SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900

42,906 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the 72nd combined percentile of all benchmarked builds. This is a configuration built on the Alder Lake architecture and the RDNA 3.0 graphics architecture, targeting users who need high multi-threaded throughput and substantial video memory. The data indicates a machine that is better suited for productivity and high-resolution rendering than for chasing maximum frame rates at lower resolutions, where the CPU’s percentile rank outpaces the GPU’s.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a discrete graphics card based on the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The memory subsystem is a standout feature: 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus delivers 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is substantial for large texture sets and high-resolution frame buffers, and the memory clock runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, providing a clear hierarchy for sustained and peak performance.

Compute resources are plentiful. The GPU has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units. It also includes 84 dedicated ray tracing cores, though it has no tensor cores listed. The raw throughput figures are notable: FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance doubles that to 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. These numbers suggest the card is heavily weighted toward rasterization and general compute tasks, with ray tracing capability present but not the primary focus.

Benchmark results for the GPU are mixed when compared to its peers. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, which is a measure of modern DirectX 12 rendering performance. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 12756, while the Vulkan score is 71068, indicating that the card scales very well with API-level parallelism. The Passmark G3D score is 29009, and the GPU compute score is 16828. The GPU sits in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, which is below the CPU’s percentile, suggesting that while the card is capable, it is not the top-tier performer in the database. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 13745, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (deltaPct -0.5), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (deltaPct -0.5), AMD Radeon RX 570X (deltaPct -0.9), and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (deltaPct 1.5). This clustering indicates that the RX 7900 XT’s overall score is very close to these other cards, with only a 1.5% difference from the RX 9070 XT, which is a newer card. For rendering, the high bandwidth and FP32 throughput make this a strong candidate for compute-intensive workloads, but the percentile position shows it is not an outlier in performance.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers strong multi-core performance across multiple benchmark suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3299 multi-core and 262 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 11994 multi-core and 1693 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results show 18628 multi-core and 1825 single-core. Geekbench scores are 13088 multi-core and 1993 single-core. Passmark results include a multi-thread score of 33608 and a single-thread score of 4003. More specialized Passmark tests reveal where the CPU excels: data compression scores 407899, data encryption scores 23203, extended instructions score 24777, floating point math scores 91514, integer math scores 127512, physics scores 1730, and random string sorting scores 44070.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42906, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-12900KF with an average score of 42830 and a deltaPct of 0.2, meaning the 12900 is essentially tied with the KF variant, which is just 0.2% faster. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43210 with a deltaPct of -0.7, indicating the 12900 is 0.7% slower. The Intel Core i9-12950HX scores 42487 with a deltaPct of 1, meaning the 12900 is 1% faster. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43326 with a deltaPct of -1, showing the 12900 is 1% slower. This grouping places the 12900 in a tight competitive cluster where the differences are within a single percentage point.

The GPU’s 55th percentile is significantly lower than the CPU’s 88th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 72. The data shows a divergence: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer relative to all GPUs. This suggests that in a combined workload, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor, and the GPU will dictate overall system throughput in graphics-intensive tasks. The gap in percentiles is the defining characteristic of this pairing, indicating that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU can utilize in many scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Core i9-12900 and the Radeon RX 7900 XT is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 55th percentile rank clearly shows that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression, integer math, or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will perform at a high level, with scores like 407899 in data compression and 127512 in integer math. In these cases, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU’s high percentile ensures fast processing.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or heavy graphics rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 29009 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 are respectable, but the 55th percentile indicates that many other GPUs will outperform it. The CPU can feed the GPU without bottlenecking, as its single-thread score of 4003 in Passmark and 1825 in Cinebench R23 are strong enough to handle game logic and draw calls. However, the GPU’s lower percentile means that frame rates will be capped by its rendering ability, not the CPU’s processing power.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so frame scaling must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high multi-core and single-core scores suggest it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU’s mid-pack percentile will likely cap performance at higher resolutions where the GPU is stressed. The 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth will prevent memory-related stutters, but the raw compute power of the GPU, as evidenced by its 51.48 TFLOPS FP32, is not top-tier. The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the component that limits peak graphics performance, while the CPU has ample headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The combination of the Core i9-12900 and Radeon RX 7900 XT is suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks over GPU-heavy tasks. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-core performance, which is evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4003 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1825. At these resolutions, the CPU can maintain high frame rates, though the GPU’s 55th percentile may limit performance in graphically intense titles. Gamers at 4K resolution will find the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth useful for large textures, but the GPU’s mid-pack compute performance may not deliver the highest frame rates.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will see strong performance from the CPU. The multi-core scores, such as 18628 in Cinebench R23 and 33608 in Passmark multi-thread, indicate that rendering tasks will complete quickly. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 51.48 TFLOPS can accelerate certain compute workloads, but it is not the primary driver of performance in these tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with integer math scores of 127512 and data encryption scores of 23203 indicating strong performance in compilation and cryptographic tasks. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking will find this setup more than adequate, though the power and cost of the components are overkill for such tasks. The CPU’s 88th percentile ensures that no productivity task will be slow, while the GPU provides a capable, if not top-tier, graphics solution.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770, and the CPU supports ECC memory.

The architecture is a hybrid design, which is reflected in the benchmark scores. The single-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1825 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1993. This translates to fast response in applications that rely on single-threaded performance, such as legacy software or lightly threaded games. The multi-core performance is where the CPU shines, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18628 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 33608. These numbers indicate that the CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations.

The Passmark extended instructions score of 24777 shows strong SIMD performance, which is useful for audio processing and certain scientific workloads. The floating point math score of 91514 and integer math score of 127512 are high, indicating robust arithmetic capability. The data compression score of 407899 is exceptionally high, suggesting the CPU is well-suited for file compression and archiving tasks. The data encryption score of 23203 is also solid, making this CPU a good fit for secure communications and VPN gateways. The physics score of 1730 is a measure of simulated physics performance, which is relevant for certain engineering simulations. Overall, the benchmark data paints a picture of a versatile CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks and holds its own in single-threaded applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the build is 72, placing it above the majority of all benchmarked systems.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-12900 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KF?

A: The Core i9-12900 has an average benchmark score of 42906, while the i9-12900KF has a score of 42830. The deltaPct is 0.2, meaning the i9-12900 is 0.2% faster than the KF variant.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and its average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 7900 XT have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz and features 16 cores with 24 threads.

Q: Does this build have measured FPS data for gaming performance?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is 700 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Alder Lake architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules, though the dual-channel memory bus and a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s apply to the configured memory type. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU has sufficient bandwidth, and the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support allows for future expansion cards that can utilize the newer standard.

The GPU has a TDP of 300 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, such as storage drives or additional cooling, but it is not excessive for a high-end system. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 16-core processor, making it power-efficient. The power connectors on the GPU are 2x 8-pin, which is standard for this class of card.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model, as the GPU is the bottleneck in this system. The CPU’s 88th percentile and PCIe Gen 5 support mean it can handle a more powerful GPU without becoming a limiting factor. The motherboard’s support for DDR5 memory could also be leveraged for a future upgrade, though the current memory bandwidth is sufficient for most tasks. The platform has room to grow, with the CPU being the long-lived component.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs a 16-core Intel Core i9-12900 with an AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer, sitting in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 72, which places the overall system in the upper-middle tier of benchmarked builds.

The CPU’s performance is its strongest asset, with multi-core scores that rival the best in the database. The GPU, while capable, does not match the CPU’s relative standing. This is a build where the processor outshines the graphics card, making it a better fit for CPU-intensive tasks like content creation, software development, and productivity work than for pure gaming at the highest settings. The 20 GB of VRAM on the GPU is a notable feature, but the raw compute power is not top-tier. The system is well-balanced in terms of memory and PCIe support, but the GPU holds back the overall performance tier.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4003 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1825, supports high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 55th percentile may limit performance at high refresh rates, especially in graphically demanding titles, but the 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth help maintain smooth textures at high resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18628, can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU’s compute score of 16828 in Passmark can also assist with encoding offload, but the CPU is more than capable of managing the workload.

Video editing: The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Passmark multi-thread score of 33608 and a floating point math score of 91514, accelerates video encoding and rendering timelines. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 51.48 TFLOPS can speed up effects and color grading, making this a strong system for 4K video production.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11994 and Passmark integer math score of 127512 indicate fast CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 and 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration for GPU renderers, though the GPU’s 55th percentile means it is not the fastest option available.

Software development: The CPU excels at compilation tasks, with a data compression score of 407899 and data encryption score of 23203, making quick work of large codebases and build processes. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but the 20 GB VRAM is useful for running virtual machines or testing graphics applications.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets, the CPU’s single-core score of 1993 in Geekbench ensures a snappy experience. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, and the system’s high performance is unnecessary, but it will handle any office workload with ease.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1825, is likely to drive high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 55th percentile may become the limiting factor in graphically heavy games. The GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings, but it will not match the performance of top-tier GPUs in the database.

At 1440p, the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth become more important. The 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 800.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks. Frame rates will be lower than at 1080p, and the GPU’s mid-pack percentile will result in performance that is solid but not outstanding.

At 4K, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The 55th percentile rank indicates that many other GPUs will offer higher frame rates at this resolution. The 20 GB VRAM is a benefit, but the raw compute power of 51.48 TFLOPS is not sufficient to deliver high refresh rates at 4K in demanding titles. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimizations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds