SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an Intel Core i9-12900F with an NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is an unusual but coherent desktop combination: a sixteen-core Alder Lake processor positioned in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, matched with a single-slot Ada Lovelace workstation GPU sitting in the 95th percentile. The combined build lands in the 92nd percentile, which places it firmly in high-performance territory while remaining distinct from halo-tier enthusiast rigs. Notably, the benchmark database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination — all frame-rate discussion on this page is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from direct measurement, and is flagged as such wherever it appears.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die. Its base clock is 2.40 GHz and it boosts to 5.10 GHz, a wide range that reflects the hybrid nature of the architecture: performance cores carry the single-threaded load while efficiency cores expand throughput in parallel workloads. The 65 W TDP rating is the rated figure for the part; the multiplier is unlocked, so sustained all-core behavior is a function of the cooler and motherboard rather than a hard ceiling.

The cache hierarchy is generous. Each core gets 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2, with a shared 30 MB block of L3 serving all cores. That shared pool matters for the workload profile this chip targets: rendering, compilation, and simulation all benefit from large shared cache because worker threads share intermediate data. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with a stated memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported — a feature that tilts the part toward workstation duty.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that is strong on both axes. In Cinebench R23 the chip scores 30405 multi-core and 4292 single-core; R20 returns 12770 and 1802 respectively, and R15 records 3064 multi-core and 432 single-core. The pattern is consistent: a high single-core score that keeps latency-sensitive applications fast, backed by a multi-core result that scales well with the thread count. Geekbench tells the same story — 2339 single-core and 15965 multi-core — and the Passmark suite adds detail: 35912 multithread, 4017 single-thread, 129504 integer math, 96452 floating point math, 451402 in data compression, 25251 in encryption, 48477 in string sorting, 28265 in extended instructions, and 1842 in physics.

The rival picture is remarkably tight. Against the field the i9-12900F sits at the 89th percentile with an average benchmark score of 47176. Its nearest rival by average score is the Intel Core i7-13700KF at 47330, a deltaPct of -0.3 — effectively a tie. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 averages 47022 (deltaPct 0.3), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 averages 46971 (deltaPct 0.4), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H averages 47468 (deltaPct -0.6). All four rivals sit within a fraction of a percent of this chip's aggregate score, which means buyers comparing this class of CPU are choosing on platform features — socket, memory support, ECC, PCIe generation — rather than raw throughput, because the data shows essentially no separation.

For real workloads, the practical reading is this: the i9-12900F compiles large codebases quickly, renders multi-frame sequences efficiently in engines that scale with threads, and holds high frame rates in games where the CPU is the limiter. The unlocked multiplier allows tuning, and the 5.10 GHz boost gives lightly-threaded games and applications headroom that many higher-core-count rivals cannot match.

Balance and Bottleneck

With the GPU in the 95th percentile and the CPU in the 89th, this build is mildly GPU-forward, and that shapes where bottlenecks appear. The combined percentile of 92 sits between the two individual figures, which is the signature of a balanced pairing rather than one grossly mismatched component.

At higher resolutions, the RTX 4000 Ada becomes the dominant limiter. GPU-bound scenarios — 1440p and especially 4K rendering with ultra settings — scale with the 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, the 360.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and the 6144 shading units, and the CPU's role diminishes toward frame submission. The CPU's single-core strength (4292 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4017 Passmark single-thread) is more than sufficient to feed a GPU at this tier, so the pairing avoids the classic high-GPU/weak-CPU mismatch.

At lower resolutions and high refresh rates, the equation flips. At 1080p with high frame rate targets, the 89th-percentile CPU becomes the constraint: the 16-core, 24-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost will cap frame rates in CPU-limited engines, particularly simulation-heavy titles. The Passmark physics score of 1842 and the multithread score of 35912 are the relevant indicators here, and they describe a CPU capable of high-refresh gaming without reaching the absolute top of the chart.

One structural note on bandwidth: the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface meets a CPU that provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The interface runs at the lower of the two generations, which is not a practical limitation at this GPU tier but is worth recording. Dual-channel memory at 76.8 GB/s is the CPU-side constraint to watch in bandwidth-hungry production workloads; it is adequate rather than extravagant, and ECC support partially offsets stability concerns in long-running compute jobs.

Benchmark Performance

The headline numbers: the Core i9-12900F averages 47176 across its benchmark suite, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation averages 135218, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 92.

The GPU's measured scores are 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan — a spread that favors the CUDA/OpenCL path, which matters for professional renderers and compute applications that ride the 192 tensor cores. Its rivals cluster tightly: the NVIDIA A10M averages 135230 (deltaPct 0), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 averages 135396 (deltaPct -0.1), the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo averages 135774 (deltaPct -0.4), and the Radeon PRO V620 averages 136472 (deltaPct -0.9). The RTX 4000 Ada edges every one of them, but by margins under one percent — aggregate performance parity, with differentiation coming from the 20 GB of GDDR6, the single-slot form factor, and the Ada feature set rather than raw score.

On the CPU side, the aggregate of 47176 against rivals spanning 46971 to 47468 tells the same story: this is a performance band, not a hierarchy. The single-core and multi-core splits in Cinebench across three generations of the test (R15, R20, R23) are internally consistent, which raises confidence that the aggregate reflects genuine capability rather than one outlier result.

The combined picture is a 92nd-percentile desktop: clearly upper-tier, competitive with professional-focused alternatives on both sides, and coherent as a unit — neither component wastes the other.

FAQ

Q: Is this build suited to gaming or professional work?

A: Both, with a professional lean. The GPU is a workstation Ada Lovelace part (95th percentile) with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, 20 GB of GDDR6, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the CPU's 16 cores and 4292 Cinebench R23 single-core score handle gaming and production equally well.

Q: Does this exact pairing have measured FPS data?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all frame-rate figures on this page are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Q: How does the i9-12900F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is statistically tied with them. The Intel Core i7-13700KF averages 47330 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 averages 47022 (+0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 averages 46971 (+0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H averages 47468 (-0.6%) — all within a fraction of a percent of this CPU's 47176 average.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4000 Ada is 300 W. The GPU draws 130 W through a single 16-pin connector, and the CPU carries a 65 W TDP rating, so the suggested figure already includes system headroom.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking and ECC memory?

A: Yes to both. The multiplier is unlocked, and ECC memory is supported alongside standard DDR4 and DDR5 on the dual-channel bus.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each component have?

A: The CPU's dual-channel bus provides 76.8 GB/s; the GPU provides 360.0 GB/s across a 160-bit bus with 18 Gbps effective GDDR6.

Q: What PCIe generation does the build run?

A: The CPU offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so the link runs at the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16.

Who Should Build It

High-resolution gamers: Players targeting 1440p and 4K with ultra settings will find the 95th-percentile GPU doing the heavy lifting, fed capably by the CPU's single-thread scores. Estimated frame rates at these resolutions should track the GPU's tier; at 1080p high-refresh, the CPU's 89th-percentile standing becomes the relevant figure.

Content creators and 3D artists: This is the strongest fit. The 30405 Cinebench R23 multi-core score pairs with 20 GB of VRAM, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores — a configuration aimed at viewport work, GPU rendering, and AI-assisted tooling where the OpenCL score of 146593 is the operative number.

Software developers: The 15965 Geekbench multi-core score, 24 threads, and ECC support make this a strong compilation and virtualization machine. Codebases that parallelize across cores will use all sixteen.

Students and office users: Capable but more than required — the combined 92nd percentile is oversized for documents and browsing, though it guarantees longevity for coursework in editing, CAD, or development.

Small business workstations: The ECC support, single-slot GPU that fits compact chassis, four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor setups, and Active production status on both parts make this a defensible professional workstation configuration.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation card built on the AD104 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 294 mm² and packs 35,800 million transistors at a density of 121.8M per mm². It belongs to NVIDIA's Workstation Ada (x000A) generation — not a consumer GeForce part, despite the "40-series" branding overlap — and succeeds Workstation Ampere, with Blackwell PRO W as the line's successor.

The specifications read as a mid-to-upper professional card. There are 6144 shading units, 192 texture units, and 64 render outputs, producing a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. FP32 compute stands at 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at 1:1 for the same 26.73 TFLOPS. Ray tracing hardware consists of 48 RT cores, and the tensor complement is 192 cores — the latter directly relevant to AI denoising, DLSS-class upscaling, and hardware-accelerated inference in professional applications.

Memory is the card's professional signature: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity comfortably exceeds consumer mid-range cards and supports large scene files, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer compositing buffers without spilling to system memory.

Clocks run from a 1500 MHz base to a 2175 MHz boost. The card occupies a single slot — rare at this performance level — measures 245 mm long and 112 mm tall, and draws 130 W through one 16-pin connector, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. Display output is four DisplayPort 1.4a connections, with API support spanning DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering, the benchmark scores translate directly. The Geekbench OpenCL result of 146593 and Vulkan result of 123842 sit in the 95th percentile overall and effectively tie or edge the A10M, Radeon PRO W6800, W6800X Duo, and PRO V620. In GPU renderers, expect performance in line with those professional peers — strong single-GPU throughput with the VRAM headroom to handle scenes that would choke smaller-frame-buffer cards.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the database contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination. Everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not measured.

The estimate framework is straightforward. A 95th-percentile GPU with 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32, 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 48 RT cores points to high-refresh 1440p gaming and playable 4K in most modern titles at ultra settings. At 4K, the 20 GB frame buffer eliminates VRAM capacity as a concern entirely; the limiter becomes raw shading and RT throughput, which the 6144 shading units place firmly in upper-tier territory. At 1440p ultra, estimated frame rates should reach well into high-refresh territory for esports-adjacent titles and comfortably above standard refresh rates in demanding AAA engines. Ray tracing performance is supported by dedicated hardware, with the 192 tensor cores additionally enabling upscaling-based reconstruction in supported titles.

The CPU side of the estimate is favorable: a 4292 Cinebench R23 single-core score and a 5.10 GHz boost indicate the processor will not cap the GPU at 1440p or 4K. At 1080p with very high refresh targets, the estimates shift toward CPU limitation, where the 24 threads and Passmark physics score of 1842 define the ceiling rather than the GPU. Users whose priority is maximum 1080p frame rates should treat the CPU percentile of 89 as the governing number; users at higher resolutions should treat the GPU percentile of 95 as the governing number.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build — buildClass is desktop — pairing a 12th-generation Intel Core i9 with an Ada Lovelace workstation GPU. The overall tier, judged by the combined percentile of 92, is upper-tier performance: above the vast majority of systems in the database, below only the extreme enthusiast and professional flagship configurations.

The character of the build is "professional performance with gaming capability," rather than the reverse. The CPU brings 16 cores, 24 threads, hybrid Alder Lake architecture, ECC support, and an unlocked multiplier at a launch MSRP of $494. The GPU brings professional drivers' hardware — 20 GB VRAM, tensor and RT cores, single-slot cooling, quad DisplayPort — at a 95th-percentile performance level. Together they form a coherent workstation that games well, rather than a gaming rig that happens to hold a workstation card.

Both parts carry Active production status, with the CPU released on 2022-01-03 and the GPU on 2023-08-08, so availability and platform support remain current concerns rather than legacy ones.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated performance supports high-refresh 1440p play, with the 95th-percentile GPU as the anchor and the CPU's 4017 Passmark single-thread score keeping frame delivery consistent. No measured FPS exists for this pairing, so treat specific numbers as estimates.

Streaming: The 24-thread CPU can encode while gaming, with the 35912 Passmark multithread score and 12770 Cinebench R20 multi-core result indicating ample headroom for simultaneous game and encoder load.

Video editing: The 20 GB of GDDR6 at 360.0 GB/s handles high-bitrate timeline media, while 16 CPU cores accelerate export. The 451402 Passmark compression score reflects throughput relevant to media transcodes.

3D rendering: This is the flagship scenario — 48 RT cores, 192 tensor cores, and the 146593 Geekbench OpenCL score combine with a 30405 Cinebench R23 multi-core CPU result to cover both GPU and CPU render engines.

Software development: 15965 Geekbench multi-core, 24 threads, ECC memory support, and Gen 5 PCIe with 16 CPU lanes make for fast compilation, responsive containers, and a stable long-uptime platform.

Student and office work: Fully covered with large margin — the 92nd combined percentile means everyday applications run without any component approaching saturation, and the build absorbs future coursework in creative or technical software without reconfiguration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, which means the CPU is replaceable within that socket's supported family without a motherboard change. Memory flexibility is a genuine asset: the board can run either DDR4 or DDR5 on the dual-channel bus, letting builders start with existing DDR4 and move to DDR5 later, with ECC supported for workstation stability.

PCIe is a forward-looking element. The CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so a future GPU upgrade can inherit faster host connectivity; the current RTX 4000 Ada uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The single-slot, 130 W GPU with one 16-pin connector leaves physical and electrical headroom in almost any chassis — a dual-slot or higher-wattage replacement card would slot in without platform surgery, subject only to the suggested PSU of 300 W being revisited for a hungrier GPU.

A sensible next upgrade path follows the percentile data. The CPU sits in a statistical dead heat with rivals scoring within a percent of its 47176 average, so a same-class CPU swap buys nothing; meaningful CPU gains require a step up beyond this performance band, likely with a socket change. The GPU, at the 95th percentile and edging the A10M, PRO W6800, W6800X Duo, and PRO V620 by margins under one percent, is similarly positioned — the upgrade direction is toward the card's successor line, Blackwell PRO W, when more performance is needed. Cooling is the remaining lever: the unlocked multiplier means a capable air cooler or better extracts additional sustained performance, with the 65 W TDP rating as the baseline figure rather than a sustained-load guarantee.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds