SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop combination that pairs a mature Alder Lake flagship processor with a current-generation Blackwell graphics card, and the data tells a curious story: a CPU sitting in the 89th percentile of all processors matched to a GPU whose single recorded benchmark score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. That asymmetry — a combined percentile of 54 — frames everything that follows. One important caveat up front: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing in the database, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly observed.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm Alder Lake-S die, measuring 215 mm². It runs a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.10 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus 30 MB of shared L3. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus delivering 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC is supported — an unusual trait for a mainstream desktop part that quietly broadens its workstation appeal.

What do the numbers say about real workloads? The Cinebench progression is instructive. R15 multi-core lands at 3064, R20 at 12770, and R23 at 30405, with single-core scores of 432, 1802, and 4292 respectively. The R23 multi-core figure in particular indicates genuine heavy-thread throughput — this is a chip that can sustain rendering, compilation, and encoding loads that punish lesser silicon. Geekbench echoes that: 15965 multi-core against 2339 single-core, a ratio that shows the hybrid architecture's 24 threads are being fed, not just counted.

The Passmark subscores add texture. Integer math hits 129504, floating point 96452, data compression 451402, and encryption 25251. Extended instructions score 28265, which speaks to vectorized workloads. Single-thread sits at 4017 while the overall multithread mark is 35912 and physics reaches 1842 — the physics score being the figure most relevant to game simulation loads. Find-prime-numbers at 127 is a niche result, but it rounds out a picture of a processor that is strong nearly everywhere.

Context matters here. The 89th percentile versus all CPUs means it outranks roughly nine in ten processors in the database. Yet its average benchmark score of 47176 puts it in a dead heat with its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i7-13700KF at 47330 (just 0.3 percent ahead), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47022 (0.3 percent behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 at 46971 (0.4 percent behind), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H at 47468 (0.6 percent ahead). Deltas that small are statistical ties. The data implies this i9 is not a generational outlier — it performs like a strong upper-mainstream chip from its competitive set, and nothing more.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is where this build gets interesting, and a little strange. The CPU's percentile is 89. The GPU's percentile is 18. The combined percentile is 54 — almost exactly the midpoint of the database, which is what you get when you average a near-elite processor with a graphics card whose recorded benchmark presence is far weaker.

On the CPU side, the full score set spans Cinebench R15 through R23, Geekbench 5-class figures, and the Passmark suite, averaging 47176. On the GPU side, the database holds exactly one recorded result: 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). That is the entire quantitative foundation for the graphics side of this page, and it deserves scrutiny.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's nearest rivals by that average score are, frankly, a baffling list: the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664 (a 1 percent gap), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 (1.1 percent), the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660 (1.1 percent), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645 (1.7 percent). A current Blackwell card benchmarked alongside those parts is a red flag about data coverage rather than hardware capability. The database appears to have very few Steel Nomad results overall, which compresses the percentile field and makes the 18th-percentile placement unreliable as a measure of real-world standing. Steel Nomad is also a deliberately heavy, forward-looking test that punishes cards hard; a single synthetic score from it should not be read as a verdict on gaming performance. The honest reading: the CPU data is rich and trustworthy, the GPU data is thin and should be treated as provisional.

GPU Analysis

On paper, the RTX 5070 SUPER's specifications describe a serious modern graphics card. The GB205 chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, packing 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die — a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimetre. It clocks from a 2325 MHz base to a 2512 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

That memory subsystem is the headline: 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering workloads, capacity plus bandwidth determines how large a scene you can hold and how fast shaders can stream textures — and 18 GB with two-thirds of a terabyte per second is a configuration built for high-resolution assets and heavy ray-traced scenes without constant spillover.

The compute and fixed-function hardware backs that up. There are 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 32.15 TFLOPS in a 1:1 configuration. Ray tracing is handled by 50 RT cores, and AI workloads by 200 tensor cores — the latter mattering for any rendering pipeline that leans on denoisers, neural upscaling, or generative acceleration.

For rendering specifically, what does the 2690 Steel Nomad score mean? Very little in isolation, and the rival table confirms it: sitting within roughly 1 to 2 percent of a Quadro K1100M, a GT 1030, an Arc Pro B50, and a GT 440 is not a plausible performance relationship for hardware with these specifications. The score should be read as a data-coverage artifact. What can be said with confidence is qualitative: the specification sheet — 50 RT cores, 200 tensor cores, 672 GB/s of GDDR7 bandwidth, 32.15 TFLOPS — describes hardware squarely aimed at real-time path tracing and GPU rendering, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 API support covers the modern software stack.

Balance and Bottleneck

With a CPU at the 89th percentile and a GPU whose recorded data places it at the 18th, the textbook conclusion would be severe GPU-boundedness — a processor permanently waiting on the graphics card. But the data caveats above complicate that. The GPU percentile derives from a single Steel Nomad score in an apparently sparse comparison pool, so the true bottleneck question cannot be answered numerically here.

What the CPU evidence does support: a Passmark physics score of 1842 and single-thread mark of 4017 indicate the processor side will not be the limiter in game simulation or draw-call-heavy scenarios. In production workloads the story flips — Cinebench R23 multi-core at 30405 and Geekbench multi-core at 15965 show the CPU carrying rendering and compilation tasks largely on its own, with the GPU's 200 tensor cores available to accelerate supported renderers.

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this combination, there is no direct scaling evidence — no frames-per-second-per-gigahertz curve, no resolution scaling data. The estimated framing is this: at higher resolutions and settings, the GPU governs; at low resolutions or in simulation-heavy titles, the i9 has headroom to spare. The 54 combined percentile, taken at face value, suggests a balanced-on-paper system dragged toward the middle by the GPU's recorded standing — but that number inherits all the noise of its GPU input.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story is one of unusual flexibility. The CPU sits in Intel Socket 1700, and the motherboard options span both DDR4 and DDR5 memory — a rare dual-generation memory support that lets builders carry forward older RAM or step into newer modules on the same platform. The dual-channel bus delivers 76.8 GB/s.

PCIe is a standout: the processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the RTX 5070 SUPER uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. That is a clean generational match — no interface bottleneck between CPU and graphics card, and Gen 5 bandwidth available for future storage devices on supporting boards.

Power considerations are concrete. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP and the GPU a 275 W TDP. The GPU draws through a single 16-pin power connector, is a dual-slot card, and measures 245 mm long, 115 mm tall, and 40 mm wide — dimensions that fit most mid-tower cases without clearance drama. The database lists no suggested PSU figure for this card, so a specific wattage recommendation cannot be made here; qualitatively, the summed TDPs leave room for a comfortably sized power supply given typical system overheads, but the exact headroom depends on the unit chosen. A sensible next upgrade path, given the CPU already ties chips like the Core i7-13700KF within 0.3 percent, is graphics-side: the processor is not the component holding this build's percentile down.

Display connectivity is modern throughout — 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b on the card.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core i9-12900F have?

A: 16 cores and 24 threads, built on the Alder Lake-S architecture at a 10 nm process node.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 47176 sits within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core i7-13700KF (47330, -0.3%), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022, +0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, +0.4%), and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47468, -0.6%) — effectively a four-way tie.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 SUPER have, and what type?

A: 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What power connectors does the graphics card require?

A: A single 16-pin connector. The card's TDP is 275 W, and it occupies two slots.

Q: Does this build have measured FPS data?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores, not directly measured.

Q: What is the single GPU benchmark score on record?

A: 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). This is the only recorded GPU result, and its rival comparisons suggest sparse data coverage rather than true performance standing.

Q: Does the platform support both DDR4 and DDR5?

A: Yes. The Core i9-12900F supports both memory types on its dual-channel bus, alongside PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Without measured FPS data, estimates must come from the scores. The CPU's physics score of 1842 and single-thread mark of 4017 indicate the processor can drive high frame-rate simulation; whether frame rates actually reach high-refresh territory depends on the GPU, whose single 2690 Steel Nomad score cannot credibly bound the answer. Treat high-refresh capability at lower resolutions as CPU-plausible and GPU-dependent.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread configuration with a 30405 Cinebench R23 multi-core score implies comfortable headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, and the GPU's 200 tensor cores can assist where software supports it. This is one of the pairing's stronger scenarios on the CPU evidence alone.

Video editing: 18 GB of GDDR7 at 672 GB/s handles large timeline assets, while 451402 in Passmark data compression and 25251 in encryption cover the transcode-and-archive side. DDR5 support on the platform sweetens the deal for memory-hungry NLE workloads.

3D rendering: The CPU contributes 30405 in R23 multi-core, and the GPU brings 50 RT cores and 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 for GPU renderers. Dual capability here means the workstation can render on whichever silicon the engine prefers.

Software development: Compilation scales with multi-core throughput, and the 15965 Geekbench multi-core plus 12770 R20 multi-core scores indicate fast build times. The unlocked multiplier offers tuning headroom for sustained compile loads.

Student and office work: This pairing is frankly oversized for documents and browsing, but the 2339 Geekbench single-core and 4292 R23 single-core scores mean snappy everyday responsiveness, and the Passmark single-thread 4017 confirms it. ECC support adds a data-integrity nicety for research work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build in the classic sense: an Intel Socket 1700 platform hosting a 12th-generation Core i9 and a current GeForce 50-series card on a matched PCIe 5.0 link. Its tier, by the database's own percentiles, is middling-to-upper — an 89th-percentile CPU, an 18th-percentile GPU standing derived from thin data, and a combined 54. The launch MSRP of the processor was $494; no GPU launch MSRP is on record. The qualitative identity is clearer than the numbers suggest: a proven high-thread-count processor paired with modern Blackwell graphics hardware, in a configuration whose database footprint is still catching up with the hardware's age gap — a 2022 CPU meeting a late-2025 GPU.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high resolutions are the natural GPU-side audience: the 18 GB of GDDR7 and 672 GB/s of bandwidth exist precisely for texture-heavy, ray-traced scenes at 1440p and 4K, though the absence of measured FPS data means that fit rests on specifications rather than recorded frame rates. Content creators get the strongest case — the Cinebench and Passmark multi-core scores, the compression and encryption results, and the RT/tensor hardware collectively cover editing, encoding, and rendering. Developers will value the compile throughput and platform flexibility. Students in technical fields and small businesses running workstations benefit from ECC support and the 24 threads, though such users may never touch the GPU's full capability. What the data does not support is recommending this build to anyone who needs certified, benchmark-backed GPU numbers today — the database simply does not have them yet.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the data-is-measured flag is false. Every frame-rate statement below is an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not observation.

From the CPU side, the estimates are favourable: a physics score of 1842, single-thread results of 4017 (Passmark) and 4292 (Cinebench R23), and an 89th-percentile standing all point to a processor that will not cap frame rates in the vast majority of titles. Simulation-heavy strategy and open-world games, which lean on single-thread speed, should run without processor-side stutter.

From the GPU side, honest estimation is harder. The sole recorded score — 2690 in Steel Nomad — cannot be reliably translated into per-game frame rates given the anomalous rival table. The specification-based estimate is that the 6400 shading units, 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores describe hardware suited to high-settings play at elevated resolutions, with upscaling assistance available through the tensor hardware where supported. But the database offers no per-title confirmation, no resolution scaling, and no paired FPS ranking for this combination. Until measured rows appear, the gaming verdict for this pairing remains an informed estimate anchored at one end by excellent CPU data and clouded at the other by a single synthetic GPU score.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds