SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900E

6,611 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900E pairs with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 to form a desktop workstation configuration that sits in the 65th percentile overall. The data indicates a platform with substantial multi-threaded compute capacity from the CPU and professional-grade rendering features from the GPU, though the pairing shows a distinct imbalance where the GPU's raw gaming performance lags behind the CPU's processing power.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake-S architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, which is complemented by a 30 MB shared L3 cache. The 16 cores are split between performance and efficiency cores, a hallmark of the Alder Lake design, enabling the processor to balance high-intensity workloads with power efficiency. The CPU's 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 16-core part, allowing for a wider range of compatible cooling solutions without sacrificing peak clock speeds. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is critical for high-bandwidth peripherals like modern NVMe SSDs and expansion cards.

Benchmark results show the i9-12900E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 and a single-core score of 3321. These figures indicate strong performance in threaded applications; the multi-core score suggests the processor can handle demanding rendering and compilation tasks efficiently. The single-core score of 3321 is competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded workloads. In Geekbench, the processor scores 10280 multi-core and 1775 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6611, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i9-12900E is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i9-10940X, showing a delta of only 0.1%. The data shows the i9-12900E is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500E and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-13400E. The most interesting comparison is against the Intel Pentium Gold G6405, which has a nearly identical average score of 6605 despite being a vastly different product class; this illustrates that the average benchmark score can obscure the i9-12900E's superior multi-threaded performance in specific tests like Cinebench R23, where it scores 23529 compared to what the Pentium would achieve given its much lower core count. The i9-12900E's strength lies in its peak multi-core throughput rather than its average across all test types.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9882 and single-core score of 1394 suggest the CPU is well-suited for video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and software compilation where all cores are utilized. The high boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks, such as legacy applications or spreadsheet recalculations, do not become a bottleneck. The 24 threads provide ample parallelism for virtual machines and heavy multitasking environments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-12900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and cost. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is forward-looking for future expansion cards and storage devices. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output and can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed.

The platform's upgrade path is somewhat limited because the i9-12900E is already a high-end 12th Gen part. A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a 13th Gen or 14th Gen processor on the same socket, provided the motherboard BIOS is updated. However, given that the i9-12900E already offers 16 cores and a 5.00 GHz boost, the performance gain from such an upgrade may be modest. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is possible on compatible Z-series motherboards, which could extend its usable lifespan.

The GPU's suggested PSU requirement is 550 W, and its TDP is 230 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, meaning a combined system draw under load would be well within the 550 W PSU recommendation, leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which are standard on most quality power supplies. The system's overall power requirements are moderate, making it suitable for a high-end workstation without requiring a specialized or oversized power supply. For a future upgrade, adding a second GPU for compute tasks would be possible but would require a higher-capacity PSU than the 550 W suggested.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this configuration. The CPU is in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 65, indicating that the overall system performance is slightly higher than either component individually. However, the nature of the workloads matters significantly.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 shows it can feed a GPU substantial data, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 is its primary gaming metric. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely the limiting factor because the CPU's single-core performance is strong enough to handle most game logic and physics calculations. The i9-12900E's single-core score of 3321 in Cinebench R23 suggests it will not bottleneck a GPU at high resolutions where the GPU is already pushed hard. However, at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphics settings, the CPU's advantage may not be fully realized because the Quadro RTX 5000's raw rendering throughput is not as high as its compute features suggest.

For compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or scientific simulation, the balance shifts. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads can process geometry and physics, while the GPU's 3072 shading units and 384 tensor cores accelerate rendering and AI tasks. In this context, the system is better balanced, as each component handles a distinct portion of the workload. The data shows the CPU's average benchmark score is 6611, while the GPU's is 21629, indicating that the GPU has a higher peak throughput, but the CPU is not so weak that it would stall the GPU in most professional applications. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that bottleneck analysis is based on the benchmark scores, which suggest that in gaming, the GPU is the primary constraint, while in compute tasks, the CPU and GPU work in tandem.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU's strong single-core performance of 3321 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 suggests it may struggle to maintain 144 FPS in modern AAA games at high settings. The GPU is better suited for 60 FPS gaming at 1440p or 4K with medium settings.

For streaming and content creation, the CPU's 24 threads are a significant advantage. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9882 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game encoding and streaming without a dedicated capture card. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, implied by its Turing architecture and 384 tensor cores, would offload encoding tasks, but the CPU's raw multi-threaded power is sufficient for software encoding as well.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits from both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's multi-core score of 23529 in Cinebench R23 accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing, while the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM handle high-resolution footage and GPU-accelerated effects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 78999 indicates strong compute performance for video processing.

For 3D rendering in Blender or Maya, the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide robust CPU-based rendering capability, while the GPU's 3072 shading units and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate viewport performance and GPU-based renderers. The GPU's 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a critical feature for photorealistic rendering.

Software development tasks such as compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10280 shows strong parallel processing capability, reducing build times. The GPU is less relevant for this workload, but its compute capabilities can be used for running local machine learning models.

For student and office work, this system is overkill. The CPU's single-core performance is more than sufficient for word processing and web browsing, and the GPU's professional features are largely unused. The system's power consumption and cost are not justified for these tasks, but it would handle them without any performance issues.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 65, placing it above the majority of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i9-12900E does not support ECC memory, as indicated by the `eccMemory: false` field.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-13500E?

A: The i9-12900E has an average benchmark score of 6611, which is 0.4% higher than the i5-13500E's score of 6586.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics capable of display output?

A: Yes, the i9-12900E includes UHD Graphics 770, which can provide display output if the discrete GPU is not used.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-12900E is $494.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. It features a TU104 chip with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI inference tasks respectively. The base clock is 1620 MHz, with a boost clock of 1815 MHz. The memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

The benchmark scores show the GPU excels in compute-oriented tasks. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 78999, and its Vulkan score is 92309, indicating strong raw compute throughput. The PassMark G3D score is 15616, which is a measure of DirectX gaming performance. The PassMark GPU Compute score is 6525, which is lower than the OpenCL score, reflecting differences in workload optimization. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Quadro RTX 5000 is 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which has an average score of 21856. It is 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, and 1.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8970M. The GPU's performance is thus closely matched with a mid-range consumer card from a previous generation, which is surprising given its professional positioning. The 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, which is a key feature for 3D rendering applications like Autodesk Maya or Blender. The 384 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based features, which can improve performance in supported applications.

For rendering, the GPU's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is substantial, and its FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) allows for faster processing of workloads that support mixed precision. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can fill high-resolution framebuffers and apply complex textures efficiently. The 16 GB of VRAM is a critical advantage for large 3D scenes or high-resolution video editing, as it prevents out-of-memory errors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need both strong multi-threaded CPU performance and professional GPU compute features. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution with a preference for high detail settings will find the GPU adequate, though the data suggests it is not a high-refresh-rate monster. The CPU's 24 threads ensure that background tasks like streaming or recording do not impact gaming performance.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, are the primary audience. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 accelerates rendering, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large textures and high-resolution timelines. The GPU's 48 RT cores are essential for ray-traced rendering in professional software.

Software developers who work with large codebases and run virtual machines will benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10280 indicates strong parallel processing for compilation tasks. The GPU is less critical for this workload, but its compute capabilities can be used for machine learning model training.

Students in engineering or computer science programs who need a workstation for simulations or CAD work will find the system capable, though it exceeds typical student requirements. Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or moderate 3D visualization tasks would perform well, with the CPU handling database queries and the GPU accelerating any visualization or rendering needs. The system is not ideal for budget-conscious builders due to the high launch MSRP of the GPU at 2,299 USD, but it offers a balance of CPU and GPU compute power for professional applications.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i9-12900E, a 16-core desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a professional Turing-architecture GPU. It is a desktop-class system, denoted by the buildClass field. The combined performance percentile is 65, which means it outperforms 65% of all recorded desktop builds in the database. The CPU is in the 62nd percentile, and the GPU is in the 67th percentile, indicating that this is a mid-to-high tier configuration, but not a top-tier enthusiast system.

The CPU is a current production part, while the GPU is marked as end-of-life, which suggests that the GPU may be harder to source new. The CPU's launch MSRP was $494, and the GPU's was 2,299 USD, making this a premium-priced combination. The system is designed for professional workloads rather than pure gaming, given the GPU's professional Quadro branding and its benchmark scores that are comparable to a mid-range consumer GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2371 and single-core 334; Cinebench R20 multi-core 9882 and single-core 1394; Cinebench R23 multi-core 23529 and single-core 3321; Geekbench multi-core 10280 and single-core 1775. The average CPU benchmark score is 6611. The GPU's scores are: Geekbench OpenCL 78999 and Vulkan 92309; PassMark DirectX 10 113, DirectX 11 140, DirectX 12 59, DirectX 9 195, G2D 709, G3D 15616, and GPU Compute 6525. The average GPU benchmark score is 21629.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-core performance suggests it can deliver high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 indicates it is the limiting factor in GPU-bound gaming. The combined picture is a system that excels in compute-heavy tasks, with the CPU's 24 threads and the GPU's 3072 shading units and 384 tensor cores providing a balanced platform for professional applications. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably low, which suggests that the GPU may not be optimized for the latest gaming APIs, reinforcing its workstation focus. The overall tier, based on the 65th percentile, places this build as a solid professional workstation with adequate gaming capability, but it is not a top-tier gaming rig.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900E

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds