SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core, 24-thread Intel Alder Lake-S desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3050 OEM graphics card. The CPU ranks in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 57th percentile among all graphics cards, giving the combined build a 73rd percentile overall ranking. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows for any game or resolution. All frame-rate discussion in this analysis is therefore estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's capability ceiling. The RTX 3050 OEM produces a Passmark G3D score of 11857 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740, placing it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 with an average score of 15171, a delta of just 0.2% — meaning the 3050 OEM and RX 7600 are statistically tied in aggregate compute performance. The GPU also sits within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics and 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, placing it in a performance band that is competitive with both modern integrated graphics and older discrete mid-range cards.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though the exact numbers depend heavily on the game engine. The 3050 OEM's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures in most current games, but not for 1440p or 4K ultra presets. The CPU side is not a limiting factor: the i9-12900F's single-core Geekbench score of 2339 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4292 are strong enough to feed the GPU in nearly any scenario. For esports titles like competitive shooters, the combination of high CPU single-thread performance and a mid-range GPU should push frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p, likely approaching high-refresh territory in lighter games. For AAA single-player titles at 1080p ultra, expect frame rates in the 40-70 FPS range depending on optimization — playable but not locked to high refresh rates.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear constraint. The 3050 OEM's 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 56.16 GPixel/s pixel rate will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at ultra settings in demanding AAA titles. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 indicate it handles modern APIs reasonably well for its class, but the raw throughput is what limits resolution scaling. At 4K, ultra settings are likely out of reach except in very light or older titles. The overall picture is that this build is a 1080p gaming machine first, with 1440p possible only by lowering settings or using upscaling technologies.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results tell a story of a high-end desktop processor that trades blows with the best of its generation. In Cinebench R23, the i9-12900F scores 30405 multi-core and 4292 single-core. The multi-core result is particularly telling: it sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-13700KF (average score 47330 vs. the i9's 47176 average), meaning the older i9 essentially matches a newer i7 in aggregate performance. The CPU also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 by 0.3% (47022 average) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 by 0.4% (46971 average), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.6% (47468 average). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i9-12900F sits at the very top of a tightly clustered performance tier.

The GPU's benchmark profile is less imposing but still respectable. Its Passmark G3D score of 11857 and average benchmark score of 15199 place it at the 57th percentile. The DirectX 11 score of 86 is the strongest of the GPU's API-specific results, while DirectX 12 scores 58 and DirectX 10 scores 61. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 5779 reflects the card's compute capabilities, which are modest compared to its gaming performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 57103 and OpenCL score of 60740 show reasonable cross-API consistency.

Combined, the picture is one of significant CPU headroom paired with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile means the processor is capable of driving far more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The combined 73rd percentile for the build reflects this imbalance — the whole is stronger than the GPU alone but weaker than the CPU alone would suggest.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65W TDP that belies its high-end positioning. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC memory support enabled.

The benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4292 places it among the fastest desktop CPUs for lightly-threaded tasks, which translates to snappy application responsiveness and strong gaming performance. The multi-core score of 30405 in the same test demonstrates substantial parallel throughput. Passmark results reinforce this: integer math scores 129504, floating-point math scores 96452, and multithread score is 35912. The data compression score of 451402 and data encryption score of 25251 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks, while the extended instructions score of 28265 shows good SIMD throughput.

Real-world workload implications are clear. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The single-thread performance ensures that legacy software and lightly-threaded applications still run at full speed. The 65W TDP is notably low for a 16-core processor, making this an efficient choice for workstations where power draw matters. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47176 and 89th percentile ranking place it above the vast majority of processors, with only a small cluster of rivals within 1% of its performance.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but do not require top-tier GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p with high or ultra settings will find the RTX 3050 OEM sufficient for most titles, while the i9-12900F ensures the CPU never holds the system back. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit disproportionately from the CPU's 16 cores and high multi-thread scores — the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 30405 and Passmark multithread score of 35912 indicate strong parallel processing capability. Students and small business users running office applications, data analysis, or virtual machines will experience excellent responsiveness thanks to the 89th percentile CPU ranking. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for GPU-accelerated light rendering or machine learning inference tasks, though not for heavy training workloads. Professionals who need ECC memory support — available through the CPU — will find this platform suitable for data integrity-sensitive applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting component in this build. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a significant imbalance: the processor can push frame rates far beyond what the graphics card can render. In gaming workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and 57th percentile position mean it will be the bottleneck at any resolution above 1080p or in graphically demanding titles. The CPU's single-core performance is so strong that it will not limit frame rates in any realistic game scenario.

In compute workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU's Passmark GPU Compute score of 5779 is modest, while the CPU's multi-thread scores are excellent relative to the processor population. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that can use both CPU and GPU, the CPU will likely complete its portion faster than the GPU completes its share, making the GPU the limiting factor for hybrid workloads. However, for pure CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or data processing, the GPU is irrelevant and the CPU performs at its 89th percentile level. The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, is predictable from the benchmark scores: the CPU can sustain high frame rates at low resolutions, but GPU throughput caps performance as resolution and settings increase.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p in esports titles, the i9-12900F's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4292 ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly, while the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile GPU ranking should push frame rates into the 100+ FPS range for competitive shooters. In AAA titles, expect lower frame rates due to GPU limits.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 35912 indicates the processor can handle encoding workloads without significantly impacting game performance, making this build viable for single-PC streaming setups.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 and Passmark integer math score of 129504 support smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times in editors that leverage CPU encoding. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and CUDA support (implied by GeForce 30-series architecture) provide acceleration for effects and rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores excel in CPU-based rendering, with the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3064 and R20 multi-core score of 12770 confirming strong performance. The GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 capability can accelerate viewport rendering and GPU-based renderers, but the GPU will be the slower path for final renders.

Software development: The 16-core, 24-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock accelerates compilation of large codebases. The Passmark data compression score of 451402 and encryption score of 25251 indicate strong performance in build tools and version control operations.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2339 ensures responsive application switching and fast document processing. The entire build's 73rd combined percentile means it handles office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheets with significant headroom, far exceeding the requirements of typical productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the GA106 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores. The base clock runs at 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz, and memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card consumes 130W TDP, requires a 300W suggested power supply, and uses a single 8-pin power connector. It has a dual-slot form factor, measures 242 mm in length, and outputs video via 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The benchmark results show a GPU that performs at the 57th percentile, with an average score of 15199. Its nearest rivals — the RX 7600 (15171, +0.2%), Radeon 680M (15270, -0.5%), GTX 580 (15283, -0.5%), and RTX 2060 (15290, -0.6%) — are all within 1% of its aggregate performance. The pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s are modest figures that explain the 1080p-oriented performance envelope. The FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS is adequate for light compute tasks, while the 72 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for features like DLSS, though the exact DLSS version support is not specified in the data. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure modern API access, but the DirectX 12 Passmark score of 58 suggests that raw API efficiency is not this card's strength. For rendering workloads, the GPU can accelerate viewport previews and light GPU rendering, but its 57th percentile ranking means it is not suited for production-level 3D rendering or heavy machine learning tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-12900F faster than the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: The i9-12900F has an average benchmark score of 47176, while the i7-13700KF scores 47330, putting the i9 0.3% behind — a negligible difference that makes them effectively comparable in aggregate performance.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM compare to the RTX 2060?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM averages 15199 in benchmark scores, while the RTX 2060 averages 15290, placing the 3050 OEM 0.6% behind. The two cards are essentially tied in overall performance.

Q: What memory types does the i9-12900F support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC memory support.

Q: Does this build support PCIe Gen 5?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so the graphics card operates on the earlier PCIe standard.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a 130W TDP and a suggested power supply rating of 300W, with a single 8-pin power connector required.

Q: Is the RTX 3050 OEM still in production?

A: The production status is listed as end-of-life, meaning NVIDIA has discontinued manufacturing this specific OEM card model.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3050 OEM have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-12900F, a 16-core Alder Lake processor with a 65W TDP, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, an Ampere-based GPU with 8 GB VRAM and a 130W TDP. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all processors places it firmly in high-end territory, while the GPU's 57th percentile ranking puts it in the mid-range segment. The combined 73rd percentile indicates a build that is above average overall but heavily weighted toward CPU performance. This is fundamentally a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level-to-mid-range GPU, creating a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, while delivering competent but not exceptional gaming performance at 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-12900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the GPU currently uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP together suggest a relatively modest power requirement; the GPU's suggested PSU is 300W, so a quality 400-500W power supply would provide headroom. The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU: the CPU's 89th percentile performance can easily drive a significantly more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model with better than 57th percentile performance would immediately improve gaming frame rates, while the CPU would remain a non-issue. The platform itself is mature, with the 12th Gen Core series being succeeded by newer generations, so further CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change. Memory upgrades are possible by moving to DDR5 if the motherboard supports it, and storage expansion via PCIe Gen 5 lanes is available for high-bandwidth NVMe drives.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds