SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900E + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900E

6,611 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900E and AMD Radeon RX 6800 form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange tier of the benchmark database. The CPU holds a 62nd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU ranks higher at the 75th percentile, with a combined percentile of 69. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of both components rather than direct gameplay data.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, the frame rate expectations below are estimates based on the CPU’s Cinebench and Geekbench scores and the GPU’s 3DMark and Passmark results. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 22067 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 indicate strong rasterization capability, but the exact FPS across game titles cannot be quantified without measured rows.

At 1080p resolution, the RX 6800’s raw compute power—16.17 TFLOPS FP32 and a texture rate of 505.2 GTexel/s—should push frame rates well beyond 100 FPS in most competitive titles, though this is speculative. The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3321 and Geekbench single-core score of 1775, suggests it can feed the GPU adequately at high refresh rates, but the absence of measured data means these are qualitative projections.

For 1440p gaming, the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes the primary asset, as higher resolutions increase memory pressure. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 places the GPU in a performance bracket near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29945 on average, indicating the RX 6800 is 0.5% ahead of that rival. At 4K resolution, the same memory capacity and bandwidth should sustain playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the FP32 throughput of 16.17 TFLOPS may limit ultra-settings performance in AAA games.

The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz and 16 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, but since no measured FPS exists, the bottleneck analysis relies on percentile gaps. The GPU’s 75th percentile versus the CPU’s 62nd percentile suggests the processor is the weaker link in pure gaming workloads, potentially capping frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6611, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 with an average score of 6605, a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-10940X also scoring 6605, another 0.1% delta. The Intel Core i5-13500E scores 6586, which is 0.4% lower, while the Intel Core i5-13400E scores 6638, placing the i9-12900E 0.4% behind that chip. These narrow deltas indicate the i9-12900E performs nearly identically to mid-range 13th-gen parts in aggregate benchmarks, despite its higher core count.

In multi-threaded workloads, the i9-12900E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9882. The Geekbench multi-core score is 10280. Single-thread results are equally strong: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 3321, while Geekbench single-core scores 1775. These numbers place the CPU in a position where it is competitive with newer i5 parts but not the top-tier i9s of its own generation.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 30095, placing it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, scores 29945, a 0.5% deficit, while the RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29928, a 0.6% deficit. The RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783, which is 1% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433, putting the RX 6800 1.1% behind that card. The RX 6800’s Passmark G3D score of 22067 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 24508 confirm substantial compute capability, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 indicates solid DirectX 12 gaming performance.

The combined picture shows a GPU that outperforms its CPU in relative percentile terms. The 13-point gap between the 75th and 62nd percentiles suggests the pairing is GPU-forward, meaning the RX 6800 has more headroom relative to its peers than the i9-12900E does.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, which reflects the average standing of both components relative to all other CPUs and GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-12900E compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13400E?

A: The i9-12900E has an average benchmark score of 6611, while the i5-13400E scores 6638, meaning the i9-12900E is 0.4% behind the i5-13400E in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i9-12900E does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score and how does it compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6800 scores 3188 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its average benchmark score is 30095, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti’s average score of 29945.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and core count?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900E has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a base clock of 2.30 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 has a suggested PSU of 600 W and a TDP of 250 W.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile data reveals an asymmetric pairing. The GPU sits at the 75th percentile, while the CPU sits at the 62nd percentile, a 13-point gap that indicates the processor is the limiting factor in most gaming workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as low-resolution esports titles or heavily threaded simulations, the i9-12900E’s 16 cores and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide sufficient throughput, but its aggregate benchmark score of 6611 is only 0.4% higher than a Pentium Gold G6405, which suggests diminishing returns in single-thread-heavy tasks.

FPS scaling would likely show the GPU being underutilized at 1080p if the CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by the Geekbench single-core score of 1775, cannot sustain frame rates above the GPU’s output capability. The GPU’s higher percentile means it can handle higher resolutions without becoming the bottleneck, but the CPU’s lower standing caps the maximum achievable FPS. In GPU-bound workloads at 1440p or 4K, the RX 6800’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB memory become the dominant factors, and the CPU’s 62nd percentile becomes less relevant.

The deltaPct values among CPU rivals show that the i9-12900E is effectively performance-identical to the i5-13400E and i5-13500E, within 0.4%. This means the 16-core design does not translate to a significant benchmark advantage over those 10-core parts, suggesting the Alder Lake architecture’s efficiency cores contribute less to aggregate scores than the performance cores. For the GPU, the 0.5% lead over the RTX 3070 Ti and 1.1% deficit to the RX 6700 place it in a tightly contested band, where driver optimizations and thermal headroom matter more than raw specs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900E is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 23529, and Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 9882. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10280 reinforces this. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 3321 and Geekbench single-core scoring 1775. However, the average benchmark score of 6611 and the 62nd percentile indicate that the CPU does not outperform its closest rivals by a meaningful margin; the i5-13400E is 0.4% faster, and the i5-13500E is 0.4% slower.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, but the presence of a discrete GPU renders it irrelevant for gaming. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 65 W TDP suggests thermal constraints may limit sustained boost clocks under load. For real workloads, the 16-core configuration benefits video encoding and 3D rendering tasks that scale across threads, as evidenced by the Cinebench multi-core scores, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock handles single-threaded applications like legacy software or lightly threaded games.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is feasible but CPU-limited. The i9-12900E’s single-core score of 3321 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 75th percentile suggests it has more to give than the CPU can deliver, potentially causing frame pacing issues in esports titles.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the 16-core, 24-thread configuration. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 handles concurrent encoding and gaming, while the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration for video transcoding, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-based enhancements are absent.

Video editing software that leverages multi-threading will see strong performance from the CPU’s 9882 Cinebench R20 multi-core score. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects rendering and timeline scrubbing, making this a capable workstation for 1080p and 1440p footage.

3D rendering workloads are GPU-forward. The RX 6800’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 and Passmark G3D score of 22067 indicate solid rasterization for Blender or similar tools, while the CPU’s multi-core scores handle geometry calculations and scene graph updates.

Software development compiles will use the CPU’s 24 threads effectively, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 reducing build times for large codebases. The GPU is largely idle during compilation, making this pairing overkill for pure coding tasks.

Student and office work is far below this hardware’s capability. The CPU’s 62nd percentile is overkill for document editing, and the GPU’s 75th percentile provides no benefit for spreadsheet or browser workloads, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could suffice if the discrete GPU were removed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage or the next generation of GPUs, though the current RX 6800 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The platform’s memory flexibility means users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify bandwidth differences.

The GPU has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W, with two 8-pin power connectors. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the total system draw remains within the 600 W recommendation, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a case with adequate clearance.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation CPU on the same socket, such as a 13th-gen Core i5 or i7, since the nearest rival data shows the i5-13400E outperforms the i9-12900E by 0.4% in aggregate benchmarks, meaning a drop in core count does not necessarily hurt performance. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier RDNA 3 or RTX 40-series card would leverage the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the CPU’s 62nd percentile may then become a bottleneck.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining a 16-core Intel Alder Lake processor with a high-end RDNA 2.0 GPU. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 75th percentile place the overall system at a combined 69th percentile, indicating an upper-midrange tier that is better suited for high-resolution gaming and content creation than for competitive esports at maximum frame rates. The pairing is unusual in that the GPU is the stronger component, which favors visually intensive workloads over CPU-bound tasks.

The i9-12900E’s launch MSRP is $494, while the RX 6800’s launch MSRP is 579 USD, but the discussion here focuses on performance metrics rather than cost. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6611 is nearly identical to the Pentium Gold G6405’s 6605, highlighting that the i9-12900E’s core count does not translate into a proportional benchmark advantage over much cheaper parts.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit most from this pairing, as the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are optimized for high-resolution textures, and the CPU’s 16 cores prevent stuttering from background tasks. Those seeking maximum frame rates at 1080p in competitive shooters should look elsewhere, as the CPU’s 62nd percentile may bottleneck the GPU.

Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will find the combination of the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23529 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 suitable for 1080p or 1440p projects. The large memory capacity also supports large texture sets and complex scenes.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads, but the GPU is largely unnecessary for this workload, making the build less efficient than a cheaper CPU-only solution. Students and office workers are over-served by this hardware, as the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle their needs without the discrete GPU.

Small business workstations handling CAD or scientific visualization will see strong performance from the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 16.17 TFLOPS, though the lack of ECC memory support limits reliability-critical deployments.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is built on the Navi 21 chip using TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². It features 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 60 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU has no tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated workloads like DLSS are unsupported, though it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Clock speeds include a base of 1700 MHz, a boost of 2105 MHz, and a game clock of 1815 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth across a 256-bit bus. The GPU’s pixel rate is 202.1 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 505.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 16.17 TFLOPS and FP16 at 32.33 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show a Passmark G3D score of 22067 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 24508, while Vulkan scores 115107. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 30095 places it at the 75th percentile, with the nearest rival being the RTX 3070 Ti at 29945, a 0.5% gap. The performance is strongest in rasterization-heavy tasks, as indicated by the high Passmark DirectX 10 and 11 scores of 128 and 214, respectively, while the DirectX 12 score of 89 suggests some driver overhead in modern APIs.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB memory capacity prevents out-of-memory errors in large scenes, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates texture streaming. The 60 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing, but the lack of tensor cores means no AI denoising, limiting ray-traced performance compared to NVIDIA counterparts. The GPU’s 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU make it a power-hungry component, requiring a robust power supply and adequate case airflow given its dual-slot design and 267 mm length.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900E + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900E

AMD Radeon RX 6800

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds