SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900K

42,335 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a profoundly mismatched desktop combination. The data shows a CPU that sits in the 88th percentile of all processors, delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance, paired with a GPU that languishes in the 17th percentile, a component whose benchmark scores place it in the company of entry-level integrated graphics. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a workstation-class CPU crippled by a graphics adapter that will bottleneck virtually any visual workload. The combined percentile for the pairing is 53, but this figure is misleading, as it masks the 71-point gap between the two components' individual standings. The benchmark data for this specific build is calculated, not measured, as no direct FPS rows exist for this combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU is designed for heavy parallel workloads, and the benchmark scores confirm this. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multi-core score of 26125, which is a dominant result that indicates exceptional capability in rendering, video encoding, and software compilation. Its single-core score of 2004.5 in the same test is also strong, ensuring responsive day-to-day use and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications.

The 3DMark thread scaling data provides a clear picture of its architecture. The score for 16 threads is 9912, while the max threads score is 11620. This scaling, though not perfectly linear, shows that the processor can effectively utilize its 24 threads to gain extra performance. The single-thread score of 1073 and the 2-thread score of 2120 suggest that the P-cores, or performance cores, are highly efficient. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 16378 multi-core and 2193 single-core, further validating its position as a high-end desktop part. The PassMark multithread score of 41213 is massive, indicating excellent throughput for tasks like data compression, which scores 537341, and integer math, which scores 139090. The average benchmark score of 42335 places it in the 88th percentile against all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-12900K is remarkably competitive. It trails the Intel Core i9-12950HX by a negligible 0.4%, despite that being a mobile part. It leads the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS by 0.9%. It is effectively a statistical tie with all of them, which underscores that the 12900K remains a relevant and powerful choice even against newer silicon. The 30 MB of L3 cache and the 76.8 GB/s of dual-channel memory bandwidth provide a robust foundation for these scores. This is a CPU that will not be the limiting factor in any modern workload; its bottleneck lies entirely with the GPU it is paired with.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface. This platform offers support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus providing a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 memory, though the platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel sockets. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the primary interface for a discrete graphics card, ensuring that a future GPU upgrade will have access to the fastest available bandwidth. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which is a useful fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found on workstation-class hardware, suggesting the 12900K can be used in reliability-focused scenarios. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, which is a modest figure for a 16-core part, but the power draw can increase significantly under sustained all-core loads. The suggested PSU for the accompanying GPU is only 200 W, which is exceptionally low. This creates a large power supply headroom. A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the Radeon RX 7400 with a significantly more powerful graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 slot and the powerful CPU can easily support a GPU that would require a much larger power supply, making this platform a strong foundation for a high-end gaming or workstation build that simply needs a new graphics card to realize its potential.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this build is defined by a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 42335, is a top-tier performer. It achieves a 3DMark max threads score of 11620 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14679. These scores indicate a processor that excels in multi-threaded environments. In contrast, the GPU's benchmark results are poor. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is just 1103. In PassMark, its G3D score is 11897, but its DirectX 12 score is a mere 44, and its DirectX 11 score is 97. These low DirectX scores are particularly telling, as they indicate very weak real-world gaming performance. The GPU's average benchmark score is 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, Intel HD Graphics 610, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M. The RX 7400 leads the 8040S by 1.1%, the 710M by 1.4%, the HD 610 by 1.8%, and the GT 710M by 1.9%. This is a critical finding: the discrete RX 7400 is only marginally faster than a legacy integrated graphics solution like the Intel HD 610. The performance delta is within a few percentage points, which means that for gaming, this discrete GPU offers no meaningful advantage over the CPU's own integrated graphics or ancient entry-level mobile GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 53, a figure pulled down almost entirely by the GPU's abysmal performance. The data shows that this is a CPU-centric system where the graphics component is woefully inadequate, making any FPS discussion purely an estimate based on the GPU's low scores.

Who Should Build It

Given the data, this specific pairing is not suitable for gamers at any resolution. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX scores indicate it would struggle even at 1080p with low settings. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering would benefit immensely from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26125 and its PassMark multithread score of 41213, but they would be severely hampered by the GPU's compute score of 5152 in PassMark, which is insufficient for GPU-accelerated rendering or modern effects. Software developers would find the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads excellent for compiling code and running virtual machines, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running build processes. However, any graphical development or use of GPU-accelerated APIs would be a poor experience.

Students and small business workstations that focus on office productivity, web browsing, and document creation would find the CPU's single-thread score of 4136 in PassMark to be more than sufficient. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle these tasks, rendering the discrete GPU almost useless. The target user for this build is someone who needs extreme processing power for CPU-bound tasks and does not need any significant graphical capability. This could be a developer building a headless server, a researcher running complex simulations, or a professional using CPU-based calculation software. The build is not a balanced system; it is a powerful CPU with a placeholder GPU. The data strongly suggests that this configuration is only sensible if the buyer intends to immediately replace the GPU with a higher-performance model, or if the system is for a use case that is 100% CPU-bound.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU, sitting in the 88th percentile, is capable of feeding data to a GPU far more powerful than the RX 7400. The GPU, sitting in the 17th percentile, is the limiting factor for any graphical workload. The evidence is in the percentiles and the FPS scaling, which can be estimated from the scores. In a game, the CPU could process game logic and physics at a very high frame rate, but the GPU would be unable to render those frames, capping the FPS at a very low number. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 is catastrophic, suggesting it will struggle to maintain playable frame rates even at low resolutions and settings.

The combined percentile of 53 is a misleading metric for this pairing. It does not represent a balanced system, but rather an average of a high and a low performer. The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any scenario. The 16 threads scale well, and the single-core performance is strong, meaning it will not hold back a more capable GPU. The GPU is the bottleneck in all gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The only workloads where this bottleneck is not an issue are those that are purely CPU-bound, such as software compilation or data processing, where the GPU is not used. In any task that requires rendering a 3D scene, applying a video filter, or running a modern game, the RX 7400 will be the sole constraint, holding the system back to its 17th percentile performance level.

FAQ

Q: Is this a good combination for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU is in the 17th percentile of all GPUs and has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103, indicating it is not capable of rendering modern games at 4K resolution. Its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests it would struggle with even basic 3D rendering tasks.

Q: How does the CPU compare to other high-end processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900K is in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. It trails the Intel Core i9-12950HX by just 0.4% and leads the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 by 0.7%, making it competitive with these modern parts in benchmark scores.

Q: What kind of RAM does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This allows for flexibility in choosing memory modules.

Q: Is the Radeon RX 7400 significantly better than integrated graphics?

A: Benchmark data shows it is not. The RX 7400's average score is 1.8% higher than the Intel HD Graphics 610 and 1.4% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, placing it in a similar performance tier as these entry-level or integrated solutions.

Q: What is the main advantage of this CPU for a workstation?

A: The CPU's strength lies in its multi-threaded performance. It scores 26125 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 41213 in PassMark multithread, making it excellent for CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-12900K is $599.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 770. This can be used for basic display output and troubleshooting, and its performance may be comparable to the discrete RX 7400 in some tasks, based on the GPU's low percentile ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 mean it cannot produce the high frame rates necessary for high-refresh displays, even at lower resolutions. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU will bottleneck every frame.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads can easily handle the encoding workload of a stream, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26125. However, the game being streamed would run poorly due to the GPU's limitations, making this a poor experience for the streamer and viewer.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a PassMark multithread score of 41213 and a data compression score of 537341, which will speed up timeline scrubbing and export times. However, the GPU's compute score of 5152 will hinder GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, making the workflow slower than it should be.

3D rendering: The CPU is a powerhouse for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14679. The GPU, however, is not useful for GPU-accelerated rendering, as its compute score is too low to be effective, forcing reliance on the CPU and increasing render times.

Software development: This is an ideal scenario. The CPU's high thread count and strong single-core performance (PassMark single thread score of 4136) will speed up code compilation. The ECC memory support provides stability, and the GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance is more than adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The system is overkill for this use case, and the discrete GPU offers no benefit over the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 for these tasks, making the RX 7400 a wasted component.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build consisting of the Intel Core i9-12900K processor and the AMD Radeon RX 7400 graphics card. The CPU is a high-end, enthusiast-class part that delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, achieving an average benchmark score of 42335 and ranking in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, however, is an entry-level component with an average benchmark score of 2467, ranking in the 17th percentile. The overall tier of this build is defined by the CPU; it is a workstation-class processor paired with an inadequate graphics solution. The combined percentile of 53 reflects the average of these two disparate components. The build is best understood as a powerful CPU platform that is severely limited by its GPU, making it a poor choice for gaming but a potential foundation for a workstation that could be upgraded with a better graphics card later.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Navi 33 chip, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 28 ray tracing cores. Its boost clock is 2300 MHz, with a game clock of 2200 MHz. The FP32 performance is rated at 16.49 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s. Despite these specifications, its benchmark performance is very poor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, and the PassMark G3D score is 11897. However, the more specific API tests are damning: the DirectX 11 score is 97, and the DirectX 12 score is 44.

These scores indicate a fundamental weakness in real-world rendering. The GPU's percentile rank of 17 vs all GPUs places it in the lowest tier. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, Intel HD Graphics 610, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M, all of which are within 1.9% of its average score. This means that for gaming and 3D rendering, the RX 7400 offers no meaningful advantage over legacy integrated graphics. The texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s, but the low DirectX scores suggest the hardware is not being utilized effectively in modern APIs. The GPU's TDP is a very low 43 W, requiring only a 200 W power supply and a single 6-pin connector. While this makes it an efficient part, the efficiency is irrelevant given the terrible performance. For any rendering workload, this GPU will be the primary bottleneck.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds