SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900

42,906 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing designed for maximum throughput in professional and high-end consumer workloads. The data indicates a system that sits at the 93rd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 98th percentile among their respective categories. This is a workstation-class combination where the graphics card is the dominant component, offering compute capabilities that rival data-center accelerators while the processor provides a robust foundation for feeding it data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a professional workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated AD102, contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 125.3M / mm². The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This configuration is particularly suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex 3D scenes that exceed the capacity of consumer graphics cards. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The core configuration is extensive, with 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. It also features 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, respectively. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s. Raw compute performance is rated at 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (with 1:1 ratio), making it a formidable device for scientific computing and rendering tasks that leverage these precision formats.

In benchmark tests, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041. These scores place the GPU in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. When compared to its nearest rivals, the performance is tightly clustered. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which scores 183,725, and 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, which scores 182,109. It trails the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3% (which scores 187,147) but leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7% (which scores 178,050). For rendering, the Vulkan score is notably high, suggesting strong performance in real-time graphics APIs, while the OpenCL score indicates robust compute throughput for offline rendering engines.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Core i9-12900, which uses the Intel Socket 1700. This socket supports the Alder Lake architecture and is compatible with DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s, and the platform supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation stability and data integrity in professional environments. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, ensuring backward compatibility without a bandwidth bottleneck for most workloads.

Power considerations are defined by the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP. The suggested power supply for the system is 600 W, which provides a reasonable amount of headroom for the combined load of the CPU and GPU, along with other system components. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The CPU is unlocked, meaning the multiplier is adjustable, which could allow for overclocking, although the stock TDP is conservative. The production status for both components is "Active," indicating ongoing availability.

A sensible next upgrade path would primarily involve the CPU, as the GPU is already at the 98th percentile. The Core i9-12900 sits at the 88th percentile, and users could consider moving to a higher-tier processor within the same Socket 1700 platform, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it. However, the data shows the CPU is only 1% behind the Intel Core i9-12950HX (which scores 42,487) and 1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900KF (which scores 42,830), suggesting that incremental CPU upgrades within this generation may yield marginal gains. The platform's support for DDR5 memory presents an opportunity for a future upgrade, as moving from DDR4 to DDR5 could improve memory bandwidth, though the current memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s is already substantial. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are a forward-looking feature, ready for next-generation storage devices.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The die size is 215 mm². The core configuration is hybrid, with performance and efficiency cores, though the exact split is not detailed in the data. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for basic display output or troubleshooting without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 3,299 in R15 multi-core, 11,994 in R20 multi-core, and 18,628 in R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are 262 in R15, 1,693 in R20, and 1,825 in R23. Geekbench scores are 13,088 for multi-core and 1,993 for single-core. The PassMark suite reveals specific workload characteristics: a multi-thread score of 33,608, a single-thread score of 4,003, and a physics score of 1,730. The data shows strong integer math performance at 127,512 and floating-point math at 91,514. Data compression scores 407,899, while data encryption scores 23,203. Extended instructions score 24,777, and random string sorting scores 44,070. The find prime numbers score is 121.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 42,906, placing it in the 88th percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the performance deltas are minimal. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900KF (which scores 42,830) and 1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12950HX (which scores 42,487). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H by 0.7% (which scores 43,210) and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 by 1% (which scores 43,326). For real workloads, the multi-core scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 result of 18,628, indicate capable performance for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The high PassMark integer and floating-point scores suggest the CPU can handle complex calculations and data processing tasks efficiently.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and strong Vulkan score of 194,041 suggest the system can drive high frame rates at high resolutions. The CPU's single-core score of 4,003 in PassMark and 1,825 in Cinebench R23 ensure that the processor is not a bottleneck for game logic and physics, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on the strong compute scores.

Streaming: The combination of the CPU's multi-thread score of 33,608 in PassMark and the GPU's 400 tensor cores provides ample headroom for encoding video and running a game simultaneously. The 32 GB of VRAM on the GPU can hold both the game frame buffer and the encoded stream buffers without issue, making for a smooth streaming experience.

Video editing: The 16-core CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,628 will handle timeline scrubbing and effects processing efficiently. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth accelerate video effects, color grading, and export, particularly in software that leverages OpenCL, evidenced by the 175,286 Geekbench OpenCL score.

3D rendering: This is the system's primary strength. The GPU's 100 RT cores and 12,800 shading units, combined with its 32 GB VRAM, are ideal for ray-traced and path-traced workloads. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and its 3.7% lead over the GeForce RTX 4090 D in average score indicate professional-grade rendering performance that can handle complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's high integer math score of 127,512 and data encryption score of 23,203 indicate fast compilation times and secure data handling. The 24 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache allow for parallel builds and large codebases to reside in cache, reducing build times for sizable projects.

Student and office work: While this system is overkill for basic tasks, the integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU provides a fallback for office applications. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,003 ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running simulations or data analysis projects common in academic settings.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the performance difference between the RTX 5000 Ada Generation and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's score of 183,725.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-12900 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the data indicates that the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability and data integrity.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU and GPU, and what power supply is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested power supply for the system is 600 W.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184,664 on average, which is 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D's score of 178,050.

Q: What are the memory specifications of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-12900's performance close to the Intel Core i9-12900KF?

A: Yes, the Core i9-12900 has an average score of 42,906, which is 0.2% higher than the Core i9-12900KF's score of 42,830.

Q: What is the process node and die size for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm², while the GPU is on TSMC's 5 nm process with a die size of 609 mm².

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is targeted at professionals in industries that demand extreme graphics compute and large memory capacity. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 32 GB of VRAM make it suitable for film and television visual effects artists who work with 8K textures and complex 3D scenes. The Vulkan score of 194,041 indicates strong real-time rendering capability, which is useful for architectural visualization and virtual production. The 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is beneficial for scientific researchers running simulations or AI inference workloads, particularly given the 400 tensor cores. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and multi-thread score of 33,608 in PassMark support tasks like data analysis and software compilation.

Content creators who edit high-resolution video will benefit from the GPU's OpenCL score of 175,286, which accelerates effects and rendering in editing suites. The 16 cores and 24 threads of the CPU, along with the 30 MB of L3 cache, are well-suited for multitasking between creative applications. Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 127,512, which speeds up compilation. The ECC memory support is a draw for small business workstations handling financial models or engineering simulations where accuracy is paramount. While the performance is excessive for standard office tasks, the integrated graphics offer a safety net, making this a versatile, if not budget-conscious, option for demanding professionals.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system is heavily GPU-bound in graphics-intensive workloads. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 88th percentile indicates that the GPU is the stronger component. In rendering tasks, the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the CPU is unlikely to limit it, given the CPU's robust multi-core score of 18,628 in Cinebench R23. For gaming, the lack of measured FPS data prevents a definitive statement, but the GPU's 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D in average score suggests it can produce high frame rates, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4,003 in PassMark is sufficient to keep up with the GPU in most titles.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation or data compression, the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 407,899 is high, but it is still the component that dictates performance in these tasks. The GPU's massive 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will not alleviate a CPU bottleneck in single-threaded tasks. The system is well-balanced for mixed workloads, but for pure compute tasks that are not GPU-accelerated, the CPU will be the ceiling. In a scenario where both components are stressed, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU's 24 threads provide enough headroom to handle encoding without significantly impacting game performance, given the 33,608 PassMark multi-thread score.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-12900 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The system achieves a combined percentile of 93, placing it in the top tier of performance. The GPU is a workstation-class part, as indicated by its "Workstation Ada" generation, and the CPU is a high-end desktop processor. The pairing is designed for professional workstations where GPU compute and memory capacity are paramount, but it also retains the flexibility of a desktop platform with upgrade options. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP result in a manageable power profile, with a 600 W suggested power supply.

The overall tier is exceptionally high, driven by the GPU's 98th percentile ranking. The CPU's 88th percentile is also strong, but it is clearly the secondary component in this pairing. The build is not a typical gaming rig but rather a professional workstation that can also handle gaming at high settings. The 32 GB of VRAM is a distinguishing feature, setting it apart from consumer GPUs. The combination of Alder Lake architecture with Ada Lovelace represents a modern, high-performance platform suitable for the most demanding applications.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark results are comprehensive. In Cinebench, the scores are 3,299 (R15 multi-core), 262 (R15 single-core), 11,994 (R20 multi-core), 1,693 (R20 single-core), 18,628 (R23 multi-core), and 1,825 (R23 single-core). Geekbench scores are 13,088 (multi-core) and 1,993 (single-core). PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 33,608, a single-thread score of 4,003, integer math at 127,512, floating-point math at 91,514, data compression at 407,899, data encryption at 23,203, extended instructions at 24,777, physics at 1,730, random string sorting at 44,070, and find prime numbers at 121. The CPU's average benchmark score is 42,906, placing it in the 88th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KF, scores 42,830, a 0.2% difference.

The GPU benchmarks are less extensive but highly indicative. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 194,041. The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725, a 0.5% difference. The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the star, outperforming the CPU in percentile terms by 10 points. The GPU's average score is more than four times the CPU's average score, highlighting the disparity in compute power. The system is exceptionally well-suited for GPU-accelerated tasks, with the CPU providing ample support for feeding the GPU data. The lack of measured FPS data means these scores are the primary evidence of performance, and they paint a picture of a top-tier workstation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds