SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 pairing represents a distinct desktop configuration where a high-end 16-core processor meets a mid-range graphics card. The data indicates a significant imbalance in class, with the CPU positioned at the 89th percentile among all processors while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile. This 30-percentage-point gap suggests the processor is the dominant component in this build, capable of driving far more powerful graphics hardware than what is currently paired with it. The combined percentile for this duo is 74, placing it solidly above the median for all system configurations but far from the top tier. Without measured FPS data, the analysis must rely on the synthetic benchmark scores and architectural details to infer real-world behavior.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It offers a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a thermal design power of 65 W. This hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact distribution. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a peak memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented tasks.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 places it within striking distance of its nearest rivals; the Intel Core i7-13700KF achieves an average score of 47330, a 0.3% difference, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, a 0.3% delta. These margins are negligible, indicating the i9-12900F is competitive with newer and more power-hungry parts. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4292 is strong for the Alder Lake generation, and the Geekbench single-core score of 2339 reinforces this. The Passmark multi-thread score of 35912 and integer math score of 129504 show high throughput for compilation and scientific computing, while the floating-point score of 96452 supports physics simulations and 3D rendering tasks.

The 89th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms 89% of all processors in the database, a remarkable feat for a part released with a launch MSRP of $494. The average benchmark score of 47176 is nearly identical to the i7-13700KF, suggesting that the two processors are interchangeable in performance despite the generational gap. The Alder Lake architecture, with its support for PCIe Gen 5 on 16 CPU lanes, ensures the processor is not a bottleneck for storage or GPU data transfer. The 65 W TDP is low for a 16-core part, indicating efficient power management, though the boost clock of 5.10 GHz suggests it can draw more power under load. For real workloads, this CPU handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, as the multi-threaded scores demonstrate.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not direct measurements.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 and Passmark G3D score of 17631 suggest it performs in the same league as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average benchmark score of 16129 (0.7% delta). This implies 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings is feasible, but 4K ultra settings would likely strain the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4292, ensures that frame times are stable in CPU-bound scenarios, preventing stutter in esports titles. For older or less demanding games, the combination should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, as the CPU's 89th percentile ranking removes most processing bottlenecks. However, for modern AAA titles at 4K, the GPU's 59th percentile ranking will cap performance, and users should expect to lower settings or rely on upscaling technologies. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is adequate for 1080p ultra settings in most current titles but becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions with high-resolution texture packs. The lack of measured data makes these estimates more uncertain, but the relative performance tiers are clear: the CPU will not hold back the GPU at any resolution, while the GPU will dictate the maximum achievable frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47176 places it at the 89th percentile, with rivals including the Intel Core i7-13700KF (47330, -0.3% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022, 0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, 0.4% delta). These sub-1% differences indicate the i9-12900F is performance-equivalent to these parts in aggregate, despite being older. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15965 both confirm strong parallel performance. The Passmark data encryption score of 25251 and compression score of 451402 highlight its capability in data-heavy tasks.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 16014 places it at the 59th percentile, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (-0.7% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852 (1% delta), and the Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679 (2.1% delta). The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 is a modern DX12 test, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 shows strong compute potential. The Passmark G3D score of 17631 is respectable for a mid-range card. The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU. The combined percentile of 74 is lower than the CPU's 89 because the GPU drags it down, but higher than the GPU's 59 because the CPU compensates. This configuration is CPU-bound in almost every scenario, meaning the processor has headroom to support a more powerful GPU in the future without requiring a platform change.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-12900F a good match for the AMD Radeon RX 9060?

A: The data suggests a mismatch. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and average score of 47176 far exceed the GPU's 59th percentile and score of 16014. The CPU has significantly more headroom than the GPU can utilize, making the processor the dominant component.

Q: What is the performance difference between the i9-12900F and its nearest rival, the Core i7-13700KF?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: 47176 for the i9-12900F and 47330 for the i7-13700KF, a delta of -0.3%. This means they perform within statistical noise of each other in aggregate workloads.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 9060 have, and is it sufficient?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. For modern games at 1080p ultra, this is adequate, but at 1440p or 4K with high-resolution textures, the capacity and bandwidth may become limiting factors.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 74, which is pulled down by the GPU's 59th percentile ranking relative to the CPU's 89th. This indicates the system is above average overall but not top-tier.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-12900F supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop part and beneficial for workstation tasks that require data integrity.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 132 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. This is modest, allowing for a wide range of power supply units.

Q: When were these components released?

A: The CPU was released on 2022-01-03, and the GPU was released on 2025-08-04. The GPU is significantly newer, underscoring the generational gap between the two parts.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is based on the Navi 44 chip using the RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The chip has a transistor density of 149.2M per mm², indicating a dense design. The GPU features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, with 28 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1700 MHz, the game clock is 2400 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2990 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The benchmark scores place this GPU at the 59th percentile, with an average score of 16014. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 is a modern test that stresses ray tracing and mesh shaders, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 39476 indicates strong low-level API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 17631 is mid-range, while the GPU compute score of 9919 shows moderate compute throughput. The nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti, has an average score of 16129, a 0.7% delta, meaning the RX 9060 is effectively a direct competitor to that older card. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are limiting factors for 1440p and 4K rendering, where memory capacity and bandwidth become critical. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the performance is likely to be modest given the mid-range positioning. For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS is respectable for tasks like Blender or video effects, but the memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s will constrain large scenes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector and 132 W TDP makes it an efficient, easy-to-install card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is rated at 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-speed NVMe storage and the latest GPUs. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, but the motherboard must be capable of delivering power for the 5.10 GHz boost clock. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which is modest. The combined TDP of the CPU (65 W) and GPU (132 W) totals 197 W, leaving ample headroom for a 300 W PSU, though real-world transient spikes may require a higher-rated unit. For a sensible next upgrade, the data strongly suggests replacing the GPU first. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it has substantial headroom; upgrading to a GPU with a higher percentile, such as those in the 80th percentile range, would better utilize the CPU's capabilities. The platform supports DDR5, so migrating from DDR4 to DDR5 could improve memory bandwidth, though the impact on gaming is often minimal. The CPU's ECC support also opens the door to workstation-class memory configurations. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures that any future GPU or NVMe drive will not be bandwidth-limited. The 16 CPU lanes are sufficient for a single graphics card and one high-speed SSD, but multi-GPU setups would require chipset lanes. Overall, the upgrade path is clear: the GPU is the bottleneck, and the platform can support a much more powerful graphics solution without changing the CPU or motherboard.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data paints a stark picture of imbalance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47176 is roughly three times the GPU's average score of 16014. In percentile terms, the CPU ranks 89th, while the GPU ranks 59th, a 30-point gap. This indicates that in CPU-bound workloads—such as physics simulation, data compression, or software compilation—the CPU will perform at a high level, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions. The Passmark multi-thread score of 35912 for the CPU versus the GPU compute score of 9919 confirms the CPU's dominance in parallel processing. In gaming, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4292 ensures that frame pacing is solid, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 will cap the maximum frame rate. The FPS scaling evidence is missing, but the synthetic scores strongly suggest that at 1080p, the GPU is the bottleneck, while at 4K, the GPU is even more limiting. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, as it has significant headroom. Conversely, the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in most graphics-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance, sitting between the two individual percentiles. For a balanced build, the GPU should be upgraded to a model with a percentile closer to the CPU's 89, which would shift the bottleneck to the GPU at high resolutions and balance the system.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining a high-end 16-core Intel processor with a mid-range AMD graphics card. The CPU is a Core i9-12900F from the Alder Lake generation, released in early 2022, while the GPU is a Radeon RX 9060 from the RDNA 4.0 generation, released in mid-2025. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47176 places it at the 89th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 16014 places it at the 59th percentile. The combined percentile is 74, indicating an above-average system overall. The CPU is the clear performance leader, with scores rivaling much newer processors like the Core i7-13700KF. The GPU is a capable mid-range part, performing on par with the RTX 3060 Ti. This pairing is typical of a user who prioritizes CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, but also wants to play games at 1080p or 1440p without requiring the highest graphics settings. The system is not balanced, as the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU, but this can be seen as a feature: the CPU has headroom for future GPU upgrades. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth of the GPU are the primary limitations for high-end gaming. Overall, this build occupies a middle tier in the benchmark database, well above the median but far from the top.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance but are willing to compromise on graphics fidelity. The i9-12900F's 24 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache make it ideal for content creators, specifically those who edit 4K video or render 3D scenes, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 demonstrates. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the Passmark integer math score of 129504 and the data compression score of 451402. The ECC memory support adds appeal for small business workstations where data integrity is paramount. Gamers at 1080p will find the RX 9060 sufficient for high refresh rates in esports titles, as the CPU's single-core score of 4292 prevents bottlenecks. However, gamers at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 59th percentile and 8 GB VRAM will be limiting. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded power for simulations, while the GPU can handle basic CAD or light rendering. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 132 W TDP of the GPU make this an energy-efficient build, suitable for users who leave their system running for long periods. The platform's support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 ensures longevity, allowing users to upgrade the GPU in a few years without replacing the motherboard or CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance ensures high frame rates in competitive titles, but the GPU's 59th percentile will cap maximum FPS, likely preventing 240 Hz displays from being fully utilized. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most esports titles at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads are more than sufficient for software encoding while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 indicates. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support allows for hardware encoding, but the CPU can handle the load without impacting game performance.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario, with high multi-threaded scores in Cinebench and Passmark. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit working with large 4K timelines. The CPU will render exports quickly, while the GPU handles real-time previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads will render scenes in Blender or similar software efficiently, as the Cinebench R23 score of 30405 suggests. The GPU's compute score of 9919 is modest, meaning GPU-based renderers like Cycles will be slower, but the CPU can compensate. The ECC memory support adds stability for long renders.

Software development: Compilation times will be short, thanks to the Passmark integer math score of 129504 and multi-thread score of 35912. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The GPU is adequate for UI rendering and basic graphics debugging, but not for testing high-end 3D applications.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP means it runs quiet and cool. The GPU supports multiple displays via HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a, which is useful for productivity. The high multi-threaded scores ensure that even demanding spreadsheet or database operations are instantaneous. The system's 74th combined percentile makes it a strong, if wasteful, choice for this scenario.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds