SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER represent a pairing of a low-power desktop CPU with a modern Blackwell GPU. The data shows a significant imbalance in their performance percentiles, which defines the character of this build. While the CPU holds an 85th percentile rank among all processors, the GPU sits at just the 18th percentile, based on the single available benchmark score. This discrepancy suggests a platform where CPU-driven tasks will far outpace GPU-accelerated workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the P-core/E-core split. The base clock is 1400.00 MHz, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. This is a 35 W TDP part, indicating a focus on energy efficiency rather than maximum sustained performance. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not present.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24528 places it well within the upper echelon of desktop CPUs. Its single-core score of 3462 is equally robust, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and applications that rely on single-thread performance. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 11615 and single-core score of 2259 reinforce this profile. The PassMark multithread score of 29601 and single-thread score of 3810 further support the CPU's capability in both parallel and sequential workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37112, which places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (avgScore 37117, deltaPct 0) and the Intel Core i7-13700 (avgScore 37135, deltaPct -0.1), show that the i9-12900T is essentially performance-equivalent to these parts. The deltaPct values are negligible, meaning for CPU-bound workloads, the user would see no meaningful difference between these processors. The data also indicates the i9-12900T is on par with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (avgScore 37093, deltaPct 0.1) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (avgScore 37161, deltaPct -0.1).

Specific PassMark sub-tests reveal workload characteristics. The integer math score of 108211 and floating-point math score of 75741 are strong, indicating solid general computation. The data encryption score of 20750 and data compression score of 345021 show proficiency in data handling tasks. The extended instructions score of 20054 suggests good performance with modern instruction sets. The find prime numbers score of 116 is a lower integer result, but this is typical for a test that is heavily dependent on single-core clock speed and memory latency.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 scores translate to fast video encoding and 3D rendering times. The Geekbench scores indicate snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The PassMark physics score of 1811 is moderate, but the overall multithread score suggests the CPU can handle physics simulations in games and professional applications without becoming the primary constraint. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial, aiding in workloads that require frequent data access.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark performance is well-documented across multiple suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2472 multicore and 348 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 10301 multicore and 1454 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores are 24528 multicore and 3462 single-core. These scores show a linear scaling from R15 to R23, which is expected as the workloads become more demanding.

The GPU has a single benchmark score from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 of 2690. This score places the RTX 5070 SUPER at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (avgScore 2664, deltaPct 1), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (avgScore 2662, deltaPct 1.1), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (avgScore 2660, deltaPct 1.1), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (avgScore 2645, deltaPct 1.7), are all within a 1.7% performance delta. This is a striking result, as it puts the RTX 5070 SUPER in the same performance class as entry-level and older discrete GPUs, according to this specific metric. The 3DMark Steel Nomad test is a DX12 benchmark that stresses the GPU's raw compute and rendering capabilities.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU is a top-15% performer, while the GPU is in the bottom 20%. The combined percentile for this pairing is 52, which reflects the average of the two components' positions. This means that for any workload, the CPU will be far more capable than the GPU. The data suggests that this build is not intended for GPU-intensive tasks like high-end gaming or 3D rendering, as the GPU will be the limiting factor. Instead, it appears optimized for CPU-bound productivity, where the GPU is sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, designated GB205, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It features 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, indicating support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based technologies like DLSS.

Memory specifications are substantial on paper. The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps. The base clock is 2325 MHz, with a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 32.15 TFLOPS, with the same figure for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. This is a dual-slot card with a 275 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector. It uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and provides one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Despite these advanced specifications, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 is surprisingly low. This suggests that either the driver or the benchmark is not effectively utilizing the GPU's hardware, or that the card's architecture has a significant bottleneck in this particular workload. The performance delta of 1.1% to the GeForce GT 1030, a much older and less powerful card, is a red flag. For rendering tasks, the FP32 and FP16 compute figures suggest theoretical capability, but the measured benchmark indicates poor real-world execution in this specific test. The RT cores and tensor cores are present, but their performance cannot be verified from the available data.

The 18 GB of VRAM is a generous allocation, which would be beneficial for large textures in gaming or large datasets in compute tasks. However, the low benchmark score suggests that the memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s is not being fully exploited, or that the card's compute units are underperforming. The pixel rate and texture rate are impressive on paper, but again, the measured performance does not align with these figures. The data indicates that for any GPU-accelerated rendering, this card will underperform relative to its specifications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 85th percentile rank contrasts sharply with the GPU's 18th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads—such as code compilation, spreadsheet calculations, database operations, and most office productivity suites—the i9-12900T will deliver excellent performance. The Cinebench and Geekbench scores confirm this capability. The GPU will not interfere with these tasks, as they do not rely heavily on the discrete graphics card.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as modern 3D gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5070 SUPER will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 indicates that the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU will be idle waiting for the GPU to complete its work, resulting in a significant bottleneck. The FPS scaling, if it were measured, would show low frame rates regardless of the CPU's power, as the GPU is the constraint.

The data suggests that the GPU is the performance floor of this system. Any workload that requires more than entry-level graphics performance will be hampered. The CPU, on the other hand, has ample headroom to handle even the most demanding computational tasks. This creates a system where the user must prioritize CPU-centric workloads to get the most value from the hardware. For gaming, the CPU will not be the limiting factor; the GPU will cap the performance. For productivity, the GPU is sufficient for basic display tasks, and the CPU will excel.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The GPU's 18th percentile rank and low 3DMark score of 2690 indicate it cannot drive high frame rates at any resolution. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will limit FPS to entry-level levels.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for encoding streams, given its strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 24528). The GPU's hardware encoder is present, but its performance is unverified. The GPU will handle the encoding, but game performance will be poor due to the low 3DMark score.

Video editing: The CPU will excel at timeline scrubbing and effect processing, with its 24 threads and high single-core score (3462 in Cinebench R23). The GPU can assist with rendering and effects, but its low benchmark score suggests it will not accelerate these tasks effectively. The 18 GB VRAM may help with large projects, but the overall GPU performance is a bottleneck.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24528 makes it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is theoretically high, but the 3DMark score of 2690 indicates poor real-world rendering performance. This pairing is best suited for CPU rendering.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's high single-thread score (2259 Geekbench) and fast compilation times (PassMark integer math 108211) make it ideal for building code. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so its low performance is not a concern.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for this scenario, but it will provide a very responsive experience. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle basic display tasks, and the discrete GPU offers no advantage given its low benchmark score. The system will handle spreadsheets and documents with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU is a modern feature, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. The CPU's 35 W TDP is very low, meaning cooling requirements are minimal. The GPU has a 275 W TDP, which is the primary power draw. The suggested PSU is not specified in the FACT PACK, so power supply headroom cannot be precisely determined, but the CPU's low power draw provides ample room for the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more capable model. The CPU is powerful enough to support a much higher-performing graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 16 cores and 24 threads would not limit any modern GPU. Since the CPU is already at the 85th percentile, an upgrade here would yield diminishing returns. The motherboard and memory support are current, so no platform changes are needed. The primary weakness of this build is the GPU, and that is where any future investment should be directed.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. It is ideal for software developers who need fast compilation times and responsive IDEs. The PassMark integer math score of 108211 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24528 are evidence of this capability. It is also suitable for students and office workers who run demanding analytical software or large spreadsheets, as the CPU will handle these tasks with ease. The low TDP of 35 W makes it an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs for long periods.

For content creators, this build is only recommended for those who use CPU-based rendering tools. The GPU is too weak for GPU-accelerated rendering, as shown by its 18th percentile rank. Gamers should avoid this build, as the GPU will not provide a satisfying experience at any resolution. Small business workstations that run database applications or financial modeling software will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded power. The system is not a balanced general-purpose machine; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a placeholder GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a high-end, low-power CPU with a low-performing GPU. The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor that sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, despite its modern architecture and 18 GB of VRAM, performs at the 18th percentile based on the 3DMark Steel Nomad score. The combined percentile of this pairing is 52, reflecting the average of the two components. The overall tier is a mid-range system for CPU-bound tasks, with the GPU serving as a weak point that defines the system's limitations. It is a desktop-class machine that is not balanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T is at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37112.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2690.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-12900T has an average score of 37112, which is 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117) and -0.1% different from the Intel Core i7-13700 (37135).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has an average score of 2690, which is 1% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664) and 1.1% higher than the GeForce GT 1030 (2662).

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 is the sole indicator of gaming performance. This score places it at the 18th percentile, alongside the GeForce GT 1030 and GT 440. Based on this, the estimated gaming performance is very low. In modern titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 5070 SUPER would likely struggle to maintain 30 frames per second. At 1440p or 4K, the frame rates would be unplayable, likely dropping to single digits in demanding scenes. The CPU would not be the limiting factor; the GPU's low score indicates it is the bottleneck.

For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the frame rates might be higher, but the GPU's low percentile suggests it would still underperform compared to other discrete GPUs. The 18 GB of VRAM is irrelevant if the GPU cannot process frames fast enough. The estimated performance is that this GPU is suitable for basic 2D games or older 3D titles, but it is not designed for modern, graphically intensive gaming. The RT and tensor cores are present, but their gaming impact is negligible given the low overall benchmark score.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds