SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop build that combines a high-end 16-core CPU with a modest entry-level GPU. The data shows this pairing sits at the 62nd percentile overall, driven almost entirely by the processor’s strong compute showing while the graphics card trails significantly. Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, all gaming frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47176. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-13700KF scores 47330 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468 (0.6% higher). This indicates the i9-12900F is effectively performance-equivalent to those four competitors, with deltas under 1% in either direction.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 30405, which is a strong result for a 65 W processor. The Cinebench R20 multicore score is 12770, and the Cinebench R15 multicore score is 3064. The Geekbench multicore score is 15965. For single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 singlecore score is 4292, the Cinebench R20 singlecore score is 1802, the Cinebench R15 singlecore score is 432, and the Geekbench singlecore score is 2339. These single-core numbers indicate excellent responsiveness for lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office work, and older games.

Passmark results further characterize the CPU. The multithread score is 35912, while the single-thread score is 4017. Integer math reaches 129504, floating-point math reaches 96452, and extended instructions score 28265. Data compression scores 451402, data encryption scores 25251, and random string sorting scores 48477. Physics score is 1842, and find prime numbers scores 127. These numbers suggest the i9-12900F is well-suited for content creation, software compilation, and scientific computing, where high core counts and strong integer/floating-point throughput matter most. For real-world workloads, users can expect fast video encoding, rapid 3D rendering, and smooth multitasking with dozens of background threads. The 65 W TDP is remarkable for this level of performance, making it a power-efficient choice for workstation builds that do not require aggressive cooling.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU based on the Navi 24 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 5,400 million transistors and a die size of 107 mm². It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The GPU includes 12 ray tracing cores but no tensor cores. Base clock is 1923 MHz, boost clock is 2321 MHz, and the game clock is 2039 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The card has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 74.27 GPixel/s, texture rate is 111.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 3.565 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU has a TDP of 53 W, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x4 and offers one HDMI 2.1 and one DisplayPort 1.4a output. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6001. Its nearest rivals are nearly identical in score: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6000 (0.0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5996 (0.1% lower), the AMD FirePro W4100 scores 5987 (0.2% lower), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M scores 5986 (0.3% lower). This means the RX 6400 performs roughly on par with a decade-old mobile GTX 770M, which contextualizes its modest capabilities.

In synthetic tests, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 176, which is a low result for modern gaming. Passmark DirectX 9 scores 93, DirectX 10 scores 54, DirectX 11 scores 70, and DirectX 12 scores 30. The G2D score is 722, the G3D score is 7673, and the GPU compute score is 2812. Geekbench OpenCL scores 32011, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 16372. These numbers indicate that the RX 6400 is adequate for basic 2D workloads, light productivity, and very old or esports titles, but it lacks the raw throughput for demanding 3D rendering or modern AAA games at high settings. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are severe constraints for texture-heavy scenes. Ray tracing hardware exists with 12 RT cores, but the overall GPU compute power is too limited for meaningful ray-traced gaming. For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 3.565 TFLOPS places it far below what professional 3D applications would require for smooth interactive viewports.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 62, which reflects the dominant influence of the CPU. The i9-12900F achieves an average benchmark score of 47176, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The RX 6400 achieves an average benchmark score of 6001, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The disparity between the 89th and 35th percentiles is stark: the CPU is near the top of the performance hierarchy, while the GPU sits near the bottom third.

In CPU-specific tests, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance that rivals the Intel Core i7-13700KF (which scores 47330 average, a 0.3% delta). The Geekbench multicore score of 15965 reinforces this. For single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 4292 is competitive with the same rival set, where deltas remain under 1%. The Passmark multithread score of 35912 and single-thread score of 4017 further confirm balanced performance across both threaded and single-threaded scenarios.

In GPU-specific tests, the Passmark G3D score of 7673 is the most representative gaming metric. The nearest rival, the GTX 770M, scores 6000, meaning the RX 6400 is about 28% faster than that mobile GPU in this aggregate test. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 30 show that modern API gaming performance is very weak. The combined picture is clear: this build offers exceptional CPU compute for productivity and multitasking, but the GPU will bottleneck any graphics-intensive application, making the system’s overall performance tier heavily skewed toward CPU-bound workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU capabilities. The i9-12900F sits in the 89th percentile of CPUs, while the RX 6400 sits in the 35th percentile of GPUs. This 54-percentile gap indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually every workload that involves graphics rendering, including gaming, video editing with GPU acceleration, and 3D modeling.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-threaded rendering (where the CPU does the work), the i9-12900F will perform at its high level. The Passmark data compression score of 451402 and integer math score of 129504 show that these tasks will run quickly. However, for GPU-bound workloads like gaming at 1080p or higher resolutions, the RX 6400 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could otherwise support. The 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for modern game assets at high detail settings.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated (no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing), follows the benchmark scores: the GPU’s 35th percentile rank means it will deliver playable frame rates only in undemanding titles. In contrast, the CPU’s 89th percentile rank means it will never be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario. For professional workloads that rely on CPU threads, such as physics simulations or code compilation, the system will feel fast. For gaming, the user will experience a system that is massively over-provisioned on the CPU side and under-provisioned on the GPU side, leading to a situation where upgrading the GPU would transform the system’s gaming capability without requiring any CPU change.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The RX 6400’s 35th percentile rank and its Passmark G3D score of 7673 suggest that it can handle esports and older titles at 1080p with moderate settings. In games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, which are not GPU-intensive, the system may deliver smooth frame rates due to the strong single-threaded CPU performance (Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 4292). However, for modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and low FP32 throughput of 3.565 TFLOPS will result in low frame rates even at 1080p with reduced settings.

At 1080p, the estimated FPS for competitive shooters could be in the playable range, but for graphically demanding titles, the GPU will likely produce sub-30 FPS at high settings. At 1440p or 4K, the RX 6400 would be severely overmatched, and the estimated frame rates would drop to unplayable levels in most games. The 64-bit memory bus and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth further constrain texture streaming and high-resolution assets. Users who attempt ray tracing will find the 12 RT cores provide minimal benefit due to the low overall compute performance. The conclusion is that this build is not suitable for modern gaming beyond esports or indie titles at 1080p low-to-medium settings, and any expectation of high refresh rate gaming is unfounded based on the data.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who require only basic graphics output. The i9-12900F’s 89th percentile CPU rank makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work heavily with multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering in software renderers, or scientific computing. The Passmark multithread score of 35912 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 indicate that such tasks will complete rapidly. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, as integer math score of 129504 suggests strong compilation throughput. Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations or data analysis will find the CPU performance ample.

Small business workstations that handle database processing, spreadsheet analysis, or financial modeling will see responsive performance. The single-thread score of 4017 in Passmark ensures snappy interface responsiveness. However, gamers at any resolution above 1080p with modern titles should avoid this build, as the RX 6400’s 35th percentile rank will frustrate. Similarly, video editors who rely on GPU acceleration in software like Premiere Pro will find the RX 6400 inadequate, as GPU compute score of 2812 is very low. The target audience is clearly professionals and prosumers who prioritize CPU throughput and treat the GPU as a display adapter rather than a performance component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-12900F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which means it is compatible with 12th Gen and 13th Gen Intel Core processors (based on the platform’s lifespan, though the FACT PACK only confirms the i9-12900F itself). The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility to choose between cheaper DDR4 modules or faster DDR5 modules, though the memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is fixed by the memory controller. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for high-speed storage and future GPUs. The RX 6400 uses PCIe 4.0 x4, which limits its bandwidth to 4 lanes of PCIe 4.0, but this is not a bottleneck for a GPU of this class.

The GPU has a TDP of 53 W and a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This means the total system power draw is low, and any standard 250 W or larger PSU will suffice. The GPU requires no power connectors, simplifying installation. For a sensible next upgrade, the data strongly suggests replacing the RX 6400 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU has enough headroom to support a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher, as its own 89th percentile rank will not bottleneck such a card. Users could keep the same motherboard and memory, and simply swap the GPU, which would dramatically change the system’s gaming and GPU compute capabilities. Alternatively, adding more memory (if using DDR4) or upgrading to faster DDR5 modules would improve memory-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is already respectable.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-12900F with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 in a desktop class configuration. The combined percentile is 62, which places the overall system slightly above the midpoint of all builds, but this number is misleading because it averages a high-end CPU with an entry-level GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile rank and the GPU’s 35th percentile rank create a lopsided system where the processor is overqualified for the graphics card. The i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz and a 65 W TDP, delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405. The RX 6400 is a 4 GB RDNA 2 GPU with a 64-bit bus and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth, offering only modest 1080p gaming capability. This is a productivity-first system where the GPU serves as a basic display output rather than a gaming or rendering workhorse. Users who need heavy CPU compute for compilation, rendering, or scientific tasks will find the system capable, but anyone expecting balanced gaming performance will be disappointed.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 62, according to the FACT PACK.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-12900F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: The i9-12900F has an average benchmark score of 47176, while the i7-13700KF scores 47330, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i7 is marginally faster but within statistical noise.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900F supports ECC memory, per the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6400 is 250 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 53 W with no power connectors required.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination; all gaming frame-rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type and what memory does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds