SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

The Intel Core i7-14701E pairs with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 in a desktop-class build that targets professional workloads and high-resolution content creation rather than pure gaming throughput. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its 65 W TDP, while the GPU, despite being end-of-life, offers substantial compute capability with 16 GB of VRAM and dedicated RT and tensor hardware. The combined percentile ranking of 75 places this pairing above the majority of systems in the database, though the GPU’s performance tier is notably lower than the CPU’s, creating a distinct balance profile that favors CPU-heavy tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. It operates at a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, which explains its strong single-thread results. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. The 33 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data, while the 80 KB per-core L1 cache handles low-latency operations. With a die size of 257 mm² and a 65 W TDP, this is a power-efficient part that does not require aggressive cooling solutions, though the 5.40 GHz boost clock implies that thermal headroom will be exercised under sustained loads.

Benchmark data shows the i7-14701E achieving a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and a single-core score of 3133. The multi-core figure indicates strong parallel throughput for rendering and compilation tasks, while the single-core score reflects excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. In Passmark tests, the CPU scores 81325 in integer math and 61873 in floating-point math, with a multithread score of 26112 and a single-thread score of 4305. Data compression and encryption workloads score 282939 and 14862 respectively, showing that the CPU handles data-intensive tasks efficiently. The extended instructions score of 18528 suggests robust AVX and similar instruction set performance, which is beneficial for scientific computing and media encoding.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 83 versus all CPUs means it outperforms roughly four out of five processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, has an average benchmark score of 33201, a 0% delta from the i7-14701E’s 33206 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244, a -0.1% delta, meaning the i7-14701E is effectively tied with these parts. The Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX score 33089 and 33091 respectively, with deltas of 0.4% and 0.3%, placing the i7-14701E marginally ahead. These results show that the CPU is competitive with mid-range laptop and mobile processors despite being a desktop part, though its advantage is narrow rather than decisive.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is skewed toward the CPU. The i7-14701E sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 5000 ranks at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This 16-point gap indicates that the CPU is the stronger component in absolute terms, and in workloads that scale with processor performance, the GPU may become the limiting factor. However, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth mean that memory-bound tasks, such as large dataset rendering or deep learning inference, will benefit from the GPU’s capacity rather than its raw compute speed.

For gaming, the CPU’s high single-core score of 3133 in Cinebench R23 and 4305 in Passmark single-thread tests suggests that it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 15616 and its percentile rank of 67 indicate mid-range performance, so at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU likely provides more frames than the GPU can render, shifting the bottleneck to the GPU. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases, and the balance becomes more even, though the GPU’s age (2018 release) means it will cap frame rates in demanding titles.

In professional workloads, the CPU’s 65 W TDP and 8-core/16-thread configuration handle multi-threaded compilation and rendering well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195. The GPU’s compute score of 6525 in Passmark GPU compute indicates that it can accelerate certain tasks, but the CPU will dominate general-purpose processing. For tasks like video encoding, the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s tensor cores (384) provide complementary acceleration, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact scaling cannot be quantified.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14701E achieves an average benchmark score of 33206, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2237 and single-core score of 315 show consistent performance across versions, while the R20 scores of 9321 (multi-core) and 1315 (single-core) follow the expected scaling. The Passmark results paint a detailed picture: multithread score of 26112, single-thread score of 4305, integer math at 81325, floating-point math at 61873, and extended instructions at 18528. The find prime numbers score of 176 is notably low, indicating that pure integer prime-finding algorithms are not this CPU’s strength, but this is a niche workload.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and a Vulkan score of 92309, showing strong compute capability for a 2018 GPU. Its Passmark G3D score of 15616 places it at the 67th percentile, while the DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 indicate that older API workloads perform better than newer ones, which is expected given the Turing architecture. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 21629 is close to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856 with a -1% delta. The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 with a 1.2% delta, meaning the Quadro RTX 5000 is effectively in the same performance class as these mid-range parts.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects the pairing’s overall standing. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread performance and the GPU’s mid-range compute suggest that 1080p gaming would be GPU-limited, while 1440p and 4K would see the GPU further strained.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for multi-threaded workloads and require GPU compute with large memory capacity. Content creators working with 4K video editing will benefit from the i7-14701E’s 16 threads and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM, which handles large frames and complex effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will see the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 translate into faster build times, while the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running builds.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s Passmark floating-point score of 61873 and integer score of 81325 provide solid baseline performance, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews and final frames. Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the dual-channel memory support and the ability to run virtual machines or simulation software, though the GPU’s end-of-life status means it is not suited for the latest gaming titles at high settings. Small business workstations handling financial modeling or database work will find the CPU’s data compression score of 282939 and encryption score of 14862 sufficient for daily tasks.

Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU adequate for medium to high settings in older titles, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 4305 (Passmark) indicates that the processor is not the limiting factor. At 1440p and above, the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking means frame rates will drop, making this build more suited to esports or less demanding games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth storage or GPU connectivity, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The 65 W TDP means the motherboard’s power delivery is not stressed, and the CPU’s locked multiplier (unlocked is false) limits overclocking but ensures stable operation.

The GPU requires a 550 W suggested PSU, which is modest given its 230 W TDP and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors. The CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves ample headroom for additional components, so a 550 W PSU is sufficient for this pairing. A sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the GPU with a newer model that offers higher performance per watt, as the Quadro RTX 5000 is end-of-life and its Passmark G3D score of 15616 is now mid-range. Alternatively, adding more memory (up to the dual-channel limit) would benefit memory-intensive workloads, though the exact capacity is not specified in the data.

The platform’s ECC memory support is a key differentiator for workstation use, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes future-proof storage connectivity. However, the socket 1700 is tied to Intel’s 14th generation, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, making the GPU the more logical upgrade target.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E ranks at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 83% of processors in the database. This is driven by its strong multi-core score of 22195 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 3133.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile. It is 1% behind the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856), 1.2% ahead of the RTX A4000 Mobile (21379), and 1.8% ahead of the Radeon HD 8970M (21237), showing it is mid-range.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation tasks where data corruption is unacceptable, such as financial modeling or scientific simulations.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM and bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for large textures and datasets, though the GPU’s compute performance is limited by its Turing architecture.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores, which indicate the CPU is likely not the bottleneck in gaming.

Q: What is the recommended PSU wattage?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, which accounts for its 230 W TDP and power connectors. The CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves headroom, so a 550 W unit is adequate for this build.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.40 GHz from a 2.60 GHz base, which contributes to its Passmark single-thread score of 4305 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133, making it responsive in lightly threaded workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC’s 12 nm process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for professional workloads but modest for gaming at high resolutions.

The GPU’s pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s, while FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 is 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures place it in the mid-range of modern GPUs, as reflected by its Passmark G3D score of 15616 and 67th percentile rank. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 show that compute workloads are handled well, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 indicate that gaming performance is better on older APIs.

The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based tasks, such as denoising in rendering applications. However, the Turing architecture is now two generations old, and its compute capabilities are outpaced by newer parts. The GPU’s power draw of 230 W and dual-slot design require adequate case airflow, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor setups for professional use. With a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD, this was a high-end workstation card at release, but its end-of-life status means it is now a budget option in the used market.

Build Overview

This desktop-class build pairs the Intel Core i7-14701E with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, creating a system that prioritizes CPU throughput and GPU memory capacity over gaming frame rates. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU’s 67th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 75. The system is best described as a professional workstation that can handle moderate gaming, with the CPU excelling in multi-threaded tasks and the GPU providing 16 GB of VRAM for large workloads. The 65 W TDP CPU and 230 W TDP GPU draw a combined 295 W, making this a power-efficient pairing that does not require exotic cooling or power supplies.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rates are estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4305 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 indicate it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 15616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will limit performance to roughly 60-80 FPS in modern titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking means frame rates would drop to 40-60 FPS, while 4K would see 30-40 FPS or lower. In esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance could push frame rates above 144 FPS at 1080p, provided the GPU can keep up, but the DirectX 9 score of 195 suggests older APIs are handled better than newer ones.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4305 (Passmark) supports high frame rates, but the GPU’s mid-range compute limits this build to 1080p at 144 Hz in less demanding titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking caps frame rates near 60-75 FPS, making this unsuitable for competitive high-refresh play in modern games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 65 W TDP allow for software encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate encoding tasks. The data compression score of 282939 suggests the CPU handles stream encoding efficiently, though the GPU’s age means newer encoding standards are not supported.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM make this a capable 4K editing system. Timeline scrubbing and previews will be smooth, and the ECC memory support ensures stability for long render sessions.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating-point score of 61873 and integer score of 81325 provide solid CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handles complex scenes, though render times will be longer than with newer GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 threads and 33 MB L3 cache speed up compilation, while the 14862 encryption score and 282939 compression score aid in build packaging. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks but useful for data visualization. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, and the dual-channel memory support handles typical productivity workloads with ease.