SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines a high-core-count 12th-gen Intel desktop processor with a professional workstation GPU built on the older Turing architecture. The benchmark database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; therefore, all frame rate expectations in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The overall build ranks in the 75th percentile across all tracked configurations, placing it firmly in the upper-midrange tier of desktop systems.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this specific configuration, gaming performance must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded throughput — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 — indicates it can feed frames rapidly in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU’s benchmark profile tells a more cautionary tale for high-refresh gaming. The Quadro RTX 4000’s Passmark G3D score of 15117 sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with its DirectX 12 Passmark score of just 52 suggesting modest modern-API rasterization performance.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU should allow the GPU to operate near its maximum output, but the RTX 4000’s raw compute (7.119 TFLOPS FP32) and 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus (416.0 GB/s bandwidth) will likely cap frame rates below what the i9-12900F can theoretically support. Expect 1080p ultra frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for most modern titles, with esports games potentially exceeding 100 FPS due to lighter GPU loads. At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary limiter; frame rates will likely drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding AAA games, as the RTX 4000’s 64 ROPs and 2304 shading units struggle with higher pixel counts.

The 4K ultra picture is significantly weaker. The GPU’s pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s are insufficient for smooth 4K gaming in modern titles; expect 20-35 FPS in graphically intensive games. The RTX 4000 does support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its Turing architecture lacks the dedicated hardware efficiency of newer generations, and the 36 RT cores are only first-generation ray tracing hardware. The 8 GB VRAM, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p, may cause texture thrashing at 4K in VRAM-hungry titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 47176 places it at the 89th percentile among all tracked processors. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13700KF, which scores 47330 — a negligible 0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 trails by 0.3% (47022), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is 0.4% behind (46971). This clustering means the i9-12900F is effectively performance-parity with newer and more expensive CPUs, making it a strong compute core.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17789 puts it at the 61st percentile, with its closest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.7% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639, 0.9% higher). The Quadro RTX 4000’s OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 in Geekbench show respectable compute capability, but its Passmark DirectX scores are weak: 108 for DX10, 128 for DX11, 52 for DX12, and 205 for DX9. These scores indicate the GPU is far better suited to compute and professional workloads than to gaming.

The combined picture is stark: a top-tier CPU (89th percentile) paired with a mid-tier GPU (61st percentile). The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by fractions of a percent, while the GPU trades blows with entry-level gaming cards. This imbalance defines the build’s character — it is a workstation-oriented configuration with gaming as a secondary consideration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support.

Benchmark results show outstanding multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 30405, while single-core scores 4292. Geekbench multi-core achieves 15965 and single-core 2339. Passmark multi-thread scores 35912, with integer math at 129504 and floating-point math at 96452. The processor’s data compression score of 451402 and data encryption score of 25251 highlight strong throughput for content creation and security workloads.

The 89th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms approximately 89% of all tracked processors. Its nearest rival, the i7-13700KF, is only 0.3% faster on average — a margin well within run-to-run variance. The 24 threads make it excellent for heavily parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response for office applications and legacy software. With a launch MSRP of $494, it was positioned as a high-end desktop part, and its performance remains competitive against newer silicon.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build ranks in the 75th percentile among all tracked desktop configurations, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong 89th percentile score.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900F has an average benchmark score of 47176, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700KF (47330) and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022). It is effectively performance-parity with all three nearest rivals.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for gaming?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has a Passmark G3D score of 15117 and a DirectX 12 score of 52, indicating limited gaming performance. Its 61st percentile ranking places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% higher) and AMD Radeon 780M (1.1% higher), suggesting it is more of a workstation card than a gaming GPU.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, built on the Turing architecture. However, these are first-generation RT cores, so ray tracing performance is modest compared to newer architectures.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU scores 4292 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4017 in Passmark single-thread, indicating strong performance for lightly threaded applications like office software and web browsing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 and 61st percentile ranking will bottleneck the CPU in most titles. Expect 1080p frame rates around 60-90 FPS in AAA games, which is below the 144 Hz or 240 Hz targets that high-refresh monitors demand. The CPU can handle the load, but the GPU cannot keep up.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and strong multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 30405, Passmark multi-thread 35912) make it excellent for software encoding while gaming. The GPU’s NVENC encoder is not detailed in the data, but its Turing architecture includes tensor cores that can assist with encoding tasks. The CPU alone is sufficient for 1080p streaming with minimal frame drops.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU’s high multi-core performance accelerates export and rendering timelines, while the GPU’s 288 tensor cores and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing projects but may limit 4K multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12770 and R15 multi-core of 3064, providing fast CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL 74540, Vulkan 78844) make it viable for GPU-accelerated renderers, though its 61st percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier render card. The 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads handle compilation and parallel builds efficiently. Passmark data compression (451402) and encryption (25251) scores indicate strong performance for build tools and cryptographic operations. The GPU is not a significant factor in most development workflows, making this a solid choice for coders.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4292) ensures snappy application response. The GPU’s professional driver support and ECC-capable CPU make it suitable for engineering and scientific computing students who need reliability over raw gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The GPU has 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference. Its base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, and the memory runs at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective) across 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Memory bandwidth is 416.0 GB/s, which is respectable for a workstation card but not exceptional. The GPU’s pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 14.24 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The card is single-slot with a 160 W TDP, requiring one 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. It has three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and one USB Type-C port, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a mixed profile. The Passmark G3D score of 15117 and GPU compute score of 6176 indicate moderate performance, while the DirectX scores (DX10: 108, DX11: 128, DX12: 52) are particularly low, suggesting poor gaming optimization. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 are stronger, reflecting its compute-oriented design. The 61st percentile ranking places it slightly above the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% higher) and below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% lower). For rendering workloads, the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate AI denoising and DLSS-like features, but its overall compute power is mid-range by modern standards.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates a significant bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads, particularly gaming. In any scenario where the GPU is the limiting factor — such as high-resolution gaming, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, or compute-heavy graphics tasks — the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to catch up.

Evidence from benchmark scores supports this: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 is in the top tier of processors, while the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 52 is among the lowest tracked. This means the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming at all resolutions, and the gap widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU may still have headroom, but the GPU will cap frame rates around 60-90 FPS. At 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s becomes the hard limit, producing sub-30 FPS performance in demanding titles.

In CPU-bound scenarios — such as video encoding, software compilation, or multi-threaded productivity — the GPU is underutilized, and the CPU’s 24 threads provide excellent throughput. The Passmark integer math score of 129504 and data compression score of 451402 indicate the CPU is well-suited to these tasks. Conversely, the GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL 74540) are not bottlenecked by the CPU in most workloads, as the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 interface (16 lanes) provides ample bandwidth.

The practical bottleneck depends on the workload: gaming and GPU rendering are GPU-limited, while CPU rendering and development tasks are CPU-accelerated with no GPU constraint. This imbalance makes the build more suitable for compute-heavy professional work than for gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-12900F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, designed for high-performance desktop workloads. The GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, marketed for professional applications rather than gaming.

The combined percentile ranking is 75th, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all tracked desktop builds. This is heavily influenced by the CPU’s 89th percentile score, which is partially offset by the GPU’s 61st percentile score. The build’s average benchmark score of 47176 for the CPU and 17789 for the GPU reflects a configuration optimized for multi-threaded compute and professional graphics, not for high-refresh gaming.

The CPU’s nearest rivals — the i7-13700KF (-0.3%), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (+0.3%), and Ryzen 9 5900 (+0.4%) — are all within a fraction of a percent in performance, indicating the i9-12900F remains a competitive choice despite being from an older generation. The GPU’s rivals — Radeon HD 7790 (+0.7%), RTX 4060 (+0.9%), and Radeon 780M (+1.1%) — are similarly close, but all are budget or integrated-class parts, underscoring the GPU’s middling standing.

As a pairing, this build represents a workstation-oriented desktop with a strong CPU foundation and a GPU that prioritizes professional features (ECC support, tensor cores, robust display outputs) over gaming performance. It is not a gaming rig, but it can handle light gaming at 1080p.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: Those targeting 60 FPS at medium-to-high settings in esports titles will find this build adequate, thanks to the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4292). However, AAA games at ultra settings will strain the GPU’s limited DirectX 12 performance (score 52).

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 30405) for rendering and export, while the GPU’s tensor cores and 8 GB VRAM accelerate effects and AI workflows. This is the build’s primary target audience.

Software developers: The CPU’s high multi-core scores (Passmark multi-thread 35912) and data compression performance (451402) make it ideal for compiling large codebases and running parallel builds. The GPU is secondary, making this a cost-effective developer workstation.

Students in engineering or science: The ECC memory support and professional GPU drivers make this reliable for computational coursework, though the GPU’s 61st percentile limits heavy simulation or machine learning tasks.

Small business workstations: For office productivity, database management, or financial modeling, the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking ensures smooth performance, while the GPU’s multi-display support (3x DisplayPort, 1x USB-C) enables multi-monitor setups.

Not suitable for: High-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, as the GPU’s pixel rate (98.88 GPixel/s) and VRAM capacity (8 GB) are insufficient for modern AAA titles at those resolutions. Enthusiasts seeking maximum gaming performance should look elsewhere.