SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900KF

42,830 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 form a high-end desktop pairing built around Intel’s Alder Lake architecture and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU architecture. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The GPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. This combination targets the upper tier of desktop computing, with the CPU sitting at the 88th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The following analysis uses only the data provided in the FACT PACK to interpret what these scores mean for real workloads, gaming, system balance, and usage scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900KF is a desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, using the Alder Lake architecture on the Alder Lake-S codename. It has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125 W. This is a 10 nm part from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700. It has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. It does not include integrated graphics, as indicated by the null value for integratedGraphics.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales well from single-thread to multi-thread workloads. The 3DMark scores show a progression: 1,069 in single-thread, 2,112 in 2-thread, 4,132 in 4-thread, 7,551 in 8-thread, 9,860 in 16-thread, and 11,586 in max-thread tests. This scaling indicates that the processor efficiently utilizes additional cores, with the 8-thread score being roughly 7 times the single-thread score, and the max-thread score being nearly 11 times the single-thread score. In Cinebench, the R15 multicore score is 3,469, while single-core is 489. The R20 multicore score is 14,456, and single-core is 2,040. The R23 multicore score is 34,420, and single-core is 4,859. These Cinebench numbers show that the CPU excels in heavily threaded rendering workloads, with the multicore scores being several times higher than single-core scores, reflecting the benefit of 16 cores and 24 threads.

Geekbench scores are 18,113 for multicore and 2,361 for single-core. PassMark tests provide further detail. The multithread score is 40,970, and the single-thread score is 4,144. Integer math scores 138,932, floating point math scores 105,558, and extended instructions score 33,779. Data compression scores 537,785, data encryption scores 29,502, and random string sorting scores 57,177. Physics scores 2,098, and finding prime numbers scores 142. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 42,830, and it ranks at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show a very tight grouping: the Intel Core i9-12900 scores 42,906, which is 0.2% higher; the Intel Core i9-12950HX scores 42,487, which is 0.8% lower; the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43,210, which is 0.9% higher; and the Intel Core i9-12900K scores 42,335, which is 1.2% lower. The 12900KF is essentially at parity with these rivals, with a delta within 1.2% in either direction. For real workloads, this means the CPU is competitive with other high-end desktop and mobile processors from the same generation, but it does not offer a significant lead over its closest peers. The strong multi-thread scores, particularly in Cinebench R23 at 34,420, indicate solid performance for video encoding, 3D rendering, and other parallel workloads. The single-thread performance, with Geekbench single-core at 2,361 and 3DMark single-thread at 1,069, supports responsive everyday use and strong performance in lightly threaded applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, as indicated by the empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field and dataIsMeasured being false. Therefore, all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,069 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,361, suggests strong per-core performance for gaming. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 38,194 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 indicate very high graphical throughput. In combination, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and it should also handle 4K gaming well due to the GPU’s substantial compute power. The RTX 4090 has 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines, along with 128 ray tracing cores and 512 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s. These specifications point to a GPU capable of pushing very high frame rates in most titles, and with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, it can handle high-resolution textures and large datasets without memory bottlenecks. The CPU’s max-thread score of 11,586 in 3DMark also suggests that it can keep up with the GPU in demanding scenes, avoiding severe CPU bottlenecks. However, since the data is estimated, exact FPS figures cannot be provided. The likely outcome is that at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver of performance, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom. At 1080p with lower graphical settings, the CPU may become more relevant, but its single-thread scores are strong enough to maintain high frame rates. In summary, this pairing is expected to deliver excellent gaming performance across resolutions, but the figures are estimates rather than measured results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is a critical factor in system performance. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 42,830, ranking at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 60,347, also ranking at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Both components are in the same percentile tier, indicating a balanced pairing in terms of overall benchmark strength. However, examining specific workloads reveals where each component dominates. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34,420 and PassMark multithread score of 40,970 show strong multi-threaded processing for tasks like rendering and encoding. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 38,194 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416 show massive parallel compute capability. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the rendering load increases. The RTX 4090’s 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth suggest it can handle even 4K workloads, but the CPU must supply draw calls and physics calculations. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,860 and 8-thread score of 7,551 indicate that it can handle multiple threads efficiently, which is relevant for modern games that use more than a few cores. The FPS scaling, based on the benchmark scores, would likely show that at 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant, while at 4K, the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,069 in 3DMark is not the highest possible, but it is sufficient for most gaming scenarios. The combined percentile of 88 for the system indicates that the pairing is well-matched, with neither component drastically exceeding the other in overall capability. The data suggests that for gaming, the GPU will be the primary limiter at high resolutions, while the CPU handles the rest. For productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, the CPU’s multi-thread scores and the GPU’s compute scores work together, with the GPU accelerating certain tasks via CUDA and the CPU managing the rest. The bottleneck in this system will depend on the specific workload, with the GPU limiting in graphics-heavy tasks and the CPU limiting in single-threaded scenarios, but overall, the balance is strong.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i9-12900KF?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, as listed in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 384-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900K?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900KF has an average benchmark score of 42,830, while the Intel Core i9-12900K scores 42,335, making the 12900KF 1.2% faster, based on the deltaPct of 1.2.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integratedGraphics field is null, indicating that the Intel Core i9-12900KF does not include integrated graphics.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, as specified in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture, codenamed AD102, and is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,347.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is well-suited. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,069 in 3DMark and 4,144 in PassMark single-thread, combined with the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 38,194, indicate the ability to drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth support demanding graphical settings. The estimated FPS, since no measured data exists, would be high across most titles, though exact numbers cannot be stated.

For streaming, the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, along with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34,420, provide ample processing power for encoding video while gaming. The GPU’s 512 tensor cores and 128 ray tracing cores can also assist with encoding and other tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 40,970 supports simultaneous workload handling.

For video editing, the CPU’s multicore performance, evidenced by Geekbench multicore score of 18,113 and PassMark multithread score of 40,970, handles timeline processing and export tasks efficiently. The GPU’s 24 GB of memory and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering in applications that utilize CUDA acceleration.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34,420 and the GPU’s compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 26,613 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416, make this a capable system. The combination of CPU and GPU rendering provides flexibility, with the GPU handling ray tracing via its 128 RT cores.

For software development, the CPU’s compilation tasks benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 11,586. The single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,361, ensures responsive IDEs and fast builds for smaller projects. The large 30 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads.

For student and office work, this system is overkill, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,144 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications. The GPU’s compute power is unnecessary for typical office tasks, but the system’s overall speed makes multitasking fluid. The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 450 W TDP of the GPU mean higher power consumption, but performance is not an issue.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a high-end GPU from the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The GPU has 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines. It includes 128 ray tracing cores and 512 tensor cores. The base clock is 2235 MHz, and the boost clock is 2520 MHz. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, with 21 Gbps effective speed. Memory consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 450 W, and it requires an 850 W suggested PSU. It uses a triple-slot cooler and a 1x 16-pin power connector. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

Benchmark scores for the GPU include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223, Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631. PassMark scores include DirectX 10 at 224, DirectX 11 at 326, DirectX 12 at 150, DirectX 9 at 397, G2D at 1,299, G3D at 38,194, and GPU compute at 26,613. The average benchmark score is 60,347, ranking at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 with a score of 60,326 (0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with 60,140 (0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with 61,896 (-2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 with 58,657 (2.9% delta). The RTX 4090 is at parity with these rivals in average score, but its specific strengths lie in ray tracing and compute, with 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. For rendering, the 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth allow for fast processing of large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 24 GB of VRAM is substantial for 4K textures and complex scenes. The data shows that the GPU is among the top tier of graphics cards, with a percentile rank of 88, though it is not the absolute highest performer, as the rivals are within a few percentage points.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is detailed across multiple tests. In 3DMark, the single-thread score is 1,069, 2-thread is 2,112, 4-thread is 4,132, 8-thread is 7,551, 16-thread is 9,860, and max-thread is 11,586. Cinebench R15 multicore is 3,469 and single-core is 489. R20 multicore is 14,456 and single-core is 2,040. R23 multicore is 34,420 and single-core is 4,859. Geekbench multicore is 18,113 and single-core is 2,361. PassMark tests show multithread at 40,970, single-thread at 4,144, integer math at 138,932, floating point math at 105,558, extended instructions at 33,779, data compression at 537,785, data encryption at 29,502, random string sorting at 57,177, physics at 2,098, and find prime numbers at 142. The average benchmark score is 42,830, with a percentile rank of 88 among all CPUs.

The GPU’s benchmark performance includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223, Geekbench OpenCL of 255,416, and Vulkan of 271,631. PassMark DirectX 10 is 224, DirectX 11 is 326, DirectX 12 is 150, DirectX 9 is 397, G2D is 1,299, G3D is 38,194, and GPU compute is 26,613. The average benchmark score is 60,347, with a percentile rank of 88 among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 88 as well. The CPU’s performance is tightly clustered with its nearest rivals, within 1.2% in either direction. The GPU is similarly clustered, within 2.9% of its nearest rivals. This indicates that the system is well-balanced, with both components performing at the same tier. The combined picture is a high-end desktop system where neither component significantly outclasses the other in overall benchmark terms, but each excels in its respective domain: the CPU in multi-threaded processing and the GPU in parallel compute and graphics. The data shows that the system is at the 88th percentile, meaning it outperforms most other systems, but it is not at the very top, as there are processors and GPUs with higher scores.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop system, as indicated by the buildClass being "desktop". It pairs the Intel Core i9-12900KF, a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, a 24 GB GPU from the GeForce 40-series. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 450 W, with a suggested PSU of 850 W. The CPU is at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 88. This places the system in the upper tier of desktop performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42,830, and the GPU’s is 60,347. The system is designed for high-performance workloads, including gaming, content creation, and compute tasks. The CPU’s Alder Lake architecture with 16 cores and 24 threads provides strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture with 16,384 shading units and 128 ray tracing cores delivers exceptional graphics and compute capability. The overall tier is high-end, as indicated by the 88th percentile ranking. The system is not the absolute fastest available, but it is close, with rivals within a few percentage points in benchmark scores. This pairing is suitable for users who need both strong CPU and GPU performance, whether for gaming at high resolutions, video editing, 3D rendering, or other demanding applications.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at high resolutions, specifically 1440p and 4K, where the GPU’s 24 GB of memory and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can be fully utilized. The estimated FPS, based on benchmark scores, would be high, though no measured data exists. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,069, ensures that it does not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. Content creators, such as video editors and 3D artists, would benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34,420 and the GPU’s compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 26,613. The 24 GB of VRAM is useful for large projects and high-resolution textures. Developers would appreciate the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads for compilation, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 11,586, and the single-thread performance for responsive IDEs. Students and office workers would find this system extremely fast, but it is overkill for basic tasks; however, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,144 ensures smooth multitasking. Small business workstations that run complex simulations or data analysis would benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 138,932 and floating point math of 105,558. The system is not for budget-conscious users, as the components are high-end, but for those who need maximum performance, it delivers. The GPU’s end-of-life status means it is being replaced by newer models, but its performance remains strong, as evidenced by its 88th percentile rank.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 12th Gen Core series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is compatible. The system’s PSU requirement is 850 W, based on the suggested PSU for the GPU, and the CPU has a TDP of 125 W. This provides headroom for the system’s components, though the exact power draw is not measured. A sensible next upgrade would be to the CPU, as the socket supports newer Intel processors, though the FACT PACK does not specify which models. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a newer generation, as the current GPU is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. The memory can be upgraded to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the current support is dual-channel. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU are sufficient for the GPU, and a future GPU with PCIe Gen 5 would still work, but at reduced bandwidth. The system’s overall performance, at the 88th percentile, means that upgrades would provide incremental gains, but the current pairing is already strong. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which could extend its lifespan. The GPU’s 24 GB of memory is ample for future games and applications, so a GPU upgrade may not be necessary soon. The platform’s limitation is the socket, which may be replaced by newer sockets in future generations, limiting CPU upgrades to the same socket family. Overall, the upgrade path includes adding more memory, switching to DDR5 if not already used, or upgrading the GPU to a newer model, but the current system is well-balanced and capable of handling demanding workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds