SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900HX

35,003 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation: A Mobile Workstation Paradox

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Alder Lake-HX flagship with NVIDIA's professional Ada Lovelace mobile GPU, creating a laptop-class configuration that sits at the 53rd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's single benchmark score places it at just the 21st percentile among all GPUs — a striking imbalance that defines this build's character. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, meaning all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the underlying benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 is the sole GPU performance datapoint, and its percentile position at 21% among all GPUs signals that this is not a high-refresh gaming part by modern standards. The nearest rivals to this GPU — the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (deltaPct 0.1), GeForce GT 735M (deltaPct -0.6), GeForce GTX 1050 (deltaPct -0.9), and AMD Radeon HD 6770 (deltaPct -1.5) — are all older or lower-tier graphics solutions, which contextualizes the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada's performance class as closer to entry-level desktop GPUs from previous generations.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the estimated performance would likely deliver playable but not spectacular frame rates in most titles, given that the GPU's closest rival is the GeForce GTX 1050 — a card that historically handles esports and older AAA titles at medium-to-high settings but struggles with modern heavy workloads. At 1440p, the 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory capacity, but the raw compute throughput of 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 and the 21st percentile ranking suggest that frame rates would drop significantly below the 60 FPS threshold in demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 1026 in 3DMark and 3745 in PassMark indicates strong gaming responsiveness for CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenes.

At 4K resolution, the picture becomes clearer: with only 21st percentile GPU performance, ultra settings at 4K would likely produce sub-30 FPS in many modern AAA games, making this pairing unsuitable for high-resolution gaming without significant settings reductions. The 112 ROPs and 236.9 GPixel/s pixel rate help with fill-rate-bound scenes, but the overall compute horsepower is simply not in the range expected for 4K ultra gaming. The estimated 1080p experience would be the most viable, potentially hitting 60 FPS in less demanding titles or with moderate settings adjustments, but users should not expect this to be a gaming-first machine.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 35003, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs — a strong showing that puts it in the upper tier of mobile processors. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13800H (avgScore 34988, deltaPct 0), Intel Core 7 253PTE (avgScore 34962, deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i5-14500HX (avgScore 35094, deltaPct -0.3), and Intel Xeon 6349P (avgScore 34890, deltaPct 0.3). These deltas are remarkably tight — within 0.3% — indicating that the i9-12900HX sits in a crowded performance band where slight binning differences determine the leader. The CPU's multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 23150 and PassMark multithread score of 33158 confirm its capability for parallel workloads, while the single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 1912.5 shows solid per-core performance.

The GPU, in stark contrast, manages only a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596, placing it at the 21st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 3596 (the single test result). The nearest GPU rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (avgScore 3594, deltaPct 0.1), GeForce GT 735M (avgScore 3616, deltaPct -0.6), GeForce GTX 1050 (avgScore 3629, deltaPct -0.9), and AMD Radeon HD 6770 (avgScore 3649, deltaPct -1.5). The fact that this professional mobile GPU scores nearly identically to a GTX 1050 — a budget desktop card from 2016 — is a critical data point. The combined percentile of 53% reflects the tension between the excellent CPU and the underwhelming GPU, pulling the overall pairing to exactly the midpoint of all combinations.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is performing at near-elite levels while the GPU performs at entry-level standards. This divergence suggests the pairing was designed for compute workloads that leverage the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads heavily, with the GPU serving as a secondary accelerator rather than the primary performance driver. The data indicates a workstation-class CPU married to a GPU that, despite its professional "RTX 5000" branding, benchmarks like a much more modest graphics solution.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Alder Lake architecture (codename Alder Lake-HX) using Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included — a feature that signals workstation intent.

The benchmark data reveals strong scaling from 2 threads to 16 threads in 3DMark: scores rise from 1994 (2 threads) to 3729 (4 threads) to 6461 (8 threads) to 8077 (16 threads) and peak at 9067 for max threads. This scaling pattern shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, with only about 12% improvement from 8 to 16 threads and 12% from 16 to max threads, suggesting memory bandwidth or cache contention limits full utilization of all 16 cores. The single-thread 3DMark score of 1026 and PassMark single-thread score of 3745 indicate strong per-core performance, though not class-leading — the 84th percentile overall reflects both strong multi-threading and respectable single-thread capability.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23150 positions this CPU for heavy parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 113416 and floating-point math score of 84410 demonstrate robust number-crunching ability. Data compression scores of 400636 in PassMark and encryption at 22932 indicate strong performance for archival and security workloads. The extended instructions score of 24315 suggests good SIMD throughput for scientific computing. For software developers, the 24 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache provide substantial headroom for parallel builds, while the boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness for code editing and compilation of smaller modules.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 53, placing it in the middle of all recorded CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-12900HX has an average benchmark score of 35003, which is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-13800H (34988), Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962), Intel Core i5-14500HX (35094), and Intel Xeon 6349P (34890).

Q: What does the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score indicate?

A: The GPU scored 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 21st percentile among all GPUs, with its closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 at 3594.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What memory configurations does the CPU support?

A: The i9-12900HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release date?

A: The CPU is marked as Active in production and was released on 2022-05-09, with a launch MSRP of $606.

Q: How many RT and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU features 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU operates with a base clock of 1425 MHz and a boost clock of 2115 MHz, consuming a TDP of 120 W. It has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The compute throughput is rated at 41.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with a pixel rate of 236.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 643.0 GTexel/s. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and the GPU is classified as an IGP slot width with no power connectors required.

Despite the professional "RTX 5000" branding and substantial memory capacity, the benchmark data tells a different story. The single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 places this GPU at the 21st percentile, with nearest rivals being the GeForce GT 545 and GTX 1050. This suggests that in raw gaming or rendering performance, the GPU performs closer to entry-level desktop graphics cards from a decade ago than to modern high-end mobile GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM is generous, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is respectable, but the compute throughput and benchmark results indicate the GPU is not a top-tier performer.

For rendering workloads, the 76 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 304 tensor cores support DLSS and AI-accelerated features. However, given the 21st percentile ranking, users should temper expectations for real-time ray tracing at high resolutions — the GPU would likely handle 1080p ray tracing with DLSS in less demanding titles, but 4K ray tracing would be out of reach. The 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 figure suggests decent rasterization capability, but the benchmark score contradicts this, indicating that architectural efficiency or driver limitations might be constraining actual performance. The 112 ROPs and 236.9 GPixel/s pixel rate are adequate for traditional rasterization at moderate resolutions, but the GPU's low percentile ranking means it will be the bottleneck in most graphics-intensive scenarios.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower with a professional GPU that offers generous memory and modern features, rather than users seeking top-tier gaming performance. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking and 16-core/24-thread configuration make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running parallel computations, and engineers using simulation tools — all workloads that benefit from the 23150 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 33158 PassMark multithread score. The 30 MB of L3 cache and DDR5 support further enhance these compute-heavy tasks.

Content creators working with video editing would benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance for rendering and encoding, though the GPU's 21st percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects would be slower than on higher-performing graphics solutions. The 16 GB VRAM is advantageous for large project files and multi-layer compositions, but the raw GPU throughput limits real-time preview performance. For 3D rendering, the 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores offer hardware acceleration, but the benchmark scores suggest render times would be significantly longer than on GPUs with higher percentile rankings.

Students in computer science or engineering programs would find the CPU's performance more than adequate for coursework, including parallel programming assignments and machine learning experiments that leverage the 24 threads. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical. Small business workstations running databases or virtual machines would benefit from the CPU's 16 cores, while the GPU provides basic graphics acceleration for office applications and light CAD work. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations might find the pairing acceptable for esports titles, but the GPU's proximity to GTX 1050-level performance means modern AAA games at high settings would be a challenge.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform — meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability, so users can choose between memory generations at build time but cannot swap between them later. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for future NVMe storage and expansion cards, though the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, totaling 175 W for the core components. The suggested PSU field is null in the FACT PACK, so no specific power supply recommendation is available, but the combined TDP suggests a moderately sized power supply would suffice in a laptop form factor where power delivery is managed by the system's charging brick. Since the build class is laptop, the upgrade path is inherently limited — users cannot swap the GPU or CPU independently in most mobile designs.

A sensible next upgrade, given the platform constraints, would be increasing memory capacity to maximize the CPU's multi-threaded performance, particularly for applications that benefit from large datasets. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking leaves little headroom for CPU improvement within the same socket generation, so users would need to move to a newer platform for a meaningful CPU upgrade. For the GPU, the 21st percentile ranking suggests that any future laptop with a higher-performing GPU would be a substantial upgrade, but the mobile form factor means this would require a full system replacement rather than a component swap.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing Intel's top-tier mobile CPU with NVIDIA's professional mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 53 places it squarely in the middle of all recorded pairings, but this aggregate figure obscures the extreme divergence between components: the CPU at the 84th percentile is elite, while the GPU at the 21st percentile is below average. This is a workstation-oriented configuration where the CPU carries the primary computational load, and the GPU provides professional features (16 GB VRAM, ECC-adjacent capabilities, RT/tensor hardware) rather than raw gaming performance.

The i9-12900HX is a 16-core Alder Lake-HX processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, 30 MB of L3 cache, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC — credentials that place it among the top mobile CPUs available. The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, despite its premium naming, benchmarks at a level comparable to the GeForce GTX 1050, making it a modest performer by modern standards. The pairing's 53rd combined percentile reflects a system that is neither a gaming powerhouse nor a balanced workstation, but rather a CPU-centric machine with a GPU that offers capacity over speed.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $606, and the GPU has no listed launch MSRP in the FACT PACK. This is a pairing for users who prioritize CPU throughput and need a professional GPU with large memory capacity, accepting that the GPU's compute performance is not competitive with higher-ranked graphics solutions. The overall tier is mid-range when considering the combined percentile, but the CPU alone is top-tier, making this a lopsided configuration that excels in CPU-bound workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data paints a clear picture of imbalance: the CPU at the 84th percentile dramatically outperforms the GPU at the 21st percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck — the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596, comparable to a GTX 1050, means that even with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score 3745), frame rates would be constrained by the GPU's limited compute throughput. The estimated FPS scaling would show minimal improvement from CPU upgrades because the GPU saturates well before the CPU reaches its limits.

In CPU-bound workloads — software compilation, data compression (PassMark score 400636), encryption (22932), and multithreaded rendering — the CPU is the star performer, and the GPU plays a minimal role. For these tasks, the system achieves near-elite performance, and the GPU's low percentile is irrelevant. The bottleneck flips entirely depending on the workload: GPU for graphics-intensive tasks, CPU for compute-intensive tasks.

The 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU provide a buffer for large textures and datasets, but the low compute throughput (21st percentile) means that even with ample memory, the GPU cannot process frames quickly enough for high-refresh gaming or real-time 4K rendering. Conversely, the CPU's 24 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock ensure that no CPU-bound task will be hindered by the processor, but the GPU will limit any workload requiring significant graphics acceleration. This is a system where the user must choose workloads wisely — it excels at CPU-heavy professional tasks and underperforms in GPU-accelerated scenarios.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 21st percentile ranking and proximity to GTX 1050 performance (deltaPct -0.9) make high-refresh gaming unrealistic at modern settings. Estimated 1080p frame rates would likely fall short of 144 Hz in most titles, and 1440p or 4K would struggle to maintain 60 FPS. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1026 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU's 3596 Steel Nomad score defines the ceiling.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23150 indicating strong x264 encoding performance. However, the GPU's modest rendering capability means the gaming side of the stream would be limited to lower settings or resolutions to maintain smooth output, making this a viable but not ideal streaming platform.

Video editing: The CPU excels in export and rendering tasks, with PassMark multithread score of 33158 and floating-point math of 84410 accelerating timeline processing and effects. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large project files, but its 21st percentile performance means GPU-accelerated effects and real-time previews would be slower than on higher-ranked graphics cards, potentially affecting editing fluidity.

3D rendering: The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced and AI-denoiser workflows, but the GPU's 3596 Steel Nomad score suggests render times would be longer than on GPUs with better benchmark performance. The CPU's 30 MB of L3 cache and 24 threads handle scene processing and geometry operations efficiently, making this a CPU-first rendering system with GPU assist.

Software development: This is the strongest scenario for this pairing. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking, 24 threads, and 5.00 GHz boost clock deliver exceptional compile times, with PassMark integer math of 113416 and data compression of 400636 supporting large codebase operations. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds, and the GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3745 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness for productivity suites, while the 16 cores handle multitasking and virtual machines effortlessly. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the system's overall 53rd combined percentile reflects a capable, if somewhat misallocated, configuration for general academic and professional use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds