SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5050's PassMark G3D score of 17,326 and its 66th percentile standing among all GPUs position it as a solid entry-level performer for 1080p gaming. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,133 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, which suggests that frame pacing in esports titles will be strong, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will likely be the limiting factor at higher refresh rates. Users targeting 144 Hz displays should expect to dial back settings from ultra to high or medium in demanding titles.

Streaming: The combination of 8 cores and 16 threads on the i7-14701E, paired with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195, provides headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding. The GPU's 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores can assist with NVENC-style workloads, though the data does not explicitly confirm encoding capabilities. The 65W TDP of the CPU keeps thermal overhead modest, which is beneficial for sustained streaming sessions where both CPU and GPU are under load.

Video editing: The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,112 and floating-point math score of 61,873 indicate strong computational throughput for timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated effects in modern editors, while the 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provides adequate data throughput for 1080p and some 1440p editing workflows. The 33 MB shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores during multi-track edits.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,237 and R20 multi-core score of 9,321 demonstrate that this CPU can handle CPU-based rendering tasks competently, though it won't compete with higher-core-count workstation parts. The GPU's PassMark GPU Compute score of 9,184 and its 20 RT cores suggest that GPU-accelerated ray tracing in Blender or similar applications will be workable but not blazing fast. The 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint for larger scenes or high-resolution textures, potentially forcing users to optimize geometry and texture budgets.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 81,325 and data encryption score of 14,862 indicate solid performance for compilation tasks and cryptographic operations. The 16 threads provide good parallelization for build systems, while the single-thread score of 4,305 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions and fast startup times for development tools. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a notable feature for professionals who prioritize data integrity during long build or test cycles.

Student and office work: With a 65W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770, this build is efficient for everyday productivity tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,305 and data compression score of 282,939 mean that document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing will feel snappy. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing among all CPUs indicates that this system will handle multitasking with dozens of browser tabs and office applications without noticeable slowdowns.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33,206 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 21,035 places it in the 66th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, indicating that the CPU is notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. Cinebench R23 scores of 22,195 (multi-core) and 3,133 (single-core) show a multi-to-single ratio of roughly 7.1:1, which is typical for a balanced 8-core desktop processor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,112 versus single-thread score of 4,305 reinforces this observation.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502 is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark result that places it modestly above entry-level territory. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 90,334 and 89,381 respectively show that the GPU performs nearly identically across these two compute APIs, suggesting well-optimized drivers and consistent hardware behavior. The PassMark G3D score of 17,326 aligns with the GPU's 66th percentile position. Interestingly, the nearest rival comparison shows the RTX 5050 within 1.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and within 1.6% of the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, indicating that the desktop RTX 5050 delivers performance comparable to a previous-generation mid-range desktop GPU and a professional mobile GPU.

The CPU's nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H matches its average score exactly (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS is just 0.1% faster and the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is 0.3% slower. This clustering indicates that the i7-14701E sits in a highly competitive performance band where architectural differences of a few percent separate products. The overall picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its GPU in relative standing, meaning that most workloads will be GPU-bound, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU's 66th percentile will be the constraining factor.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates at a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boosts to 5.40 GHz, which is an aggressive single-core boost for a 65W TDP part. The 10nm process node from Intel's own foundry produces a die size of 257 mm², which is relatively large for a mainstream processor and reflects the substantial cache hierarchy. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 33 MB shared, totaling a generous cache budget that helps mitigate memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195, when compared to the single-core score of 3,133, indicates that the processor scales well across all 8 cores. The PassMark data encryption score of 14,862 and extended instructions score of 18,528 demonstrate that the CPU handles SIMD and cryptographic workloads competently. The find prime numbers score of 176 is notably lower than other integer tasks, which is a quirk of this benchmark's single-threaded nature and not necessarily indicative of real-world weakness.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 via dual-channel configuration gives builders flexibility, though the data does not specify maximum speeds or capacities. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide modern connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage. ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use cases, as it is not universally available on consumer desktop CPUs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration for video playback, which is useful for troubleshooting or office builds that don't require the discrete GPU.

The CPU's 83rd percentile standing and its near-exact match with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (0% delta) suggest that this is a well-balanced mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop processor. The 0.4% delta against the Intel Core i7-13650HX places it in the same performance tier as that mobile processor, despite the i7-14701E being a desktop part with a 65W TDP versus the mobile chip's typically higher sustained power in gaming laptops. The data indicates that this CPU is not a performance outlier in either direction; it delivers exactly what its specifications suggest.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This pairing is well-suited for gamers targeting 1080p resolution with high settings in competitive titles and medium-to-high settings in AAA games. The CPU's 83rd percentile single-thread performance ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-limited in most scenarios, while the GPU's 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM can handle current titles at 1080p with some concessions on texture quality. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,502 suggests that DirectX 12 games will run acceptably at this resolution.

Content creators on a budget: The combination of the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 22,195) and the GPU's compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL 90,334) makes this a viable entry-level workstation for video editing and 2D graphic design. The 8 GB VRAM may be limiting for heavy 3D work, but for 1080p video timelines and photo editing, this system offers adequate performance without excessive power draw (CPU 65W, GPU 130W).

Software developers: The 8 cores, 16 threads, and ECC memory support make this an attractive option for developers who need reliable compilation performance and data integrity. The PassMark integer math score of 81,325 and data compression score of 282,939 indicate that code compilation and package management will be responsive. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows developers to choose cost-effective memory configurations.

Students and small business workstations: With a combined 75th percentile standing, this system exceeds the requirements for typical student workloads and office productivity. The integrated graphics provide a backup display solution if the discrete GPU encounters issues, and the 65W CPU TDP keeps cooling requirements modest for compact desktop cases. The 300W suggested PSU indicates that this build can run on a modest power supply, reducing overall system cost.

Not ideal for: Users targeting 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering will find the GPU's 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM insufficient. The 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth to 320.0 GB/s, which will bottleneck high-resolution texture streaming. Similarly, professionals doing extended ray tracing renders may find the 20 RT cores provide only moderate acceleration compared to higher-tier 50-series parts.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports this Raptor Lake-R processor, which means that a motherboard with this socket can accommodate the i7-14701E. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so builders can choose between existing DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, though the dual-channel memory bus means that only two memory channels are available regardless of memory type. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for a high-end GPU or fast NVMe storage, though the RTX 5050 itself uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is well within the CPU's lane allocation.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 300W, combined with the CPU's 65W TDP, means that this system has substantial power headroom for upgrades. A user could potentially install a more power-hungry GPU without upgrading the PSU, provided the rest of the system's power draw remains modest. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, which is a standard configuration compatible with most power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the RTX 5050 with a higher-tier GPU when the user's performance demands exceed what the 66th percentile GPU can deliver. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing means that it is unlikely to become the bottleneck in most gaming or productivity workloads, so a GPU upgrade would provide immediate performance gains. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that any modern GPU will have sufficient bandwidth. Conversely, users who find the CPU limiting in multi-threaded workloads could potentially upgrade to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor, though the data does not specify which models are compatible.

The 65W TDP of the CPU means that most Socket 1700 motherboards will support this processor without requiring enhanced VRM cooling. The GPU's dual-slot width and standard 8-pin power connector make it compatible with a wide range of cases. The 130W GPU TDP, combined with the 65W CPU TDP, suggests that a 300W PSU is adequate for this configuration, but upgrading to a 500W or 600W unit would provide headroom for future component upgrades.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14701E supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050's average benchmark score is 21,035, which is 1.6% higher than the RX 5600 XT's score of 20,713. This places the two GPUs at nearly identical performance levels.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W, while the GPU has a TDP of 130W. The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 300W, which accounts for the entire system's power draw.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 5050 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU provides these lanes directly from the processor.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 66th percentile. This indicates that the CPU is stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance in this pairing: the CPU operates at the 83rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile. This 17-point gap means that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,133, PassMark single-thread 4,305) should allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame output, but the GPU's 66th percentile standing will cap overall FPS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,502, when compared to the CPU's robust multi-thread scores, suggests that GPU-bound scenarios will dominate gaming performance.

In multi-threaded workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195 is substantially stronger than the GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 90,334, PassMark GPU Compute 9,184) relative to their respective peer groups. This means that in GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5050 will be the constraint, while in CPU-based tasks like data compression (PassMark score 282,939), the processor will deliver near its full potential.

The memory subsystem also plays a role in bottleneck dynamics. The GPU's 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by modern standards, and the 128-bit bus will limit performance in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's 33 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency for CPU workloads, but the GPU has no such cache to compensate for its bandwidth limitations. For users running 1440p or higher resolutions, the GPU's bandwidth constraint will become more pronounced, while at 1080p the CPU may occasionally bottleneck in lightly-threaded titles if the GPU is underutilized.

The 65W CPU TDP versus the 130W GPU TDP indicates that the GPU will consume more power and generate more heat, potentially affecting system thermals in compact cases. The 300W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for both components at stock settings, but overclocking the CPU (if the motherboard permits, though the multiplier is locked) or GPU would require a more robust power supply. The data suggests that this pairing is best described as a CPU-strong, GPU-modest combination where the upgrade path is clearly toward a more powerful GPU.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14701E, an 8-core Raptor Lake-R processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-mid-range tier of desktop configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile position makes it one of the stronger mainstream processors available, while the GPU's 66th percentile places it in the mid-range segment. This pairing is best characterized as a balanced mainstream desktop system with a slight CPU advantage.

The build class is explicitly desktop, meaning it is intended for a traditional tower case with discrete components. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a mainstream desktop socket, and the GPU is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector. The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP suggest that this system is energy-efficient for its performance class, which is corroborated by the 300W suggested PSU rating. The 10nm CPU process node and 5nm GPU process node represent two different foundry technologies, with Intel manufacturing the CPU and TSMC manufacturing the GPU.

The release dates are notable: the CPU was released on 2024-06-30, and the GPU on 2025-06-30, exactly one year apart. This suggests that the CPU is a more mature product than the GPU, which may benefit from newer architectural features like the Blackwell 2.0 design with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The GPU's predecessor is GeForce 40, and its successor is GeForce 60, placing it in the middle of the 50-series lineup. The overall tier, based on the 75th combined percentile, positions this system as a capable mainstream desktop that can handle most gaming and productivity tasks at 1080p and some at 1440p.

# Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 66th percentile standing and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502, this system is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in most current titles. The PassMark G3D score of 17,326 is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (within 1.6%), which historically provides 60-80 FPS in AAA games at 1080p ultra. At 1440p, frame rates will likely drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, requiring a reduction to high settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,133) suggests that esports titles like competitive shooters will see high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games, provided the GPU can keep up. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation in newer titles that exceed this capacity at ultra settings, particularly at 1440p with high-resolution texture packs. The 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p but may cause stuttering in memory-intensive scenes.

Ray tracing performance is expected to be modest, given the 20 RT cores and the GPU's overall 66th percentile position. Users should expect to enable DLSS or equivalent upscaling to maintain playable frame rates with ray tracing enabled at 1080p. The 80 tensor cores provide AI acceleration that can help offset the RT performance deficit. For competitive gaming, the system's CPU strength ensures minimal input latency, but the GPU's mid-range position means that high-refresh (165 Hz+) gaming will require setting adjustments in most titles.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5nm process, housing 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die with a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². This is a compact GPU with 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The core clocks are 2,317 MHz base and 2,572 MHz boost, delivering 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 13.17 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) for 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a modest configuration that will likely be the GPU's primary limitation in high-resolution gaming and texture-heavy workloads. The 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively, which is a notable feature at this performance tier.

The GPU's benchmark results show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502 is a modern metric that reflects current-generation gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 90,334 and 89,381 are nearly identical, indicating balanced compute performance across APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 17,326 places it in the 66th percentile, while the GPU compute score of 9,184 shows moderate compute throughput. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 66 is notably lower than DirectX 11 (150) and DirectX 9 (186), which may reflect driver optimizations or benchmark characteristics rather than real-world performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals are interesting: it is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, 1% slower than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, and 1.6% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile. This places the desktop RTX 5050 in a performance band that spans several generations of both AMD and NVIDIA parts. The 130W TDP and single 8-pin power connector indicate that this is a power-efficient GPU for its class, and the 300W suggested PSU confirms that it can run on modest power supplies. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck with the CPU's 16 Gen 5 lanes, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) support modern monitors.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds