SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-12900T with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 creates a desktop build with a stark performance split: the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 35th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination yields a combined percentile of 60, indicating that the system’s overall capability is anchored by its graphics component rather than its processing power.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 60, meaning it outperforms roughly 60% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i9-12900T has an average benchmark score of 37112, which is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, 0.1% faster), the Intel Core i7-13700 (37135, 0.1% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161, 0.1% slower).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and its closest competitor?

A: The Radeon RX 6400 ranks at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, with an average score of 6000 versus the RX 6400’s 6001, a 0% performance delta.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 6400 comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T features 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: Does this build have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 has a launch MSRP of $159 USD.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a profound imbalance between the two components. The Intel Core i9-12900T posts an average benchmark score of 37112, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs—a strong result that puts it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i7-13700, are within 0.1% of its score, showing that the 12900T is competitive with modern mid-range and high-end chips.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 6400 achieves an average benchmark score of only 6001, which ranks it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. This places it in the lower third of graphics cards, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at a 0% delta. The GPU’s individual benchmark results confirm its modest standing: a PassMark G3D score of 7673, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176, and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 32011.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU vastly outstrips the GPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking suggests it can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease, but the GPU’s 35th percentile means that graphics-intensive tasks—particularly gaming at high resolutions—will be severely constrained. The combined percentile of 60 reflects this bottleneck, as the GPU drags the overall system performance down despite the CPU’s strength.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. Its base clock of 1400 MHz is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, allowing for significant single-thread performance when needed. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and its 30 MB of shared L3 cache provides ample capacity for data-intensive workloads.

Benchmark results underscore the CPU’s multi-core prowess. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24528 in multi-core and 3462 in single-core. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11615 and single-core score of 2259 further reinforce its balanced capability. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 29601, a single-thread score of 3810, and strong sub-scores in integer math (108211) and floating-point math (75741). Data compression performance is particularly impressive at 345021, while encryption hits 20750.

For real workloads, these numbers indicate that the 12900T excels in parallel processing tasks. Video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation that can utilize all 24 threads will benefit from the high multi-core scores. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is more than adequate for everyday applications and lightly-threaded tasks. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking confirms that it sits comfortably above the majority of desktop processors, making it a capable foundation for productivity-focused builds. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 16-core chip, suggesting efficient power management at the cost of sustained high-frequency operation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical results. The GPU’s 35th percentile ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 7673 suggest that it is suited primarily for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles. At 4K resolution, the RX 6400’s 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause significant frame rate drops, as the card lacks the memory capacity and bandwidth for high-resolution textures.

The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3462 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 3810 indicate that it can feed frames quickly to the GPU, but the RX 6400 will be the limiting factor. In esports titles with low graphical demands, the GPU may deliver acceptable frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in games like CS:GO or Valorant. For AAA titles, frame rates will likely fall below 60 FPS at 1080p with ultra settings, requiring reduced graphical presets to maintain playability. At 1440p, the GPU’s performance will degrade further, and at 4K, it will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern games. The 12 ray tracing cores on the RX 6400 are present, but the card’s overall compute power (3.565 TFLOPS FP32) is too low for meaningful ray-traced performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6400’s 35th percentile ranking makes 144Hz gaming at 1080p unrealistic in most titles. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 and DirectX 11 score of 70 indicate limited API-specific performance, so high-refresh monitors will only be fully utilized in undemanding esports titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and strong multi-core scores (24528 in Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. However, the GPU’s low compute performance will limit in-game frame rates, making streaming at high quality settings difficult without substantial graphical compromises.

Video editing: The 12900T’s PassMark data compression score of 345021 and multi-thread score of 29601 make it well-suited for video encoding and rendering tasks. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle basic effects and timeline scrubbing, but complex GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in software like Blender will benefit from the 16-core processor, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10301 indicating solid performance. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the RX 6400’s 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 compute, which is far below what dedicated rendering cards offer.

Software development: The CPU’s high integer math score (108211) and 24 threads make compilation and code analysis tasks efficient. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development workloads, so this build serves developers well if graphics work is minimal.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3810 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites. The GPU is adequate for basic 2D tasks, with a PassMark G2D score of 722, but offers no advantage over modern integrated graphics in most office scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, or large data processing will find the 12900T’s 85th percentile ranking highly attractive. The processor’s 24 threads and strong multi-core benchmarks make it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases or run virtual machines.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations may consider this build if they stick to esports titles or older games, where the RX 6400’s performance is adequate. However, gamers seeking high-refresh or high-resolution experiences should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking severely limits frame rates. Students and office workers will find the CPU’s responsiveness beneficial for multitasking, though the discrete GPU adds little value over integrated graphics for these tasks. Small business workstations that run data analysis, accounting software, or light video production could leverage the CPU’s multi-threaded strengths, provided the GPU demands remain low.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a clear bottleneck: the GPU limits the system in graphics-heavy workloads, while the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37112 places it at the 85th percentile, while the GPU’s 6001 score puts it at the 35th percentile. This 50-percentile gap means that in gaming scenarios, the RX 6400 will be the limiting factor, as it cannot keep pace with the frame generation capabilities of the 12900T.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3810 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3462 indicate it can process game logic and physics quickly, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 and DirectX 12 score of 30 suggest it will struggle to render frames at high settings. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM further compounds the issue, as modern games often exceed this capacity at 1080p with high textures, causing stuttering or texture pop-in. Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering (CPU-based), the CPU will operate near its full potential, and the GPU’s limitations become irrelevant. For balanced performance, the CPU should be paired with a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher, but this build’s overall 60th percentile reflects the GPU’s drag on the system.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs a high-end 16-core Intel processor with a low-end AMD graphics card. The Intel Core i9-12900T, part of the Core 12th Gen series, uses the Alder Lake architecture and fits the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD Radeon RX 6400, from the RX 6000 series, is based on the Navi 24 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 60 places this system in the mid-range tier of desktop builds, though the individual components span a wide range: the CPU is in the upper tier (85th percentile), while the GPU is in the lower tier (35th percentile). This pairing is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with a basic graphics capability, rather than a balanced gaming or content creation system.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a compact, single-slot GPU based on the Navi 24 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s clocks include a base of 1923 MHz, a boost of 2321 MHz, and a game clock of 2039 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The card contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. Its compute performance is rated at 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.130 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), with a pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results place the RX 6400 at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 6001. Its PassMark G3D score of 7673 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 32011 indicate modest compute capability, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 16372 shows limited API-specific performance. The GPU’s DirectX scores are notably low—PassMark DirectX 12 at 30, DirectX 11 at 70, and DirectX 10 at 54—suggesting that modern graphics workloads will run poorly. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures or complex scenes, and the 12 ray tracing cores lack the compute power to deliver playable ray-traced performance. The GPU’s 53 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it an efficient, low-power option, but its performance class is clearly entry-level, suited for basic display output and light gaming rather than demanding graphics tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds