SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KS + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900KS

45,094 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-12900KS + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

This desktop pairing combines Intel’s flagship Alder Lake-S processor with NVIDIA’s professional Ada Lovelace-class GPU, producing a system that lands in the 70th combined percentile across all builds. The CPU alone sits in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking indicates it is a mid-pack performer relative to the broader GPU landscape. Benchmark data for this exact combination is not measured — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows — so all gaming and workload performance discussed here is estimated from the individual CPU and GPU scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900KS is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process. Its hybrid design mixes performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock reaching 5.50 GHz. The 150 W TDP classifies it as a high-power desktop part, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users who want to push beyond stock speeds.

Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 pool. This substantial L3 capacity supports heavily threaded workloads where data reuse across cores matters. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, with a measured memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, which broadens its appeal for workstation and server-adjacent use cases.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of its multi-threaded strength. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 36,859 points in multi-core and 5,203 in single-core. The R20 run yields 15,480 multi-core and 2,185 single-core, while R15 produces 3,715 and 524 respectively. Geekbench scores reach 18,538 multi-core and 2,408 single-core. The 3DMark thread-scaling tests show progressive gains: 2,212 at 2 threads, 4,320 at 4 threads, 7,872 at 8 threads, 10,316 at 16 threads, and 11,897 at max threads. This scaling curve indicates the processor extracts meaningful parallelism across its core count, with diminishing returns only after 16 threads.

The PassMark suite reinforces this profile. Multi-thread score is 43,698, while single-thread is 4,330. Integer math hits 147,575, floating-point math reaches 111,429, and extended instructions score 35,089. Data compression finishes at 563,709, data encryption at 31,403, and random string sorting at 60,539. Physics simulation scores 2,437, and prime number finding completes at 158. These figures suggest the CPU excels at mixed integer and floating-point work, with particularly strong encryption and compression throughput.

Comparing against nearest rivals, the i9-12900KS posts an average benchmark score of 45,094. The AMD EPYC 4344P scores 45,122, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the i9 is effectively tied with a server-class EPYC part. The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44,889, putting the i9 0.5 percent ahead. AMD’s Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573, a 1.2 percent gap, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466, a 1.4 percent gap. The i9-12900KS leads all four rivals by a slim margin, but the differences are minor enough that real-world application performance would be indistinguishable in most scenarios.

For real workloads, this CPU handles video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering with substantial headroom. The 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache benefit parallel tasks, while the 5.50 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded applications responsive. The 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it sits well above the median desktop processor.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a professional mobile-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm TSMC process. The AD103 chip contains 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². Despite the "Embedded" designation, this is being evaluated in a desktop build context.

Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. This capacity and bandwidth suit large datasets, high-resolution textures, and GPU-accelerated compute workloads that exceed the VRAM limits of consumer cards.

The compute core layout features 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation processors. Ray tracing is handled by 76 dedicated RT cores, while 304 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning inference. Base clock is 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz. Pixel fill rate reaches 188.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate hits 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 32.69 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio.

Power consumption is listed at 120 W TDP, which is modest for the compute capability on offer. The GPU uses no external power connectors, indicating it draws power through the slot or embedded system design. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are portable-device dependent, reflecting its embedded origins. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0, with an empty nearestRivals array. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it exactly at the median — neither a standout performer nor a weak one. The absence of measured scores means performance must be inferred from the architectural specifications. The 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth position it as a capable rendering and compute device, though the 50th percentile suggests it may trail top-tier consumer GPUs in raw gaming performance.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature. Large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer compositing all benefit from this capacity. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI-based denoising. The 1:1 FP16/FP32 ratio is notable for mixed-precision compute tasks common in scientific simulation and machine learning.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 45,094, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4344P, scores 45,122 — a negligible 0.1 percent difference. The Intel Core i5-14600 trails by 0.5 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 1.2 percent, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 1.4 percent. The i9-12900KS effectively sits at the top of this comparison group, but the margins are so thin that they fall within run-to-run variance.

The GPU’s benchmark data is absent. No scores exist in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs is the only positional data available. This makes direct GPU-to-GPU comparisons impossible from the provided data.

The combined system percentile is 70, reflecting a pairing where a strong CPU is matched with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile dominance is tempered by the GPU’s 50th percentile mediocrity, pulling the overall build down to the 70th percentile. This asymmetry is the defining characteristic of the pairing.

Without measured FPS data, the combined picture must be assembled from component scores. The CPU’s multi-threaded results (36,859 in Cinebench R23, 43,698 in PassMark multi-thread) indicate it will not bottleneck most workloads. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can drive high-resolution rendering and compute tasks, but its 50th percentile ranking implies it may lag behind dedicated gaming GPUs in frame-rate-sensitive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s strongest benchmark area?

A: Data compression leads with a PassMark score of 563,709, followed by integer math at 147,575 and floating-point math at 111,429. Multi-thread performance is also strong at 43,698 in PassMark and 36,859 in Cinebench R23.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and why does that matter?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity supports large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and AI model inference without running out of memory.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true. The CPU also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-12900KS averages 45,094 in benchmarks. The AMD EPYC 4344P scores 45,122 (0.1 percent higher), the Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44,889 (0.5 percent lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573 (1.2 percent lower), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466 (1.4 percent lower).

Q: What is the GPU’s compute capability?

A: The GPU delivers 32.69 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). It has 9,728 shading units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is measured gaming performance available for this pairing?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s overall ranking?

A: The GPU sits in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, exactly at the median. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, with no rival comparison data provided.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads while accepting mid-tier GPU performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 threads and 36,859 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Data analysts and researchers running encryption or compression tasks will see strong throughput from scores like 31,403 in encryption and 563,709 in compression.

Content creators working in video editing will find the CPU’s multi-thread performance adequate for rendering timelines, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking may limit GPU-accelerated effects. 3D artists using ray-traced rendering will leverage the 76 RT cores and 16 GB VRAM, though the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is not class-leading.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can benefit from the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking for simulation and compilation workloads. Small business workstations handling database queries, spreadsheet analysis, or light virtualization will find the 24 threads and ECC support valuable, while the GPU handles basic visualization and office graphics.

Gamers targeting high-refresh competitive titles should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s median ranking suggests frame rates will be moderate rather than exceptional. Users pairing this CPU with a stronger GPU would shift the combined percentile upward, but the embedded GPU in this build is the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p will depend heavily on the GPU’s 50th percentile performance. The CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock and 1,121 single-thread 3DMark score ensure it will not bottleneck frame delivery, but the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate mid-range frame rates rather than competitive esports numbers.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s multi-thread headroom. The 43,698 PassMark multi-thread score and 30 MB L3 cache allow simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting, while the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate AI-based stream enhancement features.

Video editing in Premiere or DaVinci Resolve will see strong CPU performance for timeline scrubbing and export encoding, with the 16 GB VRAM handling 4K previews and effects stacks. The 510.7 GTexel/s texture rate supports real-time effect rendering, though the 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests slower-than-premium export times.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya will leverage the 76 RT cores for ray-traced previews and final renders. The 16 GB VRAM fits most production scenes, and the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates GPU compute passes. CPU-based rendering also benefits from the 36,859 Cinebench R23 score.

Software development compiles large projects quickly using the 24 threads. The 147,575 integer math score and 43,698 multi-thread PassMark result indicate strong build throughput. Container orchestration and local testing benefit from the 30 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support for data integrity.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,330 in PassMark handles document processing and web browsing effortlessly, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM supports multiple 4K displays for multitasking, assuming the embedded display outputs match the monitor setup.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All gaming performance estimates are derived from the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and the CPU’s benchmark scores.

At ultra settings, the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest playable frame rates at 1080p for most titles, with 1440p requiring settings reductions for demanding games. The 16 GB VRAM prevents texture-related stuttering in modern titles, but the 50th percentile ranking indicates the GPU is not optimized for high-refresh competitive play.

The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,121 and 2-thread score of 2,212 ensure it will keep up with game logic and physics threads. The 89th percentile CPU ranking means frame pacing will be consistent, governed primarily by GPU throughput rather than CPU limits.

For ray-traced games, the 76 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the GPU’s median ranking suggests RT workloads will run at reduced frame rates compared to dedicated RTX gaming cards. DLSS support via the 304 tensor cores can recover performance, though the embedded GPU’s positioning suggests it targets professional visualization rather than gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900KS uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface. The socket supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This platform allows upgrades to newer 12th Gen or compatible 13th Gen processors within the same socket, assuming BIOS support.

The CPU’s 150 W TDP and the GPU’s 120 W TDP combine for a 270 W total thermal load. The GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing power through the slot, which simplifies PSU requirements. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, so power supply sizing must be based on the combined TDP plus system overhead.

Memory upgrades can move from DDR4 to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the 76.8 GB/s listed bandwidth reflects the dual-channel configuration. ECC memory support broadens workstation compatibility. Storage expansion uses the 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU for NVMe drives or other high-bandwidth peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile model. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking leaves headroom for a GPU that exceeds the 50th percentile, potentially raising the combined system percentile above 70. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory could benefit memory-intensive workloads, given the dual-channel bus supports additional capacity.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-12900KS, a 16-core Alder Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a flagship desktop part with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and 150 W TDP, while the GPU is an embedded-class professional card with 16 GB VRAM and 120 W TDP. The combined percentile is 70, reflecting the CPU’s 89th percentile strength and the GPU’s 50th percentile mediocrity.

The CPU’s 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache make it a workstation-class processor, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 76 RT cores suit professional rendering and compute. The pairing is unusual — a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier embedded GPU — suggesting a use case that prioritizes CPU throughput over gaming frame rates. The 70th combined percentile places this build above the median but below high-end gaming or workstation configurations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, with an 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile. This creates a clear CPU-first balance where the processor outclasses the graphics card in raw capability. For CPU-bound workloads like compilation, encryption, and compression, the system performs near the CPU’s potential. For GPU-bound workloads like gaming or GPU rendering, the 50th percentile GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The CPU’s multi-thread scores — 36,859 in Cinebench R23 and 43,698 in PassMark — indicate it can feed a faster GPU without bottlenecking. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are the ceiling for gaming frame rates. In 3D rendering, the CPU handles scene preparation and physics while the GPU accelerates ray tracing, with the 76 RT cores providing dedicated acceleration but at a mid-tier performance level.

The combined 70th percentile reflects this imbalance. Users seeking balanced performance should note that the CPU has significant headroom for a GPU upgrade, while the GPU cannot fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities in GPU-bound tasks. This pairing makes sense for workloads that are predominantly CPU-intensive with occasional GPU acceleration, rather than graphics-heavy applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KS + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900KS

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds