SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900KF

42,830 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 represents a high-end desktop configuration that combines a 16-core Alder Lake processor with a 16 GB RDNA 2 graphics card. This pairing targets the upper tier of the performance spectrum, as indicated by an 82nd combined percentile ranking, yet the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions in this analysis are therefore estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not empirical gaming tests.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the processor was released on November 3, 2021, with a launch MSRP of $564.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1069 in single-thread to 2112 in 2-thread, 4132 in 4-thread, 7551 in 8-thread, 9860 in 16-thread, and 11586 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-core efficiency, with the max-thread score being roughly 10.8 times the single-thread score, suggesting that the hybrid architecture effectively utilizes all available cores. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 34420 multi-core and 4859 single-core points. The multi-core score is approximately 7.1 times the single-core result, which is a strong ratio for a desktop processor with 16 cores.

The Geekbench scores of 18113 multi-core and 2361 single-core further corroborate the processor’s balanced capabilities. PassMark results are particularly revealing for real-world workloads: integer math scores 138932, floating-point math scores 105558, and extended instructions score 33779. Data compression scores 537785, while data encryption scores 29502. The multithread PassMark score is 40970, and the single-thread score is 4144.

The 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor in the top tier of desktop processors. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-12900KF sits within a narrow band: it is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-12900, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12950HX, 0.9% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, and 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900K. These small deltaPct values indicate that the 12900KF is effectively a peer of the best desktop and mobile processors available, with differences that would be imperceptible in most workloads.

Gaming Performance

The data pack explicitly states that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores of both components, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 75th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 88th percentile ranking suggest a system capable of high-refresh gaming, but the absence of empirical FPS data means these are projections, not results.

For frame rate expectations, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22067 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 indicate strong rasterization performance. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 11586 ensures that even the most demanding game engines will have ample processing headroom. At 1080p, this pairing would likely deliver very high frame rates in competitive titles, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in many esports games, though the exact figures cannot be confirmed from the data pack. At 1440p, the system should still provide excellent performance, with the GPU becoming a more significant factor. At 4K, the RX 6800’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth would support high texture quality, but frame rates would be lower than at lower resolutions.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 4144 in PassMark and 4859 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. Games that rely heavily on single-thread performance, such as older titles or those with poor multi-core optimization, should still run smoothly. The 24 threads provide substantial headroom for background tasks while gaming, such as streaming or voice chat.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is one of a balanced, high-performance desktop system. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42830, placing it at the 88th percentile, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 30095, placing it at the 75th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 82, indicating that this pairing sits comfortably in the upper quintile of all systems.

Looking at the CPU benchmarks in detail, the Cinebench R20 scores of 14456 multi-core and 2040 single-core show a strong ratio of 7.1, similar to the R23 results. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9860 is particularly relevant for gaming, as modern games often use up to 16 threads. The PassMark physics score of 2098 and find prime numbers score of 142 are lower absolute numbers but still represent competent performance for those specific workloads.

The GPU benchmarks show a consistent profile across different APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 115107 is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 24508, which is typical for RDNA 2 architecture. The PassMark G2D score of 990 and G3D score of 22067 indicate strong 2D and 3D performance respectively. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10864 suggests capable compute performance for non-gaming workloads.

Compared to its nearest GPU rivals, the RX 6800 is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700. These tight deltaPct values mean the RX 6800 is essentially interchangeable with these cards in terms of average performance, though individual games may favor one architecture over another.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU’s 88th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 75th percentile ranking suggests strong 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4144 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM allows maximum texture detail without memory constraints. At 1440p, this system should deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, though exact figures are not available.

Streaming: The 24 threads of the i9-12900KF provide substantial headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 40970 and 3DMark max-thread score of 11586 indicate that even with a streaming encoder running, there would be sufficient processing power for the game itself. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which could offload the streaming workload from the CPU.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34420 is strong for video editing applications that utilize all cores. The PassMark data compression score of 537785 is particularly relevant for video codecs that involve significant data compression. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU would also accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, though the exact performance would depend on the specific software.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide strong performance for CPU-based rendering, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14456. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 16.17 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 32.33 TFLOPS would accelerate GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for large scenes that exceed the memory capacity of 8 GB or 12 GB GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 138932 and extended instructions score of 33779 indicate strong performance for code compilation and execution. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 30 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data. The dual memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility in choosing a platform.

Student and office work: This system is significantly overpowered for typical student or office workloads, but it would handle any such tasks with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 4144 ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM would be entirely unused in such scenarios, making this pairing more suited to demanding professional workloads than basic productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU is the stronger component, with an 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 75th percentile. This imbalance suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the GPU may not be the limiting factor, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7551 and 16-thread score of 9860 indicate that it can feed a GPU at high frame rates, but the GPU’s performance ceiling will cap overall gaming FPS.

The FPS scaling, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 suggests that at 4K resolution, the GPU will be the bottleneck, as the rendering load increases with pixel count. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more relevant, and the gap between the CPU’s 88th percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile narrows in terms of impact on frame rates. In compute-heavy workloads like GPU rendering or machine learning, the GPU’s 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 10864 PassMark GPU compute score will be the determining factor, not the CPU.

The CPU’s nearest rival comparison shows it is 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900K, which is the same chip with integrated graphics. This indicates that the KF variant loses no performance by omitting the iGPU. The GPU’s nearest rival comparison shows it is 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700, which is a lower-tier card, suggesting that the RX 6800’s position in the lineup is slightly below its performance ranking would imply.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 82, placing it in the upper quintile of all desktop systems.

Q: How does the i9-12900KF compare to the i9-12900K in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-12900KF has an average score of 42830, which is 1.2% higher than the i9-12900K’s 42335 score.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RX 6800 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6800 is 600 W, and the CPU has a 125 W TDP.

Q: How does the RX 6800 compare to the RTX 3070 Ti in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 6800 has an average score of 30095, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti’s 29945 score.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The i9-12900KF has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the socket for 12th Gen Alder Lake processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders the choice between the more affordable DDR4 or the higher-bandwidth DDR5. The platform provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and a fast NVMe SSD.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The RX 6800 has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W suggested PSU, with two 8-pin power connectors. The card measures 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot width.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a newer GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom given its 88th percentile ranking. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads would support a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor. The platform’s support for DDR5 memory also allows for a memory upgrade, though the performance gain would depend on the specific workload. The PCIe Gen 4 interface is current, so no platform change is needed for the foreseeable future.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-12900KF with the AMD Radeon RX 6800. The CPU is from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture, while the GPU is from the Radeon RX 6000 series, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 82 indicates that this system outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations.

The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 75th percentile ranking place this build in the upper tier of performance, but not the absolute top. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, which means that for gaming, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates. For CPU-bound workloads like video editing, rendering, and software compilation, this system excels. The overall tier is high-end desktop, suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who need substantial multi-core performance.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who want to play at 1440p with high refresh rates, as the CPU’s 88th percentile single-thread performance ensures smooth frame delivery, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM supports high-resolution textures. The RX 6800’s 75th percentile ranking means it will handle most games at 1440p, though it may not reach the highest frame rates in the most demanding titles.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU’s 34420 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for rendering large scenes or working with high-resolution video timelines that would exceed the memory capacity of smaller GPUs.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s 138932 PassMark integer math score and 24 threads for parallel compilation. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the dual memory support allows for a cost-effective DDR4 build or a higher-bandwidth DDR5 build.

Students and small business users will find this system overpowered for their needs, but it would handle any tasks they throw at it. The high cost of this build makes it impractical for basic office work, but it would never struggle with any productivity application. For professionals who also game, this pairing offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU performance across a wide range of workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is built on the Navi 21 chip using the 7 nm process from TSMC, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 1815 MHz, and a boost clock of 2105 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus.

The GPU features 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It has 60 ray tracing cores, and its FP32 performance is 16.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 32.33 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 202.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 505.2 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 250 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that performs well across various APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 115107 is nearly five times higher than the OpenCL score of 24508, which is characteristic of AMD’s RDNA architecture and its strong Vulkan driver. The PassMark G3D score of 22067 and GPU compute score of 10864 round out the performance picture.

The GPU’s 75th percentile ranking places it in the upper three-quarters of all GPUs, but its nearest rivals include the RTX 3070 Ti, which it beats by 0.5%, and the RX 6700, which beats it by 1.1%. This indicates that the RX 6800 is a solid mid-to-high-end GPU, but it is not a top-tier card. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage over the 8 GB typically found on competing cards, allowing for larger scenes and textures. The 60 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the performance would be lower than NVIDIA’s dedicated RT cores in the same generation.