SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900HX

35,003 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile integrated GPU built on the Strix Halo chip, using TSMC's 4 nm process with an RDNA 3.5 architecture. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and carries a 308 mm² die size. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with memory completely dependent on the system — the memory type, size, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." This means the GPU draws from the same DDR4 or DDR5 pool as the CPU, so actual memory performance varies by platform configuration rather than being fixed by the GPU itself.

Compute resources include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU also features 32 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores; FP16 and FP32 throughput are identical at 11.47 TFLOPS each, indicating a 1:1 ratio rather than the boosted FP16 rates often seen in competing architectures. Pixel fill rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — the DirectX 12 Ultimate designation implies full support for hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders, which the 32 RT cores service.

Benchmark scores place the GPU at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62108. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 65818, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 58398. These results indicate a strong integrated solution that rivals discrete mobile GPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896 — the 8050S leads it by 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, putting it 2.5% ahead of the 8050S, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775 (2.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830 (2.7% ahead). The data shows the 8050S sits just below these three discrete cards but essentially trades blows with them, which is remarkable for an IGP with system-shared memory. For rendering workloads, the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate suggest solid performance in rasterization-heavy tasks, while the 32 RT cores provide a baseline for ray-traced effects, though the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware is present.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-12900HX achieves an average benchmark score of 35003, positioning it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Radeon 8050S achieves an average benchmark score of 62108, sitting at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 87th, indicating that both components are in the upper tier of their respective categories, with the GPU slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU.

CPU benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1026 in single-thread, 1994 in 2-thread, 3729 in 4-thread, 6461 in 8-thread, 8077 in 16-thread, and 9067 in max-thread. The jump from 8-thread to 16-thread is roughly 25%, and from 16-thread to max-thread is about 12% — indicating that the core count is substantial but with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 3566, R20 multicore is 11764, and R23 multicore is 23150, while single-core scores are 278, 1660, and 1912.5 respectively. The R23 multicore-to-single-core ratio is roughly 12:1, typical for a 16-core hybrid design.

PassMark results show integer math at 113416, floating-point math at 84410, and extended instructions at 24315. Data compression scores 400636, data encryption 22932, and random string sorting 43877. Multithread score is 33158 and single-thread is 3745. Physics score is 2012 and finding prime numbers scores 132. These figures paint a picture of a CPU that excels in parallel integer and floating-point workloads but is comparatively weaker in prime-number finding — which is often memory-latency sensitive.

The nearest CPU rivals are all within a narrow band. The Intel Core i7-13800H scores 34988 (0% delta), the Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 34962 (0.1% ahead of the 12900HX), the Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 35094 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Xeon 6349P scores 34890 (0.3% ahead). This means the 12900HX is effectively in a statistical tie with these parts, with deltas under half a percent. The combined picture is a laptop-class system that delivers upper-80th-percentile performance in both CPU and GPU terms, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its own competitive set.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-HX codename. It belongs to the 12th Gen Core series, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is 55 W. It uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-only package. Cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it includes ECC memory support — a feature more common in workstation-class parts. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770.

The architecture is a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact performance-core/efficiency-core split. The benchmark data strongly suggests a high-core-count part with excellent multithreaded scaling. The 3DMark max-thread score of 9067 versus the 8-thread score of 6461 shows that scaling from 8 to 24 threads yields roughly 40% more performance, which is reasonable for a hybrid architecture. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 places this CPU solidly in workstation-class territory for a mobile part, while the single-core score of 1912.5 indicates strong per-thread performance — important for lightly threaded applications like many games and office software.

The PassMark single-thread score of 3745 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1026 both confirm respectable single-core throughput. The extended instructions score of 24315 suggests strong AVX-family performance, which benefits scientific computing and media encoding. The floating-point math score of 84410 and integer math score of 113416 show a healthy balance, with integer performance notably higher — typical for a general-purpose x86 design. Data compression at 400636 is very strong, indicating good memory bandwidth and cache efficiency for archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption at 22932 is moderate, suggesting the CPU handles AES workloads adequately but is not specialized for them.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 12900HX is essentially tied with the Core i7-13800H (0% delta), the Core 7 253PTE (0.1% difference), the Core i5-14500HX (0.3% difference), and the Xeon 6349P (0.3% difference). The practical takeaway is that among these four parts, there is no meaningful performance hierarchy — the 12900HX delivers comparable multithreaded throughput to newer and similarly positioned mobile and entry-server parts, with all deltas under a third of a percent.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-12900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid-array package soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense — a user cannot simply swap it for a newer processor. The upgrade path for this platform is therefore limited to the laptop itself, not the CPU. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which opens the door to workstation-style memory configurations where the motherboard and BIOS permit it.

PCIe support on the CPU is Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and discrete GPUs, though this particular build uses an integrated GPU that connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and its power connectors are listed as "None" since it is an IGP. The GPU TDP is 55 W, matching the CPU TDP of 55 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of roughly 110 W for the two primary compute components before accounting for other system elements.

The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, and the power connectors are none, so there is no external power requirement for the graphics subsystem. The TDP figures suggest that a laptop chassis with adequate cooling for a combined 110 W CPU+GPU load is sufficient. Since this is a laptop build class, the "upgrade path" is more about external peripherals and storage than internal component swaps. A sensible next step for users would be ensuring the system has sufficient and fast DDR5 memory, since the GPU's performance is directly tied to system memory bandwidth — the memory bandwidth field for the GPU is "System Dependent," meaning higher-speed DDR5 will yield better GPU performance. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also be a practical enhancement given the 20 available CPU lanes.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 87th, which is between the two individual percentiles but closer to the GPU's value. This suggests that in a balanced system, the GPU is the marginally stronger component relative to its peers, meaning the CPU is the more likely bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios.

For gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread score of 1026 in 3DMark and 3745 in PassMark single-thread indicate it can feed a GPU of this class without major issues in most titles, but the GPU's 89th percentile placement means it will be the limiting factor in high-resolution or ultra-detail settings where pixel throughput dominates. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are the primary constraints for resolution scaling; at 1080p, the CPU's 16 cores provide ample headroom, but at 4K, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth (system dependent) will determine frame rates.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 and PassMark multithread score of 33158 show that the CPU is well suited for heavily threaded rendering and encoding tasks. In these scenarios, the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU will typically be the first to saturate in tasks like video transcoding or 3D scene compilation that rely on x86 cores. The FPS scaling evidence is not available as measured data — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows — so all frame-rate expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The data suggests a system where the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming, while the GPU will limit maximum frame rates at higher resolutions, and the CPU will be the primary driver of non-graphics compute workloads.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-12900HX and AMD Radeon 8050S. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame-rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 89th percentile placement and its average benchmark score of 62108, this integrated GPU should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles with high or ultra settings. The GPU's proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% ahead of the 8050S) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% ahead) implies that the 8050S will perform within a few percent of these discrete mobile GPUs. At 1080p ultra settings, users can expect smooth gameplay in esports titles and competitive frame rates in AAA games, though the system-shared memory could introduce variability depending on the laptop's memory configuration — the GPU's memory bandwidth is "System Dependent," so a dual-channel DDR5 setup will yield better results than a single-channel DDR4 configuration.

At 1440p, the GPU's 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 11.47 TFLOPS will begin to strain under ultra settings in demanding titles, and users may need to reduce settings to high or medium to maintain 60 FPS. At 4K, the system-shared memory bandwidth becomes a significant constraint, and frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in most AAA titles even at medium settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1026 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures that it will not be the limiting factor in gaming; the GPU and memory subsystem will dictate achievable frame rates. These are estimates based on the GPU's relative standing to known discrete parts, not measured results.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop-class build targets users who need strong CPU and GPU performance in a portable form factor. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 89th percentile placements indicate a system that is well above average for both compute and graphics tasks.

Gamers at 1080p resolution are the primary gaming audience. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it can handle 1080p high-settings gaming in most titles, and the CPU's single-thread performance of 3745 in PassMark ensures stable frame pacing. Gamers seeking 1440p or 4K performance will find the GPU to be the limiting factor, so this system is best suited for high-refresh 1080p play rather than high-resolution gaming.

Content creators and video editors will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150, which indicates strong rendering performance for video exports and 3D scene compilation. The GPU's 65818 Geekbench OpenCL score and 58398 Vulkan score provide hardware acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering in applications that support OpenCL or Vulkan. Software developers will appreciate the 24 threads for parallel builds, the 400636 PassMark data compression score for large code repositories, and the 22932 encryption score for secure development workflows. Students and small business users who run office productivity suites, web applications, and light content creation will find this system overqualified but future-proof, with the ECC memory support adding a layer of reliability for data-sensitive workloads.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-12900HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake-HX mobile processor with a 55 W TDP and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an integrated Radeon 8050S based on the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, also at 55 W TDP, with 2048 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores. The combined thermal envelope is approximately 110 W for both components.

The overall tier of this system is high, with a combined percentile of 87. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. This places the system in the upper echelon of laptop configurations, suitable for demanding workloads that require both strong multithreaded CPU performance and capable integrated graphics. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Core i7-13800H (0% delta), Core 7 253PTE (0.1%), Core i5-14500HX (0.3%), and Xeon 6349P (0.3%) — all statistically identical. The GPU's nearest rivals are the Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% behind the 8050S), Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% ahead), RX 7600M (2.6% ahead), and RX 9060 XT LP (2.7% ahead). This pairing represents a balanced high-end laptop configuration where the GPU is slightly more competitive relative to its peers than the CPU, but both components are in the top quartile of their respective categories.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87th, with the CPU at the 84th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 89th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, which is 0.3% higher than the Radeon Pro W6600M's score of 61896, making the 8050S slightly faster.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i9-12900HX support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8050S have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU's memory is system shared — the memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the system's main memory configuration.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i9-12900HX?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 2.30 GHz.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon 8050S faster or slower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The Radeon RX 7600M has an average score of 63775, which is 2.6% higher than the Radeon 8050S's score of 62108, so the RX 7600M is slightly faster.

Q: What is the TDP of both the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900HX has a TDP of 55 W, and the AMD Radeon 8050S also has a TDP of 55 W.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system can target high frame rates. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and the CPU's single-thread score of 1026 in 3DMark suggest the CPU will not bottleneck in most titles, while the GPU provides sufficient throughput for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The lack of measured FPS means this is an estimate from the benchmark scores.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 indicating the ability to handle simultaneous game and encode workloads. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58398 also supports GPU-side encoding in compatible applications.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 33158 and floating-point score of 84410 indicate strong performance for video timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23150 is the primary driver for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores offer GPU-accelerated path tracing and rasterization. This is a capable combination for architectural visualization and product rendering at a laptop level.

Software development: The 24 threads accelerate compilation, and the PassMark integer math score of 113416 supports heavy code builds. Data compression at 400636 aids in handling large repositories, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 89th percentile are far beyond the requirements for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The integrated GPU with system-shared memory keeps the system compact, and the 24 threads handle multitasking with ease. This system is overqualified for basic office tasks but provides headroom for any demanding academic software.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900HX

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds