SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900KS

45,094 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900KS paired with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is a desktop build defined by asymmetry: a flagship-tier processor sitting at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, driving a graphics card positioned at the exact middle of the GPU field. The combined percentile of 70 reflects that split — this is a workstation-grade compute platform with mid-range rendering muscle. The 12900KS launched at an MSRP of $739, and its benchmark portfolio (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 36859, Geekbench multi-core of 18538, PassMark multithread of 43698) shows a chip still firmly in enthusiast territory, while the RTX 3070 TiM — an Ampere-based GA104 part with 5888 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 — is now marked end-of-life. Note that this database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Core i9-12900KS use, and what memory does it support?

A: It fits Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with a rated memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 45094 places it within a hair of the AMD EPYC 4344P (avgScore 45122, deltaPct -0.1), marginally ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600 (44889, 0.5 percent), and a step ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573, 1.2 percent) and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466, 1.4 percent).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 TiM have, and is it a limitation?

A: It has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering at mainstream resolutions this is workable, but modern texture-heavy titles at higher settings can press against that capacity.

Q: Is this build balanced for gaming?

A: No. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th, and the combined percentile of 70 confirms a compute-heavy, GPU-moderate configuration. Gaming performance will be limited by the graphics card in almost every scenario.

Q: What power supply does the GPU vendor suggest?

A: A 550 W unit is suggested for the RTX 3070 TiM, whose own TDP is 220 W. The CPU adds a 150 W TDP to the platform budget.

Q: Is the RTX 3070 TiM still in production?

A: No — its production status is end-of-life. It belongs to the GeForce 30 series and was succeeded by the GeForce 40 generation.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes is available for next-generation expansion.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU-side numbers are the story here. In Cinebench R23, the i9-12900KS posts 36859 multi-core and 5203 single-core; in Cinebench R20 those figures are 15480 and 2185; in the older R15 test, 3715 and 524. Geekbench returns 18538 multi-core and 2408 single-core, and PassMark's multithread score is 43698 with a single-thread result of 4330. The 3DMark CPU profile scales cleanly across thread counts: 1121 single-thread, 2212 at two threads, 4320 at four, 7872 at eight, 10316 at sixteen, and 11897 at maximum threads.

That scaling curve tells you two things. First, the hybrid 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake design keeps feeding workloads as threads are added — the jump from eight threads to sixteen is roughly 31 percent, and max-thread throughput adds a further margin on top. Second, the single-thread figure of 1121 in 3DMark and 2408 in Geekbench places the chip among the strongest per-core performers of its era, courtesy of a 5.50 GHz boost clock.

Against rivals, the picture is competitive rather than dominant. The average score of 45094 lands essentially level with the AMD EPYC 4344P (-0.1 percent) and fractionally ahead of the Core i5-14600 (0.5 percent), Ryzen 5 7500X3D (1.2 percent), and Core Ultra X9 388H (1.4 percent). Those deltas are small enough that platform features — memory support, PCIe generation, availability — matter more than raw throughput when choosing between them.

The GPU side is thinner: the RTX 3070 TiM carries no benchmark scores in this database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty rivals list. Its position is expressed only through the 50th-percentile field — dead center of the GPU distribution. The combined build percentile of 70 sits almost exactly between the CPU's 89 and the GPU's 50, which is the statistical fingerprint of a lopsided pairing.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3070 TiM is built on the GA104 die — 392 mm² of Samsung 8 nm silicon carrying 17,400 million transistors at a density of 44.4M per mm². The shader array comprises 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 render outputs, with 46 RT cores and 184 Tensor cores rounding out the Ampere feature set. Peak FP32 compute is 16.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 runs at a 1:1 ratio for the same 16.60 TFLOPS. Pixel fill rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and texture throughput is 259.4 GTexel/s.

Clocks are modest: 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz — 14 Gbps effective. That memory subsystem is the card's defining trait: 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus for 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The wide bus keeps texture streaming healthy, but the 8 GB capacity is the ceiling that matters most in practice. At mainstream gaming resolutions with ultra settings, it holds; push texture pools higher and the card will hit its VRAM wall before it hits its compute wall.

For rendering work, the numbers read as mid-range capable. The 46 RT cores and 184 Tensor cores mean hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling are available in any engine that supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) — the card also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. The 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 figure is respectable viewport throughput for Blender-class workloads, and the Tensor cores accelerate the denoising and AI-assisted features most renderers now rely on. But the 50th-percentile positioning is the honest summary: this is average rendering hardware, and the 8 GB buffer limits large scenes more than the shader count does.

Physically it is a triple-slot card measuring 270 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 55 mm wide, drawing 220 W through a single 8-pin connector. Outputs are one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a, and it connects over PCIe 4.0 x16 — a detail worth noting alongside the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build is GPU-bottlenecked for gaming, full stop. The CPU operates at the 89th percentile of all processors; the GPU at the 50th. When one component sits nearly forty percentile points above the other, the lower one sets the frame-rate ceiling in virtually every GPU-bound workload. The 3DMark CPU profile makes the case quantitatively: even at four threads the chip scores 4320, and single-thread performance of 1121 is elite — there is no gaming load that will ask more of this processor than it can deliver.

The consequence is that frame rates will scale with the RTX 3070 TiM, not the i9-12900KS. Increasing resolution or raising quality settings will tax the GPU while the CPU idles along; the flip side is that CPU-heavy scenarios — physics simulation, draw-call-heavy open worlds, large multiplayer matches — will remain smooth because the 36859-point Cinebench R23 multi-core result provides enormous headroom.

For productivity the imbalance inverts into a strength. Exporting video, compiling code, batch photo editing, and CPU rendering all draw on the 24 threads directly, and the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS and Tensor cores are sufficient for GPU-accelerated stages of those pipelines. The build behaves like a workstation that can game, rather than a gaming rig that can work.

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this combination in the database, the scaling argument rests entirely on the percentile spread — but that spread is unambiguous, and it points one direction.

Who Should Build It

Content creators are the primary audience. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36859 with a single-core score of 5203 means fast timeline scrubbing and fast final exports in the same machine; PassMark results reinforce the breadth — 563709 in data compression, 31403 in encryption, 147575 in integer math, and 111429 in floating point math make short work of file-heavy workflows. Developers benefit similarly: Geekbench multi-core of 18538 and strong single-thread results suit both parallel builds and latency-sensitive IDE work, and the PassMark string-sorting score of 60539 indicates snappy large-codebase handling.

Small business workstations are a strong fit. ECC memory support, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 at 76.8 GB/s, and 16 cores of Alder Lake throughput make this a legitimate workstation platform for CAD, analysis, and virtualization-light duties.

Gamers get a qualified recommendation. Players targeting 1080p and 1440p at high-to-ultra settings will find the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th-percentile performance entirely serviceable, with ray tracing and upscaling available through its 46 RT cores and 184 Tensor cores. Gamers chasing maximum settings at higher resolutions should look elsewhere — the 8 GB VRAM buffer and mid-pack GPU positioning are the constraints, regardless of how much CPU is on tap.

Students in compute-heavy fields — engineering, data science, media production — get a machine that will outlast a typical degree program on the CPU side. The platform's forward-looking features (PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 support) extend that runway further.

Gaming Performance

To repeat the caveat plainly: this database contains no measured FPS figures for the i9-12900KS and RTX 3070 TiM combination, so everything in this section is estimated from benchmark scores rather than recorded runs.

The estimates are straightforward to frame. A GPU at the 50th percentile with 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32, 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 96 ROPs is a mainstream-resolution performer. At 1080p ultra, expect high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU — 1121 single-thread in 3DMark, 4330 in PassMark single-thread — never the limiter. At 1440p ultra, frame rates settle into the card's comfort zone; the 8 GB of GDDR6 is generally adequate here, though the most texture-intensive titles may require trimming one or two settings. Ray tracing is playable thanks to the 46 RT cores, particularly when paired with Tensor-core-driven upscaling, but heavy RT paths will pull performance down meaningfully from raster results.

Pushing to higher resolutions shifts the bottleneck entirely onto the GPU's fill-rate and bandwidth, and the 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate becomes the binding figure. Because the CPU contributes 11897 points at max threads in 3DMark's CPU profile, minimum frame rates and one-percent lows should track the averages closely — this pairing will produce unusually consistent frame times for its GPU class, since the processor never falls behind.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700 with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory — a genuine flexibility point, since builders can carry forward existing DDR4 kits or adopt DDR5 on the same dual-channel bus. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes is available, and while the RTX 3070 TiM itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x16, the Gen 5 lanes are ready for a future GPU or a fast storage add-in card.

Power budgeting is manageable. The CPU's TDP is 150 W and the GPU's is 220 W; NVIDIA suggests a 550 W supply for the card alone, so a system built around this pair should aim comfortably above that figure to cover the CPU, board, and peripherals. The GPU needs just one 8-pin connector and occupies three slots — check chassis clearance against its 270 mm length and 55 mm width.

The obvious upgrade is the graphics card. With the CPU at the 89th percentile, a substantially faster GPU could be dropped in without touching the processor and the combined percentile of 70 would rise accordingly — this is the rare build where the CPU outlives the GPU by a wide margin. The card's end-of-life status makes that upgrade path more likely than optional; it belongs to the GeForce 30 generation, which the GeForce 40 series succeeded. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU offers a secondary tuning avenue for those so inclined, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback output for troubleshooting.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build — the buildClass field confirms it — pairing Intel's 12th-generation flagship with a mid-generation NVIDIA graphics part. The i9-12900KS is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake-S processor on Intel's 10 nm node, with a 215 mm² die, 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 80 KB of L1 per core. It boosts to 5.50 GHz from a 3.40 GHz base and remains in active production.

Tier-wise, the numbers are clear: 89th percentile CPU, 50th percentile GPU, 70th percentile combined. That places the overall system in the upper third of all builds in the database, with the caveat that its strength is concentrated in compute. Call it a creator-first desktop with mainstream gaming capability — a machine whose CPU could anchor a far more expensive build, paired with a graphics card that defines its ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The i9-12900KS is Alder Lake at its most aggressive. Sixteen cores across 24 threads, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and the "KS" designation marking it as the special-bin flagship of the generation. The cache hierarchy — 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, 30 MB shared L3 — supports both the high clock speeds and the hybrid scheduling that Alder Lake depends on.

The benchmark record shows what those specifications buy. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 36859 and Geekbench multi-core at 18538 place it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, statistically indistinguishable from the AMD EPYC 4344P (-0.1 percent) and ahead of the Core i5-14600 by half a percent. The single-core results — 5203 in R23, 2185 in R20, 524 in R15, 2408 in Geekbench, 4330 in PassMark — demonstrate that the 5.50 GHz boost translates directly into best-in-class responsiveness for lightly threaded applications.

The 3DMark thread scaling (1121 / 2212 / 4320 / 7872 / 10316 / 11897 from one thread to max) maps cleanly onto real workload behavior. Applications that parallelize well — rendering, encoding, compiling, simulation — exploit the full 24 threads; those that don't still get elite per-thread speed. PassMark's component scores extend the story into utility workloads: 158 in find-prime-numbers, 35089 in extended instructions, and a physics score of 2437 confirm broad computational competence rather than a benchmark-specialist profile.

In this pairing, the CPU is overqualified for the graphics card it feeds — and that is the build's defining characteristic. The data shows a processor with headroom to spare, waiting for a GPU worthy of it.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900KS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds