SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900E

6,611 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop build that combines a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor with a Blackwell 2.0-based discrete GPU, and the benchmark data places this combination in the 72nd percentile of all recorded builds. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile against all CPUs while the GPU reaches the 82nd percentile against all GPUs, which immediately signals a graphics-forward configuration. One caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured gameplay.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-12900E is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Alder Lake-S architecture at a 10 nm process node. Its hybrid design yields a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP rating that sits at the efficient end of the Core i9 family. The 215 mm² die carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache — a cache hierarchy that supports both bursty single-threaded work and sustained multi-core throughput.

The benchmark scores tell a coherent story. In Cinebench R23, the chip posts 23529 in multi-core and 3321 in single-core. The single-core figure is the more revealing one: it indicates snappy per-thread responsiveness, which matters for game engines, compilers, and applications that still lean on a few fast threads. The multi-core score, combined with the 16-core count, indicates respectable throughput for rendering, encoding, and parallel compilation, though the 65 W envelope means the chip does not chase the sustained clocks of higher-TDP siblings.

Against its nearest rivals, the i9-12900E lands in a statistical dead heat. The database places it within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (avgScore 6605, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Core i9-10940X (avgScore 6605, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Core i5-13500E (avgScore 6586, deltaPct 0.4), and the Intel Core i5-13400E (avgScore 6638, deltaPct -0.4). With an average benchmark score of 6611, this processor effectively trades blows with a mixed field that spans budget parts and a previous-generation Core i9. The 62nd percentile position against all CPUs frames it as an upper-mid-tier performer — clearly above the median, but not in enthusiast-flagship territory.

For real workloads, this translates to a processor that handles heavily threaded tasks competently while remaining excellent at latency-sensitive ones. The Geekbench results reinforce the pattern: 10280 multi-core and 1775 single-core. That single-core score is the backbone of the gaming and productivity experience here, and the multiplier is unlocked, leaving headroom for users who want to push clocks further within the thermal budget.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's recorded scores are: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2371 and single-core 334; Cinebench R20 multi-core 9882 and single-core 1394; Cinebench R23 multi-core 23529 and single-core 3321; Geekbench multi-core 10280 and single-core 1775. The consistent single-core results across three Cinebench generations show a processor whose per-thread performance scales cleanly with each test's increased workload — a sign of stable boost behavior rather than thermal throttling.

On the graphics side, the RTX 5070 records a PassMark G3D score of 29137, a PassMark GPU Compute score of 15787, Geekbench OpenCL 172660, and Geekbench Vulkan 178923. The Vulkan result exceeding the OpenCL result indicates strong driver-side efficiency under modern low-overhead APIs, which is where most current game engines and renderers live. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 places the card in a demanding modern DirectX 12 workload, and the PassMark DirectX 12 result of 108 sits alongside DirectX 9, 10, and 11 results of 320, 180, and 277 respectively — a spread that reflects how differently the card scores across legacy and modern API paths.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 40377 and its 82nd percentile position against all GPUs mark it as a clearly upper-tier graphics solution. Its nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (avgScore 40318, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (avgScore 40063, deltaPct 0.8), AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (avgScore 40870, deltaPct -1.2), and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (avgScore 39568, deltaPct 2) — cluster tightly around it, though it should be noted these comparisons are aggregate-score based rather than spec comparisons.

The combined picture is a build whose GPU percentile (82) runs a full twenty points ahead of its CPU percentile (62). That asymmetry defines the character of this machine: it is graphics-led, with the processor providing enough throughput to stay competitive without leading the charge.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a GPU at the 82nd percentile and a CPU single-core score of 3321 in Cinebench R23, this build is estimated to deliver high frame rates at 1440p and strong performance at 4K, with the GPU as the limiter in graphically heavy titles. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing, these are estimates derived from the benchmark scores — but the PassMark G3D score of 29137 supports high-refresh play at mainstream resolutions.

Streaming. The 16 cores and 24 threads give streamers plenty of parallel capacity for encoding while gaming. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 indicates the CPU can absorb encoder load without collapsing game-side performance, though the 65 W TDP means sustained combined workloads will run within a conservative power envelope.

Video editing. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and the GPU's compute score of 15787 on PassMark GPU Compute make this a capable editing platform. The 12 GB of GDDR7 and 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth help timeline scrubbing and effects preview, while the CPU's multi-core throughput covers export passes.

3D rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 and Vulkan score of 178923 show serious GPU-side compute capability for renderers that use those APIs. The CPU contributes a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 for CPU-based final frames — a solid if not flagship rendering figure.

Software development. The Geekbench single-core score of 1775 points to fast compile times for single-threaded build steps, and 24 threads parallelize multi-file builds effectively. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support with PCIe Gen 5, 20 CPU lanes gives fast storage and peripheral headroom.

Student and office work. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 means the system can even run display output without the discrete card, a useful redundancy for troubleshooting. For everyday productivity, the CPU's 62nd percentile position and strong single-core results make it responsive in office suites, browsers, and light creative work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. That dual-generation memory support is a genuine advantage for upgraders: a builder can carry over existing DDR4 modules initially and move to DDR5 later without replacing the board. ECC memory is not supported, which is worth noting for anyone considering this platform for workstation-critical data work.

On the expansion side, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU-direct lanes, which pairs naturally with the RTX 5070's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. Storage and add-in cards can therefore run at current-generation link speeds without contending for the GPU's bandwidth.

Power budgeting matters here. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP while the GPU is rated at 250 W with NVIDIA suggesting a 600 W power supply. That suggested PSU figure already accounts for the pair's combined draw, so a builder following the recommendation has sensible margin rather than excess. The GPU draws through a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot footprint measuring 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width — case clearance checks should focus on card length.

The sensible next upgrade is CPU-side: with the GPU twenty percentile points ahead, a future processor upgrade on the same socket would rebalance the build more than a GPU swap would. The CPU's unlocked multiplier also allows interim tuning without any hardware replacement at all.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 is built on the GB205 chip using NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 263 mm² and packs 31,100 million transistors at a density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimetre — figures that reflect a modern, tightly packed design.

The hardware roster includes 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. The RT core count is what carries ray-traced rendering, and the tensor core count underpins AI-accelerated upscaling and denoising features. Raw throughput numbers: a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute of 30.87 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same 30.87 TFLOPS.

Memory is 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective 28 Gbps (1750 MHz memory clock). That bandwidth figure is the key to the card's rendering performance — it feeds the shading units quickly enough that the 12 GB capacity, while not enormous, is well utilized. Clocks run from a 2325 MHz base to a 2512 MHz boost.

For rendering work, the benchmark scores quantify what this hardware means. Geekbench Vulkan at 178923 and OpenCL at 172660 indicate strong GPU-compute throughput in the APIs that GPU renderers actually use. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 15787 and the DirectX 12 Steel Nomad result of 5077 confirm capable modern-API performance. Display connectivity — one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs — supports multi-monitor setups at high resolution and refresh. Software support spans DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits gamers targeting 1440p and 4K, where the 82nd-percentile GPU does the heavy lifting and the CPU's strong single-core performance keeps frame delivery smooth. Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, streamers — benefit from the 24 threads on the CPU side and the card's compute scores on the GPU side, particularly the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results. Software developers get fast single-thread response (Geekbench single-core 1775) and parallel build capacity. Students get a responsive everyday machine with the bonus of integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback. Small business workstations are well served too, though the lack of ECC support means error-critical deployments should look elsewhere. The launch MSRP of the CPU was $494 and the GPU's launch MSRP was 549 USD.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core i9-12900E have?

A: It has 16 cores and 24 threads, built on the Alder Lake-S architecture at a 10 nm process node.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: Intel Socket 1700 with dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What power supply does the RTX 5070 need?

A: NVIDIA suggests a 600 W PSU. The GPU has a 250 W TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its rivals?

A: It sits at the 82nd percentile against all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 40377 — effectively even with the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (deltaPct 0.1), ahead of the Radeon Pro WX 7100 (deltaPct 0.8) and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (deltaPct 2), and slightly behind the Radeon Pro 5300 (deltaPct -1.2).

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact CPU+GPU pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 have, and what bandwidth?

A: 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked, allowing tuning within its 65 W thermal design envelope.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing a 12th-generation Intel Core i9 processor with a current-generation NVIDIA GeForce 50-series GPU. The combined percentile of 72 against all recorded builds places it solidly in the upper third — a competent performance machine rather than a halo rig. The CPU contributes an average benchmark score of 6611 at the 62nd percentile; the GPU contributes 40377 at the 82nd percentile. The pairing spans multiple technology generations: a 10 nm Alder Lake CPU from early 2022 alongside a 5 nm Blackwell 2.0 GPU released in March 2025, connected through a shared PCIe 5.0 pathway. The result is a build whose identity is set by its graphics card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear asymmetry. The GPU sits at the 82nd percentile; the CPU at the 62nd. That twenty-point gap means the graphics card is the stronger component, and in GPU-bound scenarios — high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering, compute workloads — the RTX 5070 will be fully utilized without the processor holding it back in most cases, given the CPU's solid Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3321.

Flip the workload, however, and the CPU becomes the limiting factor. Heavily threaded tasks such as sustained multi-core rendering are capped by the 65 W TDP and the multi-core score of 23529 in Cinebench R23 — respectable, but the CPU's near-even rival grouping with parts like the Core i5-13500E and i5-13400E confirms it is not a throughput leader. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing, per-game bottleneck behavior cannot be confirmed from data; the estimate from the percentiles is that graphically intensive titles at higher resolutions will be GPU-limited, while CPU-limited scenarios such as low-resolution, high-frame-rate gaming will expose the processor's mid-tier ceiling. For balanced workload distribution — gaming at 1440p or 4K, creative applications mixing CPU and GPU stages — this pairing is well matched, with the GPU providing the performance headroom and the CPU providing sufficient, if not class-leading, support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds