SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. The GPU is equipped with 48 dedicated RT cores and 192 tensor cores, making it a capable platform for ray-traced workflows and AI-accelerated tasks such as denoising, DLSS, and machine learning inference.

Memory configuration is substantial for a single-slot workstation card: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is particularly relevant for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and GPU-accelerated rendering workloads that exceed the VRAM limits of consumer cards. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), which is modest compared to high-end gaming GPUs, but the 20 GB capacity is the standout feature for professional use cases.

Clock speeds are set at a base of 1500 MHz and a boost of 2175 MHz. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 26.73 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which indicates strong general-purpose compute performance and balanced half-precision capability for workloads that benefit from FP16 acceleration.

In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 146,593 in OpenCL and 123,842 in Vulkan. These scores place it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135,218. Compared to its nearest rivals, the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (-0.9%). This cluster of scores shows that the RTX 4000 Ada is essentially tied with these professional cards, with differences well under 1%. The practical implication is that in compute-bound rendering and simulation tasks, the RTX 4000 Ada will perform nearly identically to these alternatives, despite architectural differences.

The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are not directly represented in the Geekbench scores, but they provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and tensor operations that are essential in modern rendering pipelines. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility for professional applications. Display output is via four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, which is standard for multi-monitor workstation setups.

Power requirements are modest for the performance class: the GPU has a TDP of 130 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. The card is single-slot, measuring 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height, which makes it suitable for dense workstation builds or small form factor systems. Its 5 nm process node from TSMC contributes to the efficiency, though the exact efficiency figures are not provided in the data.

For rendering workloads, the benchmark scores indicate that the GPU is positioned in the top 5% of all GPUs, with compute performance that rivals professional cards from AMD and NVIDIA's own previous generation. The 20 GB VRAM is the key differentiator, as it allows loading larger datasets and render scenes without swapping to system memory. The combination of 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth suggests balanced performance for both compute-heavy and memory-intensive tasks, though the bandwidth is not exceptional by current high-end standards.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU, an Intel Core i9-12900T, achieves strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores across multiple benchmark suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,472 multicore and 348 singlecore. Cinebench R20 yields 10,301 multicore and 1,454 singlecore. Cinebench R23 shows 24,528 multicore and 3,462 singlecore. Geekbench results are 11,615 multicore and 2,259 singlecore. Passmark scores include 29,601 multithread, 3,810 single thread, 108,211 integer math, 75,741 floating point math, 34,5021 data compression, 20,750 data encryption, 20,054 extended instructions, 39,771 random string sorting, 1,811 physics, and 116 find prime numbers. The average benchmark score is 37,112, placing the CPU at the 85th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 135,218, at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 90, indicating that the system as a whole sits in the top 10% of configurations tracked in the database.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals reveals a tightly clustered field. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37,117 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 (0.1%), the Intel Core i7-13700 scores 37,135 (-0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37,161 (-0.1%). The i9-12900T is within 0.1% of all these processors, which means that in aggregate benchmark terms, it is interchangeable with them for most workloads. However, the specific distribution of scores matters: the i9-12900T's high multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (24,528) and Passmark multithread (29,601) indicate strong sustained all-core performance, while its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,462 shows competitive single-thread performance.

The combined picture is one of a balanced high-end system. The CPU at the 85th percentile and GPU at the 95th percentile create a pairing where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. This means that in GPU-bound scenarios (most gaming at high resolutions, rendering, and compute tasks), the GPU will be the primary performance driver, while the CPU provides sufficient headroom for most workloads without becoming a severe bottleneck in CPU-light tasks.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that gaming performance cannot be stated as fact. This analysis will therefore frame all FPS discussion as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, which is a clear limitation but still allows for reasonable inference given the strong absolute scores of both components.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is a wide turbo range typical of Intel's hybrid designs. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 215 mm², and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus. It does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking if the motherboard and cooling permit, though the T-series chip's 35 W TDP suggests thermal constraints are a design priority. The processor was released on 2022-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $489.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore of 24,528 is a strong result, indicating that the 16 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores typical of Alder Lake) can sustain heavy parallel workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 29,601 corroborates this. Single-thread performance is also solid: Cinebench R23 singlecore of 3,462 and Geekbench singlecore of 2,259 show that the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz delivers competitive per-core performance.

The Passmark sub-scores provide insight into specific workload characteristics. Integer math at 108,211 and floating point math at 75,741 indicate strong general-purpose compute. Data compression at 345,021 and random string sorting at 39,771 suggest that the processor handles data manipulation tasks efficiently. Data encryption at 20,750 and extended instructions at 20,054 show reasonable throughput for cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The physics score of 1,811 is moderate, and the find prime numbers score of 116 is a measure of integer-heavy single-thread performance, which is lower than the multi-threaded results might suggest.

For real workloads, this CPU is well-suited for content creation, software compilation, and multi-tasking. The 24 threads allow efficient parallel processing in video editing, 3D rendering, and data analysis. The single-thread performance ensures that lighter tasks like web browsing, office applications, and single-threaded legacy software remain responsive. The 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a 16-core processor, which means that in sustained workloads, the clock speeds may be lower than a higher-TDP variant, but the benchmark scores show that the Alder Lake architecture is efficient enough to deliver strong results within this power envelope.

The 85th percentile ranking places this CPU above the majority of processors in the database, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.1% in average score, indicating that it performs at the level of a modern mid-high-end desktop processor. The i7-13700, for instance, is a newer generation but scores nearly identically on average, which highlights that the i9-12900T's value lies in its efficiency and thread count rather than raw single-thread dominance.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

With the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile, the system is GPU-heavy in terms of relative performance. This means that in most demanding tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor, which is generally desirable for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but there are specific cases where the CPU could become a bottleneck.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations, AI logic, or heavy single-threaded game engines, the i9-12900T's 85th percentile ranking indicates that it is above average but not top-tier. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 3,462 is good but not exceptional compared to the highest-performing consumer CPUs. In games that rely heavily on a single thread, the CPU might limit the GPU's full potential, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as rendering with ray tracing, 4K gaming, or compute-heavy tasks like machine learning training, the RTX 4000 Ada's 95th percentile ranking means it will dominate the performance equation. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS compute allow it to handle large, complex tasks without waiting on the CPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 is nearly 13 times the CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 11,615, which illustrates the massive performance disparity between the two components in parallel compute.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, based on the percentile gap, one can infer that in a game running at 1080p with a high-end GPU, the CPU might become a limiting factor in scenes with many draw calls or complex physics. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, and the CPU's 85th percentile performance is likely sufficient to maintain high frame rates.

The combined percentile of 90 is lower than the GPU's 95th percentile, which suggests that the CPU is dragging the overall system score down slightly. This is not necessarily a problem; it just means that for a perfectly balanced system, a slightly stronger CPU would be needed to fully utilize the GPU's potential in all scenarios. However, for most real-world applications, the i9-12900T provides enough performance to keep the GPU well-fed, especially given its high multi-threaded scores that help in modern games that use multiple cores.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and the CPU's 85th percentile ranking, this system is expected to deliver high frame rates in most modern games at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures, and its 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggests strong rasterization performance. The CPU's 24 threads and 4.90 GHz boost clock should handle game logic and physics without major issues.

At 1080p, where the CPU often becomes the bottleneck in high-refresh scenarios, the i9-12900T's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 singlecore of 3,462) is competitive, but it may not reach the highest frame rates achievable by top-tier CPUs. However, the 85th percentile ranking indicates that it will perform above the majority of systems. Frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant could plausibly exceed 200 FPS, but this is speculative.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, and the system should deliver smooth gameplay in most AAA titles. The RTX 4000 Ada's compute performance, combined with 360 GB/s bandwidth, suggests that it can handle demanding games with high settings. Estimates for a game like Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p ultra might be in the 60-80 FPS range, but without measured data, this remains a rough guess.

At 4K, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and compute power come into play. The 95th percentile ranking means it outperforms 95% of GPUs, so it should run most games at 4K with playable frame rates, though the most demanding titles may require DLSS or reduced settings. The RT and tensor cores could provide significant acceleration in games that support DLSS, potentially boosting frame rates substantially.

In summary, while the exact FPS numbers cannot be stated, the benchmark data points to a system that is excellent for high-resolution gaming, with the GPU being the dominant factor in most scenarios. The CPU is sufficient for gaming, but for the absolute highest frame rates at 1080p in CPU-bound titles, a stronger processor would be needed.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop pairing of Intel Core i9-12900T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation targets users who need a balance of CPU efficiency and GPU compute power in a workstation-class system.

3D Renderers and Animators: The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS compute, combined with the CPU's 24,528 Cinebench R23 multicore score, make this a strong candidate for rendering complex scenes in Blender, Maya, or Cinema 4D, where both CPU and GPU are used.
Video Editors: The CPU's high multi-core performance (29,601 Passmark multithread) handles timeline operations and encoding, while the GPU accelerates effects, color grading, and export via CUDA.
Machine Learning Engineers: The 192 tensor cores and 20 GB VRAM provide a capable platform for training and inference of moderate-sized models, though the 360 GB/s bandwidth may be a limiting factor for very large datasets.
Data Scientists: The CPU's 24 threads and strong integer math (108,211 Passmark) support data processing, while the GPU accelerates matrix operations and data visualization.
Software Developers: The 16 cores and 24 threads allow fast compilation of large codebases, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data.
Gamers at 1440p/4K: The GPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures high frame rates at high resolutions, and the CPU is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks in most games.
Small Business Workstations: The single-slot GPU and 35 W CPU TDP contribute to a compact, efficient build that can handle CAD, financial modeling, and office productivity without excessive power draw.

The 90th combined percentile indicates that this is a high-end system suitable for professionals who require significant compute power in a desktop form factor. The 35 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP suggest that a modest cooling solution and a 300 W PSU (as suggested) are sufficient, which is attractive for quiet or space-constrained workstations.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1440p, the GPU's 95th percentile performance is expected to deliver high frame rates in most games, though the CPU's 85th percentile may limit absolute maximum FPS in CPU-bound esports titles. The 20 GB VRAM ensures that high-resolution textures do not cause memory issues.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, and the GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) can handle hardware encoding. The Passmark multithread score of 29,601 supports simultaneous gaming and streaming without significant performance loss.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,528 accelerates rendering and export times, while the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS and 20 GB VRAM handle effects, color correction, and preview rendering in 4K timelines.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 20 GB VRAM allows loading large scenes. The CPU's multi-core performance (10,301 in Cinebench R20) supports CPU-based rendering engines.

Software Development: The 16 cores and 24 threads compile code efficiently, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The Passmark integer math score of 108,211 indicates strong performance in logic-heavy tasks.

Student and Office Work: The 35 W CPU TDP and single-slot GPU make for a quiet, efficient system. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,462 in Passmark ensures responsive everyday tasks, while the GPU is overkill for basic office work but ready for any demanding academic projects.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, placing it in the top 10% of configurations in the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and a base clock of 1400 MHz.

Q: How does the RTX 4000 Ada compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada has an average benchmark score of 135,218, while the A10M scores 135,230, a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, the GPU has a TDP of 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The GPU delivers 26.73 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, with the same figure for FP16 (1:1 ratio).

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports 12th Gen Intel Core processors. The i9-12900T is the low-power variant of the 12900 series, and the socket also supports higher-TDP models like the 12900K, which could provide better multi-threaded performance at the cost of higher power draw. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users can choose either memory type depending on motherboard and budget, though the exact memory speeds are not specified in the data.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 slots and does not bottleneck the GPU's bandwidth. The suggested PSU is 300 W, which is low for a system with a 130 W GPU and a 35 W CPU. This leaves significant headroom for additional components like storage drives, fans, or peripherals, but upgrading to a more powerful CPU would likely require a larger PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-clock variant on the same socket, such as a 12900K, if the motherboard supports it. This would improve single-threaded performance for gaming and reduce potential CPU bottlenecks. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage (NVMe) would improve system responsiveness and data throughput. The GPU is already at the 95th percentile, so upgrading it would yield diminishing returns unless professional workloads require even more VRAM or compute power.

The platform's support for DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 ensures that it is not immediately outdated, and the 20 GB GPU VRAM provides longevity for future software demands. The 35 W CPU TDP also leaves thermal headroom for a more powerful CPU in the same socket, should the need arise.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-12900T, a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, a 20 GB GDDR6 workstation GPU. The CPU is positioned at the 85th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37,112, while the GPU is at the 95th percentile with an average score of 135,218. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 90, placing this system in the top 10% of tracked configurations.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high-end, as evidenced by the GPU's top-5% ranking and the CPU's above-average standing. The CPU's low 35 W TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice for a 16-core processor, while the GPU's 130 W TDP is modest for its compute capability. This pairing is suitable for professional workstations that need substantial GPU compute for rendering, AI, and video work, as well as gaming at high resolutions. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores indicate a system that is overwhelmingly capable for most demanding applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds