SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900H

28,003 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core i9-12900H + AMD Radeon 8050S

This pairing combines a 12th-generation Intel mobile processor with an AMD RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution in a laptop configuration. The CPU is built on Intel’s Alder Lake-H architecture using a 10 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC’s 4 nm node with a 308 mm² die. The combined platform ranks in the 85th percentile overall, placing it firmly in the upper tier of mobile computing hardware.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not user-replaceable, and any upgrade path requires replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping individual components. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving system builders flexibility in choosing between the two memory generations. Memory bandwidth is system-dependent, and the GPU shares system memory rather than having dedicated VRAM.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and high-speed NVMe storage in most laptop designs. However, this pairing does not use a discrete GPU — the Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) that connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. The GPU’s slot width is listed as IGP, and it has no power connectors, drawing power from the shared system power delivery.

The CPU’s TDP is 45 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 55 W. These figures indicate a combined thermal envelope of roughly 100 W for the core compute components, which is typical for a high-performance laptop platform. There is no suggested PSU listed, but given the mobile form factor, power delivery is handled by the laptop’s internal power adapter and battery system. The absence of a discrete GPU means there is no additional power headroom required for external graphics cards.

For a sensible next upgrade, users would be looking at a completely new laptop platform. The BGA 1744 socket has no upgrade path to newer Intel generations, and the integrated GPU cannot be replaced. The most practical upgrade would be to a newer mobile platform with a more recent CPU generation and either a newer integrated GPU or a discrete GPU option. The data shows this platform is still active in production status, so current users can expect continued driver and software support, but hardware upgrades are not feasible.

Benchmark Performance

The combined platform sits at the 85th percentile across all CPU and GPU pairings. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 28,003, placing it in the 80th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 62,108, placing it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs. These are strong positions, with the GPU performing slightly better relative to its peers than the CPU does relative to its own peer group.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within a very tight margin. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28,032, which is a 0.1% delta from the i9-12900H. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28,054, a 0.2% delta. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28,065, also a 0.2% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27,932, a 0.3% delta in favor of the i9. These results indicate that the i9-12900H is statistically indistinguishable from these mid-range desktop and mobile processors in overall CPU performance, despite its higher-tier branding.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a similar pattern. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, a 0.3% delta in favor of the 8050S. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693, which is 2.5% higher than the 8050S. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775, a 2.6% advantage. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830, a 2.7% advantage. The 8050S is therefore competitive with these dedicated mobile GPUs, sitting just a few percent behind the fastest of them.

The combined picture shows a laptop that can handle demanding workloads. The CPU is competitive with mid-range desktop processors, and the GPU is close to entry-level dedicated mobile graphics. The 85th percentile combined ranking suggests this platform outperforms the vast majority of current laptops.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900H features 14 cores and 20 threads using Intel’s hybrid Alder Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The die size is 217 mm², manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process.

Benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 999 in single-thread to 1,891 in 2-thread, 3,398 in 4-thread, 5,074 in 8-thread, 6,457 in 16-thread, and 6,927 in max-thread tests. This scaling shows good multi-threading efficiency, with an 8-thread score roughly 5 times the single-thread score, indicating the architecture scales well up to 8 threads. Beyond that, gains diminish, which is typical for a hybrid architecture with 8 performance cores and 6 efficiency cores.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R15 multicore score is 2,576.5 with a single-core score of 266. R20 multicore reaches 9,501 with single-core at 1,341. R23 multicore hits 15,946.5 with single-core at 1,863.5. The multicore-to-single-core ratios across these tests are consistently around 8-10 times, which aligns with the 14-core, 20-thread configuration.

PassMark results show particular strengths in integer math (93,828), floating-point math (67,940), and multithread (27,340). Data compression scores 316,714, while data encryption scores 18,548. Extended instructions score 18,875, and random string sorting scores 35,296. The single-thread score is 3,717. Physics score is 1,753, and prime number finding is 107.

For real workloads, these numbers indicate strong multi-threaded performance for compile jobs, video encoding, and 3D rendering. The single-thread score of 3,717 in PassMark is competitive for everyday applications and gaming that rely on fewer threads. The architecture’s 5.00 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-thread performance, while the hybrid design balances power consumption across 14 cores for sustained multi-threaded loads.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and capable integrated graphics in a laptop form factor. The 85th combined percentile and 89th GPU percentile suggest this is a high-end integrated graphics solution. The CPU’s 80th percentile places it above most laptop processors, making it suitable for demanding productivity work.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development will benefit from the 14-core, 20-thread configuration. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,946.5 indicates strong sustained performance for rendering tasks. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate support GPU-accelerated effects and compositing.

Students and small business users who require a single device for coursework, office applications, and light creative work will find this platform has ample headroom. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 27,340 handles multitasking with many open applications, while the GPU’s 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs deliver smooth interface rendering and basic graphics acceleration.

Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings are the primary gaming audience, based on the GPU’s benchmark position. The GPU sits between dedicated mobile graphics solutions, trailing the RX 7600M by 2.6% and the Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%, which places it in the range of capable 1080p gaming. The CPU’s single-thread score of 999 in 3DMark and 1,863.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 62,108 average benchmark score indicate it can drive high-refresh 1080p displays in less demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 999, prevents frame rate drops in CPU-bound scenarios. Users should expect smooth gameplay at 1080p with competitive settings, though the integrated nature of the GPU means system memory speed affects performance.

Streaming: The 20-thread CPU configuration is well-suited for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark data encryption score of 18,548 and extended instructions score of 18,875 suggest the CPU can handle the overhead of streaming software while maintaining game performance. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 58,398 indicates it handles graphics API calls efficiently, freeing CPU resources for encoding tasks.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,946.5 provides strong CPU-based rendering for video exports. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects, transitions, and color grading. The combination of 24 MB shared L3 cache and system-shared memory allows large media files to be processed without dedicated VRAM limitations.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 93,828 and floating-point math score of 67,940 support CPU-based render engines. The GPU’s 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for compatible renderers. The 2,048 shading units deliver 11.47 TFLOPS, which is competitive for integrated graphics but below dedicated workstation GPUs.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel compilation tasks effectively. The PassMark multithread score of 27,340 and data compression score of 316,714 indicate strong performance for build tools, version control operations, and test suites. The 5.00 GHz boost clock accelerates single-threaded scripting and IDE operations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking and single-thread score of 3,717 in PassMark ensure responsive day-to-day performance for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s integrated nature means near-zero idle power draw, extending battery life for portable use. The platform’s active production status ensures ongoing driver support for classroom and professional software.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 62,108 and 89th percentile ranking, combined with the CPU’s 80th percentile and strong single-thread performance, suggest this platform can handle modern games at 1080p with medium to high settings.

The GPU’s nearest rival comparisons provide context. The Radeon 8050S is 2.6% behind the RX 7600M and 2.7% behind the RX 9060 XT LP. These dedicated mobile GPUs are known to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles, so the 8050S should perform similarly, with slightly lower frame rates. The system-shared memory architecture means gaming performance will be sensitive to memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent.

The CPU’s 3DMark scores indicate it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The 2-thread score of 1,891 and 4-thread score of 3,398 suggest strong performance in games that use 2-4 threads, which covers the majority of current titles. The 8-thread score of 5,074 provides headroom for games that scale beyond four cores.

For esports titles and older games, the combination should deliver high refresh rate performance at 1080p. For AAA titles, users should expect playable frame rates at medium settings, with lower resolutions or reduced settings for demanding releases. The GPU’s 32 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but performance in ray-traced titles will be limited compared to dedicated GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The platform shows a relatively balanced configuration, with the GPU outperforming the CPU relative to their respective peer groups. The GPU sits at the 89th percentile, while the CPU sits at the 80th percentile. This suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its class, which is typical for integrated graphics solutions that benefit from modern architectures.

In CPU-heavy workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary compute engine. The R23 multicore score of 15,946.5 and PassMark multithread score of 27,340 indicate the CPU can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads without bottlenecking. The GPU accelerates specific tasks like effects rendering and ray tracing, but the CPU carries most of the load.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is typically the limiting factor. The 8050S’s position relative to the RX 7600M (2.6% behind) and RX 9060 XT LP (2.7% behind) indicates it is the weaker component in this pairing for graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance prevents it from being the bottleneck in most games, but the GPU will cap frame rates in demanding titles.

The system-shared memory architecture introduces a potential bottleneck for GPU performance. Since the GPU has no dedicated VRAM, its performance depends on system memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent. Users with faster dual-channel DDR5 memory will see better GPU performance than those with DDR4 or slower configurations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-12900H with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-H processor, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution on the Strix Halo chip. The combined platform ranks at the 85th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

The build represents a high-end integrated graphics solution that competes with entry-level dedicated mobile GPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 62,108 places it within 3% of the Radeon Pro W6600M, RX 7600M, and RX 9060 XT LP. The CPU’s performance is statistically tied with several mid-range desktop processors, including the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G and Core i5-14500T.

This pairing is best described as a premium productivity laptop with gaming capability. It is not a dedicated gaming machine, but it can handle gaming as a secondary use case. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP indicate a balanced power envelope that supports sustained performance in a portable form factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined platform ranks at the 85th percentile across all CPU and GPU pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-12900H has an average score of 28,003. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032), 0.2% behind the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054) and Core i5-14500T (28,065), and 0.3% ahead of the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (27,932).

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The AMD Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory for both size and type, with bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the GPU include?

A: The Radeon 8050S has 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900H supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: How does the GPU benchmark compare to the Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The Radeon 8050S scores 62,108 on average, which is 2.6% behind the RX 7600M’s score of 63,775.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 performance also rated at 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process with a 308 mm² die. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and uses the Strix Halo chip. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 32 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration.

Clock speeds are listed at 1,295 MHz base and 2,800 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.47 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 55 W and uses no power connectors, drawing power through the system.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM. This means the GPU relies on the system’s DDR4 or DDR5 memory, with bandwidth dependent on the specific memory configuration. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, providing high bandwidth to the CPU and system memory.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and a Vulkan score of 58,398. The average benchmark score is 62,108, placing the GPU at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61,896, a 0.3% deficit. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693, 2.5% higher. The RX 7600M scores 63,775, 2.6% higher. The RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830, 2.7% higher.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate support GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that use OpenCL or Vulkan. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing for compatible render engines, though performance will be below dedicated workstation GPUs. The system-shared memory architecture means complex scenes with large textures may be limited by system memory bandwidth rather than GPU compute. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, and Vulkan 1.4 support provides low-overhead access for professional applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900H

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds