SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900HX

35,003 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

18,159 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile form a laptop pairing with a combined performance percentile of 73, placing it ahead of a majority of systems while remaining below the top tier for enthusiast-class mobile hardware. The processor, a 16-core Alder Lake-HX part, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its class, while the GPU, an Ampere-based mobile part with 6 GB of memory, provides solid 1080p gaming capability. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussions are therefore estimates derived from synthetic test results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a proprietary mobile package, meaning the processor is soldered directly to the motherboard and cannot be swapped for a different chip in a conventional sense. This is a critical constraint for any upgrade consideration: the CPU is permanently affixed, so the platform’s longevity is tied entirely to the laptop’s other components. The system supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, giving the builder or buyer flexibility in choosing memory technology, though the exact capacity and speed would depend on the motherboard’s implementation. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature more commonly associated with workstation-class systems, which could appeal to users running memory-intensive professional workloads where data integrity is paramount.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5, with 20 lanes available from the CPU itself, which is a substantial amount for a mobile platform. This allows for high-bandwidth connections to an SSD or other peripherals, though the GPU in this pairing uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the CPU’s Gen 5 support is forward-looking rather than fully utilized by the current graphics card. The power delivery situation is defined by the CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 80 W TDP, which together suggest a laptop design that needs to manage roughly 135 W of thermal load from the two primary components alone, not accounting for other system elements like memory, storage, and display. The GPU has no power connectors listed, indicating it draws power solely from the motherboard slot, which is typical for mobile graphics but also means the laptop’s dedicated power brick and internal VRM design are the limiting factors for any potential overclocking or sustained boost behavior.

A sensible next upgrade, given the fixed CPU and GPU, would focus on memory and storage. Moving from DDR4 to DDR5, if the motherboard supports it, could improve memory bandwidth-sensitive tasks, though the benchmark data does not quantify this gain. More practically, upgrading to a Gen 5 NVMe SSD would leverage the CPU’s PCIe lane allocation for faster data transfer in workloads like video editing or large dataset manipulation. The CPU’s multiplier is listed as unlocked, which is unusual for a mobile part and suggests potential for enthusiast tuning, but the laptop chassis’s cooling solution would be the ultimate bottleneck; without a robust thermal design, raising clocks would likely lead to thermal throttling rather than sustained performance gains. The platform’s production status is active, so replacement parts or future BIOS updates may still be available, but the GPU is end-of-life, signaling that support for the graphics component may taper off.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 3060 Mobile’s 62nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it can handle competitive titles at 1080p with high settings, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are estimates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1026 in 3dMark_single_thread and 3745 in PassMark single-thread suggests it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, allowing the graphics card to hit its performance ceiling.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s substantial multi-threading capability, evidenced by a 9067 score in 3dMark_max_threads and 23150 in Cinebench R23 multicore. This allows for software encoding while gaming, freeing the GPU to focus on rendering, though the GPU’s tensor cores could also handle encoding tasks if the software supports it.

Video editing is a mixed bag: the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 33158 and floating-point math score of 84410 indicate strong processing power for timeline operations and effects, while the GPU’s 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM are adequate for 1080p or modest 4K projects. The data compression score of 400636 suggests efficient handling of codec-heavy tasks, but large projects may strain the 6 GB memory capacity.

3D rendering relies heavily on both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outpaces most desktop processors in multi-threaded tasks. The GPU’s 13230 PassMark G3D score and 5718 compute score indicate it can handle GPU-accelerated rendering at a moderate level, but for complex scenes, the 6 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor, causing texture swapping in memory-heavy workloads.

Software development sees strong performance from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with the 3dMark_16_threads score of 8077 showing efficient scaling across multiple threads for compilation tasks. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 80344 and OpenCL score of 79483 are relevant for developers working on graphics APIs or compute shaders, as these scores indicate the hardware’s ability to execute parallel workloads common in game engines and scientific computing.

Student and office work is overwhelmingly covered by this hardware. The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet tasks, while the GPU’s 2D performance score of 588 in PassMark G2D indicates smooth desktop compositing. The system’s combined percentile of 73 suggests it will remain responsive for years under typical office workloads, though the 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP mean battery life may be shorter than lower-power alternatives, a trade-off for the performance headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system holds a combined percentile of 73, meaning it outperforms 73% of all benchmarked laptop configurations, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of mobile hardware.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900HX supports ECC memory, which is a feature not commonly found in consumer mobile processors and may be relevant for workstation-class reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile has a 192-bit memory bus with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, though it may limit performance in high-resolution texture-heavy scenarios.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13800H?

A: The i9-12900HX has an average benchmark score of 35003, while the i7-13800H scores 34988, a delta of 0%, indicating they are effectively performance equals in aggregate.

Q: Is the GPU considered a current-generation product?

A: No, the RTX 3060 Mobile has a production status of end-of-life, meaning NVIDIA has discontinued its production, though it remains capable for many current titles at 1080p.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The i9-12900HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which contributes to its strong single-thread performance scores.

Q: Does the laptop support PCIe 5.0 devices?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so the platform supports Gen 5 devices, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the full Gen 5 bandwidth is only available for other peripherals like SSDs.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a laptop buyer who needs strong multi-threaded CPU performance without the premium cost or power draw of a top-tier mobile GPU. Gamers playing at 1080p on high or ultra settings will find the RTX 3060 Mobile’s 62nd percentile ranking adequate for most AAA titles, though they should temper expectations for ray tracing or high-refresh 1440p, where the 6 GB VRAM and 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance may become limiting. Content creators working with video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU’s 84th percentile ranking, particularly in tasks that scale well across the 16 cores, such as rendering, encoding, or compiling.

Software developers, especially those working on multi-threaded applications or game engines, will appreciate the CPU’s 3dmark_16_threads score of 8077 and PassMark multithread score of 33158, which indicate strong parallel processing for build times and test execution. The GPU’s compute scores, including 5718 in PassMark GPU compute and 79483 in Geekbench OpenCL, make this a reasonable choice for developers experimenting with GPU-accelerated computing, though the 6 GB memory limit will restrict the size of datasets that can be processed. Students in engineering, computer science, or media production programs will find the hardware overkill for coursework but capable of handling demanding projects, with the CPU’s 30 MB shared L3 cache aiding in data-heavy workloads.

Small business workstations, particularly those running virtual machines, database servers, or financial modeling software, will benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support and 24 threads, which provide reliability and multitasking headroom. The PassMark data encryption score of 22932 indicates capable handling of encrypted communications or disk encryption, a common requirement in business environments. However, the laptop form factor means upgrades are limited to memory and storage, so buyers should configure the system with sufficient RAM and SSD capacity upfront, as the CPU and GPU are permanently soldered and cannot be replaced.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that allows for aggressive power delivery in a laptop chassis designed to handle it. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a mobile chip and aids in multi-threaded workloads where shared data is frequently accessed.

The processor’s benchmark scores paint a picture of a chip that excels in multi-threaded scenarios while maintaining strong single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 is particularly notable, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, which means it outperforms the vast majority of desktop and laptop processors in rendering and compute tasks. The single-core score of 1912.5 in the same benchmark is respectable, though not class-leading, and the 3dMark_single_thread score of 1026 confirms that the CPU will not be a bottleneck for most games that rely on a few high-frequency cores.

The PassMark results offer additional insight into specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 113416 and floating-point math score of 84410 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, which is relevant for scientific computing, financial modeling, and any task that involves heavy mathematical processing. The data compression score of 400636 is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving, code compilation, and other I/O-bound tasks. The extended instructions score of 24315 shows that the CPU handles SIMD and other specialized instruction sets effectively, which benefits applications like video encoding and cryptography. The random string sorting score of 43877 indicates robust memory management and pointer-chasing performance, which is critical for database operations and certain types of software development workloads.

The CPU’s 3dmark thread scaling results show how performance grows with core utilization. From 1994 at 2 threads to 3729 at 4 threads, the scaling is near-linear, and it continues to 6461 at 8 threads and 8077 at 16 threads, before reaching 9067 at max threads. This indicates efficient thread scheduling and inter-core communication, with diminishing returns only at the highest thread counts, which is expected given the hybrid architecture’s performance and efficiency core mix.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures in this section are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 13230 and its 62nd percentile ranking among all GPUs suggest that this system is capable of running most modern games at 1080p with high settings, achieving playable frame rates in the 60–90 FPS range for less demanding titles, while more graphically intensive games may dip to 40–60 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3745 in PassMark and 1026 in 3dmark_single_thread indicate it will not constrain the GPU in most gaming scenarios, as these scores are well above the threshold where CPU bottlenecks typically occur.

The GPU’s 6 GB GDDR6 memory, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, is sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p gaming, but it may require texture quality reductions in games that exceed this capacity. The 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance is in line with previous-generation desktop GPUs like the RTX 2060 SUPER, which has a similar average benchmark score of 18093 compared to this GPU’s 18159, indicating comparable raw rendering power. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the GPU’s high pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 171.0 GTexel/s suggest it can push well beyond 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, making it suitable for high-refresh displays.

Ray tracing performance is a weaker area, as the GPU has 30 RT cores but its mobile power envelope limits sustained clocks, resulting in fewer rays processed per second compared to desktop variants. Games with heavy ray tracing, such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Control, may require DLSS to maintain playable frame rates, and the 120 tensor cores provide the necessary hardware for this upscaling technology. Without measured FPS data, the estimates provided here should be viewed as a general guide rather than a definitive performance statement, and actual results will vary depending on the game title, settings, and laptop cooling solution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35003, with a percentile ranking of 84, meaning it is faster than 84% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13800H, which has an average score of 34988 and a delta of 0%, indicating that the i9-12900HX offers no meaningful performance advantage over its lower-tier counterpart in aggregate benchmarks. The Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 34962, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the i9, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 35094, which is 0.3% higher than the i9, showing that the i9-12900HX sits in a tight cluster of processors with nearly identical average performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 18159, with a percentile ranking of 62. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 5700, which scores 18189, a delta of -0.2% in favor of the AMD card, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER scores 18093, a delta of 0.4% in favor of the RTX 3060 Mobile. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 3060 Mobile, and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, also 1.2% higher, indicating that the RTX 3060 Mobile is slightly below average compared to its nearest competitors.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a clear strength, ranking in the 84th percentile, while the GPU is more modest, ranking in the 62nd percentile. This asymmetry means the overall system percentile of 73 is pulled down by the GPU, and workloads that are GPU-bound will see lower relative performance than those that are CPU-bound. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 33158 and the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 5718 further illustrate this gap, with the CPU outperforming its peers by a larger margin than the GPU does.

Build Overview

This pairing of an Intel Core i9-12900HX with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile represents a laptop-class build designed for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The build class is explicitly listed as laptop, meaning both components are mobile variants with power and thermal constraints distinct from desktop hardware. The combined percentile of 73 places this system in the upper-midrange tier, ahead of a majority of laptops but behind high-end configurations that pair similar CPUs with more powerful GPUs like the RTX 3070 or RTX 3080 Mobile.

The CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 80 W TDP together define the system’s thermal envelope, which is moderate for a performance laptop and allows for thinner chassis designs than those required for 150 W+ GPU parts. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, meaning this is a mature platform that has been on the market for several years; the CPU is still active, but the combination as a whole is likely to be found in budget or midrange gaming laptops rather than flagship models. The system’s overall tier, based on the percentiles, is best described as a “high-CPU, mid-GPU” configuration, where the processor is capable of workstation-class tasks while the graphics card handles mainstream gaming and content creation at 1080p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU performance, with the CPU ranking in the 84th percentile and the GPU in the 62nd percentile. This suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the system will perform admirably, but in GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the graphics card will limit overall performance. The CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 9067 versus the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 13230 illustrates this disparity, as the CPU is significantly further ahead of its peers than the GPU.

In gaming, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck at resolutions above 1080p, where the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to keep up with the GPU, but the GPU’s 62nd percentile ranking means frame rates will be lower than what the CPU could theoretically support if paired with a faster card. For example, if the CPU were paired with a GPU in the 90th percentile, the system would likely see a proportional increase in gaming FPS, but the current GPU limits this potential.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU’s role is secondary. The GPU’s compute score of 5718 is moderate, but for tasks like video editing in Premiere Pro, the CPU’s multithread score of 33158 will handle most of the heavy lifting, with the GPU accelerating effects and rendering. However, in GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles, the GPU’s 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the limiting factor, and users should expect render times to be longer than with a higher-tier GPU. Overall, the system is balanced for CPU-intensive tasks but unbalanced for GPU-intensive tasks, making it a better fit for developers and content creators than for gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is based on the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process node with a die size of 276 mm² and 12,000 million transistors. It features 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units, along with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective data rate on its 6 GB GDDR6 memory.

The memory subsystem consists of a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but may struggle with high-resolution textures or large datasets in compute workloads. The GPU’s pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 171.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for a mobile part. The FP32 performance of 10.94 TFLOPS is identical to its FP16 performance, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual for Ampere GPUs that typically have 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratios; this suggests the mobile variant may have reduced FP16 throughput.

The benchmark scores show that the GPU is a solid mid-range performer. The PassMark G3D score of 13230 places it in the 62nd percentile, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 5718 indicates moderate compute capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 79483 and Vulkan score of 80344 are respectable for a mobile GPU, suggesting it can handle compute workloads like OpenCL-based rendering or Vulkan-based game engines. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1821 is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark, and while it is lower than desktop counterparts, it confirms the GPU’s capability for current DX12 titles.

The GPU’s 30 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but the 6 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for ray-traced games, which often require more memory for scene geometry and lighting data. The 120 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can mitigate the performance hit of ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features. The GPU’s TDP of 80 W is modest for a performance laptop, allowing for efficient power delivery, but it also means the boost clock of 1425 MHz is lower than desktop RTX 3060 variants, resulting in reduced performance compared to the desktop version.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds