SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900KF

42,830 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop build that presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a high-end 12th Gen Alder Lake part that sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, despite its next-generation Blackwell architecture, benchmarks in the 18th percentile. This creates a fundamentally unbalanced pairing where the graphics card is the clear limiting factor for gaming, and the processor's massive multi-threaded headroom is left largely untapped in most scenarios. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from the provided benchmark scores; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the component scores.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this specific CPU and GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 places it at the 18th percentile, which is critically low. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (1.1% faster), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (1.1% faster). This indicates that the RTX 5070 SUPER in this data set performs at the level of an entry-level or legacy discrete GPU, not a modern high-end card.

For 1080p gaming, this GPU would struggle with modern titles at high or ultra settings. The estimated FPS would likely fall below playable thresholds for demanding AAA games, potentially in the 20-40 FPS range depending on the title. The CPU is capable of far more, but the GPU's 80 ROPs and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while respectable on paper, are bottlenecked by its overall low compute performance. At 1440p, the situation worsens; the GPU would be the absolute ceiling, and frame rates would likely dip into the 15-30 FPS range. At 4K, the card would be overwhelmed, with estimates suggesting it would be unable to maintain consistent 30 FPS in most modern games.

The CPU's performance in gaming-related workloads is excellent, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1069 and a 2-thread score of 2112. However, this does not translate into gaming FPS because the GPU cannot process frames fast enough. The i9-12900KF's high single-thread performance is what allows it to achieve an 88th percentile ranking, but that power is wasted when the GPU is the limiting factor. In esports titles or older games with low graphical demands, the system might achieve 60+ FPS, but for any graphically intensive game, the estimated FPS figures would be disappointing for a build with a 16-core processor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are robust across the board. In Cinebench R23, the i9-12900KF scores 34420 multi-core and 4859 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks exceptionally well. The Geekbench scores of 18113 multi-core and 2361 single-core reinforce this, showing a strong dual-purpose design. The CPU's average benchmark score is 42830, placing it at the 88th percentile, and it is nearly identical to its direct rivals: it is 0.2% slower than the Intel Core i9-12900 (42906), 0.8% faster than the Intel Core i9-12950HX (42487), 0.9% slower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (43210), and 1.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900K (42335). This shows the 12900KF is perfectly positioned among the top-tier desktop and mobile chips of its generation.

The GPU benchmark is a single data point: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690. Its average score is also 2690, and its percentile is 18. This is a catastrophic score for a card named RTX 5070 SUPER, as its closest competitors are the GT 1030 and GT 440. The combined picture is one of severe imbalance. The CPU's performance is that of a top-tier workstation and gaming processor, while the GPU's performance is that of a basic display adapter. The combined percentile of 53 for this pairing is dragged down entirely by the GPU, making the system a poor choice for any graphics-intensive workload.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the sole limiting factor in this build. The CPU's percentile (88) versus the GPU's percentile (18) shows a 70-point gap, which indicates that the processor has significantly more performance headroom than the graphics card can utilize. In gaming, this means the CPU will often sit idle waiting for the GPU to render frames. The FPS scaling, or lack thereof, confirms this: even with a powerful CPU, the estimated FPS would be low because the GPU cannot produce frames quickly enough.

In CPU-centric workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the GPU would not be a factor, and the system would perform admirably. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34420 and Passmark multithread score of 40970 demonstrate that the CPU can handle these tasks without being slowed down by the GPU. However, in any workload that involves GPU acceleration or 3D graphics, the RTX 5070 SUPER will be the absolute bottleneck. For example, in a 3D rendering application that uses GPU acceleration, the render times would be limited by the GPU's 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is low for a modern card but is the only number available. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9860 shows it can feed data to the GPU, but the GPU cannot process it fast enough.

Who Should Build It

This build is not suitable for gamers targeting 1080p, 1440p, or 4K resolutions. The estimated FPS figures are too low for a satisfying experience in modern titles. The low GPU percentile makes it a poor choice for any gaming-focused user. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks, such as music production, video editing with CPU-based rendering, or software development, would find the i9-12900KF's performance excellent. The 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34420, make it a powerful workstation.

However, for content creators who rely on GPU acceleration in Adobe Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or Blender, this build would be a failure, as the GPU's low benchmark score would result in poor performance. Developers and students compiling code would see strong performance from the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 138932. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and web browsing would be more than adequately served by the CPU, but any graphics-dependent tasks would suffer. The only scenario where this build makes sense is if the user never intends to use the GPU for anything other than basic display output and relies entirely on the CPU for all compute tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 125W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed for high multi-threaded throughput, which is evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34420. This score suggests it can handle heavy video rendering, 3D modeling, and scientific simulations with ease.

Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4859. This is critical for everyday responsiveness, legacy software, and games that rely on a few fast cores. The Passmark single-thread score of 4144 confirms this strength. The CPU's average score of 42830 places it at the 88th percentile, which reflects its overall capability. It is a top-tier chip, and its performance is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-12900, Core i9-12950HX, and Core Ultra 9 386H. This means for pure CPU work, the 12900KF is among the best in its class, but its potential is wasted in this specific build.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Core i9-12900KF scores 4859 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its overall average score is 0.2% lower than the Core i9-12900 and 1.2% higher than the Core i9-12900K, showing it is directly competitive with the top chips of its generation.

Q: How does the GPU benchmark compare to its nearest competitors?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad. This is 1% slower than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and 1.1% slower than the GeForce GT 1030, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Is this build good for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's low benchmark score suggests it would be unable to maintain consistent 30 FPS at 4K in modern titles, making it unsuitable for high-resolution gaming.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible Intel Socket 1700 motherboards.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel CPU is built on a 10 nm process, while the NVIDIA GPU is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 53, which is a middling score. This is heavily dragged down by the GPU's 18th percentile ranking, despite the CPU's 88th percentile ranking.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The card includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, which are the hardware components for ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The GPU's clocks are 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost. It has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS.

The single benchmark score of 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad is the only quantitative measure of its performance, and it is exceptionally low. This score places it in the 18th percentile, meaning it outperforms only a small fraction of the GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and GeForce GT 1030, which are ancient, low-power cards. This is a clear indication that, despite its modern feature set and specifications, the benchmark data suggests the card's actual rendering performance is on par with entry-level hardware from years ago. The 672.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32.15 TFLOPS are meaningless if the card cannot execute the rendering pipeline efficiently, and the benchmark score reflects that inefficiency. For any rendering task, this GPU would be the primary source of poor performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier 12th Gen Intel processor with a GPU that benchmarks in the 18th percentile. The Core i9-12900KF is an 88th percentile CPU, making it an excellent choice for compute-heavy tasks. The RTX 5070 SUPER, however, is a GPU that, based on the data, performs at the level of a legacy entry-level card. The overall tier of this build is "highly unbalanced," with a combined percentile of 53.

The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread monster with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, making it a capable workstation processor for compiling, rendering, and multitasking. The GPU is a Blackwell architecture card with 18 GB of VRAM, but its 3DMark score of 2690 suggests it cannot leverage that memory or its compute units effectively. This pairing is akin to putting a racing engine in a car with bicycle wheels. The CPU's power is undeniable, but the GPU prevents the system from achieving any level of graphical performance. The data suggests that this build is only sensible for users who plan to swap out the GPU immediately or who require no 3D acceleration whatsoever.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in motherboard and memory choices. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The CPU has a 125W TDP, and the GPU has a 275W TDP, requiring a robust power supply. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

The most sensible next upgrade is to replace the GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, and its performance is within 1.2% of the Intel Core i9-12900K. Any modern GPU that benchmarks higher than the 18th percentile would unlock the system's true potential. However, the motherboard must support the new GPU's interface. Since the platform supports PCIe Gen 4, a modern high-end GPU would work, though it might not achieve its maximum theoretical bandwidth on older PCIe Gen 3 boards. A sensible upgrade path would be to keep the CPU and platform and focus entirely on a new graphics card, as the processor is not the bottleneck in this system. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users are not locked into a single memory type, allowing for a cost-effective upgrade if they already have DDR4.