SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900TE

5,050 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900TE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing represents a desktop configuration built around an energy-efficient 16-core processor and a mainstream Ampere graphics card. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark data provided; no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900TE is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, all within a remarkably low 35 W TDP. This low power envelope distinguishes it from typical high-core-count desktop parts, suggesting a design focused on sustained multi-threaded workloads in thermally constrained environments. The chip carries 30 MB of shared L3 cache, with 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU makes it largely redundant.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches above its power class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 17461 points in multi-core and 2465 in single-core. The R20 results are 7333 multi-core and 1035 single-core, while R15 shows 1759 multi-core and 248 single-core. These scores place the CPU in the 60th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 5050. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-9820X, which scores 5049, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE scores 5070 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Xeon W-2155 scores 5072 (0.4% higher). The Intel Xeon Gold 6334 is 0.1% behind at 5043. This positioning indicates the 12900TE delivers performance comparable to older high-end desktop and workstation chips, despite its drastically lower TDP.

For real workloads, the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 17461 suggests strong capability in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 2465 is competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The low base clock might appear limiting, but the 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures burst performance when needed. The 35 W TDP, however, means sustained all-core loads will likely throttle below the boost ceiling, making this a processor that excels in short bursts or in systems with excellent cooling. The data shows a chip that trades raw sustained throughput for efficiency, fitting a niche of compact or low-noise workstations.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and relative performance positioning.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11857 in Passmark G3D, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 15199. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.5% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (0.5% higher). The RTX 2060 scores 15290, 0.6% higher. This tight clustering around 15200 points means the RTX 3050 OEM is a mid-range performer, roughly equivalent to a previous-generation RTX 2060.

In gaming terms, this GPU is suited for 1080p at high settings, but ultra settings at 1440p will likely strain it. Given the CPU's 60th percentile position, the processor is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most titles. For esports and competitive shooters, the combination could push high frame rates at 1080p with lowered settings. For AAA titles, expect 60 FPS at 1080p with medium-to-high presets, with dips below 60 in demanding scenes. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for current textures but may limit future titles. The GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 18 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, though enabling RT will significantly cut frame rates. The estimated figures suggest a smooth 1080p experience rather than a high-refresh or 1440p powerhouse.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900TE scores 17461 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its average benchmark score is 5050, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-9820X at 5049 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE is 0.4% faster at 5070.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 2060?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199. The RTX 2060 scores 15290, which is 0.6% higher. The performance difference is negligible in real-world terms.

Q: Is the CPU's 35 W TDP a limiting factor for performance?

A: The 35 W TDP is low for a 16-core processor. Despite this, the CPU reaches a 60th percentile ranking and matches the performance of the Intel Core i9-9820X, which suggests the efficiency design does not cripple performance in benchmark scenarios.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The specific speeds are not listed in the data.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM is in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its Passmark G3D score is 11857.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This provides a basic display output without the discrete GPU.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 59, indicating the system sits slightly above the median of all desktop configurations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the foundation for Alder Lake and Raptor Lake processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is ample for a single high-end GPU and fast NVMe storage. The platform's dual-channel memory bus means two DIMMs are optimal for bandwidth.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The RTX 3050 OEM has a 130 W TDP, and the system's suggested PSU is 300 W. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades. The CPU's 35 W TDP means the total system draw is low, so a higher-wattage PSU would not be necessary unless a more powerful GPU is installed.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate. The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile is the weaker link compared to the CPU's 60th percentile. Moving to a GPU in the 75th percentile or higher would better utilize the CPU's multi-core capability in gaming. The CPU itself is already near the top of its power-efficiency class, so upgrading it would require moving to a higher-TDP part, which may not fit the same thermal envelope. Memory upgrades to DDR5 could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, but the data does not specify speed benefits. The platform supports a clear path: replace the GPU with a higher-tier model, keep the CPU and memory, and the system becomes more balanced.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 5050, placing it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. This score is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-9820X (5049, 0% delta) and the Intel Xeon Gold 6334 (5043, 0.1% lower). The CPU is 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE (5070) and the Intel Xeon W-2155 (5072). In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 17461 indicates strong parallel processing, while the single-core score of 2465 is solid for daily tasks.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile. This is 0.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171) and 0.6% lower than the RTX 2060 (15290). The Passmark G3D score of 11857 is the primary gaming metric, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate compute capability. The GPU's Passmark compute score is 5779.

The combined percentile of the system is 59, which is a weighted average of the CPU's 60 and the GPU's 57. This indicates a balanced pairing where neither component wildly outperforms the other. The CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The delta between the CPU and its rivals is minimal, with all within 0.4%, while the GPU's rivals are also within 0.6%. This suggests the system is well-matched in terms of tier, though the CPU has a slight edge in percentile ranking. For mixed workloads, the CPU will handle compute-heavy tasks while the GPU manages graphics, and neither will dominate the other excessively.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile and 8 GB memory will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p ultra in modern titles. Estimated FPS at 1080p ultra would be in the 60-80 range for esports, but AAA games may drop to 40-60. This is not ideal for 144Hz monitors.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a 60th percentile ranking, provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder is also available, though its 8.087 TFLOPS compute may be better used for gaming. The 35 W CPU TDP keeps system heat down, benefiting streaming rigs.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17461 supports smooth 4K timeline editing and rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 60740 aids in effects and acceleration. This is a capable mid-tier editing machine.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores will handle CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles effectively, with a 60th percentile score. The GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 72 tensor cores can accelerate GPU rendering in supported applications, though its 8 GB memory may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache provide fast compilation times. The single-core score of 2465 ensures responsive IDE performance. The low 35 W TDP is beneficial for always-on development servers.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's single-core performance and UHD 770 integrated graphics would suffice, but the discrete GPU adds gaming capability. The system is quiet and efficient due to low TDPs, making it suitable for dorm rooms or small offices.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance without the power draw of a high-end desktop processor. The Intel Core i9-12900TE, with its 60th percentile ranking, is ideal for content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering, where the 16 cores and 24 threads shine. The 35 W TDP makes it suitable for compact builds or systems where thermal noise is a concern.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM serves gamers at 1080p resolution who accept medium-to-high settings. Its 57th percentile ranking and 8 GB memory handle current esports and older AAA titles well. It is not for 1440p ultra or high-refresh gaming. Small business workstations that run CPU-heavy simulations or compile code will benefit from the CPU's multi-core might, while the GPU provides adequate graphics for CAD or light video work.

Students who need a single system for coursework and gaming will find this balanced. The CPU's efficiency means a smaller PSU (300 W suggested) and lower electricity bills. Developers building Linux kernels or running virtual machines will appreciate the 24 threads. This is not a system for budget-constrained builders, as the CPU's launch MSRP is $494, but for users prioritizing multi-core performance per watt, it is a compelling choice.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i9-12900TE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a 16-core Alder Lake-S part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ampere-based card with a 130 W TDP. The combined percentile of the system is 59, placing it just above the median of all desktop configurations.

The CPU's 60th percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile indicate a mid-to-upper-mid range system. The average benchmark scores of 5050 for the CPU and 15199 for the GPU confirm this tier. The CPU matches the performance of older HEDT chips like the Intel Core i9-9820X, while the GPU is comparable to the RTX 2060. This pairing is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it sits comfortably in the upper half of the performance spectrum.

The system excels in CPU-bound workloads due to the 16 cores and efficient design. The GPU is adequate for 1080p gaming. The low TDPs of both components suggest a system that runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for professional environments. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $494, indicating a premium for the efficiency and core count. Overall, this is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream GPU, creating a balanced machine for productivity and casual gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-12900TE and the RTX 3050 OEM is slightly skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 60th percentile is three points higher than the GPU's 57th percentile. In CPU-intensive workloads like rendering or compilation, the GPU is not the limiting factor; the CPU's 16 cores will be the primary driver, and the GPU will be underutilized. The Cinebench R23 score of 17461 is the key metric here.

In gaming, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile is below the CPU's 60th, meaning the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU will likely be waiting on the GPU in most titles. At higher resolutions, the GPU's load increases, and the bottleneck shifts further toward the GPU. The 8 GB memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, limiting texture-heavy scenarios.

The combined percentile of 59 suggests the system is well-balanced overall. Neither component is drastically weaker than the other. The CPU has a slight edge, which is beneficial for productivity tasks. For gaming, the GPU will limit frame rates, but the CPU's single-core score of 2465 ensures it won't hold back the GPU in most scenarios. The FPS scaling is not measured, but the percentile delta of 3 points indicates a minor imbalance. A GPU upgrade would create a more balanced gaming system, while a CPU upgrade would be unnecessary given the current GPU's limits.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds