the GPU can run at PCIe Gen 5 speeds, while the RTX 4080 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — the GPU will not bottleneck on interface bandwidth, though the slot is backward-compatible.

The CPU's TDP is 35 watts, which is exceptionally low for a 16-core part, and this low thermal envelope means a modest air cooler suffices; there is no need for exotic liquid cooling. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 320 watts, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card alone is 700 watts. A system combining the 35W CPU and 320W GPU should therefore be built around a 700W-class power supply to ensure headroom for transient spikes and other components. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must have that connector or an adapter. The CPU supports ECC memory? No — ECC is false, so this is not a workstation ECC platform.

The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output if the discrete GPU is removed, but it is not a gaming solution. The platform's upgrade path: the socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the CPU is from the Core 12th Gen series with the Alder Lake architecture. Given the release date of 2022-01-03, this is a mature platform. A sensible next upgrade from this CPU would be a higher-tier 12th Gen or 13th Gen part on the same socket, but the FACT PACK does not list specific compatible models beyond the 12900TE itself. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so the long-term upgrade for graphics would be to that newer generation, though no performance data for the successor is provided.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 5050, placing it at the 60th percentile of all CPUs — a solid mid-pack result for a processor with a 35W TDP. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 17461, while the single-core score is 2465. The multicore result is roughly 7 times the single-core score, indicating strong scaling across the 16 cores. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 7333 and single-core is 1035; in Cinebench R15, multicore is 1759 and single-core is 248. The gap between R20 and R23 multicore scores (7333 vs 17461) is notable — the newer test suite is more demanding but also reflects the CPU's ability to maintain boost clocks under load.

The CPU's nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core i9-9820X scores 5049 (0% delta), the Intel Xeon Gold 6334 scores 5043 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE scores 5070 (0.4% ahead), and the Intel Xeon W-2155 scores 5072 (0.4% ahead). This means the 12900TE performance is essentially identical to those four other processors — within half a percent — despite the 12900TE having a much lower TDP (35W vs those parts' unspecified but likely higher TDPs). The data suggests the 12900TE is a power-efficiency champion that matches much higher-power rivals in average throughput.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 54247, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs — a top-tier result. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 6567. In Geekbench OpenCL, the score is 214739, and in Vulkan, it is 263779. Passmark results show G3D at 34457, GPU compute at 20671, G2D at 1239, and legacy DX scores of 204 (DX10), 314 (DX11), 132 (DX12), and 370 (DX9). The Passmark DX12 score is oddly low relative to DX11, which may reflect driver or test methodology quirks, but the G3D and compute scores are what matter for modern workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals: the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (2.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (2.7% ahead). The 4080 is effectively tied with its SUPER variant and is slightly behind several AMD parts in the aggregate score — but those AMD parts may have different feature sets. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 73, which reflects the CPU being a relative weak point against the GPU's strength.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and the CPU's 60th percentile ranking imply that in gaming, the GPU will be the dominant factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU may limit at lower resolutions.

At 1080p, the estimated FPS would be high, but the CPU's 60th percentile could cause occasional dips in CPU-bound scenes. The RTX 4080's Passmark G3D score of 34457 is roughly 68 times the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2465, but that comparison is not directly meaningful for gaming; the CPU's single-core performance is what drives game logic. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 suggests strong DX12 gaming performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's lower percentile will matter less. The estimated FPS at 4K would be very high for most titles, given the GPU's 86th percentile position, but the lack of measured data means these are educated estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile and the CPU's 60th percentile mean that at 1440p or 4K, the system can drive high refresh rates (above 120 Hz) in most titles, but at 1080p with a very high refresh monitor (240 Hz+), the CPU may become the limiting factor, as its single-core score of 2465 in Cinebench R23 is only modest. The 3DMark DX12 score of 6567 supports strong modern API performance.

Streaming: The GPU has 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based features, but the FACT PACK does not list NVENC specifications. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding software-side if needed, but the GPU's tensor cores are likely the preferred path for streaming workloads. The CPU's 60th percentile suggests it can handle streaming plus gaming simultaneously without major degradation, though not at the highest settings.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17461 indicates good multi-threaded performance for rendering timelines, while the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and exports. The 86th percentile GPU will handle 4K video scrubbing and color grading smoothly. The CPU's low TDP of 35W means sustained video encoding runs will not cause thermal throttling.

3D rendering: The CPU's multicore scores (17461 in R23, 7333 in R20) are adequate for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance makes GPU rendering the clear choice — the GPU is roughly 2800 times faster on paper, though real-world scaling is less extreme. The 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in supported applications. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle compilation and virtualization well; the 60th percentile means it is not a top-tier developer CPU but is competent. The GPU's compute score of 20671 in Passmark supports CUDA-based development and machine learning workloads. The memory support for DDR4 or DDR5 allows for cost-effective large RAM configurations.

Student and office work: Overkill. The CPU's single-core score of 2465 and the GPU's massive compute power are far beyond what office applications require. The 35W TDP makes the CPU efficient for all-day use, but the 320W GPU is wasteful for document editing. Integrated graphics UHD 770 would suffice for office tasks, making the discrete GPU unnecessary in this scenario.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900TE is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel. The base clock is 1100 MHz, which is very low, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz — a 4.3x multiplier between base and boost. This is an unusual design: the low base clock keeps the TDP at 35W, but the high boost clock delivers performance when needed. The die size is 215 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores tell a clear story: in Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 17461 is about 7.1 times the single-core score of 2465, which indicates good scaling across the 16 cores. However, the single-core score is not exceptional — it is roughly equal to a mid-range desktop CPU from the same era. The average benchmark score of 5050 puts it at the 60th percentile, meaning 40% of CPUs outperform it on average. The nearest rival comparison shows a 0% delta versus the Core i9-9820X and a 0.1% delta versus the Xeon Gold 6334 — these are older, higher-TDP parts that the 12900TE matches or nearly matches while consuming far less power.

For real workloads, the CPU is a strong multi-threaded performer for its power class. The 24 threads will handle concurrent tasks like compiling, rendering, and virtualization, but the low base clock means sustained all-core loads may drop below the boost clock if the 35W TDP envelope is exceeded — the FACT PACK does not specify the sustained power limit, so this is an inference from the base clock being only 1100 MHz. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is possible, but the low TDP suggests the cooling and power delivery may limit headroom.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The memory subsystem is 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The memory clock is 1400 MHz, with 22.4 Gbps effective data rate. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 raster output units, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores.

The clock speeds are 2205 MHz base and 2505 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The GPU uses a triple-slot cooler, measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, and requires a 700W PSU with a single 16-pin connector. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark results: the GPU scores 6567 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern, demanding test. Geekbench scores are 214739 in OpenCL and 263779 in Vulkan — the Vulkan score being 23% higher suggests strong API efficiency. Passmark G3D is 34457, and GPU compute is 20671. The average benchmark score is 54247, at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER with a 0.1% delta, meaning the 4080 is essentially identical in performance to its SUPER variant — the SUPER likely offers better efficiency or minor clock bumps, but the aggregate score shows no meaningful difference.

For rendering workloads, the 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores make this a powerhouse for real-time ray tracing and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures and large 3D scenes, and the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most scenarios. The tensor cores (304) enable DLSS and AI-based features, which the FACT PACK does not quantify beyond the hardware count.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need top-tier GPU performance but do not require a top-tier CPU. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions are the primary audience — the GPU's 86th percentile ensures high frame rates at these resolutions, while the CPU's 60th percentile is sufficient to keep up at 1440p and above. At 1080p with a 240Hz monitor, the CPU could become a bottleneck, so this is not ideal for esports enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates at low resolutions.

Content creators who render on the GPU will benefit greatly: the 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM handle video editing, 3D rendering, and AI workloads. The CPU's 16 cores provide adequate support for timeline operations and asset management, but the GPU is the star. Software developers, particularly those using CUDA for machine learning or GPU computing, will find the 304 tensor cores and 20671 Passmark compute score valuable.

Students and small business workstations are a poor fit — this hardware is far beyond their needs, and the 320W GPU plus 700W PSU requirement is excessive for office tasks. The CPU's integrated graphics would be sufficient for such use, making the discrete GPU an unnecessary expense. The target user is someone who wants high-end GPU performance without paying for a top-tier CPU, sacrificing some CPU-bound workloads for a lower power draw and cost.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, which is very low for a 16-core part. This means a basic air cooler is sufficient, and the system will not require heavy liquid cooling for the processor.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is false. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but not ECC.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average score is 5050, with the Core i9-9820X at 5049 (0% delta) and the Xeon Gold 6334 at 5043 (0.1% behind). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE is 0.4% ahead, and the Xeon W-2155 is 0.4% ahead.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. The CPU is still active in production.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 700W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 320W, so the 700W recommendation includes headroom for the rest of the system.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how does it relate to the base clock?

A: The base clock is 1100 MHz, and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz. This is a 4.3x difference, allowing the CPU to idle efficiently but burst to high performance when needed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU is at the 86th percentile while the CPU is at the 60th percentile, and the combined percentile is 73. This means the CPU is the limiting factor in CPU-bound workloads, while the GPU is the star in GPU-bound tasks. In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution: at 1080p, the CPU's 60th percentile will limit frame rates in CPU-heavy titles, as the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2465 is not exceptional; at 4K, the GPU's 86th percentile dominates, and the CPU's lower percentile matters less because the GPU is fully utilized.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores supports this: the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 indicates strong DX12 performance, but the CPU's average score of 5050 (60th percentile) suggests it cannot feed the GPU at very high frame rates in all scenarios. In productivity, the CPU's multicore score of 17461 in Cinebench R23 is respectable but not top-tier — the nearest rivals are within 0.4%, meaning the CPU is mid-pack. The GPU's compute score of 20671 in Passmark is 86th percentile, so GPU-accelerated workloads will not be CPU-limited.

The bottleneck analysis: for gaming at 1440p or 4K, the GPU is the primary component and the CPU is sufficient. For 1080p esports, the CPU will bottleneck. For video editing and 3D rendering, the GPU accelerates exports and ray tracing, while the CPU handles encoding and scene management — both are used, but the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS will do the heavy lifting. For software development, the CPU's 24 threads handle compilation, but the GPU is underutilized unless using CUDA. The system's overall balance is skewed toward GPU performance, which is appropriate for a gaming-focused build but less ideal for CPU-bound workloads.