SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900K

42,335 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count 12th-generation Intel processor with a professional-grade laptop-derived GPU. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 50th percentile, and the combined pairing lands at the 69th percentile overall. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than reported from direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900K is an Alder Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². It contains 16 cores and 24 threads, operating with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The hybrid architecture mixes performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not break down the core composition beyond the total counts. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class reliability. The processor is unlocked, allowing multiplier adjustments for overclocking.

Benchmark results reveal a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26125 in multi-core and 2004.5 in single-core. The multi-core figure is 13 times the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across the 24 threads. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 16378 versus a single-core score of 2193 shows a 7.5x scaling factor. The 3DMark threaded tests tell a similar story: the max-threads score of 11620 is 10.8 times the 2-thread score of 2120, and the 16-thread score of 9912 is close to the max-threads result, suggesting that the CPU is nearly saturated by 16 threads and gains only modest additional performance beyond that point.

PassMark results reinforce the processor’s versatility. The multithread score of 41213 and single-thread score of 4136 indicate balanced performance across both lightly and heavily threaded workloads. The floating-point math score of 105471 and integer math score of 139090 suggest strong computational throughput, which benefits scientific computing and financial modeling. Data encryption at 29579 and data compression at 537341 highlight the CPU’s ability to handle data-intensive tasks efficiently. The extended instructions score of 33682 indicates robust SIMD and AVX performance, which is relevant for media encoding and 3D rendering. The find prime numbers score of 147 is comparatively low, reflecting a workload that does not scale well with this architecture.

The nearest rivals provide context for the CPU’s standing. The Intel Core i9-12950HX scores 42487 on average, which is 0.4% higher than the 12900K’s 42335 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 sits at 42055, 0.7% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963, 0.9% lower. The Intel Core i7-14700T trails by 1% with an average score of 41914. These deltas are small, meaning the 12900K is effectively in a dead heat with its closest competitors, trading places depending on the specific workload. The 88th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs available, making it a top-tier desktop processor for multi-threaded applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42335, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The three closest rivals are all within 1% of this score, indicating that the 12900K is not a clear leader but rather one of several strong performers in its class. The GPU, however, presents a different picture: its average benchmark score is 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no nearest rivals listed. This means the GPU is a middle-of-the-pack performer, likely reflecting its embedded mobile origins and the power constraints that come with that design.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 69, which is notably lower than the CPU’s individual 88th percentile. This gap suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in overall system performance, dragging the combined score down. In workloads that are heavily CPU-bound, the system will perform near the CPU’s level, but in GPU-bound tasks, the system will fall to the GPU’s mid-tier level. The disparity between the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s median percentile creates an unbalanced platform that excels in CPU-intensive applications but struggles to keep pace with high-end GPUs in graphics-heavy workloads.

The Cinebench R15 scores of 4057 multi-core and 289 single-core follow the same pattern as newer versions, with multi-core performance dominating. The 3DMark 4-thread score of 4145 and 8-thread score of 7596 show steady scaling as thread count increases. The single-thread score of 1073 in 3DMark is comparatively modest, indicating that the architecture prioritizes multi-threaded throughput over raw single-core speed. This makes the CPU well-suited for rendering, compilation, and scientific simulation, but less exceptional for workloads that rely on a single fast core, such as legacy productivity applications.

The PassMark physics score of 2219 is a weak point, suggesting that the CPU may not excel in physics simulations that rely on a limited number of threads. The random string sorting score of 57094 is moderate, indicating average performance in certain data-sorting algorithms. Overall, the CPU’s benchmark profile shows a processor that is excellent in multi-threaded tasks, good in mixed workloads, and merely average in pure single-threaded and physics-specific tests.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The dual-channel memory bus provides 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for most applications but may be a bottleneck in memory-intensive workloads like large dataset processing or high-end content creation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a modern standard that allows for high-bandwidth connections to GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without a discrete GPU.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, which is moderate for a 16-core processor. The GPU has a TDP of 150 W, so the combined power draw is substantial. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU for this pairing, so the power supply requirements cannot be precisely quantified from the data. However, the absence of a suggested PSU value combined with the combined power draw of the two components suggests that a capable power supply is necessary, though no specific wattage is provided. The GPU uses no power connectors, indicating it draws power through the motherboard slot, which is typical for embedded or mobile-derived GPUs.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU, as it is the weak link in the pairing. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU, but the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means that any modern GPU will be able to communicate at full bandwidth. Memory upgrades are also possible, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier permits overclocking, which could extract additional performance, though the benchmark data does not indicate whether the scores were achieved at stock or overclocked settings.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance but are less demanding on GPU power. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank makes it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, as these workloads benefit from the 24 threads and high Cinebench scores. The 26125 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 positions it well for rendering tasks where every additional core translates to faster output. Developers working on large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 139090, which indicates strong performance in arithmetic-heavy compilation tasks.

The GPU’s 50th percentile rank means that this system is not ideal for gamers seeking high frame rates at high resolutions, but it can handle lighter gaming workloads at lower settings. Students and office workers who run productivity applications will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 4136 in PassMark sufficient for everyday tasks, and the CPU’s 88th percentile overall rank ensures smooth multitasking. Small business workstations that rely on CPU-intensive applications like database management or financial analysis will benefit from the data encryption score of 29579 and data compression score of 537341, which indicate strong performance in data-heavy workflows.

The 69th combined percentile suggests that this is a mid-to-high-tier system overall, but the imbalance between CPU and GPU performance means it is best suited for workloads that are primarily CPU-bound. Users who occasionally play games or use GPU-accelerated applications will find the system adequate but not exceptional, while those who prioritize CPU performance above all else will find it a compelling choice.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900K has an average benchmark score of 42335, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The closest rival is the Intel Core i9-12950HX with an average score of 42487, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 (0.7% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963 (0.9% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41914 (1% lower).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: Does the system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900K has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for high-end gaming?

A: The GPU’s 50th percentile rank suggests mid-tier performance, so it is not ideal for high-end gaming at high resolutions, though it can handle lighter gaming workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 69, which is lower than the CPU’s individual 88th percentile, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor in overall system performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank provides ample processing power for gaming, with a single-thread score of 4136 in PassMark and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1073. These scores suggest that the CPU will not be a bottleneck in most games, even at high frame rates. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank, however, indicates mid-tier graphics performance that will limit frame rates in demanding titles.

At 1080p resolution, the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle most games at medium to high settings, with estimated frame rates in the range that corresponds to mid-tier hardware. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with high-refresh-rate monitors, and frame rates will drop significantly compared to 1080p. At 4K, the GPU’s 50th percentile rank means it will likely fall below playable frame rates in many modern titles, especially those with high graphics demands. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for game streaming or recording, but the GPU’s limitations will cap the overall gaming experience.

The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are qualitative estimates, not exact numbers. Games that are CPU-bound, such as strategy titles or simulation games, will perform better relative to the GPU’s capabilities, while GPU-bound games will highlight the graphics card’s mid-tier status. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9912 suggests that the CPU can handle the physics and AI calculations in modern games, but the GPU will determine the final frame rate in most scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a 38-percentage-point gap. The combined percentile of 69 is closer to the GPU’s percentile than the CPU’s, confirming that the GPU drags down overall system performance. In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the system will perform near the CPU’s high level, but in GPU-bound workloads like gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will fall to the GPU’s mid-tier level.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, reinforces this imbalance. In games that are CPU-intensive, the CPU’s high multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26125) will allow the system to maintain high frame rates even with the mid-tier GPU. In games that are GPU-intensive, the GPU’s 50th percentile rank will cap frame rates regardless of the CPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s 3DMark max-threads score of 11620 versus the 2-thread score of 2120 shows that the CPU scales well with additional threads, which benefits modern games that use multiple cores, but the GPU cannot match the CPU’s performance tier.

The memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is another potential bottleneck, though it is shared between the CPU and GPU in a system configuration. The GPU’s own bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is significantly higher, so memory is less of a constraint for the GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the connection is not a limiting factor. Overall, the bottleneck analysis points squarely at the GPU as the component that will most often limit system performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs Intel’s Core i9-12900K, a 16-core Alder Lake-S processor, with NVIDIA’s RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, a GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU is a top-tier desktop part at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-tier embedded part at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 69 places this system in the upper-mid tier overall, though the imbalance between components means the system’s real-world performance varies significantly depending on the workload.

The build class is desktop, and the CPU’s socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in system configuration. The GPU’s 150 W TDP and the CPU’s 125 W TDP indicate a system that requires a robust power supply, though no specific PSU rating is provided in the FACT PACK. The GPU’s lack of power connectors suggests it draws power from the motherboard, which is typical for embedded designs. This pairing is unusual in that it combines a high-end desktop CPU with a mobile-derived GPU, resulting in a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is less impressive in GPU-bound ones.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with a die size of 379 mm² and 45,900 million transistors. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. It contains 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.69 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU’s 50th percentile rank among all GPUs indicates mid-tier performance, which is consistent with its embedded origins and 150 W TDP. The 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable but not exceptional for a modern GPU, placing it below high-end desktop models. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and AI workloads, but their performance is proportional to the GPU’s overall mid-tier status. The 16 GB of VRAM is generous for a mid-tier GPU and allows for large textures and datasets, which is beneficial for content creation. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU’s compute capabilities, though it is lower than high-end GPUs.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, which is unusual and contributes to its 0 average score. The lack of benchmark data makes it difficult to assess the GPU’s exact performance relative to other models, but the 50th percentile rank provides a general indication of its standing. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs. The display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, which reflects the embedded nature of the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 88th percentile rank and single-thread score of 4136 in PassMark provide enough processing power for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s 50th percentile rank will limit frame rates to mid-tier levels. Estimated performance at 1080p is acceptable for 60-100 FPS in most titles, while 1440p will require lower settings to maintain smooth frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26125) are well-suited for game streaming, as the CPU can handle both the game and the encoding workload. The GPU’s mid-tier performance may require lower game settings to free up resources, but the CPU provides sufficient headroom for streaming software.

Video editing: The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 41213, makes this system excellent for video editing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and rendering, though its mid-tier rank means it will not match high-end workstation GPUs.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26125 ensures fast CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides decent GPU-accelerated rendering. The 76 RT cores support ray-traced rendering, but the GPU’s 50th percentile rank limits its contribution to the rendering pipeline.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 139090 and data compression score of 537341 indicate strong performance in compilation and data processing tasks. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 88th percentile rank ensures smooth operation in development environments.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4136 in PassMark is more than sufficient for productivity applications, and the 88th percentile rank ensures responsive multitasking. The GPU’s mid-tier performance is irrelevant for most office tasks, making this system overkill for basic productivity but with room to grow for more demanding applications.