SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This system pairs one of Intel’s most power-efficient desktop processors with NVIDIA’s professional mobile-grade graphics solution. The result is a desktop build that prioritizes compute versatility and thermal headroom over raw gaming dominance. The data shows a CPU that sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, paired with a GPU at the 50th percentile, creating a distinct performance profile that favors multi-threaded productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a 16 GB GDDR6 part built on the AD103 chip at TSMC’s 5 nm process. The memory subsystem is substantial, with a 256-bit bus delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a configuration designed for large datasets and high-resolution textures, not just frame rate. The 16 GB capacity alone suggests the GPU is intended for workloads that exceed the memory ceiling of typical consumer cards.

Clock speeds are conservative, with a base of 930 MHz and a boost of 1680 MHz. This is a power-aware design, with the GPU’s 120 W TDP indicating a focus on sustained professional workloads rather than bursty gaming performance. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective, which is moderate for the era but paired with the wide bus to achieve that 576.0 GB/s figure.

The compute resources are where this GPU differentiates itself. With 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, the raw rasterization throughput is present, but the specialized hardware is more telling. There are 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-accelerated workflows. The FP32 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1), which is a notable capability for machine learning inference and certain scientific compute tasks. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50. This means the data places it exactly in the middle of the GPU performance distribution, though this is based on an empty benchmark array. The lack of measured scores makes direct comparisons difficult. The API support is modern — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — meaning it is fully current for software compatibility. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 capability, but the bandwidth available is sufficient for most professional workloads.

For rendering, the benchmark data is sparse, but the hardware specifications indicate a strong performer in ray-traced scenes and AI-accelerated denoising. The 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing for larger scenes and more complex materials in 3D applications without transferring data to system memory. The 304 tensor cores suggest that DLSS-style upscaling and AI-based tools will function well, though the exact performance gains are not quantified in the FACT PACK.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` object is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. All gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The GPU’s 50th percentile position suggests it will handle 1080p and 1440p gaming competently, but it is not a top-tier gaming part. The 16 GB VRAM is more than enough for current titles at ultra settings, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks at these resolutions. The FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS indicates strong raw shader performance, which translates to good frame rates in non-ray-traced scenes.

However, the conservative clock speeds (930 MHz base, 1680 MHz boost) and the 120 W TDP limit sustained high-refresh-rate performance. The GPU is likely to perform well in the 60-100 FPS range at 1440p in most titles, but it may struggle to maintain 144 Hz in demanding games. The CPU, with its high single-thread score of 3462 in Cinebench R23, is capable of feeding the GPU effectively, so the GPU will be the primary limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Ray tracing performance is a question mark. The 76 RT cores are present, but without measured FPS data, it is impossible to say whether the GPU can handle ray-traced effects at playable frame rates. The tensor cores support DLSS, which could offset the RT load, but this is speculative. The estimates suggest a capable 1440p gaming machine that can handle ultra settings in most titles, but it is not designed for chasing maximum frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a platform with a defined lifespan. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for professional workloads that require error correction.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is a slight mismatch with the platform’s newer capability. For most workloads, this will not be a significant bottleneck, as PCIe 4.0 x16 bandwidth is substantial. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and can handle basic tasks when the dedicated GPU is not in use.

The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, which is remarkably low for a 16-core processor. This is a "T" series chip, designed for power efficiency. The GPU’s TDP is 120 W. There is no suggested PSU figure in the FACT PACK, but the combined power draw of these components is modest, meaning a mid-range power supply would be sufficient. The GPU has no power connectors listed, as it is an embedded (IGP) form factor, which simplifies installation.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer generation GPU, provided the chassis and power supply can accommodate a card with external power connectors. The CPU itself is still capable, with an 85th percentile ranking, so it does not need an immediate upgrade. The platform’s DDR5 support means memory bandwidth can be increased by switching from DDR4 to DDR5, though the exact performance gain is not quantified. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes could be utilized by a future NVMe SSD for faster storage access.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a clear imbalance. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. This indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in most workloads that are not purely CPU-bound. The CPU’s multi-threaded score of 24528 in Cinebench R23 and single-thread score of 3462 are strong, indicating it can handle demanding physics, AI, and simulation tasks without breaking a sweat.

In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU can easily feed the GPU with frame data, but the GPU’s 50th percentile performance will cap the frame rates. The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p will have a more significant impact on the GPU than the CPU. The CPU is unlikely to be the source of stutters or frame drops in most scenarios.

In productivity, the CPU is the star. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29601 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10301 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and tensor cores can accelerate certain tasks, but for CPU-bound workloads like code compilation or spreadsheet calculations, the CPU will dominate. The PassMark data compression score of 345021 and data encryption score of 20750 are indicative of strong integer performance, which is useful for file archiving and security tasks.

The power envelope is also a factor. The CPU’s 35 W TDP means it will not throttle under sustained load, but the GPU’s 120 W TDP is the larger power draw. In a combined workload, the GPU will consume more power and generate more heat. This suggests that the system’s cooling solution should prioritize the GPU, even though the CPU is the higher-performing component.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 76 RT cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is notably low for a 16-core processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s PCIe interface?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Q: What is the CPU’s integrated graphics solution?

A: The CPU includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who need the CPU’s multi-threaded power but do not require top-tier gaming frame rates. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The 16 cores and 24 threads will accelerate compilation times and rendering tasks. The PassMark floating point math score of 75741 indicates strong scientific computing potential.

The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a draw for 3D artists and designers who work with large textures and complex scenes. The tensor cores support AI-accelerated tools in creative software. This is a workstation-class GPU in terms of memory capacity, even if its raw performance is mid-range. Students in engineering or data science fields would benefit from the CPU’s compute power and the GPU’s AI capabilities.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines or handle database workloads will find the CPU’s 24 threads useful. The PassMark integer math score of 108211 and the random string sorting score of 39771 suggest strong performance in data processing tasks. The low TDP of the CPU makes this a viable option for compact or power-conscious builds. Gamers at 1440p will find the system capable, but those seeking 4K or high-refresh 1080p should look elsewhere.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are extensive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24528 multi-core and 3462 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 11615 multi-core and 2259 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a single-thread score of 3810 and a multi-thread score of 29601. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37112, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 160, with an average score of 37117, a negligible delta of 0%. The Intel Core i7-13700 is also close, at 37135, with a delta of -0.1%.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which is a median position. The combined percentile for this build is 68, indicating it outperforms 68% of all builds in the database. The pair rank by FPS is null, as there is no measured FPS data.

The combined picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The system’s overall strength lies in its CPU, which can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease. The GPU provides adequate performance for professional applications and moderate gaming, but it will not set any records. The 68th combined percentile suggests a well-rounded machine that is better than average but not exceptional in any single metric.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system. The pairing of the Intel Core i9-12900T with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation creates a desktop workstation with a specific focus. The CPU is a 16-core Alder Lake-S part with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency. The GPU is a 16 GB Ada Lovelace professional part with a 120 W TDP.

The overall tier from the percentiles is mixed. The CPU is in the top 15% of all processors, while the GPU is in the middle of the pack. The combined percentile of 68 indicates this is a solidly above-average build. The system is not a gaming powerhouse, but it is a capable content creation and productivity machine. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is its primary strength, enabling large workloads. The CPU’s 24 threads are its primary strength, enabling heavy multitasking. This is a balanced machine for professional use, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The base clock is 1400.00 MHz, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The TDP is 35 W, which is exceptionally low for a processor with this core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 215 mm².

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 is strong, indicating it can handle video rendering and 3D modeling tasks efficiently. The single-core score of 3462 is also competitive, ensuring responsive performance in everyday tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 345021 and data encryption score of 20750 suggest strong performance in file management and security applications.

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160, is virtually identical in score (37117 vs 37112), showing that this processor is at the top of its class. The architectural advantage of Alder Lake, with its hybrid core design, is evident in the balance between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility, though the dual-channel memory bus is a standard configuration. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a bonus for systems without a dedicated GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the primary use case. The GPU’s 50th percentile performance and conservative clocks will likely deliver 60-100 FPS at 1440p, but the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3462 ensures it will not be the bottleneck. Gamers seeking 144 Hz or 4K should consider a different GPU.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. The 16 cores and 24 threads can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without significant performance loss. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29601 indicates ample headroom for encoding tasks. The GPU’s tensor cores could also accelerate NVENC-style encoding, though this is not explicitly confirmed.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 accelerates video rendering and export times. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM allows for smooth scrubbing of high-resolution timelines and effects processing. The combination of CPU and GPU resources is well-balanced for this workload.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is a boon for CPU-based renderers. The 24 threads will process complex scenes efficiently. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM make it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering and real-time viewport work. The 76 RT cores also enable hardware ray tracing in supported renderers.

Software Development: The CPU’s 24 threads and strong integer performance (PassMark integer math score of 108211) make it ideal for code compilation. The PassMark data encryption score of 20750 is useful for secure development environments. The GPU is less relevant here, but the system’s overall responsiveness will be high.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3810 in PassMark ensures snappy performance in word processors and spreadsheets. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle dual monitors for productivity. The low 35 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial in a shared workspace.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds