SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE represents a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count Alder Lake processor with a mid-range RDNA 3 graphics card. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame rate data exists for this specific combination. The CPU holds an 89th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 86. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from these benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. Consequently, all frame rate expectations discussed below are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not empirical gaming tests. The data clearly indicates this is not a measured performance profile, and any specific FPS figures should be treated as projections from compute and graphics benchmarks.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 places it in a competitive position, trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by only 1.2% in average benchmark score. This suggests that at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the RX 7650 GRE should deliver high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 60 FPS in demanding games and approaching or surpassing 100 FPS in esports or lighter titles. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient headroom for 1080p ultra textures, though 1440p ultra settings may strain the memory capacity in the most texture-heavy games.

At 1440p resolution, the 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate the card can handle moderate refresh rates, but users should expect lower performance than at 1080p. The 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth scalability, so titles with heavy asset streaming may show more pronounced performance drops. For 4K resolution, the data suggests the RX 7650 GRE would require significant setting reductions to maintain playable frame rates; the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are simply below the threshold for consistent 4K ultra gaming.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4292 and multi-core score of 30405 indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most scenarios. The i9-12900F’s 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures strong per-core performance, which directly translates to game engine logic and draw call processing. At lower resolutions where the CPU becomes more relevant, the processor’s 89th percentile rank provides confidence that frame pacing will remain stable. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is solidly mid-range: strong 1080p performance, acceptable 1440p with adjustments, and 4K limited to esports or older titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, placing this desktop configuration in the top 14% of all CPU and GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900F has an average benchmark score of 47176, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700KF’s score of 47330 and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375’s score of 47022.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and how does it compare to the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, which is 1.2% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER’s score of 43223.

Q: Does this configuration support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bus width?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 170 W with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists the integratedGraphics field as null, meaning the i9-12900F lacks integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-12900F delivers an average benchmark score of 47176, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, positioning the processor within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-13700KF (score 47330) and 0.6% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (score 47468). The CPU outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (score 46971) by 0.4%, showing that the Alder Lake architecture remains competitive against newer and older designs alike.

In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 30405 in multi-core and 4292 in single-core. The multi-core result highlights the 16 cores and 24 threads, delivering substantial parallel processing capability. The single-core score of 4292 indicates excellent per-thread performance, driven by the 5.10 GHz boost clock. Cinebench R20 results show 12770 multi-core and 1802 single-core, while R15 shows 3064 multi-core and 432 single-core, all consistent with a processor that ranks in the top tier.

Geekbench scores of 15965 multi-core and 2339 single-core reinforce the balanced nature of the CPU. PassMark results further detail the workload profile: integer math scores 129504, floating point math scores 96452, data compression scores 451402, and data encryption scores 25251. The multithread score of 35912 and single-thread score of 4017 confirm that the CPU excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 42723, ranking in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2336, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 83109. The GPU trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2% (score 43223) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2% (score 43262), placing it in a tightly contested performance band. The RX 7650 GRE also sits 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (score 43268).

The combined picture shows a well-matched pairing. The CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile yield a combined percentile of 86, indicating that neither component dramatically outclasses the other, though the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. This balance suggests the system will perform without severe bottlenecking in most workloads, with the CPU capable of feeding the GPU effectively at standard gaming resolutions.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This desktop configuration is suitable for gamers targeting 1080p ultra settings, where the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate provide ample compute and fill rate. The CPU’s high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4292) ensures that game logic and physics calculations keep pace with the GPU’s rendering output. For 1440p gaming, users should expect solid performance with some settings adjustments, given the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Content creators focused on video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads highly beneficial, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 and PassMark multithread score of 35912. The GPU’s 32 ray accelerators and DirectX 12 Ultimate support provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities, which are valuable for rendering workflows. The 2048 shading units and 128 texture mapping units contribute to a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s, aiding in graphics-intensive tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s multicore prowess, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 83109 suggests capable compute offload for tasks like data processing or machine learning inference. Students and small business users building general-purpose workstations will appreciate the combination of high CPU throughput and competent GPU acceleration, though the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build includes.

The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a notable feature for workstation builds where data integrity is critical, and the dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in system design. The suggested PSU of 450 W indicates the system has modest power requirements, making it suitable for compact or efficiency-focused builds without requiring oversized power supplies.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, providing a wide dynamic range for both power efficiency and peak performance. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the high core count and ensures data locality for multithreaded workloads. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark results illustrate the processor’s capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 places it among high-end desktop CPUs, and the single-core score of 4292 shows excellent per-thread performance for workloads that cannot utilize all cores. Geekbench multicore score of 15965 and single-core score of 2339 confirm this balanced profile. PassMark data compression score of 451402 and data encryption score of 25251 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks, while integer math (129504) and floating point math (96452) scores show robust arithmetic processing.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 89 among all CPUs is consistent with its nearest rivals: it is 0.3% below the Intel Core i7-13700KF (score 47330) and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (score 47022). The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core processor, suggesting efficient power management that allows sustained boost clocks without excessive thermal output. The multiplier is unlocked, enabling overclocking for users seeking additional performance, though the stock boost clock of 5.10 GHz already provides substantial headroom.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is based on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process node with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1720 MHz, the game clock is 2350 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2695 MHz, with memory operating at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray accelerators. The pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute performance is rated at 22.08 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 reflects the GPU’s rendering capability in modern APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 indicates strong general-purpose compute performance, which is relevant for tasks like video encoding or GPU-accelerated effects. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 42723 places it in the 83rd percentile, trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2% (score 43223) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2% (score 43262).

For rendering workloads, the 32 ray accelerators provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in professional rendering applications. The 128-bit memory bus is a bottleneck for bandwidth-intensive tasks, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming and mid-range creative work. The dual-slot design and single 8-pin power connector keep installation simple, and the 170 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU makes power supply selection straightforward.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile create a configuration where the processor has slightly more relative headroom than the graphics card. In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely to be the primary limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4292) should keep up with the GPU’s 1080p-oriented compute capability, but at 1440p and above, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will constrain performance more severely.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336, which is 1.2% below the RTX 4070 SUPER, suggests that the card is not a top-tier performer, and this will be the binding constraint in graphically intensive games. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 35912 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 indicate it can handle background tasks, streaming, or recording while gaming without significantly impacting frame rates.

In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU becomes the dominant factor. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide substantial parallel processing, and the CPU’s 89th percentile rank ensures it outpaces most processors in multithreaded tasks. The GPU’s 83rd percentile is still strong, but its 22.08 TFLOPS is dwarfed by the CPU’s aggregate compute capability in many rendering scenarios.

The combined percentile of 86 suggests that neither component is severely mismatched. The CPU is 6 percentile points higher than the GPU, indicating a slight CPU-favoring balance. This means users upgrading from a slower GPU would see immediate gains, while upgrading the CPU would provide diminishing returns for gaming but significant benefits for productivity workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x8 on the GPU ensure no bandwidth bottleneck between the two components.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the Intel Core i9-12900F with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake-S processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a Navi 33-based RDNA 3.0 card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 2695 MHz boost clock. The combination targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and mid-range content creation, with a combined percentile of 86.

The CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile place this build in the upper tier of all configurations in the database. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 47176 is competitive with the Intel Core i7-13700KF (score 47330, delta -0.3%) and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (score 47468, delta -0.6%), while exceeding the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (score 46971, delta 0.4%). The GPU’s average score of 42723 is within 1.3% of several rivals, including the RTX 4070 SUPER and RTX 5050 Mobile.

The CPU’s release date of January 2022 and the GPU’s release date of February 2025 indicate a generational mix, but both components remain in active production. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W and the GPU’s TDP of 170 W suggest a total system power draw that can be handled by a 450 W PSU, making this a reasonably efficient desktop configuration. The build supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for system integrators and DIY builders.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-12900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving room for future graphics cards that may utilize the higher bandwidth. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is sufficient for current applications, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use.

The GPU has a TDP of 170 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, providing headroom for additional components. The single 8-pin power connector means the card has a modest power draw, and the dual-slot design fits standard cases. The 8 GB VRAM is the most likely upgrade trigger for users moving to higher resolutions or more demanding textures, and a future GPU upgrade would be the first sensible step.

The CPU’s socket and platform are at the end of the LGA 1700 lifecycle, meaning future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard. However, the i9-12900F’s performance is still competitive, so a GPU upgrade would yield more tangible gains for gaming. Users could consider a GPU with more VRAM and a wider memory bus to address the current card’s limitations, while the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads remain sufficient for several more years.

The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures compatibility with future high-bandwidth devices, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is not a current bottleneck. The suggested PSU of 450 W leaves headroom for a GPU with a higher TDP, but users should verify the power supply’s quality and connectors before upgrading. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with 12 GB or more VRAM and a 256-bit memory bus, which would better complement the CPU’s strong multi-core performance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 and pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s support high frame rates, while the CPU’s single-core score of 4292 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive gameplay. This pairing can handle 144 Hz monitors in esports titles and maintain 60+ FPS in AAA games at ultra settings, based on the 83rd percentile GPU ranking.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405, provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The PassMark multithread score of 35912 confirms the processor can handle the additional load without significant frame drops, while the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS handles the rendering workload.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 451402 and floating point math score of 96452 indicate strong performance in codec operations and effects processing. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 83109 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and timeline rendering, making this a capable system for 1080p and moderate 4K video editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12770 and R23 score of 30405 provide substantial CPU-based rendering throughput. The GPU’s 32 ray accelerators and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity for GPU rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 15965 and single-core score of 2339 accelerate code compilation and IDE responsiveness. The PassMark integer math score of 129504 supports heavy logical operations, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 83rd percentile provide substantial performance for multitasking, spreadsheet analysis, and presentation creation. The 65 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP keep power consumption reasonable, and the dual-slot GPU fits standard office cases, making this a capable but not power-hungry workstation.