SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900K

42,335 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-end 16-core processor with a mid-range graphics card. The CPU, built on the Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, offers a hybrid design with 16 cores and 24 threads, capable of boosting up to 5.20 GHz from a 3.20 GHz base clock. This processor sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong multi-threaded performance for demanding productivity workloads. The GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 23 chip, provides 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a boost clock of 2491 MHz. The graphics card holds the 63rd percentile position among all GPUs, placing it firmly in the mid-range segment. The combination results in a 76th overall percentile for the build, suggesting a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks while providing adequate, but not class-leading, graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake-S architecture. This design leverages a hybrid architecture, though the data provided does not specify the exact core type distribution, the high thread count and boost clock of 5.20 GHz suggest a robust configuration for parallel processing. The CPU’s benchmark scores demonstrate its capability across various loads. In multi-threaded tests, the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 score of 26125, indicating exceptional sustained performance for rendering and compilation tasks. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2004.5 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1073, which is crucial for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications.

The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, coupled with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, offers flexibility in platform configuration without bottlenecking the core performance. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample fast storage for frequently accessed data. The PassMark tests further illustrate its strengths: a multithread score of 41213 and an integer math score of 139090 point to strong scientific and financial computing performance. Data encryption and compression scores of 29579 and 537341, respectively, indicate that the CPU can handle archival and security workloads efficiently.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-12900K is effectively in a dead heat. It scores 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i9-12950HX and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400. This places the desktop chip in the same performance tier as high-end mobile parts and newer desktop offerings, suggesting that the architecture remains competitive. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9912 and max-thread score of 11620 show that scaling from 16 to 24 threads yields a 17% improvement, which is reasonable for workloads that can utilize the extra threads. For real-world workloads, this translates to snappy application loading and smooth multitasking, with the headroom to handle video encoding or 3D rendering without halting background processes.

Benchmark Performance

The aggregate benchmark data paints a clear picture of a system with a significant performance disparity between its components. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42335, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result, indicating the processor can handle the most demanding computational tasks. In contrast, the GPU’s average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a solid mid-range result, capable of smooth 1080p gaming but not designed for extreme resolutions. The combined build percentile is 76, reflecting the high CPU performance dragging the overall score up, while the GPU provides a more modest contribution.

Specific GPU scores show its capabilities in different APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67623 is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 28850, indicating strong performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 is a measure of modern gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 15096 is a direct comparison point for older games, while the DirectX 12 score of 51 is notably low, highlighting a potential weakness in specific legacy workloads. The GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, with a delta of 0%, meaning the RX 6600 performs virtually identically to this professional card in the aggregate. It is also 0.1% slower than the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, showing it competes with entry-level laptop GPUs. The combined picture suggests that for gaming, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor, and the GPU will dictate the achievable frame rates, especially at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s 88th percentile performance ensures high frame rates are achievable, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile will limit the maximum output. The data indicates the CPU can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames, so users will see GPU-bound performance in most titles.

Streaming: The i9-12900K’s strong multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26125, allow for x264 encoding while gaming without significant performance dips. The GPU’s dedicated hardware encoding (not detailed in the pack) and its 8 GB of VRAM can handle the encoding offload, but the system will be more stable using the CPU’s ample core count.

Video Editing: This workload benefits immensely from the CPU. The PassMark multithread score of 41213 and the high floating-point math score of 105471 will accelerate rendering times and effect processing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU will assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but its mid-range standing means it will not be the primary driver for export speeds.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based renderers, this is an excellent workstation. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4057 and R20 score of 14679 confirm that the processor will chew through ray tracing calculations. The GPU can also contribute via OpenCL, as evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 28850, but it will be a secondary engine compared to the CPU.

Software Development: Compilation times will be short, driven by the CPU’s high integer math score of 139090 and 24 threads. The data suggests that large codebases will build quickly, and the high single-thread score of 4136 (PassMark) ensures fast UI responsiveness for the IDE. The GPU is sufficient for running multiple virtual displays or lightweight UI rendering.

Student and Office Work: This system is over-specified for these tasks. The CPU’s performance is far beyond what is needed for document editing or spreadsheet calculations. The GPU’s 63rd percentile is more than adequate for office applications and 4K video playback, making this a powerful, if extravagant, machine for academic work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data overwhelmingly indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the primary bottleneck in this configuration for graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU’s percentile rank of 88 is significantly higher than the GPU’s rank of 63, creating a 25-point gap. This imbalance means that in gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the system will be GPU-limited. For example, the CPU can produce frames much faster than the GPU can render them, leading to situations where the frame rate is capped by the graphics card. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15096, while respectable, is nowhere near the level required to match the CPU’s output potential.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like data compression (PassMark score of 537341) or 3D rendering with a CPU-based engine, the roles are reversed. Here, the GPU will be underutilized, and the CPU will be the limiting factor. The FPS scaling, when estimated from these scores, would show that lowering resolution or graphical settings will not yield significant frame rate improvements in CPU-bound scenarios, but will provide a large boost in GPU-bound games. The sweet spot for this build is 1080p gaming, where the GPU can maintain high frame rates, and the CPU’s headroom ensures stable frame pacing and prevents dips below the GPU’s output.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be considered approximate. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1492 and its 63rd percentile position suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming card. In less demanding esports titles, the high single-thread performance of the CPU (3DMark single-thread score of 1073) combined with the GPU’s DirectX 11 score of 152 suggests that frame rates could be very high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with lower settings.

For more demanding AAA titles, the GPU’s performance will be the deciding factor. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67623 indicates that the card performs well in modern APIs, but the 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will limit texture quality and resolution. At 1440p, the GPU is likely to struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most graphically intensive games, as its bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is modest. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 51 is concerning and suggests poor performance in some DX12 titles, which could lead to inconsistent experiences. The data implies that this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU ensures high minimum frame rates and the GPU can deliver a smooth experience.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize processing power over graphical fidelity. The target audience is a content creator who needs the i9-12900K’s 16 cores for video editing and 3D rendering but does not require top-tier GPU performance for their workflow. They might play games occasionally at 1080p, and the RX 6600 will provide a satisfactory experience.

Software developers and engineers will find this configuration ideal. The CPU’s massive multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 score of 26125) accelerates build times, while the GPU is sufficient for running modern UI frameworks and multiple monitors. For small business workstations handling large datasets in Excel or financial modeling, the CPU’s integer and floating-point scores are exceptional.

However, this is not the build for a high-refresh-rate gamer at 1440p or 4K. The GPU will become the bottleneck, and the investment in the CPU will not translate to higher frame rates. Students in gaming-focused fields would be better served by a more balanced system. This build is for those who buy a processor for its compute capabilities and add a competent, mid-range GPU for visual output.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The card has 28 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The clock speeds are set at a base of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz.

The benchmark scores show a mixed bag for rendering capabilities. The FP32 performance is 8.928 TFLOPS, which is a solid figure for rasterized rendering. The texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s are adequate for 1080p. However, the ray tracing performance is not top-tier, as indicated by the 28 RT cores, which is a lower count than higher-end cards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 28850 shows that the card can accelerate compute tasks, but the PassMark GPU Compute score of 6554 suggests it is not a primary compute workhorse.

The GPU’s performance in the 63rd percentile is consistent with its positioning as a mainstream part. It sits directly between the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 and the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile in aggregate score. This means it offers performance comparable to a professional workstation card from a previous generation, but it lacks the advanced features of newer cards. The 8 GB of VRAM is now considered a minimum for modern games at high settings, and the 128-bit bus limits memory bandwidth, which can cause performance drops in games that require high data throughput. For rendering, the card is best suited for 1080p output and light 1440p work, relying on the CPU for heavy lifting.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this build?

A: The combined performance is in the 76th percentile of all builds, indicating a system that is better than most, but not at the top end.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900K performs 0.7% better than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 and is 0.4% slower than the Intel Core i9-12950HX.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to a professional card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 has an average score of 19036, which is exactly 0% different from the NVIDIA Quadro K6000.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for manual overclocking of the processor.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the power draw and PSU requirement for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 132 W and requires a power supply with a wattage of at least 300 W.

Q: What are the display outputs available on the GPU?

A: The card features 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Build Overview

This build pairs a top-tier desktop CPU with a mid-range desktop GPU, resulting in a system with a combined percentile of 76. The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high-end processor in the 88th percentile, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a mainstream graphics card in the 63rd percentile. This is fundamentally a workstation-oriented pairing, where the CPU’s massive computing resources are the main attraction. The GPU is included to provide a complete visual output solution rather than to spearhead gaming performance.

The class is desktop, and the overall tier is high. The data suggests that this build is intended for users who require extreme processing power for tasks like software compilation, video rendering, and scientific simulations. The GPU is an afterthought, providing enough power for standard graphical interfaces and light gaming. The performance imbalance is stark, but it is a deliberate choice that prioritizes computational throughput over graphical prowess.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900K uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, as well as PCIe Gen 5.0 for the CPU’s 16 lanes. The platform offers a clear upgrade path for the GPU, as the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the RX 6600 can be replaced with a more powerful card. The data indicates that the CPU has significant headroom, as its performance is on par with newer rivals like the AMD Ryzen 5 7400. Therefore, a future GPU upgrade would be the most sensible next step to balance the system.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W, and its TDP is 132 W, leaving ample headroom in most power supplies for a more demanding graphics card. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 6600 with a GPU that performs in a higher percentile to match the CPU’s output capability. The CPU’s 30 MB of L3 cache and support for high-speed memory ensures that it will not become a bottleneck for a more powerful GPU. The platform is not at its end of life, as the CPU is still in active production, allowing for future CPU upgrades within the same socket, although newer generations may require a different platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds