SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701TE + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701TE

26,013 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701TE and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 73rd combined percentile among all builds. The CPU, a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the 10 nm process, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU, a Turing-architecture workstation card, offers substantial compute and rendering capabilities. However, the data for this specific combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all in-game performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts up to 5.20 GHz, a wide frequency range that allows it to balance efficiency with peak performance. The chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, which is a configuration well-suited for parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps reduce memory latency in data-heavy applications.

The CPU’s benchmark results confirm its position as a capable mid-range performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 17035 points in multi-core and 2405 points in single-core. The multi-core score indicates strong scaling across the 8 cores, making it suitable for professional tasks like software development and content creation. The single-core score, while lower than the multi-core figure, is still competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In PassMark tests, the chip shows specific strengths: integer math scores 65792, floating-point math scores 50219, and data compression scores 220520. The extended instructions score of 14354 suggests decent SIMD performance, which benefits scientific and engineering software. It also handles encryption well with a score of 11699.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26013, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all AMD parts, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scoring 25981 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scoring 26106 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scoring 25880 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scoring 26187 (0.7% behind). These deltas are all under one percent, meaning the i7-14701TE is essentially performance-equivalent to these competitors in aggregate benchmark scores. The data shows no significant victory or defeat among this group, indicating that the chip sits in a tightly contested performance tier. For real workloads, this means the i7-14701TE will handle multi-threaded rendering and compilation tasks with similar efficiency to these AMD alternatives, but its single-thread boost of 5.20 GHz may give it a slight edge in latency-sensitive applications that rely on one or two cores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-14701TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is an established ecosystem with broad motherboard availability. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 sticks or invest in newer DDR5 modules. ECC memory support is present, which is a notable feature for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for the latest NVMe storage or graphics cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the dedicated GPU is removed or disabled.

The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, which is a low-power design for a desktop part with 8 cores. This modest TDP means a capable air cooler is sufficient for thermal management, and it also reduces the strain on the power supply. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 230 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. This means the overall system power draw is dominated by the Quadro RTX 5000, and any PSU selection must account for the GPU’s demand rather than the CPU’s. The GPU uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, so the PSU must have those connectors available.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform offers several paths. The Socket 1700 socket supports other 14th-gen parts, so a user could swap to a higher-core-count CPU within the same generation without changing the motherboard. Memory can be upgraded from DDR4 to DDR5 if the motherboard supports it, though this would require a board with both slot types or an outright replacement. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean that future storage devices can achieve full bandwidth. The GPU, being end-of-life, is the most likely candidate for replacement; the slot and PSU headroom suggest that a newer workstation or gaming card could be installed, provided the 550 W PSU recommendation is revisited for higher-power options. The ECC memory support makes this platform viable for long-running compute tasks where memory errors are unacceptable.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i7-14701TE and the Quadro RTX 5000 is skewed by their respective performance percentiles. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This 11-point gap indicates that the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression or integer math, the processor will likely be the limiting factor only if the task is purely single-threaded; however, the GPU’s lower percentile suggests it will constrain frame rates in gaming scenarios.

The benchmark data supports this interpretation. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score is 20042, which is a strong result, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 15616. The GPU compute score is 6525, which is lower than the CPU’s integer math score of 65792 when normalized to the same scale. In practice, this means that for workloads like 3D rendering that use both the CPU and GPU, the GPU will likely finish its portions quicker than the CPU in some stages, but the CPU may stall in others. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-core score of 2637 in PassMark suggests it can feed frames at high rates, but the GPU’s performance tier will cap the maximum FPS. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the pixel fill rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s are moderate by modern standards.

The data shows no FPS scaling evidence because there are no measured FPS rows for this combination. However, based on the percentile gap, a user can expect that lowering resolution will increase frame rates until the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the constraint. For professional workloads like video editing, the balance is more even: the CPU’s 16 threads handle encoding, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units accelerate effects and color grading. The conclusion is that this pairing is CPU-favorable in compute tasks, but GPU-limited in real-time graphics.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balanced desktop for professional work rather than gaming. The CPU’s 78th percentile and the GPU’s 67th percentile make it a strong choice for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes, as the CPU’s multi-core score of 17035 in Cinebench R23 will handle ray tracing and physics calculations, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM supports large textures and complex scenes.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s compilation speed, with the PassMark integer math score of 65792 indicating solid performance for code builds and unit tests. The ECC memory support is a draw for developers working on long-running simulations or databases where a memory error could corrupt results. Students in engineering or data science fields can run MATLAB, Python, or CAD tools with confidence, as the CPU’s floating-point score of 50219 and the GPU’s compute score of 6525 provide enough headroom for coursework and small research projects.

Small business workstations handling office productivity, accounting, or light design work will find this pairing overqualified but reliable. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2637 in PassMark ensures snappy response in spreadsheets and browsers, while the GPU’s G2D score of 709 indicates adequate 2D performance for multiple monitors. Gamers at 1080p will achieve playable frame rates in most titles, but the GPU’s 67th percentile is not ideal for high-refresh displays; this is not a gaming-first machine.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. This hardware configuration supports both real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workflows. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is ample for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s capabilities. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 78999, and in Vulkan, it scores 92309. The PassMark G3D score is 15616, and the GPU compute score is 6525. The DirectX 12 score is 59, which is low compared to the DirectX 11 score of 140, suggesting that the Turing architecture is more efficient in older APIs or that driver optimizations favor them. The DirectX 10 and DirectX 9 scores are 113 and 195, respectively, indicating strong legacy performance. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s are moderate, meaning the GPU can handle 1440p gaming but will struggle with 4K at high settings. The FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) make it suitable for scientific computing and machine learning inference.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856, 1% behind), the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, 1.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, 1.8% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, 2.3% ahead). The deltas are small, but the GTX 1060’s proximity is notable: the Quadro RTX 5000 is roughly equivalent to a mainstream gaming card from several generations ago, despite having 16 GB of VRAM and RT cores. This suggests that the Quadro’s value lies in its driver certification and memory capacity rather than raw gaming throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a strong scenario for this build. The GPU’s percentile rank of 67 suggests it will deliver playable but not high-refresh frame rates at 1080p. The CPU’s single-core score of 2637 can drive frames, but the GPU’s moderate pixel rate will cap FPS below 144 Hz in demanding titles. Users with a 60 Hz monitor will be satisfied, but competitive gamers should look elsewhere.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads can handle software encoding for streaming at reasonable quality, while the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate hardware encoding if the software supports it. The data shows a PassMark data compression score of 220520, which indicates fast encoding throughput. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM will hold game and stream buffers without issue.

Video Editing: This scenario is a strong fit. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17035 handles timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units accelerate effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with multiple layers. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 shows it can assist in GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU and GPU both contribute here. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7154 indicates solid CPU rendering, while the GPU’s FP32 TFLOPS of 11.15 supports GPU rendering in engines like Blender or Octane. The 48 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing previews, though final renders will still take time.

Software Development: The CPU excels here with a PassMark integer math score of 65792 and a multithread score of 20042. Compilation of large codebases will be fast, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites. The GPU is underused but available for CUDA-based testing.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for most student tasks, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 2405 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth performance in Office suites and web browsers. The GPU’s G2D score of 709 handles multiple monitors, and the low CPU TDP of 45 W means quiet operation for library use.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 2637 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 suggest a system that can run most games at 1080p with medium to high settings. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s high boost clock of 5.20 GHz will likely push frame rates above 144 FPS at 1080p. In AAA titles, the GPU’s performance tier, comparable to a GTX 1060, will cap frame rates around 60 FPS at 1080p with reduced settings.

At 1440p, the GPU’s pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in modern games, and users should expect to lower settings to high or medium. At 4K, the GPU is not suitable for gaming, as the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient but the compute throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS is too low for high-fidelity rendering. The DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates poor optimization in newer APIs, which could further reduce performance in DX12-only titles. Older games using DirectX 11 or 9 will see better frame rates, as the scores of 140 and 195, respectively, suggest stronger legacy support. These figures are estimates, as no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the GPU support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 48 RT cores, which enable real-time ray tracing.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank?

A: The GPU is at the 67th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rates are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, which is low for a desktop part.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong across tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1716 multi-core and 242 single-core. In R20, the scores are 7154 multi-core and 1010 single-core. The R23 scores are 17035 multi-core and 2405 single-core. PassMark results show a multithread score of 20042 and a single-thread score of 2637. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26013, placing it at the 78th percentile. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 78999 and Vulkan score is 92309. The PassMark G3D score is 15616, and the GPU compute score is 6525. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative terms. The CPU’s 78th percentile is 11 points higher than the GPU’s 67th percentile, indicating that the processor is the stronger component. In multi-threaded tasks, the CPU’s R23 score of 17035 is impressive for a 45 W part, rivaling higher-TDP desktop chips. The GPU’s G3D score of 15616 is modest for a workstation card, reflecting its older Turing architecture. The nearest rivals for the CPU are all AMD parts with score deltas under 1%, meaning the CPU is statistically tied with them. The GPU’s nearest rival is a GTX 1060, which is a mid-range gaming card from 2016, highlighting the Quadro’s age. The combined percentile of 73 places this build in the upper-mid range of all systems.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-14701TE with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 14th-gen Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 45 W TDP, 8 cores, and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 3072 shading units. The pairing sits at the 73rd combined percentile, which is a solid overall tier for professional workloads.

The CPU’s 78th percentile and the GPU’s 67th percentile make this a CPU-favorable system. The data shows that the CPU is competitive with AMD’s Ryzen 5 series, while the GPU is comparable to a GTX 1060 in raw performance. This build is best suited for content creation, software development, and small business workstations where the CPU’s multi-threading and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM are more important than raw gaming frame rates. The GPU is end-of-life, so its performance will not improve with driver updates, but the CPU’s active production status ensures continued support. The overall tier is upper-mid, with the CPU providing most of the system’s strength.