SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900HX

35,003 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

43,268 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis covers the Intel Core i9-12900HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile in a laptop configuration. The data presented is derived from synthetic benchmark suites, as no measured frame rate data exists for this specific combination. All performance characterizations are estimates based on the aggregate scores and percentile rankings provided.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake-HX architecture. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel, featuring a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip houses a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, and connects via a Gen 5 PCIe interface with 20 CPU lanes.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 84th percentile among all tested processors. Its average benchmark score of 35003 puts it in direct competition with the Intel Core i7-13800H, which scores 34988, and the Intel Core 7 253PTE, which scores 34962. The data shows a negligible delta of 0% against the i7-13800H, meaning these two chips are effectively performance equals in aggregate. The Core i5-14500HX scores 35094, a 0.3% advantage, while the Xeon 6349P scores 34890, a 0.3% deficit.

Single-thread performance is strong but not class-leading. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1026 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1912.5 indicate solid responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 3745 reinforces this picture. For multi-threaded workloads, the processor demonstrates significant scaling. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 8077 jumps to 9067 at max threads, showing the 24 threads are effectively utilized. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 is a robust figure, and the Passmark multithread score of 33158 confirms strong parallel capability.

Real-world workload interpretation aligns with these numbers. The data indicates this CPU handles data compression efficiently, with a Passmark data compression score of 400636. Floating-point math performance is also notable, scoring 84410 on the Passmark test, which supports scientific and engineering applications. Integer math scores higher at 113416, suggesting strong general-purpose computing. The processor also excels at extended instruction sets, with a score of 24315 on the Passmark extended instructions test, which benefits modern software that leverages AVX and similar instruction sets.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate benchmark picture shows a well-rounded processor. Its percentile rank of 84 versus all CPUs places it in the upper tier of mobile processors. The specific Cinebench R20 results of 11764 multicore and 1660 single-core provide a clear reference point for rendering performance. Meanwhile, the Passmark physics score of 2012 indicates adequate performance for simulation workloads, though it is not the primary strength of this chip.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. It achieves an 83rd percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43268. This places it in close proximity to the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, which scores 43262 (0% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, which scores 43223 (0.1% delta). The RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, a 0.9% advantage, indicating the RTX 5050 Mobile is not far behind a top-tier mobile GPU in aggregate synthetic performance.

The GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2365 provides a specific data point for modern DirectX 12 workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171 shows strong compute capability for general-purpose GPU tasks. When combined, the CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile suggest a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The combined percentile for this build is 84, reflecting the aggregate capability of the system.

The absence of measured FPS data means these benchmark scores are the only quantitative basis for performance assessment. The data suggests a system that can handle demanding workloads, with the CPU providing high multi-threaded throughput and the GPU offering solid rasterization and compute performance. The delta percentages against rivals are minimal, implying this configuration sits at a performance plateau where small gains require moving to substantially different hardware tiers.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is remarkably even, as evidenced by their nearly identical percentile rankings of 84 and 83, respectively. This parity suggests that in most workloads, neither component will consistently bottleneck the other. The CPU’s average score of 35003 and the GPU’s average score of 43268 are both competitive within their respective product categories.

However, workload-specific analysis reveals where each component takes the lead. The CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 9067 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded scaling, meaning CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or 3D scene compilation will leverage the processor’s full potential. Conversely, the GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2365 indicates it can drive graphically intensive tasks at resolutions that demand high pixel throughput.

For gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1026 (3dmark) and Passmark single-thread score of 3745 become more relevant, as the processor must feed frames quickly. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the limiting factor. The data does not provide specific FPS scaling, so these conclusions are inferred from the component scores.

The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus is a potential constraint in texture-heavy scenarios, but the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth mitigates this somewhat. The CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache is ample for gaming workloads, reducing memory latency. Overall, the system is well-balanced, but users pushing maximum settings at high resolutions will likely find the GPU as the primary limiter, while competitive gamers at lower settings may encounter CPU limitations in heavily threaded titles.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a mobile workstation capable of both productivity and entertainment. The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it suitable for content creators who render video or 3D scenes. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 indicates the processor can handle substantial rendering workloads without excessive wait times.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 113416 and data encryption score of 22932, which support compilation and cryptographic operations. The support for ECC memory is a notable feature for professionals requiring data integrity in their work. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample parallelism for build servers and virtual machines.

Students and small business users will find the system responsive for office applications, given the Passmark single-thread score of 3745. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, though the discrete RTX 5050 Mobile handles graphics-heavy applications. The 83rd percentile GPU ranking ensures the system is not a slouch in creative applications like photo editing or light 3D modeling.

Gamers targeting high-refresh-rate esports titles will appreciate the CPU’s fast boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which supports high frame rates in CPU-bound games. For AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU’s 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for medium to high settings, though not for maximum presets with ray tracing enabled. The data indicates this is a versatile system for users who need one device for work and play, with performance that sits comfortably above average without reaching enthusiast extremes.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a compact GPU based on the GB207 chip, featuring 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. It includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, which support ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1020 MHz and a boost clock of 1500 MHz, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz for 24 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate bandwidth figure, sufficient for 1080p gaming and 1440p in less demanding titles. The memory capacity of 8 GB is adequate for current games, though future titles may require more. The GPU’s pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s indicate balanced fill rates for its class.

The FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS is the same as FP16 at 7.680 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio that simplifies compute workloads. This places the GPU in a competitive position, as evidenced by its 83rd percentile ranking. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2365 shows it handles modern API features well. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171 confirms strong compute throughput.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 20 RT cores, but the absence of measured FPS data prevents a quantitative assessment. The tensor cores, numbering 80, enable DLSS and other AI features, which can boost effective gaming performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming software.

The GPU’s 50 W TDP is low, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. Its IGP slot width and lack of power connectors indicate it is designed for integration into laptops rather than standalone use. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth for data transfer between the CPU and GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the CPU’s 84th percentile ranking suggest a system capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p for most titles. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2365, while not directly translatable to FPS, indicates that modern DirectX 12 games will run at playable frame rates on medium to high settings.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 1026 (3dmark) and boost clock of 5.00 GHz should support frame rates well above 144 Hz at 1080p. The GPU’s 7.680 TFLOPS is more than sufficient for these lightweight games. In contrast, AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield will be more GPU-bound, and the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions at higher resolutions.

The absence of measured FPS data means we cannot confirm specific resolutions or settings. The data suggests the system is a capable 1080p gaming machine, with the potential for 1440p in less demanding titles or with DLSS enabled. The tensor cores support upscaling technologies that can improve frame rates, but the 8 GB memory capacity is a limiting factor for 4K gaming with high-resolution textures.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 1026 (3dmark) support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures adequate graphics throughput for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 22932 indicates the processor can handle encryption overhead for secure streams, while the GPU’s tensor cores can offload encoding tasks.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 demonstrates strong rendering performance for video exports. The GPU’s 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, and the 8 GB GDDR7 memory handles 4K timelines with ease.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 9067 and Passmark floating-point math score of 84410 indicate robust ray tracing and physics simulation capabilities. The GPU’s 20 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing, though final frame renders rely on the CPU.

Software Development: The Passmark integer math score of 113416 supports fast compilation and code analysis. The support for ECC memory ensures data integrity during long build processes, and the 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and Office Work: The Passmark single-thread score of 3745 ensures responsive application switching. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup for display tasks, and the CPU’s 84th percentile ranking guarantees smooth multitasking for typical office workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire system. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, allowing for memory upgrades up to the capacity supported by the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides bandwidth for current and next-generation storage devices.

The GPU’s 50 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is also soldered, with no upgrade path. The system’s power delivery is designed around this TDP, so adding a more powerful GPU is not feasible. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the 50 W GPU and 55 W CPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that is manageable for a laptop power adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is increasing memory capacity and speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 support can improve performance in memory-sensitive applications. Adding a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD would also enhance storage bandwidth, benefiting load times and data-intensive workloads. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a rare feature for mobile systems, making it suitable for critical workstations.

The production status of both components is Active, indicating they are still in the market. The CPU was released on 2022-05-09 with a launch MSRP of $606, while the GPU was released on 2025-06-23. The gap in release dates suggests the GPU is newer, but the overall platform is mature with established driver support.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1026 in 3dmark_single_thread and 9067 in 3dmark_max_threads, indicating strong scaling. The Cinebench R23 scores of 1912.5 single-core and 23150 multicore show an approximate 12x improvement in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268 on average, while the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43223, a 0.1% delta. This indicates the RTX 5050 Mobile is statistically equivalent in aggregate benchmark performance.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900HX supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class systems. This is beneficial for professionals who require data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 84, reflecting the aggregate performance of the CPU at the 84th percentile and GPU at the 83rd percentile. This indicates a well-balanced system.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and architecture?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node using the Alder Lake-HX architecture. The GPU uses TSMC’s 5 nm process with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing high bandwidth for storage and GPU connectivity. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds